两岸刑事实体法差异对合作打击跨境犯罪之影响及对之英文（精选多篇）

第一篇：两岸刑事实体法差异对合作打击跨境犯罪之影响及对之英文

两岸刑事实体法差异对合作打击跨境犯罪之影响及对策

陈茂华

（福建警察学院法律系，福建 福州 350007）

内容摘要：《两岸司法互助协议》是两岸合作打击跨境犯罪的法律框架。两岸合作打击跨境犯罪的成效不仅受两岸刑事程序法影响，而且受两岸刑事实体法影响。两岸刑事实体法律差异下的罪名差异、同质异罪、同罪异罚等问题已带来司法互助中的管辖争议、合作懈怠、法公平性的损害等负面作用，并有形成两岸“犯罪洼地”之趋势。应经由“合作范围”去罪名化、商定两岸互涉犯罪之管辖条款以及自由裁量下的刑罚趋近等对策和路径，减少两岸刑事实体法差异的负面影响，以提升两岸合作打击跨境犯罪之成效。

关键词：司法互助；跨境犯罪；刑事实体法；差异；合作

The Differences of Criminal Law’s Impact on Cooperating Attack Cross-strait Crimes and Countermeasure

CHEN Mao-hua(Law Department of Fujian Police College, Fuzhou 350007,China)

Abstract: Agreements on Mutual Judicial Assistance and Cracking down on Crimes Across the Straits is the legal framework for cross-strait cooperation in combating trans-border crime.The effect of cross strait cooperation in combating transnational crime is not only determined by the criminal procedure law, but also by the criminal law.The differences of criminal law such as accusation of a charge, constitution of a crime, and the penalty attached a crime et al issues have brought the problems include jurisdiction dispute, negative cooperation, justification impairment, even with the trend of forming the“ crime depressions ” across strait.With respect to minimize the negative effect of criminal law divergence, and improve the effect of cooperating attacking crimes, the cooperation scope should not be determined by the accusation, the jurisdiction issues arisen by cross-border crimes should be negotiated, and the difference of penalty should be minimized as soon as possible.Key words: mutual legal assistance;cross-border crime;criminal law;differences;cooperation