第一篇:演讲稿开场白要引起对方的好奇心[小编推荐]
演讲稿开场白,从心理学原理看,思维与语言是紧密地联系着的,演讲稿开场白语言所表达的是思维活动的结果。如果思维不敏捷不清晰不严密,语言的表达也就不可能流畅清楚。一个思维迟钝而又混乱的人,绝不可能口若悬河滔滔不绝而又条理清晰地表达自己的思想。因此,口才表述水平的提高,很大程度上取决于表述者思维素质和能力的提高。开场白的选择
第一句往往是最难的,往往又是最重要的。因为你若说得不好,可能会给对方留下一个不好的印象,从而打消了与你继续交谈的兴致。
以下几种开头方法可供你参考: 说些幽默、有趣的事情,使对方心情放松。引起对方的好奇心。先扼要提出问题的要点。
先把一些非凡事件的结果说出来,使听者想知道这件事的经过情形,从而引起听者的好奇心。
先提出一个问题,请对方帮助你共同思考,在取得共同认识的基础上,再进一步发挥你的话题。
说一些与听者切肤相关的话。
不要用重复的字眼,话未说出口时,先在脑海里打好一个腹稿,然后根据这个腹稿叙述出来以免表达不流畅。
最重要的是,说话时,字句不可经常叠用。演讲稿开场白“为什么”一语,用一次就够了,有些人却偏爱说:“为什么为什么为什么”;答应别人某件事时,最多说两个“好”,如说成“好好好好好好”,那就不精炼了。叠句的使用是为了引人注意,起一种强调的作用,所以,非必要时,这种语句还是少说为佳。
还有些人,由于词汇贫乏,以致把本来可以丰富的表述,简单化了。如某些人喜欢用“伟大”这个词,于是,他的话中什么都“伟大”起来。“你太伟大了”,“这出戏真是伟大”,“我见到一个伟大的场面”,“吃了一顿伟大的午餐”等等。某些字眼不分场合的重复使用,使你的表述显得呆板、拖沓,明智的做法是,应根据不同的语言环境来变化。
还有一些近乎口头禅似的字眼,也是不可多用或重叠使用的。如:“那个⋯⋯那个⋯⋯”、“基本上⋯⋯”、“反正”、“就是说⋯⋯”这类没有意义的口头禅是思维出现障碍时用来填空的,目的是引出后面的话。
与口头禅类似的,还有诸如“自然啦”、“当然啦”、“坦白地说”、“老实说”、“你明白了吗”、“你说是不是”这一类不必要的话,都造成语句芜杂的现象。
苏格拉底曾说:“别说‘我想’,而说‘你想呢?’”他提醒人们千万不要在表述中“我”字当头。
因为突出“我”的人,容易给人造成一种自高自大的感觉。“我认为”、“我需要”、“我⋯⋯”都使人认为你是“自我中心”,从而产生疏远感。
不要用鼻音说话
用鼻音说话,具有破坏性的效果。尤其是初次与人交谈时,往往会给人一种无精打采的厌烦之感。
纠正鼻音必须努力减低心理紧张,演讲稿开场白放松你的下颚、舌头,张开喉咙,使声音可以由此散发,而不从鼻孔中遁出。
不要用尖音说话
尖音给人的感觉是不愉快的。因为尖音刺耳,使人神经紧张,容易破坏谈话的气氛。
尖音的消除当然也离不开心理因素,因此要做到心平气和。此外,平时还应多作放松喉咙的训练。下列方法可供你训练时参考:
1.轻闭双目,合上嘴唇;2.放松下已,嘴唇仍闭着;3.打一个懒洋洋的大呵欠;4.张大嘴巴及至喉咙深处,感受到肌肉的伸张,张开喉咙。
第二篇:演讲稿开场白要匠心独运
演讲稿开场白要匠心独运
文章开头最难写,同样道理,作演讲开场白最不易把握,要想三言两语抓住听众的心,并非易事。如果在演讲的开始听众对你的话就不感兴趣,注意力一旦被分散了,那后面再精彩的言论也将黯然失色。因此只有匠心独运的开场白,以其新颖、奇趣、敏慧之美,才能给听众留下深刻印象,才能立即控制场上气氛,在瞬间里集中听众注意力,从而为接下来的演讲内容顺利地搭梯架桥。
奇论妙语、石破天惊、听众对平庸普通的论调都不屑一顾,置若罔闻;倘若发人未见,用别人意想不到的见解引出话题,造成“此言一出,举座皆惊”的艺术效果,会立即震撼听众,使他们急不可耐地听下去,这样就能达到吸引听众的目的。
海量资料分享
第三篇:演讲稿开场白与演讲稿开场白要出语惊人
演讲稿开场白
近日了解到很多同学不太清楚演讲稿怎么写,因此为大家整理了一些优秀的演讲稿范文,请同学们参考。
歌唱比赛演讲稿开场白
在缤纷的焰火和欢快的乐曲中,新的一届……唱歌比赛向我们走来。我们百感交集、思绪万千。
在新的一届里,我们有许许多多的事情要做,有许许多多的任务要去完成,我们将面临新的挑战和新的机遇。我和全体教职员工以最诚挚的心意、用最吉祥的语言祝福你们,也祝福每一位同学,祝同学们美梦成真,学习进步,身体健康!同学们,阳光将洒在你们的身上,春风将吹在你们的脸上,请坚信,我们将和你们同行,因为我们对你们的爱是那么深沉和执着!
赞扬式演讲稿开场白
俗话说“宝剑锋从磨砺出,梅花香自苦寒来”“不经历风雨,怎能见彩虹”,这几句话告诉我们:成功来自于勤奋,只有从小树立远大理想,才能成就伟大事业。信念,就是要有志气,有志向,有雄心壮志。信念是成才的动力。“志不立,天下无可成之事”。
爱国演讲稿开场白
大家好,首先请允许我向伟大的祖**亲致敬(鞠躬)!随着历史的发展和时代的进步,无可否认,中国这一东方璀璨的明珠已傲然屹立于世界人的瞩目中;作为炎黄子孙、华夏儿女,我深深的引以为豪!
好的演讲稿开场白能够紧紧地抓住听众的注意力,为演讲的成功打下基础,希望汇总的演讲稿开场白能够对大家有所帮助。
演讲稿开场白并不需要多么华丽的辞藻,贵在新颖、亲切,能够很快将人们带入你的演讲中去。
学生演讲稿开场白
草,对春的态度是拱土而出;花,对夏的态度是翘首怒放;叶,对秋的态度是归根寻母;木,对冬的态度是休养蛰伏。这一个个态度决定了四季的美景。
失明的双目无法阻挡海伦·凯勒用对生活的热爱观察世界;不健全的大脑无法扼止舟舟用对未来的憧憬指挥交响;贫困的家境无法困住志坚者飞出的翅膀;低微的出身无法绑牢心高者跨越的步伐。不同的人用不同的态度面对现实,会有不同的结果。
婚礼演讲稿开场白
大家好!今天我由衷地开心和激动,因为我终于结婚了。一时间纵有千言万语却不知从和说起。但我知道,这万语千言最终只能汇聚成两个字,那就是“感谢”。首先要感谢在座的各位朋友在这个美好的周末,特意前来为我和xxx的爱情做一个重要的见证,没有你们,也就没有这场,让我和我妻子终生难忘的婚礼。
演讲稿开场白要出语惊人
演讲稿开场白,演出或其他开场时引入本题的道白,比喻文章、介绍或讲话等开始的部分。开场白是否成功,在很大程度上影响着演讲的成败。对开场白的基本要求是简洁而富有吸引力。
演讲稿开场白怎么写
要知道演讲稿开场白怎么写,首先要明白,常见的开场白类型有以下6种:通过一个与演讲主题有密切关系的故事或事件作为演讲的开头的故事式开场白;用精炼的语言交代演讲意图或主题,然后在主体部分展开论证和阐述的开宗明义式开场白;以幽默、诙谐的语言或事例开头的幽默式开场白;直接引用别人的话语,为展开自己的演讲主题作必要的铺垫和烘托的引用式开场白;能激发听众的好奇心,能促使听众尽快进入演讲者的主题框架的悬念式开场白;把要论及的内容加以适度夸张或从常人未曾想象过的角度予以渲染,以引起听众的高度重视的强力式开场白。
演讲稿开场白:故事式开场白
演讲稿的开头通过故事跌宕起伏的情节,将听众引入一种忘我的境界,并将自己的思想观点不动声色地溶入到故事中,起到随风潜入夜,润物细无声的作用,真正达到讲故事的目的。用形象性的语言讲述一个故事作为开场白会引起听众的莫大兴趣。选择故事要遵循这样几个原则:要短小,不然成了故事会;要有意味,促人深思;要与演讲内容有关。故事式的开场白要避免复杂的情节和冗长的语言。
演讲稿开场白:开宗明义式开场白
开宗明义式开场白适合运用于较为正规、庄重的应用性演讲场合,它要求演讲者具有较好的概括能力。演讲者不拖泥带水,开场便亮相,从而给听众留下了深刻印象。
演讲稿开场白:幽默式开场白
幽默式是以幽默、诙谐的语言或事例作为演讲的开场白,它能使听众在轻松愉快之中很快进人演讲接受者的角色,使听众倍感亲切,无形中缩短了与听众间的距离。
演讲稿开场白:引用式开场白
第四篇::回复对方要来访的商务信件
范文:回复对方要来访的商务信件
Dear Mr./ Ms,Thank you for your letter informing us of Mr.Green's visit during June 2-7.Unfortunately, Mr.Edwards, our manager, is now in Cairo and will not be back until the second half of June.He would, however, be pleased to see Mr.Green any time after his return.We look forward to hearing from you.Yours faithfully,尊敬的先生/小姐
谢谢来函告知我方六月2-7日格林先生的来访。不巧,我们的总经理艾得华先生现正在巴黎,到六月中旬才能回来。但他回来后愿意在任何时间会见格林先生。
希望收到您的来信。
您诚挚的
第五篇:演讲稿开场白
经典演讲稿开场白
经典演讲稿师德演讲稿--爱与责任
世上有很多东西,给予他人的同时,自己往往是越来越少,而唯有一样东西却是越给越多。您也许会惊奇地问我:“那是什么呢?”我将毫不迟疑的回答您:“那就是爱!”爱,不是索取,不是等价交换,爱是付出,是自我牺牲。只有在爱的基础上,教师才会投入他的全部力量,才会把他的青春、智慧无怨无悔地献给学生,献给教育事业.师爱,是教育力量的源泉,是教育成功的基础,是教师的天职与责任。今年4月,我有幸在人民大会堂聆听了方永刚先进事迹报告会,感受到了这位“平民理论家”对学生的爱,对事业的爱。
2006年11月17日,结肠癌手术6小时后,方永刚从麻醉中醒来,第一句话问的是他的研究生:你的毕业论文准备得怎么样了?
随后几天,方永刚又让妻子把自己的3个研究生叫到病房。没有讲台、没有黑板、没有课桌,方永刚坐在病床上给学生们上课。即使不一会儿就脸色发白,汗珠成串往下掉,他也不肯停下来。
做完第二次化疗,方永刚惦记着自己还有几次课没上完,要回去上课。系领导不同意,方永刚急了:“我肚子有问题,但脑子没问题,嘴没问题!如果离开了讲台,我可能真的会倒下。”说着说着他竟然哭了。在人生磨难面前,他没有掉泪;在伤病痛苦面前,他没有掉泪;在死神威胁面前,他也没有掉泪;但因为上不了心爱的讲台,这个顶天立地的男子汉却留下了两行热泪。他的泪水让我们真正明白了什么是教师的品德。
终于,经过再
一、再
二、再三的请求,2007年1月15日,在第二次和第三次化疗的间隙,方永刚回到离开了两个多月的教室。看到学生们,方永刚眼里闪烁出欣慰和满足,那眼神似乎是说:同学们,我终于又见到你们了!
这堂课,方永刚讲的是《新世纪新阶段我军历史使命》。
整整军装,开场白只有一句话:只要我还能站着,就要为大家讲课,这是我的使命。
同学们强忍泪水,他们知道,此时此刻,他们的老师恐怕连站着都是一种抗争,一种与生命的抗争。
好像这只是一堂普通的政治课,是方永刚无数次授课中最普通的一堂课,依旧是铿锵有力的声音,依旧是幽默风趣的语言,依旧是充满理性的思辩,依旧是入情入理的分析,只是一条白毛巾被他频繁地拿起又放下,手术后的引流管被他掖在了军装里面„„
学生们震惊了,这是一个癌症晚期的患者吗?这是一个即将接受第三次化疗的病人吗?
两个小时的大课结束了。任何华丽的乐章也比不过这样一堂课更能触动心灵,任何精彩的语言也会显得苍白无力,同学们用雷鸣般的掌声和充满敬意的目光向方老师敬礼!
什么是使命?共-产-党员的使命是崇高的,军人的使命是伟大的,教师的使命是神圣的,不用多说什么,不用多做什么,方永刚,一名共-产-党员、军人、教师,在癌症晚期的时候往讲台上一站,就是对使命的最好诠释。
勤勤恳恳、默默无闻”这是老黄牛的精神;“采得百花成蜜后,为谁辛苦为谁甜”这是蜜蜂的精神;“燃烧自己,照亮别人”是蜡烛的精神。可以说每种产物的存在,都有一种精神支撑着它。教师的存在呢?支撑它的就应该是这种高尚的师德吧!
报告会上,我和同事们听得很认真,记得很仔细,不时的被方永刚的事迹感动得热泪盈眶。走上三尺讲台,我们教书育人;走下三尺讲台,我们为人师表。师德,不是简单的说教,而是一种精神体现,一种深厚的知识内涵和文化品味的体现。让我们一起建设爱岗敬业、爱生如子的首医家园,用我们的爱与责任撑起教育的蓝天。像珍惜爱情一样珍惜你的现在说起来很讽刺。当我最终定下来写有关珍惜的讲稿时,想上网搜几个有关珍惜的名言警句,于是我打开百度网页,再搜索栏里输入“珍惜”,空格,“名言警句”,然后摁了回车。一个让我有些尴尬又哭笑不得的事情发生了。我看到,在蹦出来的十个词条里边,有七八个在“珍惜”两个字的后面,紧跟着的是“小学生演讲稿”。看来,我打算要在大学课堂里当作重点来讲的东西是人家小学生早就知道的。
是啊,对于珍惜,或许在我们很小的时候就已经知道了,甚至已经懂得了它的涵义以及如何才能做到珍惜。然而,知道就等于自己都做到了吗?事实并非如此,所以我最终还是选择了这个看起来似乎有些幼稚的话题,因为有时候不是大
家不知道珍惜,而往往是在拥有的时候忘记了要珍惜。我想,或许现在我们都需要被“珍惜”这两个字来提醒。
不知道大家还记不记得这样一则新闻:一架飞外阿拉斯加的飞机因为机械故障,造成机毁人亡,坠入了太平洋。当时看到这则新闻的时候,让我印象最深的是报道说,在那些遇难者中,有一对要去阿拉斯加度蜜月的新婚夫妇。我几乎可以想象得到在飞机失事前,那对新婚夫妇脸上洋溢的喜悦和甜蜜。或许他们还在规划着飞机着陆后,将去哪里就餐,或许直接奔往早已定好的酒店入住,再或许一起欣赏向往已久的极地风光。可是人的生命是那么脆弱,他们甚至来不及好好地享受已经拥有的幸福。
那些无辜的人们一瞬间就丧失了生命,看着死难者家属无助又痛苦的电视画面,我的心情复杂极了。对于那对年轻的夫妇来说,不幸的,是小夫妻俩没能来得及享受蜜月期间的快乐,而所幸的是,他们已经彼此找到了对方,并以对方为伴。最起码他们在生命的最后一段时光中是幸福的,因为他们身边有相爱的人陪伴,他们珍惜了自己的爱情。我甚至可以想象,在他们知道自己就要离开人世之前,浮现在他们脸上的是那早已把恐惧驱散的没了踪影的幸福笑容。
同学们,再想想我们吧,看到这些难道就没有触动?瑞士伟大的民-主主义教育家——裴斯太罗奇说过,今天的事没有做,明天再早也是耽误了。是啊,为什么我们要等到失去或已无法挽回的时候才追悔莫及。这一刻的我们不会知道下一刻会有怎样的变化,甚至不知道现在拥有的一切是否突然就会溜走,所以我们必须像珍惜爱情一样珍惜现在。
以下是英文演讲稿
英文演讲稿开场白
Opening Statement
mr.chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f.hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma.i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956.i am the youngest of 13 children.i had my early education in okmulgee county.my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area.my mother's name is irma hill.she is also a farmer and a housewife.my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents.i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983.it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977.i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980.upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend.judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him.he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights.after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.in my early period there, i had two major projects.the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students.the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive.i had a good deal of responsibility and independence.i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment.after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things--experiences of my life.it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleeplenumber--a great number of sleeplenights tha(t i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship.i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office.i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised.i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.these incidents took place in his office or mine.they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuse-x.on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.his conversations were very vivid.he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes.he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large peni
ons, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about se-x with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects.i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonse-xual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs.my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements.my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations.this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education--or of
fice for civil rights.i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.these incidents took place in his office or mine.they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuse-x.on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.his conversations were very vivid.he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes.he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large peni
ons, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.