雅思写作[优秀范文五篇]

第一篇：雅思写作

Environmental problems are so big that they cannot be solved by any person or country alone.Instead, it should be solved at international level.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Environmental degradation has been recognized as one of the main challenges that we have to overcome in the 21st century.The rapid deterioration of environmental problems is believed to have posed a serious threat to our survival.To address this concern, countries worldwide should join forces, instead of working individually for their own target.People support international cooperation for two reasons.The first point is the impact of environmental problem is normally on a global scale.It is common knowledge that we share the same biosphere, its components are interrelated.For example, a stream in one country can be polluted by the sewage dumped by its neighboring country.In other words, one country’s effort to reduce pollution can be futile if other countries are not involved.It should also noted that some countries do not have adequate resources to reduce pollution, even though these countries realize the importance of environmental protection.These countries can cooperate with developed countries, introduce technologies and draw on experiences so as to implement environmentally friendly policies continuously.Despite the importance of international cooperation, countries should take the initiative to implement some changes.It is fair to say that countries are confronted with different environmental problem.For example, greenhouse gas emissions in China are mainly created by the electricity generation industries while in the United States are primarily attributed to the increase in car use.The technologies and methods that are globally applicable may not be effective in some countries.In addition, countries should enforce some environmental laws and raise citizens’ awareness so as to restore the environment.To summaries, countries should make a join effort not only because the ecosystem is a unified mechanism but also because it can make optimal use of financial and human resources.Country’s resource commitment is also important at regional or national level.In some countries, it is possible for people to buy products made in other countries.To what extent do the benefits of this development outweigh the problems?

As the world is increasingly globalised, the exchange of commodities across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate.It has sparked controversy over whether the increase in imports has adverse impacts.From my point of view, this practice’s advantages outweigh its disadvantages.Importing goods can yield a number of benefits.The first benefit is that despite the high cost of transportation, imports are competitively priced.The main reason is that the countries that export these goods normally have technology and professional knowledge to ensure the goods’ quality and affordability.For example, China specialises in the production of textile products so China-made textile products are cheaper than local counterparts in many parts of the world.Besides, imported goods have challenged domestic manufacturers’ dominance and intensified competition, thereby prompting these manufacturers to lower product prices.It is beneficial to domestic customers, because products are more affordable and the cost of living will decline.On the other hand, the downside of importing goods is that the excessive reliance on imports is likely to lead to the underdevelopment of some domestic industries.For instance, many countries import computers, resulting in domestic manufactures’ bankruptcy.This is harmful to the development of a self-contained economy, and also likely to trigger massive job cuts.Another problem is that transportation may create considerable pollution, especially when it involves air freight.It will degrade air quality and also lead to other environment issues, such as global warming.It is therefore reasonable to think that the advantages of importing of commodities should be accepted with caution.Although customers are able to acquire commodities at lower cost, countries also need to pay attention to the development of their respective industries.Some people believe that charities should give aid to those who need the aid most, wherever they live.Some people believe that charity organisations would better concentrate on people in their own countries instead.Discuss both views and give your own pinion.Concern about humanitarian has been heightened in recent years.Although international aid illustrates a moral ideal of mankind, many people who hold the opposing views think that the welfare of fellow citizens is the priority.International aid has its weaknesses but its importance should not be denied.The main reason why international donation agencies should view international aid from a global perspectives is that their funds can help the citizens of those recipient countries to combat poverty, disease and inequality.We should recognise that citizens of developing countries are in desperate need of aid, because they are susceptible to natural or man-made disasters such as wars.In those war-ton or poverty-stricken countries, resources are extremely scarce, which demand for food, medicine, tents and shelters.Despite the importance of helping those beyond our national borders, it is reasonable to lend a hand to our fellow citizens.Even in the richest countries, there are some disadvantaged people whose needs for daily necessities are not met.If we can solve problems on our doorstep, low income people can have basic living standards and this is beneficial to social stability.From my personal perspective, humanitarian action can restore some of their basic rights, such as the right to receive education, in recipient countries.This is consistent with the universal principle of supporting vulnerable populations.Those who cannot provide financial support can work as aid workers and deliver services to those needy people.To summaries, we should realise the implications of international aid to those who are affected by disasters, poverty and misfortunes.We can deliver aid to other countries to show compassion, although helping local beneficiaries is important.The tourist industry has been expanding in some countries and international tourism has benefited these countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent decades, tourism has become an important industry and has brought unprecedented opportunities to these countries.However, the impact of tourism on these countries remains a source of constant debate.The essay will elaborate on both positive and negative impacts of tourism.The implications of tourism for some countries are two fold.First of all, it should be recognised that the development of tourism stimulates economic growth by generating enormous employment opportunities and increasing foreign exchange earnings.This benefit is particularly valuable to those impoverished countries, whose citizens are jobless, malnourished and ill-housed.Tourism provides a driving force for the development of various industries such as hospitality, transportation, communications, retail sales and manufacture, which require substantial capital investments.Without the revenues created by tourism, these industries are not likely to develop and the economic growth will be sluggish.Furthermore, tourism provides economic incentives for cultural preservation, because some places of cultural importance,e.g., historical sites,remain the most popular destinations.Those who express concerns about the negative effect of tourism should realise that tourism revenues can be used to protect cultural or historical heritage and also the local landscape.On the negative side, environmental destruction is one problem that arises from international tourism.The construction of infrastructure and tourism facilities(including airports, roads,hotels and resorts)will destroy environmental resources.Another problem associated with tourism is that it can threaten the local culture.The arrival of tourists can disrupt the life of local people, who abandon their traditional livelihoods and start to work in the tourism industry.It is also true that in many places, local people do not embrace tourism with open arms.Due to a lack of understanding of local customs, tourists might display some impolite or even offensive behaviour, which can lead to local people’s unhappiness or hostility.In the light of these facts, we can come to the conclusion that tourism can help some countries reap benefits although these countries may have to accept social and environmental costs.These countries should promote culturally appropriate activities and require tourists to show respect for the local life, traditions and natural scenery.English has become a universal language.Do you think that the positive effects of the trend outweigh negative effects?

At the present time, the role of English as a global language is indispensable, but it is worth mentioning that the prevalence of English worldwide might have its negative effect.In my opinion, English’s dominance can be viewed in a positive light.It is unquestionable that the extensive use of English worldwide helps promote international cooperation, as language constitutes the biggest barrier to people’s communication in the global setting.For example, if a company’s financial statements are written in English, any investor who has a good command of English is able to read this company’s documents and understand this company’s operation, whether or not English is their first language.That’s why English has been recognised as the main language by many international conferences and academic groups.Around 80 per cent of websites in the world present their information in English.It would be no exaggeration to say that those who do not speak English find it difficult to survive in the global community.By contrast, people who have proficiency in two languages(English plus their native language)can easily find jobs, collect information and travel overseas.Despite the contribution of the English language to globalisation, it is considered the main culprit of the loss of language diversity.The idea lies in the fact that many English learners, such as those who move to English-speaking countries, speak their native language less frequently.It should also be noted that English, as the favorite language for international media, conveys English-speaking countries’ lifestyles, values and beliefs to different parts of the world.It might affect the world’s cultural diversify.In spite of this, I am convinced that English is able to bridge the language gap and introduce minority cultures to the world, thereby protecting these cultures.In conclusion, English plays a vital role in communication and cooperation among people from different countries.Although some people suspect that English will endanger some minority languages.This claim is not supported with evidence.The reality is that English sometimes assists us protecting cultural heritage.Many countries spend a lot of money in art.Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent public services and facilities.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Government sponsorship for arts is a controversial issue, especially when the state is confronted with budget problems.There who object to public funds for arts believe that money should be diverted to the construction of public facilities.I am of the opinion that the government should take citizens’ benefits into consideration and adjust the spending on art or infrastructures accordingly.It is important to realise that art is an essential component of cultural legacy, so the protection and development of art has important implications to cultural diversity.In terms of painting, for example, styles, genres, tools and materials differ from culture to culture.An art form is likely to disappear, if it is not well protected.Despite the importance of art, public facilities deserve more of government spending than art.Citizens are interested in the availability of public facilities, such as water and electricity supply, schools, libraries and roads, which have a direct impact on their daily lives.By contrast, for most people, sculptures, paintings or operas are luxury items, which cannot bring tangible benefit to them.Therefore, it is pointless to support the use of public funds for this purpose, if basic facilities are underfunded and ill-equipped to meet public needs.I personally think that the arts should get public money, because it boosts the appeal of the built environment, reflected in the diversity of architecture and landscaping.If we are exposed to visually attractive objects everyday, we can enjoy peace of mind and feel an increased level of satisfaction with life.People will be less likely to commit violent or anti-social behaviors, and this is beneficial to community cohesion.In the light of the facts outlined above, government investment in the arts is essential to cultural diversity and the visual appeal of the built environment.However, in those countries whose infrastructure is inadequate, spending cuts on the arts are justifiable.Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The government has long been the major founder of university education.Those people who support government spending on education think that some students do not enroll because of learning costs.My view is that students’ personal situations should be considered, before the government decides whether to offer free education.It is worth noting that university education is the key to bridging the income gap.There are numerous students, especially those from low income families, who cannot afford educational expenses.For example, students who study architecture or medical science may spend many years in the university, which is an expensive choice for them.Because of financial constraints, people of low socio-economic status are at a disadvantage in terms of educational opportunities and career development.If the government provides free access to education, children from disadvantaged backgrounds can get into the college and find decent jobs in future.This can close the social divide and create a prosperous country.Even though government sponsorship can inspire people to receive tertiary education, it can also cause the waste of public resources.Free education may be a reason why many students are reluctant to complete their courses and enter the workforce at the earliest date.It not only imposes a burden on the country but also affects state funding for other sectors(e.g., primary and secondary education).Another problem is that, because of financial pressures, universities cannot upgrade facilities and recruit well-qualified lecturers, which can have a negative impact on students’ academic achievement.To summarise, government should provide financial support according to students’ needs to ensure that they have access to education.However, tuition fees are applicable to most students, especially those from middle to high income families, as it helps maintain the quality of tertiary education.Some people say that the government should ensure that people lead a healthy life, while others believe that individuals should have their own choices.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Healthy lifestyle is very important because it relevant to dignity and happiness.It is suggested that people are unlikely to adopt healthy lifestyle, unless the government takes some actions.My view is that lifestyle should be decided by people themselves, despite the importance of the government’s guidance and intervention.It is reasonable to argue that if people can choose their lifestyles freely, it reflects the respect for basic human rights.People who are obsessed with how to comply with government regulations will live under tremendous pressure.Although people are encouraged to eat vegetables and adopt a balanced diet, it does not mean that laws should specify the proportion of vegetables in diet.It not only poses a threat to their health, but also causes their resentment against the government.On the other hand, it is important for the government to impose restrictions on some habits, especially those that are widely believed to be damaging.This is due to the fact that most people have difficulty in disciplining themselves and cannot refrain from some unhealthy habits.For example, it is common knowledge smoking is harmful to people’s health but many people have problems ceasing smoking.The consequence is that their behaviour not only damage their own health but also has an adverse effect on others.Their reliance on medical care leads to overconsumption of resources and a higher demand for the use of taxpayers’ money;this is unfair to those who follow healthy habits.Overall, I believe that one’s freedom to choose lifestyles should be protected provided that it dose not interfere with other people.The primary role of the government is to provide information rather than to regulate citizens’ behaviour.This is important especially when citizens do not realise the health consequences of their habits and their problems can put pressure on the health service.The society is based on rules and laws.The society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Laws refer to the rules imposed on human beings.Although the laws is important in regulating people’s behaviour, many people argue that it restricts individuals’ freedom.I think that it is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the functions of law in society and its demerits.It is an undeniable fact that the law informs citizens of the rules that are recognized by the whole society.The essential point of formulating laws is that laws can prevent one from engaging in actions that are harmful to other people.Anybody who fails to comply with laws will be punished, so the law helps establish a harmonious society.For example, people may commit robberies and murder because of jealous, greed and hatred.If these actions were accepted on the grounds of personal choice, it would be detrimental to other people’s interest.It is also true that many ethical standards, such as those standards that emphasis honesty, loyalty and compassion, enhance social cohesion.Nevertheless, laws sometimes inevitably infringe upon human’s freedom and even hamper social development.For instance, if one country has many limits on the business world, the business activity will not be active.High income earners who are subject income tax rates may lack motivation to make greater efforts to increase their income.It is also the case that in a society where personal freedoms, such as the freedom of speech are limited, it is impossible to have different voices heard and solve problem efficiently.It is reasonable to conclude that society cannot operate well without laws and rules.Even though the law does not allow people to act at will, the main purpose is to create a society where people can live in harmony.

第二篇：雅思写作

雅思写作范文

Many old building are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history.However，some people think knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.How important is it to maintain old buildings？ Should history stand in the way of progress？Old buildings sometimes conflicts with social advancement.Appealing as it is in the eyes of business people，tearing down old architect to make room for real-estate development is not a wise idea in many ways.The primarily reason is that old buildings，like our native language，forms our cultural identity and keep a unique record the history of a country.From this aspect，old buildings are considered very valuable as one of the symbols of the culture of a nation.For instance，the traditional Chinese residence in Beijing，Siheyuan，are once seen as the remains of the Old World，and were destroyed by people shortly after the founding of People's Republic of China.Until recently did the people and policy makers as well realize that it is an inexcusable and stupid idea to commit such a terrible deed because old buildings，once gone，are not restorable.But their economic values and aesthetic appeals have just caught the attention of Chinese people.Moreover，old buildings，if planed and preserved properly，could coexist with modern real-estate development.In France，aged buildings bring millions of dollars of revenue for the government and amazed thousands of tourists.Yet no one thinks the high-rising office buildings and apartment buildings make the old architect a sore of the eye.By contrast，the new learn from the old，a fact that makes them more attractive.We admit that not all old buildings should be treated equally and some of them do need to be torn down for various reasons such as safety and new buildings.However，we should not be too blind to see their value too.If only the real and practical factors are being considered，the country will be sorry for its loss in years to come.As we have discussed，old buildings are part of a country's history and are valuable in many ways.We should plan well and be wise enough to see their value.But the same time，we should also do our best to find solutions to make the old and the new coexist in harmony.

第三篇：雅思写作

很多人在准备雅思考试的初期都会问几乎相同的问题：“需要多大的词汇量？”“应该背哪本词汇表？”就这些问题，北语雅思的看法如下：

雅思是个能力考试（a proficiency test），与人们所熟悉的 achievement test 不同。

所谓 achievement test，是指那些对学生所学过的知识进行检测的考试。如每学期的期 中、期末考试。一般来说，在这样的考试前，学校都会安排复习，老师也许还会划定复习范围。这些考试都和教学大纲规定的内容和进度等有关。考试的内容一般不超出大纲规定的内容。以英语为例，大纲规定了词汇表，试题中如有超纲词要注明中文定义。所以，每当面临一个新的考试时，考生会很自然地问：看哪几本书？有没有词汇表？

一般来说，proficiency test 与教学进度、内容、教学大纲等无关，自然也与词汇表无关。市面上有“雅思词汇”

七、八本之多，均为出版社为了赚钱，雇人编写的，没有一本具有所谓“权威性”。稍好一些的有例句说明单词的用法，差的只给出中文定义。如果想背词汇，随便买本“托福词汇”、“

四、六级词汇”、甚至某本英汉辞典，效果是一样的。

其实，词汇的最好学习方法是通过大量的阅读来学习，而这种大量的阅读正是雅思考试阅读部分所侧重的。备战一个 proficiency test 时，最好的准备方法就是：考什么，准备什么。考阅读，就通过阅读准备，而不是通过背词汇表准备。

常有考生问：考雅思需要多大的词汇量？很多人把词汇量看成是能力的标志，这又回到 achievement test 和 achievement test 问题上。如果能从知识和能力的方面划分考试的话，对词汇量的测试是知识型的测试。有些考生可以得很高的知识分，但能力欠佳，即所谓“高分低能”。换言之，词汇量不是能力标志。从另一个角度看，词汇量的统计也有问题。以下这些词怎么算：

act, actor, actress, action, active, activity, react, reactive, reaction, counteract, interact, hyperactive 等等，这到底算几个词。

那么该用什么来判断一个人是否达到了挑战雅思的水平呢？很简单，做

一、两套模拟题就可以了。拿体育作比喻，如果你想知道自己跑一百米需要多少秒，最好的办法就是去跑。而不是分析自己的心脏情况、血压、体重等。当你知道自己“吃几碗干饭”，再去做相应的准备，去有针对性地练爆发力、步幅、节奏等。

在作听力和阅读试题时，三分之一的正确率就是一个很好的起点。经过一学期的脱产培训，在考试中获得6段是有可能的。如果起始正确率能达到三分之二，也许不用参加培训，考自己多做几套模拟试题，就可以获得很好的成绩。如果正确率在三分之一以下，那就不应该上雅思培训班，而应该上一个不和任何考试挂

钩的培训班。这样的班更好地解决打基础、提高能力的问题，因为大部分雅思培训班都花很多达到时间琢磨应试技巧，而顾及不到能力的提高。

如何自测口语和写作呢？看一看雅思口语和写作的题目，你自己离议论这些题目还差多远？要想在口语和写作考试中获得有意义的分数（6段），应该能达到“侃”的水平。如论述“大城市面临的交通问题的原因、现状、出路”；“在教育孩子的过程中„惩罚‟的作用”；“很多人感到越来越忙，没有闲暇时间，原因是什么，应该怎么办？”。这几个题目是去出现过的雅思作文真题（task 2）。口语题的难度也相差无几，如“论教育对一个民族的重要性”。

之二

雅思考试与我们所熟悉的许多考试的区别之一是，雅思没有语法和词汇题。于是有人认为不懂语法、不认识几个单词也可以考雅思。考过之后才感叹，难！于是赶紧四处打听“有多大的词汇量才能挑战雅思”。

中国学生的习惯是，所有的考试都可以通过“准备”来通过的。

北语雅思想说的是，proficiency tests 是不能“准备”的，至少是不能以“期末复习、考试”那种形式来准备，更不能靠达到“五千”或是“八千”词汇来准备的。北语雅思的所有教师都考过雅思，有的了两次、三次，可是谁也不知道自己有多大的词汇量。什么人关注“自己”的词汇量呢？英语学习还不入门的学生，英语教学还是新手的教师。

还是那句话，考什么，你就应该能够做什么。比如，留学类的阅读的三篇文章都出自原文报刊，如“New Scientist”，那么考生就应该去看和这类杂志在难度、长度、题材有可比性的文章，通过阅读来学习词汇，而不是去背词汇表。读懂这样的文章靠什么？语法、词汇、背景知识等等，但这些都是次要的，主要的、乃至最重要的是：靠日积月累达到的量。

读有难度、长度的文章比背词汇表痛苦的多。背词汇表可以让人有“feel

good”、“我没闲着”的感觉，因为可以通过“量化”来衡量自己的投入与产出。所以，背词汇表的人多，脚踏实地、靠阅读量来学习的人少。

听听womo于2003-3-17在51ielts.com上怎么说的：“环球说得6000-7000，不过我现在手里有三本雅思单词书，发现他们不仅说雅思该有的单词量不同，就连选录的单词也差很远，背完新东方再看环球的，一堆不会。背完环球再看杨凡的，一堆不会”。

把那些“词汇手册”之类的东西都扔了吧。去读、去听！！！

之三

浅谈雅思词汇

这个问题往往是各位准备考雅思的朋友们非常关心的，说起来也很正常。词汇量本身就是衡量英语水平和考试难度的一个尺度，尤其在雅思考试形式比较特殊，没有考试大纲的情况下，对词汇来年量的需求自然倍受关注。很多朋友张口就问，考雅思要不要背单词？背什么单词书？也有很多朋友给我发邮件来询问这个问题。很久没有写关于英语学习的东西了，最近采访了不少刚考完雅思的同学们，今天正好借这个机会和大家讨论一下。

首先要说明一点，本文里面的观点都是针对起点为词汇量在1，500-2，000的基础不是太好的朋友们。换句话说，如果你的起点更低，连最基本的1，500词汇都没有的话，那么我个人认为你是必须要背单词的，没有多少商量的余地。

那么，具备了1，500-2，000的词汇量，到底要不要背单词呢？应该背什么单词呢？下面我就结合雅思考试的特点，分项展开说明。

首先来看看对词汇要求最简单的口语。有关学好口语需要多少词汇量的问题几乎已经被讨论烂了，比较公认的结论应该是500-800日常词汇足矣。换句话说，如果你具备1，000以上的词汇，但口语仍然不好，那请一定不要把原因归结为词汇量不够，也请一定不要把解决办法定位于背单词。其实，除去因为缺乏练习造成的表达不够流利之外，口语不好的主要问题在于对一些小词掌握的不够到位。比如get，take，make这样的动词，搭配上不同的介词，几乎可以表达所有的日常动作。因此，当你觉得你有意思表达不出来时，先不慌查字典找单词，而应该问问自己，你是不是可以用已经学过的很简单的单词和词组来表达这个意思？所以说，为了提高口语，是没有必要专门背单词的，相反，应该把所知道的简单词汇学好，学精。你知道see是看见，是否知道see off是告别？你知道large是大，又知道at large表示逃亡在外么？再次向口语不好的朋友们推荐《学好17个动词走遍天下》，以后千万别动不动就拿起词汇书来背了。

接下来我们看看写作。雅思考试作文的批改方式比较特殊，是analytical scoring，而不是象TOEFL采取的global scoring。什么叫global scoring呢？其实它比较象我们中学时的作文评分方式，就是一眼看上去大概是什么水平，属于哪个档次，就给多少分。那么analytical scoring又是怎么回事呢？我们翻译过来叫做“分项评分”。雅思作文评分有三项：内容结构，连贯衔接，语言质量。每一项分别评分，要注意，在给每一项评分时是不受其他两项影响的。也就是说，哪怕你的文章离题万里，只要文字优美，那么语言那一项也是有可能打8分的。三项加起来除以三，就是一篇作文的最终得分。那么这种分项评分到底有什么好处呢？显然是有的，因为英语作为外语，普遍中国学生写作文时语言水平有限，因此如果把握好文章的内容结构，在连贯方面处理得好，完全可以将最终分数提上去。而把握文章的结构，做好连贯衔接，显然与词汇量的大小丝毫扯不上关系吧？退一步讲，如果要提高写作的语言质量，也几乎不取决于词汇量大小。关于这一点，我在《关于写作的一点个人体会》中详细阐述，这里不再废话。

说起听力，我又要提起我反复强调的一个概念：听力词汇量。听力词汇量区别于阅读词汇量，简单地说，就是不看拼写，仅从发音判断就能确定认识的单词，才属于你的听力词汇量。对于听力水平普遍不高的中国考生，可能听力词汇量还不到阅读词汇量的一半。而雅思听力考试显然要求的是更多的听力词汇量，而不是

阅读词汇。从这一点出发，整天抱着词汇书死背，往纸上反复抄写，对提高听力词汇量有百害而无一益。其次，雅思听力作为考察英语国家生存能力的测试，对日常用语考得非常频繁。雅思听力的特色题目就是填空，简答这样需要动手填写单词的题目。而需要填写的单词往往是日常用词。比如有一次考过jackfruit（菠萝蜜），还考过pomelo（釉子），这样的词生活中很常用，可是好象哪本单词书中都不会收录吧？那么，整日抱着单词书背，意义究竟何在？

最后我们来讨论存在争议最大的阅读问题。

雅思考试的阅读文章往往是从报刊杂志上摘下来的，这样就造成大量的专有名词，以及一些不常用的词汇。这样造成了考生在考试时遇到大量不认识的单词，因此带来的结果就是，很多人马上将自己无法答对题的原因归结为不认识单词，将解决办法归纳为背单词。于是背了刘毅的5000和10000，三个月后满怀信心走入考场，发现不认识的单词比上次还多！很多培训机构也很不负责地拿有些考生的成绩来做虚假宣传，说某某词汇量多少，于是阅读多少分耳耳，好象他的成绩就归功于他词汇量一样。那么，问题究竟出在什么地方？

要了解这一点，首先有必要了解一下雅思阅读的出题原则和思路。雅思阅读是考察从文章中获得有效信息的能力，因此充满生词是必然的，问题在于你能否从中读出对你有用的信息。我可以完全负责任的说，雅思阅读从来不出从上下文推断词义的题目，换句话说，雅思阅读中根本就没有考察词汇量的题！！

象summary，short anwser question这样的题目，只需要你从原文中寻找特定的信息，哪怕它是个专有名词，你不认识，没关系，找出来填进去就是了。对于大多数人来说，最难的题当属T/F/NG，这种题怎么考呢？比如，文中讲Tom is taller than Mary。题目中说Tom is as tall as Mary。那么显然，这道题为FALSE。有人说这太简单了，雅思不会考这么简单的，其实这说明你没有意识到T/F/NG题的精髓所在罢了。对于雅思考试来说，无非就是把TOM，MARY这样的词换成谁都不认识的专有名词来吓唬人而已，因为T/F/NG题根本就不考你的词汇量，它考的是你对句意的把握。而能否正确把握句意，取决于你的语法和句子结构分析能力，与词汇量无关。下面举个真实考试的例子大家就明白了。

文中说&& is a poor predictor,%% is little better than &&.题目说%% is a good predictor.（&&和%%表示两个难词）。好，这个题答案是什么呢？是FALSE。为什么呢？很显而易见，这里的专有名词我都没写出来，认不认识肯定对答题不影响，这里题目考察的是对little better than这个语法结构的理解，你必须知道这个结构，才能正确把握句子的意思。那么什么人需要背单词呢？那就是连

poor，little这样的词都不认识的人才需要背，也就是我开头说的那些基础实在太差，词汇量可能只有三位数的人。而对于很多词汇量并不小的人，由于不认识little better than这个结构，照样无法做对题目。

举个简单的例子，无非是想告诉大家，要看清阅读考试的实质，千万不要轻易将做错题的原因归结为词汇不够。其实造成阅读能力有限的原因是多方面的，主要是阅读速度和对句子结构的分析能力。前者必须通过广泛的阅读来锻炼和提高，而后者，说到底是一个英语基本功是否扎实的问题，冰冻三尺非一日之寒，解决语法问题是慢工夫，并不是背背单词就可以提高英语水平的。

说到这里，很多朋友可能会这样问，你写这个是不是就是要大家把手里的单词书全都扔掉？非也。对于很多已经工作的朋友，或者长时间不接触英语的朋友，找一本合适自己的词汇书看看，是尽快恢复的最好办法之一。背单词的关键在精不在多，对于一个单词，并不是看到它知道中文意思就足够的，如果让你造个句子你会不会用？如果在收音机里听到它你能不能分辨出来？这都是衡量对词汇的掌握程度。因此，反复复习，反复再实践中运用刚学到的单词，才是背单词的正道。

本人是机械背单词的强烈反对者，因此从不推荐词汇参考书。如果非要说起来的话，找一本用法详细，注解丰富（最好有英文注解）的四级词汇书，足矣 ：）

PS：这里我想谈谈很多所谓《雅思词汇》这样的书。郑重其事告诉大家，这种书绝大多数都是不科学的。首先，雅思考试没有明确大纲，只要在英语中出现的词汇，都有出现在卷子上的可能，并没有规定哪些词汇才是所谓“雅思词汇”。很多编者宣称他的书是经过多少多少次对真题的统计得出的结论而搞出来的词频，大家千万不要轻易上当。首先，雅思真题保密工作很好，真题不可能在考场外泄露，而考生离开考场是不准带出一张纸。那么这些所谓的“统计者”，从哪里搞来那么多的真题作为统计材料？用脑子把卷子一字不差背下来？呵呵。其次，由于雅思考试的特殊性，每次考题与上次几乎没有关系，也就是说，一次考题中出现什么单词，与它上次出现与否，下次还会不会出现，是完全没有规律可循的。做这种统计本身就是无意义的。希望广大鸭友们在选取参考书的时候一定要睁大眼睛，千万不要被*商蒙蔽。

第四篇：雅思写作

Topic: only when people make a large sum of money can they be said successful.Do you agree or disagree?

It is vital to define success although currently criteria are colorful.A sound definition of the term helps people to live and learn better.Moreover, it plays an important role in the construction of good social mores.It is wrong to say that people are not successful if they have failed to make a huge sum of money.The reason is that whether one is successful is not only measured with material yardstick but also against the spiritual criterion.Spiritual achievements and contributions bear little relationship with money.Put it in other word, many of those who have not earned sufficient money are considered successful for their accomplishments.For instance, my mother has never been able to make enough money but she is successful in that she has told us why we live.To emphasize the spiritual elements in the understanding of what success is is not to deny the importance of the ability to make money.On the contrary, the capability to make a massive sum of money in many cases is a kind of success.In terms of the individual development, any human being in a modern society where money is the main economic dimension must be able to live independently by means of earning and spending.In terms of the society development, a country must be rich enough to protect basic human rights, provide foods, and offer education to its members.Otherwise it is not successful.In conclusion, money is not the only standard of success, but it is necessary to be able to make money.

第五篇：雅思写作

Topic: Should grad student be paid higher than non-grads?

In China, it is obvious now that the university graduates earn more money than non-graduates(a funny contrast in which it was opposite scenario when in 1970s China).I quite agree with those graduates who have paid a lot for their studies and expect to make more for either himself or his family.However, it is not so optimistically for those who hope to make it.The critical career competition makes them frustrated due to many factors involved.One of the utmost factors is they feel what they anticipate is not matching up with what they have found in reality.Many university graduates are not satisfied with what they get for what they have done.As a matter of fact, some of them expect so unrealistic that they immediately lose the credit to the workforce they belong to.On the contrary, some of the non-graduate students who are more realistic in career hunting tend to get more satisfied job compared with graduates.Thus what really matters here in salary balance is how one can contribute to the organization rather than what background they hold.The tuition is really high in China.Many high quality students due to this have lost their academic pursuit.This is really shameful for a family or any government who initially should take the burden for whatever reason is supposed to be.Any responsible government should inevitably take this burden and put more money in order to bring up better next generation for the nation.