第一篇：精彩演讲开场白集锦
精彩演讲开场白集锦
对于演讲者来说，开场白很重要，开场白不好等于白开场。
好的开场白可以一开始就牢牢地抓住听众的心，让听众愿意听，喜欢听，演讲者也就能牢牢地掌控整个演讲，让你的演讲荡气回肠。精彩的演讲，开场白是有一定的技巧的，可以遵循一定的模式
和规律，而其中一些引人入胜的经典语句能为我们的开场增光添彩！下面一些精彩演讲开场白供大家借鉴，切记根据演讲的场合、对象和内容灵活运用。
1、不是每朵鲜花都能代表爱情，但是玫瑰做到了；不是每棵树
都能耐得住干渴，但是白杨做到了；不是每个人都在追求上进，想挑战自我，改变人生，想成就梦想与众不同，但是在座的各位——你们做到了！所以，应该把掌声送给我们自己！
2、亲爱的朋友，俄国伟大的作家托尔斯泰说过三句话。第一句话是：这世界上最重要的人是谁？各位朋友，是谁？（互动）——就是：现在在我眼前的人！第二句话：这世界上最重要的事是什么？ ——就是：现在我要做的事。第三句话：这世界上最重要的时间是什么？——就是：此时此刻。所有，各位朋友，此时此刻，你们就是我最重要的人！参加好课程，就是我们最重要的事！
3、今日天有晴，阳光灿烂；今日地有情，花团锦簇；今日海有情，浪迭千重；今日人有情，欢聚一堂！
4、朋友是天，朋友是地，有了朋友就能顶天立地；朋友是风，朋友是雨，有了朋友就能呼风唤雨！在座的亲爱的朋友，给我们身
边的朋友问一下好，掌声鼓励一下！
5、在这个说大不大，说小不小的世界上，其实并没有陌生人，只是有些人和我们擦肩而过，成为路人；有些人停下，转身，离去，成为无缘的，或许成为还在不经意间给我们留下伤痕的那个人；有的却成为陪伴我们一生的人，或许成为我们影响较深的朋友——
今天在座的各位，你们就是将要成为陪伴我一生的人！
6、这个世界没有陌生的人，只有还没有来得及认识的朋友，真诚的友谊来自不断地自我介绍，请允许我自我介绍一下，——
7、信念是巍巍大厦的栋梁，没有它，就只是一堆散乱的砖瓦；知识是滔滔大江的河床，没有它，就只有一片泛滥的波浪；激情是熊熊烈火的引星，没有它，就只有一把冰冷的柴把；动力是远洋巨轮的主机，没有它，就只剩下瘫痪的巨架。在座的各位，让我们树立坚强的信念，开动最大的马力，燃起火热的激情在知识的海洋里遨游！
8、只有启程，才会到达理想和目的地，只有拼搏，才会获得辉煌的成功，只有播种，才会有收获。只有追求，才会品味堂堂正正的人。今天，我们启程了，今天，我们在拼搏，今天，我们来追求——
真诚祝福在座的每一位！
9、如果说友谊是一颗常青树，那么，浇灌它的必定是出自心田的清泉；如果说友谊是一朵开不败的鲜花，那么，照耀它的必定是从心中升起的太阳。今天，我们亲手播下友谊的种子，明天我们收获友谊的果实！
10、多少笑声都是友谊唤起的，多少眼泪都是友谊揩干的。友谊的港湾温情脉脉，友谊的清风灌满征帆。友谊不是感情的投资，它不需要股息和分红。（友谊可以换朋友）在座的各位，让我们一起享受友谊享受人生！
11、安东尼开场白：我是世界一流的演讲家，我喜欢人浪，我热爱演讲，我的磁场辐射整个宇宙和海洋，我的声音传播神州大地，甚至面对大海，我掀起一阵阵海浪。每一天，我吸入新鲜的空气，吸纳最新的信念，就像草原上的狮子、森林的老虎、天空的鹰鹫，在太阳还没有升起的海平线，我用巅峰的状态，打造巅峰的人生，刷新我又一个新的记录。今天是新的一天，也是全世界新的一天，也是演说家新的一天。在海岸线，我的一天与太阳一同升起。我的演说就像太阳一样，光芒
普照大地，温暖辐射大海，我拥有无穷无尽的能量，因为我是世界一流的演说家。我喜欢任何的人浪，更喜欢任何声浪，总之，我的演说讲到哪里，哪里掀起人浪；讲到哪里，哪里掀起声浪。因为我的磁场辐射整个宇 宙，我发出正面的思想，传播积极的心态，向我的观众传播我的巅峰状态。我传播爱，获得爱，我传播的爱越多，获得的爱就越多。今天，我面朝大海，站在海岸的一线，用一流演说的声音，传播
我的巅峰状态，这就是我的开场白。我是世界一流的演说家，每一天我都向世界传播我的爱。YES！
12、如果说生命是一座庄严的城堡，如果说生命是一株苍茂的大
树，如果说生命是一只飞翔的海鸟。那么，信念就是那穹顶的梁柱，就是那深扎的树根，就是那扇动的翅膀。没有信念，生命的动力便荡
然无存；没有信念，生命的美丽便杳然西去。（信念可以换其他词语）
13、毅力，是千里大堤一沙一石的凝聚，一点点地累积，才有前不见头后不见尾的壮丽；毅力，是春蚕吐丝一缕一缕的环绕，一丝丝地坚持，才有破茧而出重见光明的辉煌；毅力，是远航的船的帆，有了帆，船才可以到达成功的彼岸。（毅力可以换成学习）
14、爱心是一片照射在冬日的阳光，使贫病交迫的人感到人间的温暖；爱心是一泓出现在沙漠里的泉水，使濒临绝境的人重新看到生活的希望；爱心是一首飘荡在夜空的歌谣，使孤苦无依的人获得心灵的慰藉。让我们激发我们心中爱的潜能，让世界充满爱！
15、大海如果失去了巨浪的翻滚，就会失去雄浑；沙漠如果失去了飞沙的狂舞，就会失去壮观。人生如果仅去求得两点一线的一帆风顺，生命也就失去了存在的意义。今天，我的演讲如果失去您的掌声和笑声，那就会索然无味！
16、生命不是一篇“文摘”，不接受平淡，只收藏精彩。她是一个完整的过程，是一个“连载”，无论成功还是失败，她都不会在你背后
留有空白；生命也不是一次彩排，走得不好还可以从头再来，她绝不
给你第二次机会，走过去就无法回头。今天，我们来参加课程，就
是来书写我们的精彩人生！
17、春蚕死去了，但留下了华贵丝绸；蝴蝶死去了，但留下了漂亮的衣裳；画眉飞去了，但留下了美妙的歌声；花朵凋谢了，但留下了缕缕幽香；蜡烛燃尽了，但留下一片光明；雷雨过去了，但留下了七彩霓虹。我希望在座的各位，在我们身后，也能留下精彩华章！在我演讲结束之后，也能留下掌声一片！
18、有种感觉叫清风细雨，有种思念叫月满西楼，有种默契叫心有灵犀，有种爱情叫至死不渝，有种约定叫天老地荒，有种口才叫领导演讲口才，有种幸运叫认识你真好！请珍惜我们短暂的相遇，让我们共同进步一起成长！
第二篇：精彩演讲开场白案例赏析
文章开头最难写，同样道理，作演讲开场白最不易把握，要想三言两语抓住听众的心，并非易事。如果在演讲的开始听众对你的话就不感兴趣，注意力一旦被分散了，那后面再精彩的言论也将黯然失色。因此只有匠心独运的开场白，以其新颖、奇趣、敏慧之美，才能给听众留下深刻印象，才能立即控制场上气氛，在瞬间里集中听众注意力，从而为接下来的演讲内容顺利地搭梯架桥。
奇论妙语 石破天惊听众对平庸普通的论调都不屑一顾，置若罔闻；倘若发人未见，用别人意想不到的见解引出话题，造成“此言一出，举座皆惊”的艺术效果，会立即震撼听众，使他们急不可耐地听下去，这样就能达到吸引听众的目的。
我记起了毕业欢送会上班主任给我们的致词。他一开口就让我们疑窦丛生――“我原来想祝福大家一帆风顺，但仔细一想，这样说不恰当。”这句话把我们弄得丈二和尚摸不着头脑，大家屏声静气地听下去――“说人生一帆风顺就如同祝某人万寿无疆一样，是一个美丽而又空洞的谎言。人生漫漫，必然会遇到许多艰难困苦，比如……”最后得出结论：“一帆风不顺的人生才是真实的人生，在逆风险浪中拼搏的人生才是最辉煌的人生。祝大家奋力拼搏，在坎坷的征程中，用坚实有力的步伐走向美好的未来！”十多年过去了，班主任的话语犹在耳边，给我留下了永难磨灭的印象。“一帆风顺”是常见的吉祥祝语，而老师偏偏反弹琵琶，从另一角度悟出了人生哲理。第一句话无异于平地惊雷，又宛若异峰突起，怎能不震撼人心？
需要注意的是，运用这种方式应掌握分寸，弄不好会变为哗众取宠，故作耸人之语。应结合听众心理、理解层次出奇制胜。再有，不能为了追求怪异而大发谬论、怪论，也不能生硬牵扯，胡乱升华。否则，极易引起听众的反感和厌倦。须知，无论多么新鲜的认识始终是建立在正确的主旨之上的。
自嘲开路 幽默搭桥自嘲就是“自我开炮”，用在开场白里，目的是用诙谐的语言巧妙地自我介绍，这样会使听众倍感亲切，无形中缩短了与听众间的距离。在第四次作代会上，萧军应邀上台，第一句话就是：“我叫萧军，是一个出土文物。”这句话包含了多少复杂感情：有辛酸，有无奈，有自豪，有幸福。而以自嘲之语表达，形式异常简洁，内蕴尤其丰富！胡适在一次演讲时这样开头：“我今天不是来向诸君作报告的，我是来‘胡说’的，因为我姓胡。”话音刚落，听众大笑。这个开场白既巧妙地介绍了自己，又体现了演讲者谦逊的修养，而且活跃了场上气氛，沟通了演讲者与听众的心理，一石三鸟，堪称一绝。
年中央电视台邀请台湾影视艺术家凌峰先生参加春节联欢晚会。当时，许多观众对他还很陌生，可是他说完那妙不可言的开场白后，一下子被观众认同并受到了热烈欢迎。他说：“在下凌峰，我和文章不同，虽然我们都获得过‘金钟奖’和最佳男歌星称号，但我以长得难看而出名……一般来说，女观众对我的印象不太好，她们认为我是人比黄花瘦，脸比煤炭黑。”这一番话嬉而不谑，妙趣横生，观众捧腹大笑。这段开场白给人们留下了非常坦诚、风趣幽默的良好印象。不久，在“金话筒之夜”文艺晚会上，只见他满脸含笑，对观众说：“很高兴又见到了你们，很不幸又见到了我。”观众报以热烈的掌声。至此，凌峰的名字就传遍了祖国大地。
即景生题 巧妙过渡一上台就开始正正经经地演讲，会给人生硬突兀的感觉，让听众难以接受。不妨以眼前人、事、景为话题，引申开去，把听众不知不觉地引入演讲之中。可以谈会场布置，谈当时天气，谈此时心情，谈某个与会者形象……例如，你可以说：“我刚才发现在座的一位同志非常面熟，好像我的一位朋友。走近一看，又不是。但我想这没关系，我们在此已经相识，今后不就可以称为朋友了吗？我今天要讲的，就是作为大家的一个朋友的一点儿个人想法。”在教师节庆祝大会上，如果天气阴沉沉的，你可以这样开头：“今天天气不太好，阴沉昏暗，但我们却在这里看到了一片光明。”接着转入正题，讴歌教师的伟大灵魂和奉献精神，他们燃烧了自己，照亮了别人和人类的未来。
年，美国葛底斯堡国家烈士公墓峻工。落成典礼那天，国务卿埃弗雷特站在主席台上，只见人群、麦田、牧场、果园、连绵的丘陵和高远的山峰历历在目，他心潮起伏，感慨万千，立即改变了原先想好的开头，从此情此景谈起：
站在明净的长天之下，从这片经过人们终年耕耘而今已安静憩息的辽阔田野放眼望去，那雄伟的阿勒格尼山隐隐约约地耸立在我们的前方，兄弟们的坟墓就在我们脚下，我真不敢用我这微不足道的声音打破上帝和大自然所安排的这意味无穷的平静。但是我必须完成你们交给我的责任，我祈求你们，祈求你们的宽容和同情……这段开场白语言优美，节奏舒缓，感情深沉，人、景、物、情是那么完美而又自然地融合在一起。据记载，当埃弗雷特刚刚讲完这段话时，不少听众已泪水盈眶。
即景生题不是故意绕圈子，不能离题万里、漫无边际地东拉西扯。否则会冲淡主题，也使听众感到倦怠和不耐烦。演讲者必须心中有数，还应注意点染的内容必须与主题互相辉映，浑然一体。
讲述故事 顺水推舟用形象性的语言讲述一个故事作为开场白会引起听众的莫大兴趣。选择故事要遵循这样几个原则：要短小，不然成了故事会；要有意味，促人深思；要与演讲内容有关。
年，82岁高龄的麦克阿瑟回到母校――西点军校。一草一木，令他眷恋不已，浮想联翩，仿佛又回到了青春时光。在授勋仪式上，他即席发表演讲，他这样开的头：
今天早上，我走出旅馆的时候，看门人问道：“将军，你上哪儿去？”一听说我到西点时，他说：“那可是个好地方，您从前去过吗？”
这个故事情节极为简单，叙述也朴实无华，但饱含的感情却是深沉的、丰富的。既说明了西点军校在人们心中非同寻常的地位，从而唤起听众强烈的自豪感，也表达了麦克阿瑟深深的眷恋之情。接着，麦克阿瑟不露痕迹地过渡到“责任――荣誉――国家”这个主题上来，水到渠成，自然妥帖。
李燕杰在《爱情与美》的演讲中这样开场：“我不是研究爱情的，为什么会想到要讲这么一个题目呢？”然后讲了一个故事：北京一家公司的团委书记再三邀请李老师去演讲，并掏出几张纸，上面列着公司所属工厂一批自杀者的名单，其中大多数是因恋爱问题处理不好而走上绝路的。“所以，我觉得很有必要与大家谈谈这方面的问题。”这个故事一下子把听众的注意力集中起来，使他们感到问题的严重性和紧迫性。
制造悬念 激发兴趣人们都有好奇的天性，一旦有了疑虑，非得探明究竟不可。为了激发起听众的强烈兴趣，可以使用悬念手法。在开场白中制造悬念，往往会收到奇效。
党的早期革命家彭湃当年在海陆丰从事农民工作，一次到乡场上准备向农民发表演讲。怎样才能吸引来去匆匆的农民呢？他想出了一个好主意。他站在一棵大榕树下，突然高声大喊：“老虎来啦！老虎来啦！”人们信以为真，纷纷逃散。过了一会，才发现虚惊一场，于是都围上来责怪他。彭湃说：“对不起，让大家受惊了。可我并没有神经病，那些官僚地主、土豪劣绅难道不是吃人的老虎吗？”接着，向大家宣讲革命道理。这次演讲后，该地的农运工作很快就开展起来。
制造悬念不是故弄玄虚，既不能频频使用，也不能悬而不解。在适当的时候应解开悬念，使听众的好奇心得到满足，而且也使前后内容互相照应，结构浑然一体。比如，有位教师举办讲座，这时会场秩序比较混乱，学生对讲座不感兴趣，老师转身在黑板上写了一首诗：“月黑雁飞高，单于夜遁逃。欲将轻骑逐，大雪满弓刀。”写完后他说：“这是一首有名的唐诗，广为流传，又选进了中学课本。大家都说写得好，我却认为它有点问题。问题在哪里呢？等会儿我们再谈。今天，我要讲的题目是《读书与质疑》……”这时全场鸦雀无声，学生的胃口被吊了起来。演讲即将结束，老师说：“这首诗问题在哪里呢？不合常理。既是月黑之夜，怎么看得见雁飞？既是严寒季节，北方哪有大雁？……”这样首尾呼应，能加深听众印象，强化演讲内容，令人回味无穷。
第三篇：如何写精彩的演讲开场白
一、内容
1、楔子。用几句诚恳的话同听众建立个人间的关系，获得听众的好感和信任;
2、衔接。直接 地反映出一种形势，或是将要论及的问题，常用某一件小事，一个比喻，个人经历，轶事传 闻，出人意外的提问，将主要演讲内容衔接起来;
3、激发。可以提出一些激发听众思维的 问题，把听众的注意力集中到演讲中来;
4、触题。一开始就告诉听众自己将要讲些什么。世界上许多著名的政治家、作家和国家领导人的演讲都是这样的。
二、主要方法
演讲稿的开头有多种方法，通常用的主要有：
1.开门见山，提示主题。这种开头是一开讲，就进入正题，直接提示演讲的中心。例 如宋庆龄《在接受加拿大维多利亚大学荣誉法学博士学位仪式上的讲话》的开头：“我为接受加拿大维多利亚大学荣誉法学博士学位感到荣幸。”运用这种方法，必须先明晰地把握演讲的中心，把要向听众提示的论点摆出来，使听众一听就知道讲的中心是什么，注意力马上集中起来。
2.介绍情况，说明根由。这种开头可以迅速缩短与听众的距离，使听众急于了解下文。在1814年生于萨尔茨维德尔。她的父亲冯·威斯特华 伦男爵在特利尔城时和马克思一家很亲近;两家人的孩子在一块长大。当马克思进大学的时 候，他和自己未来的妻子已经知道他们的生命将永远地连接在一起了。”这个开头对发生的 事情、人物对象作出必要的介绍和说明，为进一步向听众提示论题作了铺垫。
3.提出问题，引起关注。这种方法是根据听众的特点和演讲的内容，提出一些激发听 众思考的问题，以引起听众的注意。例如弗雷德里克·道格拉斯1854年7月4日在美国纽约州罗彻斯特市举行的国庆大会上发表的《谴责奴隶制的演说》，一开讲就能引发听众的 积极思考，把人们带到一个愤怒而深沉的情境中去：“公民们，请恕我问一问，今天为什么 邀我在这儿发言?我，或者我所代表的奴隶们，同你们的国庆节有什么相干?《独立宣言》 中阐明的政治自由和生来平等的原则难道也普降到我们的头上?因而要我来向国家的祭坛奉 献上我们卑微的贡品，承认我们得到并为你们的独立带给我们的恩典而表达虔诚的谢意么?” 除了以上三种方法，还有释题式、悬念式、警策式、幽默式、双关式、抒情式等。
三、开场白技巧
1.开门见山，不讲多余的话
有的人演讲，开头常讲一些没有必要的客套话。叶圣陶对此曾评述说：“谁也明白，这些都是谦虚的话。可是，在说出来之前，演讲者未免少了一点思考。你说不曾预备，没有什么可以说的，那么为什么要上演说台呢?随后说出来的，无论是三言二语或长篇大论，又算不算'可以说的’呢?你说随便说说，没有什么意思，那么刚才的一本正经，是不是连场作欢呢?自己都相信不过的话，却要说给人家听，又算是一种什么态度呢?”其实，演讲者说这种“多余的话”，并不一定是出自本心，不过是受了陈规旧套的影响，听人家这么说，自己也这么说，结果，往往是使听众松弛了注意力。
实例一：
一般政治性或学术性的演讲稿都是开门见山，直接揭示演讲的中心。如邓小平的《党和国家领导制度的改革》的开头：
这次扩大会议，主要是讨论党和国家领导制度的改革以及—些有关问题。
实例二：
再如张承先的《“三个面向”是教育改革的指针》的开头：
1983年9月，邓小平同志又提出“教育要面向现代比，面向世界，面向未来”。“三个面向"指明了斯历史时期教育工作的战略方向，是今后教育改革的总指针。
这样的开头，使听众一听就知道明白讲的是是什么，注意力马上就能集中起来。
2.交代背景，说明演讲的目的和原因
实例：
例如《在欢迎民主柬埔寨代表闭宴会上李先念主席的讲话》的开头：
在我国举国上下，万众欢腾，热烈庆祝中华人民共和国诞生三十五周年的日子里，以西哈努克亲王为团长，宋双和乔森潘阁下为副团长的民主柬埔察代表团特地来参加我国的庆祝活动，并进行正式友好访问，我们感到格外高兴。我代表中国政府和人民，对你们的光临表示热烈的欢迎和哀仓的感谢。
这个开头，说明了这次演讲的背景、起因，使听众了解这篇讲话是在怎样的一种情况下讲的。
第四篇：英文精彩演讲稿开场白集锦
Opening Statement
mr.chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f.hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma.i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956.i am the youngest of 13 children.i had my early education in okmulgee county.my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area.my mother's name is irma hill.she is also a farmer and a housewife.my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents.i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983.it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977.i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980.upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend.judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him.he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights.after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.in my early period there, i had two major projects.the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students.the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive.i had a good deal of responsibility and independence.i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment.after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things--experiences of my life.it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number--a great number of sleepless nights that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship.i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office.i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised.i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.these incidents took place in his office or mine.they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex.on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.his conversations were very vivid.he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes.he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts.on several occasions, thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects.i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs.my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements.my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations.this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education--or office for civil rights.during the latter part of my time at the department of education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended.i began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.when judge thomas was made chair of the eeoc, i needed to face the question of whether to go with him.i was asked to do so, and i did.the work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended.i also faced the realistic fact that i had no alternative job.while i might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, i was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field.moreover, the department of education itself was a dubious venture.president reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.for my first months at the eeoc, where i continued to be an assistant to judge thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures.however, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again.the comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why i didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance.i remember his saying that some day i would have to tell him the real reason that i wouldn't go out with him.he began to show displeasure in his tone and voice and his demeanor and his continued pressure for an explanation.he commented on what i was wearing in terms of whether it made me more or less sexually attractive.the incidents occurred in his inner office at the eeoc.one of the oddest episodes i remember was an occasion in which thomas was drinking a coke in his office.he got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the coke, looked at the can and asked, “who has pubic hair on my coke?” on other occasions, he referred to the size of his own penis as being larger than normal, and he also spoke on some occasions of the pleasures he had given to women with oral sex.at this point, late 1982, i began to feel severe stress on the job.i began to be concerned that clarence thomas might take out his anger with me by degrading me or not giving me important assignments.i also thought that he might find an excuse for dismissing me.in january of 1983, i began looking for another job.i was handicapped because i feared that, if he found out, he might make it difficult for me to find other employment and i might be dismissed from the job i had.another factor that made my search more difficult was that there was a period--this was during a period of a hiring freeze in the government.in february of 1983, i was hospitalized for five days on an emergency basis for acute stomach pain which i attributed to stress on the job.once out of the hospital, i became more committed to find other employment and sought further to minimize my contact with thomas.this became easier when allison duncan(sp)became office director, because most of my work was then funneled through her and i had contact with clarence thomas mostly in staff meetings.in the spring of 1983, an opportunity to teach at oral roberts university opened up.i participated in a seminar--taught an afternoon session and seminar at oral roberts university.the dean of the university saw me teaching and inquired as to whether i would be interested in furthering--pursuing a career in teaching, beginning at oral roberts university.i agreed to take the job in large part because of my desire to escape the pressures i felt at the eeoc due to judge thomas.when i informed him that i was leaving in july, i recall that his response was that now i would no longer have an excuse for not going out with him.i told him that i still preferred not to do so.at some time after that meeting, he asked if he could take me to dinner at the end of the term.when i declined, he assured me that the dinner was a professional courtesy only and not a social invitation.i reluctantly agreed to accept that invitation, but only if it was at the every end of a working day.on, as i recall, the last day of my employment at the eeoc in the summer of 1983, i did have dinner with clarence thomas.we went directly from work to a restaurant near the office.we talked about the work i had done, both at education and at the eeoc.he told me that he was pleased with all of it except for an article and speech that i had done for him while we were at the office for civil rights.finally, he made a comment that i will vividly remember.he said that if i ever told anyone of his behavior that it would ruin his career.this was not an apology, nor was it an explanation.that was his last remark about the possibility of our going out or reference to his behavior.in july of 1983, i left washington, dc area and have had minimal contact
with judge clarence thomas since.i am of course aware from the press that some questions have been raised about conversations i had with judge clarence thomas after i left the eeoc.from 1983 until today, i have seen judge thomas only twice.on one occasion, i needed to get a reference from him, and on another he made a public appearance in tulsa.on one occasion he called me at home and we had an inconsequential conversation.on one occasion he called me without reaching me, and i returned the call without reaching him, and nothing came of it.i have on at least three occasions, been asked to act as a conduit to him for others.i knew his secretary, diane holt.we had worked together at both eeoc and education.there were occasions on which i spoke to her, and on some of these occasions undoubtedly i passed on some casual comment to then chairman thomas.there were a series of calls in the first three months of 1985, occasioned by a group in tulsa, which wished to have a civil rights conference.they wanted judge thomas to be the speaker and enlisted my assistance for this purpose.i did call in january and february to no effect, and finally suggested to the person directly involved, susan cahal(ph)that she put the matter into her own hands and call directly.she did so in march of 1985.in connection with that march invitation, ms.cahal(ph)wanted conference materials for the seminar and some research was needed.i was asked to try to get the information and did attempted to do so.there was another call about another possible conference in july of 1985.in august of 1987, i was in washington, dc and i did call diane holt.in the course of this conversation, she asked me how long i was going to be in town and i told her.it is recorded in the message as august 15.it was, in fact, august 20th.she told me about judge thomas's marriage and i did say congratulate him.it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration that i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone except my closest friends.as i've said before these last few days have been very trying and very hard for me and it hasn't just been the last few days this week.it has actually been over a month now that i have been under the strain of this issue.telling the world is the most difficult experience of my life, but it is very close to having to live through the experience that occasion this meeting.i may have used poor judgment early on in my relationship with this issue.i was aware, however, that telling at any point in my career could adversely affect my future career.and i did not want early on to burn all the bridges to the eeoc.as i said, i may have used poor judgment.perhaps i should have taken angry or even militant steps, both when i was in the agency, or after i left it.but i must confess to the world that the course that i took seemed the better as well as the easier approach.i declined any comment to newspapers, but later when senate staff asked me about these matters i felt i had a duty to report.i have no personal vendetta against clarence thomas.i seek only to provide the committee with information which it may regard as relevant.it would have been more comfortable to remain silent.i took no initiative to inform anyone.but when i was asked by a representative of this committee to report my experience, i felt that i had to tell the truth.i could not keep silent.
第五篇：几种精彩的演讲开场白
一段精彩的开场白有三种作用。第一，吸引听众的注意力，激发听众的好奇心;第二，概述你演讲的主要内容;第三，向听众阐明听你演讲的必要性。
1、引人入胜的开头
开场白的主要目的就是赢得听众的注意。由于听众对演讲的第一印象会很快形成，如果开场白不能吸引他们，那么其他部分就只会白白浪费掉了。
举例：想像一下现在是2050年。你已经65岁了。你刚刚收到一封来信，打开信封，里面是一张10万美元的支票。不，不是你赢什么彩票。当意识到在过去的40年中自己的少量投资的策略现在终于有了可观的收益时，你不禁喜上眉头。
2.概述要点
在开始演讲后的几秒钟内，听众应该对你要谈到的内容有一个很好的了解。不要因为讲了几个笑话或例证导致离题万里，而把根本目标抛到了脑后。
举例：今天我来回答三个问题，这三个问题有助于你理财。第一，你如何挣钱?第二，你如何投资?第三，小钱如何生大钱?
3.向你的听众阐明听你演讲的理由
即便你已经抓住了听众的注意力，也阐明了演讲的话题，你也必须告诉听众为什么要接着听下去。
举例：弄清这三个问题的答案的确可以带来意外的收益。你只需要很少的投资，严谨的态度，挣得10万美元不在话下。
点击咨询 