SAT写作技巧[定稿]

第一篇：SAT写作技巧[定稿]

内容摘要：SAT作文是SAT考试中永远放在第一个section考察的the 25-minute essay。在你开始写第一篇作文之前，请你务必仔细阅读CB的the Offical SAT Study Guide中的相关章节。只有它，才能为你指明真正的备考方向。SAT作文如何取得高分呢？我们一同来分享一下SAT写作三步致胜法则吧。

出题特点

首先，我们来关注一下SAT写作考试的出题形式。一般来说，SAT作文题目由Prompt(背景)+ Assignment(任务，题目)这两部分组成。Prompt是给考生提供理解Assignment的线索，而Assignment中的问题则是在作文中要回答的。

由于SAT是针对高中生升大学的考试，因此写作话题不需要具备单项的专业背景知识，但话题涉及范围却非常广泛，包括文学、艺术、运动、政治、技 术、科学、历史及时事。值得学生注意的是，SAT的Official Guide中清楚地说明了 The essay readers are not looking for one correct viewpoint。

所以有些考生企图竭力 寻找一个观点，借此讨好阅卷老师，这种做法是没有意义，也是浪费时间的。你选择什么样的立场其实并不重要，重要的是你能否做到运用简洁清晰恰当的例子，推理论证你持有的观点。

考查重点

SAT作文主要考察的是考生在一定时间内就某个特定话题给出观点并用各种具体论证手段加以支持分析的能力，不要偏题是基本要求。

我们可以看出SAT写作与其他留学写作考试(如新托福)的定位非常不同。新托福是语言能力测试，而SAT作为入学考试，更注重考察一个学生的逻辑推理能力，要求学生的论证严密、有效、有力。因此不建议考生把TOEFL写作的那套东西搬来用于SAT写作上，想取得高分必须区别复习。时间分配

SAT作文考试是为时25分钟的限时写作，但作文的字数没有硬性规定。有些考生疑惑究竟应该写多长?

如果我们参照官方提供的样卷，会发现6分的作文需填满一页半A4纸，基本等同于400字数。在短短25分钟内，要围绕一个题目写一篇不少于400字的有水平的essay，对于母语非英语，特别是没接受过大学英语教育的考生来说是很有难度的。

如何合理分配25分钟?有些考生第一个section开始10分钟后还在思考，也有考生到了最后时刻还没收尾。

建议考生采用三步走的方法：

1.读题构思写纲要：

保持在2-4分钟，最多不要超过5分钟。一定要仔细耐心地读清楚prompt和assign-ment，构思时最好简单记下你想表达的中心思想和打算使用的例子，选2-3个例子为宜，并且想好如何把文章有逻辑地“串”起来。

2.书写作文：

真正的写作时间有一刻钟左右。按照构思的规划作文，同时关注词汇和句型的多样性，避免用词不当。

3.复查：

保持在4分钟左右。写完初稿后，建议至少留2分钟复读一遍。这个环节非常重要，一定不能省掉。首先通读，检查观点陈述是否清晰、论据是否直接证 明论点、论据是否有效效展开、论据过渡是否顺畅、句子表达是否清楚等。之后再花少部分时间来检查语法，着重注意一下时态、主谓一致、代词使用和标点符号等。

第二篇：SAT作文题目

SAT作文题目汇总SAT ESSAY QUESTIONS COLLECTION

1.(2005.3)Is the opinion of the majority — in government or in any other circumstances — a

poor guide?

2.(2005.3)Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today?

3.(2005.3)Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remain

neutral and impartial?

4.(2005.3)Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of other

people?

5.(2005.5)Do people depend on work—whether it is a job, schoolwork, or volunteer work — to

determine what their daily activities and interactions with others should be?

6.(2005.5)Does progress depend on people with new ideas rather than on people whose ideas

are based on the current way of doing things?

7.(2005.5)Are people afraid to speak out against authority, whether the authority is an

individual, a group, or a government?

8.(2005.5)Does worrying too much about other people’s opinions prevent us from seeing things

clearly?

9.(2005.6)Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeed

in the present?

10.(2005.6)Do people put too much emphasis on learning practical skills?

11.(2005.6)Should schools help students understand moral choices and social issues?

12.(2005.6)Do newspapers, magazines, television, radio, movies, the Internet, and other media

determine what is important to most people?

13.(2005.10)Is success in life earned or do people succeed because they are lucky?

14.(2005.10)Is society’s admiration for famous people beneficial or harmful?

15.(2005.10)Do we live in a time when people do not engage in serious thinking?

16.(2005.10)Should people make more of an effort to keep some things private?

17.(2005.11)Should our perceptions of beauty be influenced by the perceptions of beauty of

other people?

18.(2005.11)Is praising others, even if the praise is excessive or undeserved, a necessary part of

life?

19.(2005.11)Is conflict helpful?

20.(2005.11)Has the acquisition of money and possessions replaced more meaningful ways of

measuring our achievements?

21.(2005.12)Are leaders necessarily people who are most capable of leadership?

22.(2005.12)Is knowledge of the past no longer useful for us today?

23.(2005.12)Is it necessary to limit or put restrictions on freedom of thought and expression?

24.(2005.12)Do the benefits of scientific and technological developments come at the cost of1

undesirable changes to people’s lives?

25.(2006.1)Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things in their own way?

26.(2006.1)Is it necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negative consequences for

other people?

27.(2006.1)Can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?

28.(2006.1)Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?

29.(2006.4)Is it best not to change our ideas, opinions, or behaviors?

30.(2006.4)Is our ability to change ourselves unlimited, or are there limits on our ability to make

important changes in our lives?

31.(2006.4)What do you think motivates people to do their best?

32.(2006.4)Should each individual decide what and how to learn?

33.(2006.5)Are we free to make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices we can

make?

34.(2006.5)Would the world be a better place if everyone always told the complete truth?

35.(2006.5)Does the success of a community—whether it is a class, a team, a family, a nation, or

any other group—depend upon people's willingness to limit their personal interests?

36.(2006.5)Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?

37.(2006.6)Does a strong commitment to technological progress cause a society to neglect other

values, such as education and the protection of the environment?

38.(2006.6)Are established rules too limited to guide people in real-life situations?

39.(2006.6)Is it sometimes better to take risks than to follow a more reasonable course of action?

40.(2006.6)Do we tend to accept the opinions of others instead of developing our own

independent ideas?

41.(2006.10)Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?

42.(2006.10)Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of

authority?

43.(2006.10)Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?

44.(2006.10)Can deception—pretending that something is true when it is not—sometimes have

good results?

45.(2006.11)Do we put too much value on the ideas or actions of individual people?

46.(2006.11)Can books and stories about characters and events that are not real teach us

anything useful?

47.(2006.11)Can people achieve success only if they aim to be perfect?

48.(2006.11)Do success and happiness depend on the choices people make rather than on factors

beyond their control?

49.(2006.12)Are people more likely to be productive and successful when they ignore the

opinions of others?

50.(2006.12)Is it better for people to be realistic or optimistic?

51.(2006.12)Is it important to try to understand people’s motivations before judging their

actions?

52.(2006.12)Is happiness something over which people have no control, or can people choose to

be happy?

53.(2007.1)Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect their

communities or the nation in general?

54.(2007.1)Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?

55.(2007.1)Is education primarily the result of influences other than school?

56.(2007.1)Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?

57.(2007.3)Is it more valuable for people to fit in than to be unique and different?

58.(2007.3)Is it best to have low expectations and to set goals we are sure of achieving?

59.(2007.3)Do we really benefit from every event or experience in some way?

60.(2007.5)Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?

61.(2007.5)Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?

62.(2007.5)Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right and wrong, or can we benefit

from following the crowd?

63.(2007.5)Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?

64.(2007.6)Are people more likely to be happy if they focus on goals other than their own

happiness?

65.(2007.6)Is there a value in celebrating certain individuals as heroes?

66.(2007.6)Have modern advancements truly improved the quality of people’s lives?

67.(2007.6)Do people truly benefit from hardship and misfortune?

68.(2007.10)Is identity something people are born with or given, or is it something people create

for themselves?

69.(2007.10)Can people ever be truly original?

70.(2007.10)Do people achieve greatness only by finding out what they are especially good at

and developing that attribute above all else?

71.(2007.10)Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?

72.(2007.11)Does having a large number of options to choose from make people happy?

73.(2007.11)Is it always necessary to find new solutions to problems?

74.(2007.11)Is the main value of the arts to teach us about the world around us?

75.(2007.11)Is criticism — judging or finding fault with the ideas and actions of others —

essential for personal well-being and social progress?

76.(2007.12)Do people need to “unlearn”, or reject, many of their assumptions and ideas?

77.(2007.12)Should people choose one of the two opposing sides of an issue, or is the truth

usually found “in the middle”?

78.(2007.12)Do images and impressions have too much of an effect on people?

79.(2007.12)Is the most important purpose of technology today different from what it was in the

past?

80.(2008.1)Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?

81.(2008.1)Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached?

82.(2008.1)Should people always prefer new things, ideas, or values to those of the past?

83.(2008.1)Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups with which they

something in common?

84.(2008.3)Are organizations or group most successful when their members pursue individual

wishes and goals?

85.(2008.3)Should people always be loyal?

86.(2008.3)Do people learn more from losing than from winning?

87.(2008.5)Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of modern technology, even

when using it would make life easier?

88.(2008.5)Do people place too much emphasis on winning?

89.(2008.5)Are people’s actions motivated primarily by a desire for power over others?

90.(2008.5)Do incidents from the past continue to influence the present?

91.(2008.6)Does fame bring happiness, or are people who are not famous more likely to be

happy?

92.(2008.6)Is it better for a society when people act as individuals rather than copying the ideas

and opinions of others?

93.(2008.6)Are widely held views often wrong, or are such views more likely to be correct?

94.(2008.6)Are the actions of individuals more valuable than the actions of groups or teams?

95.(2008.10)Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?

96.(2008.10)Are the decisions made quickly just as good as decisions made slowly and

carefully?

97.(2008.10)Can a group of people function effectively without someone being in charge?

98.(2008.10)Do actions, not words, reveal a person or group’s rule attitudes and intentions?

99.(2008.11)Do all established traditions deserve to remain in existence?

100.(2008.11)Do people need to compare themselves with others in order to appreciate what they

have?

101.(2008.11)Is it necessary for people to combine their efforts with those of others in order to be

the most effective?

102.(2008.11)Should society limit people’s exposure to some kinds of information or forms of

expression?

103.(2008.12)Is persistence more important than ability in determining a person’s success?104.(2008.12)Is acting an essential part of everyday life?

105.(2008.12)Can people have too much enthusiasm?

106.(2008.12)Do we only help others in order to help ourselves in some way?

107.(2009.1)Does planning interfere with creativity?

108.(2009.1)Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly because they

expect more of themselves?

109.(2009.1)Should people change their decisions when circumstances change, or is it best for

them to stick with their original decisions?

110.(2009.1)Is striving to achieve a goal always the best course of action, or should people give

up if they are not making progress?

111.(2009.3)Does being ethical make it hard to be successful?

112.(2009.3)Is it sometimes necessary to be impolite?

113.(2009.3)Should we limit our use of the term “courage” to acts in which people risk their own

well-being for the sake of others or to uphold a value?

114.(2009.5)Should we pay more attention to people who are older and more experienced than

we are?

115.(2009.5)Should people let their feelings guide them when they make important decisions? 116.(2009.5)Has today's abundance of information only made it more difficult for us to

understand the world around us?

117.(2009.5)Are people best defined by what they do?

118.(2009.6)Do we benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect?

119.(2009.6)Is it best for people to accept who they are and what they have, or should people

always strive to better themselves?

120.(2009.6)Can common sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned?

121.(2009.6)When some people win, must others lose, or are there situations in which everyone

wins?

122.(2009.10)Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?

123.(2009.10)Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network or family? 124.(2009.10)Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?

125.(2009.10)Is it better for people to know everything they can about something before taking

action or should they act first and get more information later?

126.(2009.11)Are the values of a society most clearly revealed in its popular culture?

127.(2009.11)Do society and other people benefit when individuals pursue their own goals? 128.(2009.11)Is it better for people to stop trying when they feel certain they will not succeed? 129.(2009.11)Should new ideas be questioned?

130.(2009.12)Is it easier now to form friendships than ever before?

131.(2009.12)Should people give up their privacy in exchange for convenience of free services?132.(2009.12)Is it better for people to work out their own ideas on a problem or issue before

learning how others have approached it?

133.(2010.1)Do the demands of others tend to make people more productive than they would be

without such pressure?

134.(2010.1)Should all people’s opinions be valued equally, or should only informed opinions be

taken seriously?

135.(2010.1)Should books portray the world as it is or as it should be?

136.(2010.1)Do people make the greatest discoveries by exploring what is unfamiliar to them or

by paying close attention to what seems familiar?

137.(2010.3)Does society put too much emphasis on working hard?

138.(2010.5)Do small decisions often have major consequences?

139.(2010.5)Is talking the most effective and satisfying way of communicating with others?

140.(2010.5)Should the government be responsible for making sure that people lead healthy

lives?

141.(2010.5)Do people succeed by emphasizing their differences from others?

142.(2010.6)Do people tend to get along better with people who are very different from them or

with those who are like them?

143.(2010.6)Is solitude—spending time alone—necessary for people to achieve their most

important goals?

144.(2010.6)Should ordinary people be considered heroes, or should the term “hero” be reserved

for extraordinary people?

145.(2010.6)Is it wrong to use the word “courage” to describe behaviors that are ordinary or

self-interested?

146.(2010.10)Is it absolutely necessary for people to study the creative arts?

147.(2010.10)Is it important for people to spend time outdoors and to learn to appreciate the

natural environment?

148.(2010.10)Should originality always be more highly praised than conformity?

149.(2010.10)Should people adapt to their new surroundings, or should they refuse to change?150.(2010.11)Do people put much emphasis on doing things by and for themselves?

151.(2010.11)Is imagination less valuable than facts and objectivity?

152.(2010.11)Is a group of people more likely than an individual leader to bring about significant

change?

153.(2010.11)Would it be better if people were more accepting of mistakes?

154.(2010.12)Is it possible to be a hero in the modern world?

155.(2010.12)Does the way that information is communicated today result in people learning less

than ever before?

156.(2010.12)Do temporary or otherwise imperfect solutions to problems only create more

serious problems?

157.(2010.12)Is it better for people to have limited choices?

158.(2011.1)Is an idealistic approach less valuable than a practical approach?

159.(2011.1)Is it better for people to learn from others than to learn on their own?

160.(2011.1)Do people put too much importance on getting every detail right on a project or

task?

161.(2011.1)Does the process of doing something matter more than the outcome?

162.OG 2ed.P119-Is there always another explanation or another point of view?

163.OG 2ed.P189-Is deception ever justified?

OG Practice Test 1: 同上面No.42: 2006-10

OG Practice Test 2: 同上面No.53: 2007-01

OG Practice Test 3: 同上面No.61: 2007-05

164.OG Practice Test 4: Do changes that make our lives easier not necessarily make them better? 165.OG Practice Test 5: Is conscience a more powerful motivator than money, fame, or power? 166.OG Practice Test 6: Can success be disastrous?

167.OG Practice Test 7: Do we need other people in order to understand ourselves?

168.OG Practice Test 8: Is the world changing for the better?

169.OG Practice Test 9: Do you think that ease does not challenge us and that we need adversity

to help us discover who we are?

170.OG Practice Test 10: Should heroes be defined as people who say what they think when we

ourselves lack the courage to say it?

171.OC 1: Is the way something seems to be not always the same as it actually is?

172.OC 2: Are bad choices and good choices equally likely to have negative consequences? 173.OC 3: Do people learn who they are only when they are forced into action?

174.OC 4: Are people’s lives the result of the choices they make?

175.OC 5: Do closed doors make us creative?

176.OC 6: Do people have to be highly competitive in order to succeed?

177.CB-1: Is style more important than substance?

178.CB-2: Can what we value be determined only by what we sacrifice?

179.CB-3: Is perfection something to be admired or sought after?

180.CB-4: What makes a person wise?

181.CB-5: Is discontent often the first step to action?

CB-6: 同上面No.163: OG 2ed.P189

第三篇：SAT学习心得

sat阅读满分学习心得分享

作为普通高中学生，我在准备sat前的英语水平是远远不够出国的，但经过一年的准备后，我最终考出了阅读800的分数。这让我相信，无论任何基础，只要踏踏实实准备sat，最

终都会有一个不错的结果。接下来我就分享些关于sat阅读的个人心得。a.单词

建议英语基础非常薄弱的同学(例如普高党)，先补上英语四级的基础词汇，然后再背针对

sat阅读的高级词汇。我当时完整背完的sat词汇书就是一本巴朗3500，但我发现书上

很多定义并不准确或不完整，所以我自己参考了webster dictionary和new oxford american dictionary(用macbook的同学可以在电脑里找到这个字典)上的注释，给所有

巴朗词汇重新定义，用excel做成字典。这种死记硬背确实是绝大多数人的难题，我采用的

方法是写成单词卡片，随机抽选着背，此外，我还利用同义词词典将数个单词放在一起背，也会起到较好的效果。因为是死记，所以单词的遗忘率很高，一定要在背完后参考遗忘曲线

反复复习，否则都是无用功。除了背单词书，我还把做过的所有真题中的生词都找出来，做

了单词表。我发现这样做有两个好处：一.真题中的填空词重复率非常高，在背完所有真题

中国的填空词后，我的填空题几乎再没错过。二.因为基础薄弱，一开始阅读中我有许多小

词不认识，但积累了一段时间后很多基础词就都认识了，很好的弥补了我的低起点，而且在

阅读中记词比死记硬背的效果好得多。如果离备考时间已经很近，来不及背大量单词，建议

先把真题中的填空词背了，以及看direct hits的vocabulary book或者巴朗高频词。b.做题

我当时做真题的顺序是og、历年考题(注意04年及以前的改革前的旧题可以在网上找到，虽说题型略有不同，但难度比05年以后更大，可以提高阅读水平)和oc。我当时将题目前

后刷了三遍，第一遍最仔细，力求文章中的每句话都理解，每道题都弄懂，我认为在这个阶

段能有个老师/学姐学长帮助你将看不懂的一一解决，并带着精读一些较难的文章，效果就

很好。接下来的第二、第三遍就基本靠自己做题和反思，培养出题感。有些浮躁的同学为了

追求速度，做完题就了事，不求甚解，这样即使做很多遍也不会有成效，相反的，沉下心来

踏踏实实分析题目和文章，我相信不出几次就会有显著的提高。此外，有些机构和老师会吹

嘘各种做题技巧，但我认为那些都是虚的，不能帮你拿到高分，我个人从未看过解题技巧总

结。要想拿到高分，只能靠真正的提高自己的阅读水平，并且通过多做题找到题感。我的做

题习惯是先将文章通读一遍，再做题，个人认为sat阅读最好不要读一段写几道题(toefl 阅读完全可以这么做)，因为有很多题目会考你对文章的整体把握，所以要有足够快的阅读

速度。

c.课外阅读

课外阅读自然是提高阅读水平的有效方式。小说方面，推荐简单一些的课外书有《to kill a mocking bird 》《animal farm》《never let me go》，难一点的有《1984》《the great gatsby》《the moon and sixpence》《tess》等各种名著。散文方面，推荐alain de botton 的书(他的散文曾被收入真题中)和thoreau的《walden》，以及欧美的很多大家都有著名

散文，例如e.b.white，virginia woolf和russell。杂志方面，推荐times, new york times，the economist之类的。d.机构

这个我没有发言权，因为我当初是找了家教和学姐的一对一帮助。但sat阅读这件事，师傅领进门，修行在个人，最主要还是靠自己的努力。外面很多机构都挺水的，选择时一定

要小心，多问问懂内幕的熟人，否则很容易被坑。e.机经

因为2016年sat要改革，改革前的这段时间内旧题重复率高，很多人用机经获得了高 分，中国社会的浮躁可见一斑。暂且不谈诚信问题，即使高分将你送入了名校，可没有英语

能力的你如何在名校严苛的学术氛围中存活下来?用机经逞一时的小聪明，将来gpa过低甚

至被退学将让你后悔莫及。请对自己负责，珍爱生命，远离机经。篇二：sat学习心得：阅读800靠脚踏实地点滴积累 sat学习心得：阅读800靠脚踏实地点滴积累

今天太傻留学小编给正在备考的考生们整理了一篇通过自己的不断努力取得sat阅读满分的sat学习心得文章，正如笔者所说，无论任何基础，只要脚踏实地去准备，就有拿高分、满分的可能，下面我们一起来看看这位考生的sat学习心得吧!作为普通高中学生，我在准备sat（/retype/zoom/e0b5aba13968011ca200911d?pn=2&x=0&y=1268&raww=1152&rawh=89&o=png_6_0_0_135_65_622_48_892.979_1262.879&type=pic&aimh=37.***&md5sum=c146bb322fc3b2ac1582928af3313039&sign=faa5c66fd3&zoom=&png=26051-&jpg=0-0“ target=”_blank">点此查看

为了追求速度，做完题就了事，不求甚解，这样即使做很多遍也不会有成效，相反的，沉下心来踏踏实实分析题目和文章，我相信不出几次就会有显著的提高。此外，有些老师会吹嘘各种做题技巧，但我认为那些都是虚的，不能帮你拿到高分，我个人从未看过解题技巧总结。要想拿到高分，只能靠真正的提高自己的阅读水平，并且通过多做题找到题感。我的做题习惯是先将文章通读一遍，再做题，个人认为sat阅读最好不要读一段写几道题(toefl阅读完全可以这么做)，因为有很多题目会考你对文章的整体把握，所以要有足够快的阅读速度。c.机经

因为2016年sat要改革，改革前的这段时间内旧题重复率高，很多人用机经获得了高分，中国社会的浮躁可见一斑。暂且不谈诚信问题，即使高分将你送入了名校，可没有英语能力的你如何在名校严苛的学术氛围中存活下来?用机经逞一时的小聪明，将来gpa过低甚至被退学将让你后悔莫及。请对自己负责，珍爱生命，远离机经。d.课外阅读

课外阅读自然是提高阅读水平的有效方式。小说方面，推荐简单一些的课外书有《to kill a mocking bird 》《animal farm》《never let me go》，难一点的有《1984》《the great gatsby》《the moon and sixpence》《tess》等各种名著。散文方面，推荐alain de botton的书(他的散文曾被收入真题中)和thoreau的《walden》，以及欧美的很多大家都有著名散文，例如e.b.white，virginia woolf和russell。杂志方面，推荐times, new york times，the economist之类的。

以上文章为大家提供了拿到sat阅读高分考生的sat学习经验分享，希望能够给正在备考的你一定的借鉴意义，语言考试不能只靠技巧，还需自己的日积月累踏踏实实掌握应试技能，只有双管齐下才能考出高分，太傻sat考试频道祝考生们备考顺利，早日取得高分!3月北美sat备考心得 2-3月份春节期间在美国出差，在纽约家中呆着无聊，就报名了一次3月的sat考试。主要目的有两个： 1.很多在美国读高中的学生上我们的sat培训，希望我们对北美题和考试经历进行分析，以便给他们更好的指导;2.去年5月份香港考试，我2270分，阅读690，很多同行和学生都说我应该不止这个实力。我说我至少应该2300分吧。很多我们的学生都比我分数高。我重新测试一个复习方法。3.我想证明sat考试是基础和强化都重要的。

顺便说一下，成人考生在香港有单独的考场，在美国通常是坐在考场第一排，还是很荣幸的。一个上午考下来腰酸背疼，我35岁高龄考试，监考的黑人大妈还给了我一瓶矿泉水。还是美国的考试贴心。大妈问我为什么来考试，我说教育改变命运，我要向奥巴马总统学习上哈佛法学院。

美国的sat和亚洲的差别不大，作文和阅读稍微难一些。见过北美题的都知道，最后一个作文题是给亚洲的，比较简单。美国作文稍微难一些，阅读也难一些。据说某些北美题亚洲会重复考，因此亚洲学生有些投机可以高分。我这次去考试不是为了偷题给学生以后亚洲考试准备，也不在乎这个。

长话短说。这次结果基本满意，阅读720，数学780，写作790。总分2290.其实我主要是去考阅读，其他两项上次数学780，写作800，没啥需要再证明的了。作文： whether looking at the big picture is more important than the minute details。就是问大局观和细节哪个重要。我说的是细节重要。

关于写作，我的建议是，不要去看老师们给的模板和例子。要有自己的例子，至少也要改写一下相同的例子。我去香港考试，看到很多中国的孩子，都在背诵什么jack welch和sony ericsson的例子。我们时代焦点的雷静老师，2012年10月sat写作800，作文12分，她的学生很多也是11分和12分，原因就是一定要学生写自己独特的例子。sat作文，我觉得，文学类的和历史类的例子含金量相对高，比近代的例子显得有深度。

写作很多同学的误区是：背诵例子。这个是保证得低分的终南捷径。例子可以重复，但是组织结构，如何扣题，就是说例子为什么相关更加重要。而且如何长短句结合，变化句式，是非常重要的。此外如何扣题，点题，我觉得中国的老师都缺乏。

另外，写作提高，需要把自己的作文，找老师修改到12分，这样几个来回，就找到感觉了。我觉得这个是重要的。写作可以突击，也有技巧，但是不是背诵案例，而是找到好的老师，好的参考书，还有修改。写作文，临场时候，我觉得可以写作文用两支铅笔。填表之后，通常笔会变粗，这样字容易占篇幅，是阅卷人不喜欢的。作文如果写一半，笔变粗，就马上换另外一支笔。我建议，作文两面，每一面一支笔。

篇幅我建议尽量写满，至少一页半要再多几行。大家可以看看雷静老师的12分作文。关于例子，我推荐2个或者3个。我觉得3个例子是北美流行的方法，加上开头结尾总共5段，更好。两个例子有些少，而且有些黔驴技穷的感觉。3个例子游刃有余，也不会有堆砌辞藻和例子的生硬感觉。

参考书方面，美国最流行的就是killer sat essays。下面是亚马逊网上书店截图，它的评分最高，里面有大量学生范文，都是12分的。美国最好的sat作文书。我花重金从美国购买了这本书的版权，中文名字叫做《sat满分作文集萃 秒杀sat作文攻略》，我们就原版引进了。没有添加太多内容。现在当当网快有卖了，而且便宜，就是为了造福大家。

词汇我觉得，barron 3500已经过时了。很多解释都是错的，而且呢，很多词也不常考。比如agnostic这个词，sat考察的不是“无神论者”，而是“没有倾向性和依赖性的”。direct hits 1,2两本书很好，所有有价值的单词我都收录到了《sat高频词汇完全分类》。我是真的一边准备sat，一边编写这本书，绝对是第一手的资料。这本书收录了direct hits 1,2全部词汇，并总结了大量中国学生咬不准的熟词僻意，比如check:阻止;currency:支持，主流;afford:提供(而不是负担得起)等等。所以读了我的sat高频词汇的就没有必要再看direct hits了，比direct hits全，而且放了最近10年的真题词汇。我们很多2250+的学生都是用这本书准备的。

最关键的是，这本书背起来不会枯燥，不是清一色地都是从a开头以z结尾的单词排列，而且列上且仅列上了sat考察意思。绝对是帮助大家“省时间地“背单词。什么是创新的背单词的方法，读了就知道啦。

还有这本词汇书让你快速切入sat常考意思，并对市面词汇书的一些错误的解释做了一一的修正。

在这次sat考试中，有个别词看着眼熟，但是有时候咬不准。这种情况总会出现，但是难词基本我的词汇书都收录到了。这种情况下，要用充分必要判断法。不认识的单词先假定可以做正确选项或者错误选项，如果其他4个选项单词认识，并且一定不正确，再选择这个不认识的单词。

再说语法。语法我一次790，一次800。我建议的复习方法如下： 1.1.基础差的同学，找老师一对一梳理一次知识点，系统地查缺补漏。2.2.基础好的同学，把所有错过的题，找老师答疑一次。3.3.所有同学，把错过的题吗，手机拍摄下来，坐车和吃饭时候看。

我这么大年龄了，每次几乎都满分，就是每次考试前，看看手机，常考的就那么多知识点。注意： 1.1.不要硬挑错，很多题是正确的，选择e.2.2.如果看到一个不顺眼，坚持看完全文，有可能有更大的错误，比如单复数、时态等。不顺眼不一定就是错误的。

最后说阅读，我觉得阅读，好比收音机调频。650以上的学生，都有实力考700，因为他们做题，文章基本可以看懂，就是题目方面把握不好。sat和托福不同，不是选择正确选项，而是选择最佳。通常这样的学生，要在2选1时候，纠结。单纯做题已经解决不了他们的问题了。

这个时候，我建议，最新题目考前做1-2遍可以了。需要阅读考试之外的经典文章，然后提高实力，提高精读能力。这里，学生应该根据自己的弱项，比如文学类、双篇文章还是理科的文章，进行有的放矢的弥补。2012年暑假，我给实验中学熊同学和北京四中的吴同学和几个国外的学生开了一个小班，就是用sat出题的文章，找到出处，精选了21篇考察过的文章或者常考的背景知识，从黑人文学到英美当代作品，到议论文，比如记忆的扭曲等等进行精读，最后他们都考了2250以上。两个阅读700+。后来我索性把这些文章出了一本书，《sat阅读真经21篇》现在还没有出版，只做内部教材，现有这本书的精简版，感兴趣的家长同学，欢迎私信给我，我线下可以发给你们。sat阅读的文章之难处之一，就是让读者突然感觉“没头没尾”地出现一段文字，考生不知道上下文的大背景和来龙去脉，但是要硬着头皮去“管中窥豹”一样迅速进入状 态，不仅仅要理解文章的意思，还要揣摩作者的态度。这种“切片”式的文章就好比在万花筒中抽取一个切面，让读者迅速理解和分析。这个好比让你和一个陌生人 迅速进入状态，进行交流，还是蛮难的。很多同学看到不熟悉的文章就懵了。如何突破，我以后会每次总结给大家。最后说数学。数学是一定要拿高分的。也是中国学生的长项。不能掉以轻心。

总结一下，sat确实需要长期准备，但是考前冲刺非常重要。很多比如语法和写作的临阵磨枪非常重要。阅读实力重要，状态调整也重要。对《sat阅读真经》有兴趣而且想考高分的，可以私信我，我会免费发给大家。

作文是考试第一项，看看killer sat essay这个美国最畅销书非常有帮助。词汇需要慢慢积累。考之前2周要把《sat高频词汇完全分类》的前200页词汇每两天刷一遍。

最后我不建议做非真题的普林斯顿这些题。oc可以做。单纯刷题没有用，尤其是阅读。多看小说和议论文最最重要。5月份、6月份我都会去香港，我们有考团，也有冲刺班。需要报名考团或者想试听课程的都可以找我们，我们都会一一满足大家。

来源于：时代焦点篇四：3月北美sat备考心得

全国咨询热线：4000-365-967 3月北美sat备考心得 2-3月份春节期间在美国出差，在纽约家中呆着无聊，就报名了一次3月的sat考试。主要目的有两个： 1.很多在美国读高中的学生上我们的sat培训，希望我们对北美题和考试经历进行分析，以便给他们更好的指导;2.去年5月份香港考试，我2270分，阅读690，很多同行和学生都说我应该不止这个实力。我说我至少应该2300分吧。很多我们的学生都比我分数高。我重新测试一个复习方法。3.我想证明sat考试是基础和强化都重要的。

顺便说一下，成人考生在香港有单独的考场，在美国通常是坐在考场第一排，还是很荣幸的。一个上午考下来腰酸背疼，我35岁高龄考试，监考的黑人大妈还给了我一瓶矿泉水。还是美国的考试贴心。大妈问我为什么来考试，我说教育改变命运，我要向奥巴马总统学习上哈佛法学院。

美国的sat和亚洲的差别不大，作文和阅读稍微难一些。见过北美题的都知道，最后一个作文题是给亚洲的，比较简单。美国作文稍微难一些，阅读也难一些。据说某些北美题亚洲会重复考，因此亚洲学生有些投机可以高分。我这次去考试不是为了偷题给学生以后亚洲考试准备，也不在乎这个。

长话短说。这次结果基本满意，阅读720，数学780，写作790。总分2290.其实我主要是去考阅读，其他两项上次数学780，写作800，没啥需要再证明的了。作文： whether looking at the big picture is more important than the minute details。就是问大局观和细节哪个重要。我说的是细节重要。

关于写作，我的建议是，不要去看老师们给的模板和例子。要有自己的例子，至少也要改写一下相同的例子。我去香港考试，看到很多中国的孩子，都在背诵什么jack welch和sony ericsson的例子。我们时代焦点的雷静老师，2012年10月sat写作800，作文12分，她的学生很多也是11分和12分，原因就是 全国咨询热线：4000-365-967 一定要学生写自己独特的例子。sat作文，我觉得，文学类的和历史类的例子含金量相对高，比近代的例子显得有深度。

写作很多同学的误区是：背诵例子。这个是保证得低分的终南捷径。例子可以重复，但是组织结构，如何扣题，就是说例子为什么相关更加重要。而且如何长短句结合，变化句式，是非常重要的。此外如何扣题，点题，我觉得中国的老师都缺乏。

另外，写作提高，需要把自己的作文，找老师修改到12分，这样几个来回，就找到感觉了。我觉得这个是重要的。写作可以突击，也有技巧，但是不是背诵案例，而是找到好的老师，好的参考书，还有修改。写作文，临场时候，我觉得可以写作文用两支铅笔。填表之后，通常笔会变粗，这样字容易占篇幅，是阅卷人不喜欢的。作文如果写一半，笔变粗，就马上换另外一支笔。我建议，作文两面，每一面一支笔。

篇幅我建议尽量写满，至少一页半要再多几行。大家可以看看雷静老师的12分作文。关于例子，我推荐2个或者3个。我觉得3个例子是北美流行的方法，加上开头结尾总共5段，更好。两个例子有些少，而且有些黔驴技穷的感觉。3个例子游刃有余，也不会有堆砌辞藻和例子的生硬感觉。

参考书方面，美国最流行的就是killer sat essays。下面是亚马逊网上书店截图，它的评分最高，里面有大量学生范文，都是12分的。美国最好的sat作文书。

我花重金从美国购买了这本书的版权，中文名字叫做《sat满分作文集萃 秒杀sat作文攻略》，我们就原版引进了。没有添加太多内容。现在当当网快有卖了，而且便宜，就是为了造福大家。

词汇我觉得，barron 3500已经过时了。很多解释都是错的，而且呢，很多词也不常考。比如agnostic这个词，sat考察的不是“无神论者”，而是“没有倾向性和依赖性的”。direct hits 1,2两本书很好，所有有价值的单词我都收录到了《sat高频词汇完全分类》。我是真的一边准备sat，一边编写这本书，绝对是第一手的资料。这本书收录了direct hits 1,2全部词汇，并总结了大量中国学生咬不准的熟词僻意，比如check:阻止;currency:支持，主流;afford:提供(而不是负担得起)等等。所以读了我的sat高频词汇的就没有必要再看direct hits了，比direct hits全，而且放了最近10年的真题词汇。我们很多2250+的学生都是用这本书准备的。

全国咨询热线：4000-365-967 最关键的是，这本书背起来不会枯燥，不是清一色地都是从a开头以z结尾的单词排列，而且列上且仅列上了sat考察意思。绝对是帮助大家“省时间地“背单词。什么是创新的背单词的方法，读了就知道啦。

还有这本词汇书让你快速切入sat常考意思，并对市面词汇书的一些错误的解释做了一一的修正。

在这次sat考试中，有个别词看着眼熟，但是有时候咬不准。这种情况总会出现，但是难词基本我的词汇书都收录到了。这种情况下，要用充分必要判断法。不认识的单词先假定可以做正确选项或者错误选项，如果其他4个选项单词认识，并且一定不正确，再选择这个不认识的单词。

再说语法。语法我一次790，一次800。我建议的复习方法如下： 1.1.基础差的同学，找老师一对一梳理一次知识点，系统地查缺补漏。2.2.基础好的同学，把所有错过的题，找老师答疑一次。3.3.所有同学，把错过的题吗，手机拍摄下来，坐车和吃饭时候看。

我这么大年龄了，每次几乎都满分，就是每次考试前，看看手机，常考的就那么多知识点。注意： 1.1.不要硬挑错，很多题是正确的，选择e.2.2.如果看到一个不顺眼，坚持看完全文，有可能有更大的错误，比如单复数、时态等。不顺眼不一定就是错误的。

最后说阅读，我觉得阅读，好比收音机调频。650以上的学生，都有实力考700，因为他们做题，文章基本可以看懂，就是题目方面把握不好。sat和托福不同，不是选择正确选项，而是选择最佳。通常这样的学生，要在2选1时候，纠结。单纯做题已经解决不了他们的问题了。

这个时候，我建议，最新题目考前做1-2遍可以了。需要阅读考试之外的经典文章，然后提高实力，提高精读能力。这里，学生应该根据自己的弱项，比如文学类、双篇文章还是理科的文章，进行有的放矢的弥补。

全国咨询热线：4000-365-967 2012年暑假，我给实验中学熊同学和北京四中的吴同学和几个国外的学生开了一个小班，就是用sat出题的文章，找到出处，精选了21篇考察过的文章或者常考的背景知识，从黑人文学到英美当代作品，到议论文，比如记忆的扭曲等等进行精读，最后他们都考了2250以上。两个阅读700+。后来我索性把这些文章出了一本书，《sat阅读真经21篇》现在还没有出版，只做内部教材，现有这本书的精简版，感兴趣的家长同学，欢迎私信给我，我线下可以发给你们。sat阅读的文章之难处之一，就是让读者突然感觉“没头没尾”地出现一段文字，考生不知道上下文的大背景和来龙去脉，但是要硬着头皮去“管中窥豹”一样迅速进入状 态，不仅仅要理解文章的意思，还要揣摩作者的态度。这种“切片”式的文章就好比在万花筒中抽取一个切面，让读者迅速理解和分析。这个好比让你和一个陌生人 迅速进入状态，进行交流，还是蛮难的。很多同学看到不熟悉的文章就懵了。如何突破，我以后会每次总结给大家。最后说数学。数学是一定要拿高分的。也是中国学生的长项。不能掉以轻心。

总结一下，sat确实需要长期准备，但是考前冲刺非常重要。很多比如语法和写作的临阵磨枪非常重要。阅读实力重要，状态调整也重要。对《sat阅读真经》有兴趣而且想考高分的，可以私信我，我会免费发给大家。

作文是考试第一项，看看killer sat essay这个美国最畅销书非常有帮助。词汇需要慢慢积累。考之前2周要把《sat高频词汇完全分类》的前200页词汇每两天刷一遍。

最后我不建议做非真题的普林斯顿这些题。oc可以做。单纯刷题没有用，尤其是阅读。多看小说和议论文最最重要。5月份、6月份我都会去香港，我们有考团，也有冲刺班。需要报名考团或者想试听课程的都可以找我们，我们都会一一满足大家。

全国咨询热线：4000-365-967 扫描二维码限时获取免费视频课程。

来源于：时代焦点篇五：sat突破2080分心得【新东方高分学员分享】 sat突破2080分心得【新东方高分学员分享】

分享主角：郑州新东方sat学员张竞凡

学习课程：郑州新东方sat培训班

收获成绩：sat突破2080分 sat成绩分享——2080分

当我准备接触sat的时候，竟然天真的以为它的难度和托福差不多，和原来一样吊儿郎当学两天玩三天的状态就可以拿到比较满意的成绩，但是我第一次翻开official guide看到词汇题的时候整个人都傻眼了，十个单词有九个都不认识，简直是压力山大。后来经过了更深入的了解，意识到想要真正考好sat需要更大的词汇量，更强的理解能力和更快的做题速度。

关键词：阅读——词汇量

接触sat 后最深刻的感受就是词汇量完全不够用，而阅读题里包含的词汇填空也是高分的关键。我不是很喜欢抱着单词书一个劲的背，而且记忆效率也很低，所以我开始了广泛的总结词汇。在做完每套题之后都要把所有的生词都画出来并且誊到本子上，有闲时间就翻出来看看。其实每次看自己的本就会发现常出现的单词总结了很多遍，这就是说明下的功夫不够大。多做题后就会有厚厚的一本词汇，常常复习就会有长足的进步。

关键词：语法——刷题、总结

语法题就是要靠大量的刷题和总结，通过积累来一点点进步。同时掌握到考试的规律会省很多的时间和精力。.关键词：写作——案例储备 sat写作要保证自己有丰富的例子，并且熟练掌握，这样在短短的25分钟里可以切题的写出自己的论点和论据。

关键词：题库——抓重点、答题点 对sat题库的分析也很重要，抓住重点，找到最好的答题点以及例子的切入点才能得到高分。

第四篇：SAT写作

三立教育www.xiexiebang.com

SAT写作范文

为了帮助大家减少SAT写作部分失分，取得高分好成绩，下面三立小编为你带来SAT写作范文，让你学到技巧，减少分数的丢失，希望对你有所帮助，更多资讯请访问三立在线教育，专业老师为你在线解答相关疑问。

《阅读很重要》

The vicissitude of history never fails to amaze us with all the changes it has brought to human life.If we trace back to see what has been changed since human civilization, seldom can we see anything that remains intact, with only one exception-the importance of reading.Despite the fact that reading has never dropped from our top priorities, few people keep the habit of it.As a reaction to such pathetic phenomenon, writer Frank Bruni draws people’s attention back to reading and encourages people to value it.Strategies he employs include contrast, credible reference and tactic reasoning that appeal to people’s emotion and agreement.One impressive feature of this article is Bruni’s contrast at the very beginning to introduce his topic, with the next paragraphs addressing its benefits.He compares things that he always ignores such as nephew’s birthday and niece’s school production with things he never fails to overlook-reading.For the majority of people, especially teenagers, birthday party and school performance are events that family members should remember.Unfortunately, this is not the case for the author.Reading at this point, readers are left a bit disappointed at the author and tend to pay more attention to what he wants to convey next.At the cusp of people’三立教育www.xiexiebang.com

s attention, author Bruni brings about something that deserves greater emphasis-reading: “I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.” Thus the readers start to realize how justifiable the author is-as nothing like a birthday party or a performance in school is comparable with the importance of reading.With the utilization of this contrast, the author successfully draws the attention from the readers and lays a solid foundation for his later argument.Aside from this, the author’s careful choice of evidence adds credibility to the article.He cites properly a report by Common Sense Media, claiming that three is a sharp decline in the percentage of teenagers read for fun “fewer than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure”.At the same time, however, the number of the young who hardly ever read or never read for pleasure elevates from “only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds” 30 years ago to “22 percent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of 17-year-olds “ today.This worrisome report indicates that the young no longer read as much as they used to.Linked with the previous paragraphs, the author urges the reader to weight the disadvantage of such trend and possibly spurs some kind of response.Besides, the inclusion of an authoritative agency backs up Bruni’s point, makes the work of Bruni believable and credible.The most exquisite technique of the passage, however, is its elaborate reasoning.From paragraph 8 to 15, the author lists all the possible benefits of reading to add weight to the persuasiveness of the article.He starts from how 三立教育www.xiexiebang.com

reading benefit the brain in paragraph 8, that interviews indicate a symbiotic relationship between reading and intelligence.Paragraph 9 follows with a benefit to the qualities required to success, because those people who read are more adept at “ reading people” and “sizing up the social whirl around them”.If these benefits are not enough, in paragraph 10, 11, 12 and 13, the author compares reading with exposure to technological devices to indicate how reading would benefit the spirit.One obvious benefit reading offers to the spirit is that reading smoothens people “with thoughts less jumbled, moods less jangled”.The other benefit to spirit is that reading grants people “the ability to focus and concentrate”, which becomes a social corrective to “metabolism and sensory overload of digital technology”, because those who indulge themselves in technology requires something to force them to be focused and have delayed gratification.Finally, in paragraph 14 and 15, Bruni talks about the joy of reading: as the connection reading can provide to people is not anything like watching a movie is able to offer.In order to prove the zealous love people possess for reading, he sites the line from the protagonist in a famous love story that “You read a book and it fills you with this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the book.” People love reading want to share the zeal for it, because only those who read can feel the same addiction.All these are connected well to elaborate the value of reading to not only people’s brain and success, but also spirit and gratification.The combination of all these paragraphs provides the readers with a chance to see the 三立教育www.xiexiebang.com

well-rounded and multi-layer benefits of reading, surely help the reader to deliver his idea.All in all, the evidence and source make the reader’s idea worthy of recognition, and the tactical reasoning appeals to people’s emotion and trust.These writing techniques contribute to a well-structured and compelling argument that reading deserves more attention and emphasis.以上相关信息由三立在线为你提供，希望阅读完以上文章后，你能有所收获，对学习有一定的帮助，更多资讯请访问三立在线，专业老师为你指导讲解相关疑惑，为你的考试之路保驾护航。

第五篇：SAT最新作文题目

official

● Is the opinion of the majority-in government or in any other circumstances-a poor guide? ● Is creativity need more than ever in the world today?

● Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remain

neutral and impartial?

● Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of other

people?

● Is success in life earned or do people succeed because they are lucky?

● Is society’s admirations for famous people beneficial or harmful?

● Should people make more of an effort to keep some things private?

● Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?

● Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things in their own way? ● ls it necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negative consequences for

other people?

● Can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?

● Are we free to `make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices we can make? ● Would the world be a better place if everyone always told the complete truth?

● Does the success of a community-whether it is a class, a team, a family, a nation, or any

other group depend upon people’s willingness to limit their personal interests?

● Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?

● Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?

● Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of authority? ● Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?

● Can deception-pretending that something is true when it is not-sometimes have good

results?

● Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect their communities

or the nation in general?

● Is it more important to do Work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?

● Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?

● Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?

● Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?

● Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right or wrong, or can we benefit from

the crowd?

● Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?

● Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?

● Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network or family? ● Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?

● Is it better for people to know everything they can about something before taking actions,or should they get more information later?