第一篇:英文名著读后感——《巴黎圣姆院》
Notre Dame de Paris Victor Hugo(1802.2.26~1885.5.22)was the leader of romantic literature and the representative of humanism in 19 century.As the “Shakespeare of France ”, he wrote a considerable amount of works, such as les Miserable, Cromwell, Notre-Dame de Paris, etc.These immortal masterpieces established his fame as one of the brightest stars in the history of literature.Quasimodo, an ugly but kind bell-ringer, in one accidental situation by vice-Bishop Klode“rat hole”, when the nuns.When she sees the little shoes, she also took out his amulet mounted on the same inside a small embroidered shoe, so mother and daughter meet.Teresa cut the prison bar, lost possession of his daughter for 16 years into the “rat hole”, mother and daughter immersed in the joy of reunion in the flesh.At that moment, vicar shouted to the warden and guards surrounded the “rat hole.” Maternal love that ranked Seoul had the strength and wisdom;she deceived them into believing that girls have fled.But when than to hear the name, could not help out the window, exposed himself.So mother and daughter were taken to the execution ground, his daughter on the gallows, his mother died at the gallows below.In the end Esmeralda was hanged because of the persecution of Claude.Overwhelming with the feeling of despair, Quasimodo push down Claude from the top of Notre-Dame de Paris, then killed himself beside dead Esmeralda.Esmeralda was so beautiful, so kind-hearted.In my mind, she was the perfect combination of beauty and kindness.Both Quasimodo and Claude adored Esmeralda, but one was an “angel”, the other was a “devil”.As the archdeacon of Notre-Dame de Paris, Claude, respected by others, led an ascetic life.It seemed he was a kind, pious Christian.However, he was sanctimonious.The yearning for sex enjoyment exposed his selfishness, insidiousness and evil to us.He had an outward appearance of angel, but deep down he was a devil.On the contrary, Quasimodo was dumb, deaf, hunchbacked, and as broad as he was tall.Obviously he was as ugly as devil.But he had a heart of gold,and his love was selfishness and pure.In the end, he committed suicide for frustrated love.In my heart, Quasimodo was an angel.However,what is beauty? What is ugliness? Through the novel Hugo taught me a profound lesson: inner beauty is the real beauty.We can't judge a person by his appearance.The beauty of appearance is just skin-deep.A person with ugly appearance has a heart of gold, is he deemed to be “ugly”? Absolutely not!It is the inner heart not the appearance where real beauty exists.Moved by the gold heart of Quasimodo, I will spare no effort to pursue the real beauty, to let my heart grow with the moisture of the true, the good and the beautiful in life.I am sure that the real beauty can thrive in my heart sooner or later.
第二篇:英文名著读后感——《巴黎圣姆院》
Notre Dame de Paris
Victor Hugo(1802.2.26~1885.5.22)was the leader of romantic literature and the representative of humanism in 19 century.As the “Shakespeare of France ”, he wrote a considerable amount of works, such as les Miserable, Cromwell, Notre-Dame de Paris, etc.These immortal masterpieces established his fame as one of the brightest stars in the history of literature.Quasimodo, an ugly but kind bell-ringer, in one accidental situation by vice-Bishop Klode“rat hole”, when the nuns.When she sees the little shoes, she also took out his amulet mounted on the same inside a small embroidered shoe, so mother and daughter meet.Teresa cut the prison bar, lost possession of his daughter for 16 years into the “rat hole”, mother and daughter immersed in the joy of reunion in the flesh.At that moment, vicar shouted to the warden and guards surrounded the “rat hole.” Maternal love that ranked Seoul had the strength and wisdom;she deceived them into believing that girls have fled.But when than to hear the name, could not help out the window, exposed himself.So mother and daughter were taken to the execution ground, his daughter on the gallows, his mother died at the gallows below.In the end Esmeralda was hanged because of the persecution of Claude.Overwhelming with the feeling of despair, Quasimodo push down Claude from the top of Notre-Dame de Paris, then killed himself beside dead Esmeralda.Esmeralda was so beautiful, so kind-hearted.In my mind, she was the perfect combination of beauty and kindness.Both Quasimodo and Claude adored Esmeralda, but one was an “angel”, the other was a “devil”.As the archdeacon of Notre-Dame de Paris, Claude, respected by others, led an ascetic life.It seemed he was a kind, pious Christian.However, he was sanctimonious.The yearning for sex enjoyment exposed his selfishness, insidiousness and evil to us.He had an outward appearance of angel, but deep down he was a devil.On the contrary, Quasimodo was dumb, deaf, hunchbacked, and as broad as he was tall.Obviously he was as ugly as devil.But he had a heart of gold,and his love was selfishness and pure.In the end, he committed suicide for frustrated love.In my heart, Quasimodo was an angel.However,what is beauty? What is ugliness? Through the novel Hugo taught me a profound lesson: inner beauty is the real beauty.We can't judge a person by his appearance.The beauty of appearance is just skin-deep.A person with ugly appearance has a heart of gold, is he deemed to be “ugly”? Absolutely not!It is the inner heart not the appearance where real beauty exists.Moved by the gold heart of Quasimodo, I will spare no effort to pursue the real beauty, to let my heart grow with the moisture of the true, the good and the beautiful in life.I am sure that the real beauty can thrive in my heart sooner or later.
第三篇:《巴黎圣母院》名著读后感
《巴黎圣母院》名著读后感
这本书看完好几天了,那感觉就像是有一团说不清是什么的东西一直堵在心里,很想找人和自己探讨,很想让它澄清。书里面的经典情节很多很多,那里面展示的很多,我不能一一的重复,就这样借着几个点,简单的说几句好了,让我印象深刻的场景是作者笔下的当时的那些建筑,那些奢华的象征权力的教堂,人们还不知道可以拥有自己的思想,以及为了自己的愿望可以做什么事情,一切都假借神圣的宗教,一切都假借神圣的教堂来展现,展现建筑家的审美观,也就是个人的才华,或者展示自己的能力,我想那时的人们,把人性深深地埋在一件神圣的宗教的外衣下面,典型的人物就是副主教--克洛德。从那许多的错综复杂的毫无章法的建筑群,我们不难看出,当时人们的内心是怎样的压抑,怎样狂躁,那些像雨后春笋一般从地下冒出来的教堂的尖顶,正是人们扭曲的灵魂在对着苍天做这无声的哀号!
教堂里面是那么的阴森恐怖,这让人联想到在宗教的遮拦下,当时社会是怎样的肮脏和败坏,真善美的宗教和利用宗教制造血腥事件,形成了强烈的感官刺激。通篇都是在这样的对照下进行的,让人的心灵深刻的体会出迷茫,困惑,和不安,如果有一把利剑,你会尽你的全力去刺破那层蒙在社会上空的阴云,那阴云是邪恶的,你对它充满了愤怒和鄙视,就像书里面的那些流浪汉们对待社会的疯狂的报复。可是你不能,因为如果你想刺痛那些邪恶,你就先要将代表着真善美的上帝打倒在地,那是多么残酷的事情啊!还有比人丧失本性更悲哀的么!
印象深刻的是这样的几个人物,代表美丽善良的姑娘--爱斯梅拉达。她不仅有迷人的外貌,更有一颗纯真善良的心灵,从她对待那只山羊,救下那个落魄的诗人,对于伤害过自己的卡齐莫多,送上的水和怜悯,对待爱情的牺牲,等,我们看到她是美丽的,她的身上心灵上没有污垢,她是没有被污染的。可是,这样的天使一样的姑娘,受到的是怎么样的对待呢?流浪,在最肮脏的环境里面生活,被所谓的上流社会排斥和嘲讽,被玩弄,被抛弃,被诬陷,被威胁,最后,作了彻底的牺牲。
书中描写了一个那样的社会,和在那个社会生活中的种种人物的状态,麻木的如那个弗比斯,最底层的如老鼠洞里的那几个隐修女,疯狂的副主教,还有尽全力反抗的最丑陋的卡齐莫多,副主教和卡齐莫多形成了人性上的鲜明对比,同样爱上了美丽的姑娘,同样的遭到了拒绝,他们的爱都是那么的热烈,那么的诚挚,可是,一个是占有,一个是奉献,已占有为目的的,当目的无法达到的时候,他想到的是毁灭,毁灭别人;以奉献为目的的,当无法奉献的时候,想到的也是毁灭,毁灭自己。
我想这也就是世界名著的真正魅力所在,他让人看到的不是一个简单的故事,他深刻的揭示了人类内心深处的一些活动,无论放在什么时候,什么社会,人的共性是始终存在的,对美好的向往,对美好的追求,对美好的赞美,人是一个天使和魔鬼的综合体,人和人的经历没有相同的,也就是说,社会本身就不可能让所有人享受到同等的待遇,这种不一样的待遇,让多少人的内心失去了平衡,失去了对美好的追求阿!林林总总的肮脏的巧取豪夺,充斥着我们的眼睛,振荡着我们心灵,我们该怎么办?
我想每一个人都会有一个属于自己的答案。
查看更多:
读《巴黎圣母院》400字
《巴黎圣母院》800字读后感
巴黎圣母院读后感400字
读《巴黎圣母院》有感600字
《巴黎圣母院》读后感800字
巴黎圣母院读后感300字
巴黎圣母院读后感500字
高中巴黎圣母院读后感:巴黎圣母院
高中巴黎圣母院的读后感:不绝对的美和丑
高中生优秀读后感:《巴黎圣母院》读后感550字
第四篇:名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感
名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感
名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感1
在寒假中,我读了法国作家维克多·雨果浪漫主义小说《巴黎圣母院》,它讲述了一个发生在15世纪中叶的法国的故事:艾丝美拉达是一位纯洁热情的吉普赛少女 ,在巴黎靠卖艺生。不幸的是,巴黎圣母院教堂副主教弗洛罗看上了她,并开始疯狂地爱上了她。道貌岸然的弗洛罗先是指使卡西莫多去劫持女郎,又因为嫉妒刺伤弗比斯嫁祸给艾丝美拉达,最后得不到爱情的他便置艾丝美拉达于死地。可怜的艾丝美拉达就这样死去了。后来,圣母院敲钟人卡西莫多因失去自己的心上人艾丝美拉达而绝望,愤怒地杀死了弗洛罗,追随她而去。
这本书让我了解了15世纪法国上流社会的虚伪和下流社会劳动人民的善良、互助与舍己为人。除了艾丝美拉达,卡西莫多也是一个在书中情感丰富的角色:作为敲钟人的他,虽然面目狰狞,但是却为人和善、富有正义感。他对艾丝美拉达充满了爱慕,这种爱慕并不是普通的爱,而是由感激、尊重和同情组成的,一种高洁到值得人赞颂的爱。卡西莫多也是雨果在书中“善良”的象征,在人们的意志中,善良注定要压倒任何邪恶,卡西莫多便这样诞生,为人们送去雨果“面容不美丽也可以善良”的思想。
雨果塑造了卡西莫多和艾丝美拉达这两位“善”与“美”的代表,他们揭露了那个时代法国下层人民的美丽高洁品质,批判了上流人民的腐败与做作。让我们一起翻开书,去体验历史的沧桑风雨吧。
名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感2
在1482年的巴黎圣母院,上演着一部围绕美丽淳朴的吉普赛女郎艾丝美兰达和由主角代理克洛德养大的奇丑无比的敲钟人卡西莫多,二人共同演绎的震撼人心的爱情故事。
《巴黎圣母院》在雨果的浓墨重彩下表现出强烈尖锐的美丑对比,大大夸张和强化使得国色天香淳朴善良的吉卜赛女郎艾丝美兰达和奇丑无比以恶报恶的敲钟人卡西莫多形成了两个极端。
艾丝美兰达的善良驱使她从“奇迹王宫”绞刑架上救下了贪生怕死的穷酸诗人格兰古瓦并与其结成了名义上的夫妻,她的善良让她不计前嫌,化为耻辱柱下的受刑犯卡西莫多面前的一潭清水,这样一个仿佛集世间万千美好于一身的天使怎能叫人不爱!
然而,深受众人喜爱的少女美貌使得她遭来了“巫女”、“杀人犯”的称谓,并被装模作样的迂腐法官判以死刑。情形只转而下,这身心完美统一的少女不能再沐浴阳光,在波斯旧地毯上迈动着灵动的舞步,博得众人欢笑了,失散的母女阴差阳错之下得以相见,她们忘记了之前的仇恨,全心全意的沉浸在亲情的喜悦中。
然而无情冷酷的执法兵队残忍的把绳索套在了少女颤抖的纤细脖颈……这一幕幕绚丽而奇异的画面,引起了人们对她的无限同情,从而产生对封建教会及王权的强烈愤恨。
名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感3
《巴黎圣母院》是雨果写的第一部大型浪漫主义小说,这部小说是以中世纪的巴黎为背景,揭示了禁欲主义压抑下的人性的扭曲。
故事发生在十五世纪的法国巴黎,爱斯美拉达是一个十分美丽的女子,她白天靠卖唱为生,晚上就和乞丐王国的穷苦人住在一起,爱斯美拉达倾国倾城的容貌,却给她带来了杀身之祸。当奇丑无比的卡西莫多因劫持爱斯美拉达被绑在广场上的转盘上示众,惨遭鞭打,口渴难忍时,爱斯美拉达却不计前嫌的给他喂水,卡西莫多爱上了这个善良的姑娘。爱斯美拉达爱上了曾经救过她的弗比斯,在和他幽会时,邪恶无比的教主克洛德刺伤了弗比斯,但法庭确认为,爱斯美拉达是凶手,在她被送往绞刑的路上,卡西莫多救下了她,并把她藏于圣母院。国王的卫队开始进攻圣母院抓回爱斯美拉达,最终,爱斯美拉达被绞死了,而卡西莫多把真正的凶手——克洛德从圣母院顶层扔了下去,自己却在爱斯美拉达的遗体旁自尽。
这部小说使用对比的手法,爱斯美拉达和卡西莫多,是在于美与丑的对比;卡西莫多和克罗德,是善良和邪恶的对照;弗比斯和卡西莫多,是虚情假意和坚贞不渝的对照。卡西莫多虽然丑,但却心地善良。克罗德虽然受人爱戴,但他却有一颗虚伪、邪恶的心。
读了这篇文章,使我知道了:如果华丽的外表下隐藏着一颗虚伪的心,那怎么装扮都是丑陋的。我们一定要做一个心地善良的人。
名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感4
美丽而又善良的女神艾丝美拉达,和相貌丑陋却品德高尚的敲钟人--卡西莫多,他们演绎着一段传奇,令人久久不能忘怀,这就是雨果创作的《巴黎圣母院》。
1482年,艾丝美拉达在广场上欢快的舞着,唱着动听的歌,使得所有人都被她吸引。与此同时,卡西莫多成为了丑人王被大家簇拥着。卡西莫多被副教主支使去做坏事,伤害艾丝美拉达。但在卡西莫多遭受鞭刑时,艾丝美拉达不计前嫌,用她那颗善良美好的心灵包容了他,让卡西莫多心中深深的刻下了她的美丽。在这不公平的.时代中谁都得不到丝毫的同情。人们讨厌吉普赛人,艾丝美拉达也难逃被诬陷而处决绞刑的命运。她心中那位能保护她的白马王子,却眼睁睁的看着她被判死刑。卡西莫多为了救她不顾一切,但是最后悲剧并不能被阻止。
在看完《巴黎圣母院》后,令我感触最深的就是卡西莫多,他的正直深深地打动着我。他自小因为畸形而被抛弃,由副教主收养,长大后也不曾离开教堂。他从没有得到过别人的一点关爱,但是他的心灵却和他的外表大相径庭。他向往着美和爱情,然而,艾丝美拉达太优秀了,对他来说,艾丝美拉达是一位女神,是高高在上的。他不顾自身的安危都会去保护心目中的女神,他们的这种爱超越了生与死,最终上帝给了他们一个“爱的世界”。
名著《巴黎圣母院》读后感5
《巴黎圣母院》用朴素的语言讲述了法国受宗教黑暗统治时发生的一起起悲剧,引发的一起起惨祸,衬托出那时社会的阴暗面,人们生活的艰辛和危险,稍不小心,还会被认为是巫婆,将会处以死刑。
书中的人物很多,有帅气的羽林军弓箭队长浮比斯,美丽的吉卜赛舞女--爱斯美拉达,失去爱女而隐修的香歌乐女等等。但其中我最喜欢的一名角色还是丑陋但心地善良的敲钟人--卡西莫多,他为敲钟,竟然把耳朵给震聋,忠厚、诚实已成了他的代表,他甚至还愿意付出自己的生命,去给爱斯美拉达陪葬。
书中的故事许多,但令我感慨最深的还是卡西莫多冒着生命危险,从刑场上救走了爱斯美拉达,这一行为充满了危险,如果被旁边的卫士逮个正着,那么这个“救美”的代价也太不值得了!这么危险的计划,卡西莫多却毫无惧怕,在他劫刑场的前一刻,他早已做好了牺牲的准备,他就是牺牲自己也要救出爱斯美拉达,虽然他的外表是那么丑陋,但他有一颗无比善良的心。
中世纪的黑暗生活与我们现在的生活相比,简直是一个天一个地,生于这个和平年代的我们,要更加珍惜现在这来之不易的生活。
第五篇:巴黎圣母院英文读后感
About the Notre Dame cathedral 《 Notre Dame cathedral》 is one known far and wide romantic faction strength which Victor Hugo writes.I read this great book these days.In this story, I saw not only friendly relationships and beautiful character, but also the flow selfish desire.Regardless of is good beautiful Asmelada, or has the ugly semblance, Cacimodo with one pure mind, they represent the great amount the lower level populace which suppresses.Perhaps is sinister Coloud, he is appears by the theocracy face, all load bearing one kind of author’s ponder.In this story,I like Cacimodo best.Whatever the book described him ugly,it can’t stop my love of this role.It seems that if someone is a little good to him, he will return you more and more and take you as his god.However, people is so mean to such a little bit.So we are also very easy to understand why Asmelada just gave him some water, he can move to tears.I think he told me the meaning of true.He can bury his own deep love of Asmelada, he knew that he was not good with her, he just hoped he could have quietly by her side to protect her.He could do everything for her.In order to not let Asmelada sad , he didn’t told her that Phoebus has already married though she maybe blame him.In order to her, he try his best to stop beggars broke into Notre Dame.He is a real man!
The book touched me the most is that the nun protect Asmelada in the room.She is a wonderful mother because she protected her daughter in the last minute.In that time, she forgot other identities, only remember that she is just a mother.By reading this book, I thought my life carefully.A person's appearance does not mean anything, the key is what he has and wheather he has a good soul.