蒙娜丽莎的微笑影评

第一篇：蒙娜丽莎的微笑影评

She is smile, is she happy?

She is smile, is she happy? 贝蒂问他的妈妈，看到这里，我们可以发现这个女孩内心的转变。达芬奇的《蒙娜丽莎的微笑》中的主人公，把永恒的神秘的微笑定格在画面上，几个世纪，我们沈溺于它“83%的高兴，9%的厌恶，6%的恐惧，2%的愤怒”中，可是，他真的快乐么，在表象的背后，在她的内心里真的开心么。

看完电影，我们不得不说，我们不知道蒙娜丽莎是否真的开心，但是，影片中的那些女孩子，真的拥有了自己的快乐。不是来源于家庭的恩赐，丈夫的赏识，社会的赞誉，而是源于自己内心的肯定与认知，一个自信、自尊、自爱的女孩子，不管他是不是蒙娜丽莎，他笑起来都很美。讲到这里，我们将它回拉到教育的话题上，影片中，凯瑟琳华森老师将女性进步的观点带入到了课堂，带着孩子们，以艺术为起点，重新审视自己审视作为一个女性的人生观。这颇有些文艺复兴的味道，只不过，她的影响范围是小的，在一个封闭的以婚姻为主的校园里，他只将种子洒向几个角落，幸运的是，种子发芽了，在靠自己的力量去生长，身为一个施教者，它无疑是成功的。这便是教育的意义。一个老师，就像一个播种者，在把自己的思想传播给下一代，而一个具有进步思想的老师，就像是在一片田野上播种粮食，这里有肥沃的土壤，但是他们世代只生长着杂草，不仅需要除掉杂草，种上新的种子，还需要在它们生长的过程中精心照料，防止风霜的摧残。

影片的结局虽然含蓄地表现了凯瑟琳没能改变校长和家长的思想，也没能改变教育机制，但她确实做出了改变，在她的努力下，那些鸡蛋里的小雏开始挣破蛋壳，对待艺术、男人、家庭和人生也有了不同的看法.这边是教育带来的进步。

文章的最后，我希望每个自信的女孩子都能发自内心的smile.”I am smiling,I am really happy”

She Is Smile,Is She Happy?

“Sheis smile ,is she happy ? ”Betty asked her mother, From there ,we can realized the girl’s changes from her inside.The Protagonist of Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa Smile let her eternal and mysterious smile frames on the image.So for centuries, we dwell on its “83%of happiness,9%of disgust,6%of fear and 2%of anger”smile..but behind the surface, is she really happy?

After watching the movie, I have to say, I don’t know whether Mona Lisa is

really happy or not.But the girls in movie finally achieve their happiness.These happiness not from their families’ gift, not from their husbands’recognition, not from the society’s praise.But from their inner affirmation.Everyone who has confident, self-esteem, self-love will own beautiful smile whether of she is Mona Lisa.Now, let us come back to the topic of education.In the movie, Miss Watson brings new opinions of women to these young girls.She leads them to open a new gate, out of the gate, they realized their new values except as a wife or a mother.Her action looks like Renaissance though its influence is small.Fortunately, the seeds she spilled was germinating, they try their hard to grow up.To be a educator, she is successful, and these achievements are educational outcomes.At the end of the film, With Miss Watson’s efforts , she failed to change the thinking of the principals，the parents and the education mechanism, but she let the girls began to rupture the eggshells.By the end of the article, I hope every confident girl will achieve heartfelt smile and said to the world “I am smiling, I am really happy.”

第二篇：蒙娜丽莎的微笑 影评

蒙娜丽莎的微笑

在这所女子学院，学生们大多有着良好的家庭背景，受过优秀的教育，第一堂课就给凯瑟琳来了个下马威。但是学院灌输给学生们关于成功的定义却是嫁一个好丈夫，她们所学的一切东西都是为了这个目的，找一个好丈夫，为丈夫服务。于是，凯瑟琳就在这个保守的环境里，试着引导学生们去寻找真实的自我，并且大胆去实践她们的想法。

但我并不是说当好一个家庭主妇就比当个女强人或女名人差，这就象那蒙娜丽莎的微笑，各人有各人的判断。我只是希望无论她们作出何种选择，都是发自内心的，是自己喜欢的，而不是别的什么强迫她们这样做。这就是我所理解的妇女解放运动的实质吧上一评论。是影射那些生活在传统社会中的女性在家里虽然表面上是在微笑，但那并不是他们所追求的，是社会传统和社会价值观赋予他们的，她们微笑的背后并不是真正的快乐，所以这微笑有些暖昧和诡意。当然，我觉得蒙的微笑是永远也无法说清的主题，There are a thousand Hamlets in a thousand people's eyes.(一千个观众眼中有一千个哈姆雷特）

蒙娜丽莎究竟在笑什么？直到现在没人知道。影片最后的许多照片里，许多女性有的在作男人的工作，有的展示女性独特的娇媚体态，有的相夫教子回归传统女性工作。只有一点影片说对了：对女人来说，选择什么样的道路是她们自己决定的事，并且不要后悔！

情节比较松散，缺少那种振奋人心的张力。相比，《死亡诗社》给人的冲击力更让人震撼。

一个都不能少

这个故事内容很简单，但着实让我感动。魏敏芝只是听到高老师一句口头嘱咐，就把看住孩子当成自己必须完成的任务。诚信，执著，责任心强，答应别人的事情就一定要办到，哪怕看起来没有任何希望，也决不放弃。这种精神在魏敏芝身上体现得淋漓尽致。而这种精神，是当今我们生活中逐渐在缺失的东西。

影片让我感动的同时，也让我对这个现实社会感到悲观失望。魏敏芝找张慧科时，多少辆车驶过，没有一辆停下来，倒是拖拉机会停；多少少年为一天两块钱在城里劳动；找人办事时，哪怕是举手之劳，总要塞点钱别人才愿意帮忙；电视台接待室的阿姨的冷漠无情和官僚主义；扫大街大娘的冷漠；从电视台里步行或推车进出的人，就是没有台长；电视台只图收视率；最终解决问题，靠得还是暂时的好心人微薄的同情，而不是长期的社会制度的优化。

看完影片后，首先引起我思考的主要是在剧作层面，这就是它的人物动机问题。《一个都不能少》全片并无尖锐的矛盾，人物的行动也相互离散，并末构成饺激烈的冲突。影片的前三分之一，即张惠科进城之前，给我的印象挺好。这一部分主要的剧作功能是树立起几个很鲜明的人物性格，环境的设置也有较强的视觉陌生感。这种环境设置有着丰富的社会内涵，令人深思许多东西。在张惠科离校进城以后，本片主人公的动作线在于寻找。我感到疑惑的是魏敏芝寻找的动机和编导对这一主导动作的行为动机的处理。我感到这里存在着巨大的阐释的偏差，这种阐释的过分离散、漂移是由于叙事上的巨大空洞造成的。魏敏芝进城寻找张惠科的动机到底是什么?是为了50元钱还是为了10元钱?魏敏芝踏踏实实地当—‘L—这乡村教师是在对50块钱的承诺之后。魏敏芝两次拼命追赶在现代工业的产品后面，一次是追拖拉机，一次是追汽车。第一次追上拖拉机之后。她得到了对代课费的承诺。这是一段极重要的台词，影片的片名就出自这段三人对话。村长笛应会给她50入代课费，高老师则说大意如此的话：“这50块钱，他不给伯；，我给你。但是学生可得看好了。——个都不能少。要是——个都不少，我还给你加10块钱。”到了后来张惠科离开学校进城以后，村长不同意魏敏芝进城去找。这就是说魏敏芝不去找也不会影响她得到村长答应的那50块钱。那魏敏芝是不是为了得到“一个都不能少”的差价，即高老师答应外加的那10块钱呢?抑或她是觉得只有高老师才会给她60块饯?影片刻意地避开了这一动机的解释。而这一动机支配

着人物在影片后面约三分之二部分的行动。

叨能足锐敏乏目己忘记了。她在做事的过程中把自己原先来代课时的目的忘了，在做好事的过程中自己的行为异化了，自己的追求升华了，自己的人格高尚了。在影片的后半部分魏敏芝自己也不清楚自己这样做是要得到什么。这是本片可能有的最好的一个艺术方向，即人物在合理利己的出发点上又超越了自己的现实功利考虑，这也是许多艺术作品发展人物的方向。但本片好像并没有这样写。影片的后半段，编导让人物在自己坚实的立足点上滑走了。魏敏芝变得似乎坚定行动而不知所为，勇往直前而不知为何。从故事编排看，张艺谋并没有写魏敏芝行为的无意识转变。因为我认为如果那样写好像缺几笔，缺的是魏敏芝与张惠科的更紧密的关系建立。如果魏敏芝后来进城寻找不是为了钱，可以写成魏敏芝与张惠科之间有了一种较上劲的关系。这样写于魏敏芝的那种一根筋式的性格也是有依据的。或者，编导可以写成魏敏芝在教学生的过程中对张惠科产生了同情和关心，她的行为目的由敷衍了事、看住学生、挣得60元钱变成了高尚的目的：救助张惠科、启蒙张惠科。可是现在我看到的影片在动机设计1：似乎几种考虑都有，但有几种考虑都没有写通、写透。所以，许多评论者和观众的疑惑不解是很自然的。

第三篇：②《蒙娜丽莎的微笑》之影评

②蒙娜丽莎的微笑之影评

——2010120631数计院 软件班 林淑娟 是谁叩响了知识殿堂的大门

我,一位普通的女性

你在追求什么

通过苦学活得灵魂……将我的一生献给知识

那么欢迎你

所有和你怀有同样的抱负的女性都将受到欢迎

这是电影的开头，卫斯理大学开学典礼的一个仪式，由优秀的学生——贝蒂敲开礼堂大门并与校长的对话。仪式对于我们来说可谓新颖形象生动，也觉得学校便是“将我的一生献给知识”、传递知识的地方，可是接下来的故事让人感到啼笑皆非，转移思考又觉得可以理解。

故事发生在20世纪50年代的美国，此时女性地位虽然已有所提高，但是传统的上层封建思想依然非常严重。保守的卫斯理女子学院俨然是其中的典范。学生们拥有显赫的家世，优秀的艺术素养，聪明高智慧的头脑。她们的礼仪完美无缺，可以随心所欲的演奏世界名曲，轻易记得课本中的内容，可是这些优秀的女孩在这高等学府的目的只为将来不久的婚姻生活相夫教子。学校俨然成了“婚前妻子培训班”！然而主人公——“激进前卫”的凯瑟琳的到来激起了传统的涟漪。主人公带着她那美丽的笑容，“培养国家领袖者”的美好教育理想走进了这个学院。这些她还没来得及认识的孩子们让她震惊，震惊的不只是她们的才华，震惊的更是她们的思想。她作为一名艺术历史老师，不仅在专业知识领域里让她们“大开眼界，发散思维”。更用她的勇气和智慧让她们敞开心扉，回归心灵的选择。并让这群学生重新审视自己的世界观和价值观。她坚定地告诉她们“不，这不是你们想要的，你们可以做得更好，找回自己”，她的勇气激励了她们，更让我们敬佩。可是，凯瑟琳老师也尝到了现实的力量，她感受到学生的挑战和学校的各种压力，但是她并没有放弃，不仅仅是不放弃自己的教育，更不会放弃对学生的关注，于是，她没有像其他老师那样沿袭学校一贯的教学做法和风格，而是根据自己的判断和教学的方法，使得这些“心意”的教法让学生们“睁大了眼睛”。并且，她还鼓励学生们挖掘自己的兴趣，实践她们的才能。于是她和她的学生一起在传统和理想中挣扎，解脱。最后，当学生们骑着单车，追着跑着来跟她道别时，我们知道，她胜利了，她得到了这群学生的理解和爱戴。特别喜欢的一个角色——优秀的贝蒂，一直被母亲严格教育遵守妻子教条，在结婚后却面临婚姻的种种问题，深深的压抑后便是爆发，最后勇敢地提出离婚，过自己想过的生活。这个过程中她慢慢受到老师凯瑟琳的影响，由原来的抵制老师到后来的提倡追求老师的思想，追求自由。这不可谓不是凯瑟琳的成功之处。

这是一部很干净利落的电影，没有多余的画面，惊飞的鸽，极致的静谧，沸腾的喧嚣，幻灯的切换，暗藏玄机的眼神，压抑的神情，每一个人物都在用最少的表演，传递最深的情感。电影中有几处让我落泪了，其中一个是凯瑟琳的一堂课。在那堂课中，她很愤怒，禁止学生发表，然后说出她心中的感慨。我感受到了凯瑟琳的无奈，传统的一些东西想要改变真的很难很难，不过好在凯瑟琳并没有放弃。还有一个地方是结局处，她的学生骑车追着凯瑟琳，虽然凯瑟琳最终离开了卫斯理，但她成功了，她确实改变了孩子们学习只是为了相夫教子的想法。

看完电影，我依然不明白这部电影为什么叫《蒙娜丽莎的微笑》，也许讲的是主人公或无奈或欣慰或勇敢的微笑，但我学到了在自己的人生里，要学会独立、思考，要知道自己真正要的是什么。

第四篇：蒙娜丽莎的微笑英文影评

Film Review

--Be ourselves

The story took pace in 1953, when the second women's liberation gradually arisen.However, some educational institution in American, expecially Wellesley College, the most conservative college in the nation, still tenaciously performed the mission that male society endowed: to cultivate women with both moral integrity and professional competence.When Katherine Watson, a first –year teacher from Oakland State, who always sought truth beyond tradition, got a position in the Art History department in Wellesley College, contradiction between her feminist thought and students under the influence of male chauvinism was stirring.Most of students in Wellesley College were well educated with fine family background.They gave Katherine a caution in the first class.In their mind, the definition of success was to marry a good man and the role they born to fill was to be a good wife.In this conservative situation, Katherine tried to open her students’ mind to do whatever they want.She encouraged her students to be themselves, to become professionals in field they loved, to improve their economic futures.It seemed that she used her art teaching as a vehicle to put across her opinion to the young women that women were not born to become housewives and mothers.Katherine wanted to make a difference and do more things in life rather than solely adopt the roles of wives and mothers.I can never forget she showed her students carcass by Soutine 1925, and said, “There’s also no textbook telling you what to think”.In those girls opinion, the carcass can not be called art;“there is something aggressive about it and erotic”.I asked myself, what is art? Can a conservative artist become a successful artist? I can never forget, in one scene of the movie, she showed her students four newspaper ads, and asked what future scholars would think of the idea that women were born to be housewives and mothers.From her tearful eyes, I can see indignation, perplexity, and helplessness.I can never forget she introduced Van Gogh, who refused to conform his ideals to popular taste, who refused to compromise his integrity, to her backward-looking students.When Van Gogh alived, no one thought Sunflower was a art, but after his idioctonia, the Sunflower became world-famous.Katherine was just like another Sunflower, who was resisted by standpatter.If she was not tenacious enough, she would be strangled.There was no doubt that Katherine’s ways of teaching were contrary to school’s directors, who believed firmly that Katherine should just teach art instead of using class to spread her point of view.The conservative headmistress warned Katherine she would lose her job if she not change herselve to fit in Wellesley.There were numerous unreasonable pacts in Katherine new contract, including “you can teach only the syllabus as outlined by the department;all lesson plans must be submitted at the beginning of every term for approve and revision;you shall not provide counsel beyond her own subject for any student at any time;you will agreee to maintain a stricty professional relationship with all members of the faculty”.Katherine choosed to leave finially, but her independent, creativeness, adamancy, and loving heart indeed made a difference.It was Katherine that helped students in Wellesley College shake off the yoke of traditional Feudalism.I am happy to see that Betty marched toward her own life bravely, and no longer was in the charge of her mother.Katherine lelt Wellesley College with smile, which was so warm that affected many people, including me.Eight years ago, I have a good friend named Lucy, whose family ties always made her somber.Her father had sweetheart ectad and hadly went home.When he return home, there must be a drastic war.Her poor mother always grined and beared it.I had ever asked Lucy’s mother why she didn’t get a divorce.In fact, she could live a happy life independently.She had a good job with high income and had no need relying on her husband.She said she could bear any grievance as long as Lucy had a integrated famiy.When I was young, I regarded her as a great mother for her spirt of sacrifice.However, when I grew up little by little, I realized that her sacrifice was meaningless.It is no good to have a home which exists in name only.It brought to children only agony rather than happiness.Lucy was driven to terrible depressive illness and hardly communicate with any one, expecially her mother.It was Lucy’s mother’s sacrifice and forbearance that ruin Lucy and herself happiness.Last winter vacation, I visit Lucy and her mother.Lucy had discontinued her studies due to her depressive illness, although had ever been a top student.Her mother, who was ever a beautiful women with professional competence, had lost job and became more decrepit than women in her group of age.How can a mother, who always inhibit her desire to seek happy life, bring up a mentally health child? How can a child cultivited a healthy mind educated by a unbalanced and painful mother? How can a person who not loves herself loves others? How can a women who dares not be herself becomes succeful? In fact, the tragedy is inevitable owing to Lucy’s Mother’s traditional thought.Women are never inferior compared with men.They are not appendage of men, although the story that Adam’s rib created Eve are still widely circulated.We have right to do what we want, to seek freedom, happiness, success.What we need is independent personality rather than blind forbearance.I don’t mean being a housewife was bad than being a able women or famous women.I only hope that whatever choice we had made, we are always loyal to our mind, rather than other thing forces us to make decision.Like Joan, although she finally gave up enterprise and chosen family, can we say she was incorrect or unsuccessful? Everyone has right to chossen their own road.Live our lives by our own definition, and this is life.

第五篇：蒙娜丽莎的微笑英文影评

Film Review

--Be ourselves

The story took pace in 1953, when the second women's liberation gradually arisen.However, some educational institution in American, expecially Wellesley College, the most conservative college in the nation, still tenaciously performed the mission that male society endowed: to cultivate women with both moral integrity and professional competence.When Katherine Watson, a first –year teacher from Oakland State, who always sought truth beyond tradition, got a position in the Art History department in Wellesley College, contradiction between her feminist thought and students under the influence of male chauvinism was stirring.Most of students in Wellesley College were well educated with fine family background.They gave Katherine a caution in the first class.In their mind, the definition of success was to marry a good man and the role they born to fill was to be a good wife.In this conservative situation, Katherine tried to open her students’ mind to do whatever they want.She encouraged her students to be themselves, to become professionals in field they loved, to improve their economic futures.It seemed that she used her art teaching as a vehicle to put across her opinion to the young women that women were not born to become housewives and mothers.Katherine wanted to make a difference and do more things in life rather than solely adopt the roles of wives and mothers.I can never forget she showed her students carcass by Soutine 1925, and said, “There’s also no textbook telling you what to think”.In those girls opinion, the carcass can not be called art;“there is something aggressive about it and erotic”.I asked myself, what is art? Can a conservative artist become a successful artist?

I can never forget, in one scene of the movie, she showed her students four newspaper ads, and asked what future scholars would think of the idea that women were born to be housewives and mothers.From her tearful eyes, I can see indignation, perplexity, and helplessness.I can never forget she introduced Van Gogh, who refused to conform his ideals to popular taste, who refused to compromise his integrity, to her backward-looking students.When Van Gogh alived, no one thought Sunflower was a art, but after his idioctonia, the Sunflower became world-famous.Katherine was just like another Sunflower, who was resisted by standpatter.If she was not tenacious enough, she would be strangled.There was no doubt that Katherine’s ways of teaching were contrary to school’s directors, who believed firmly that Katherine should just teach art instead of using class to spread her point of view.The conservative headmistress warned Katherine she would lose her job if she not change herselve to fit in Wellesley.There were numerous unreasonable pacts in Katherine new contract, including “you can teach only the syllabus as outlined by the department;all lesson plans must be submitted at the beginning of every term for approve and revision;you shall not provide counsel beyond her own subject for any student at any time;you will agreee to maintain a stricty professional relationship with all members of the faculty”.Katherine choosed to leave finially, but her independent, creativeness, adamancy, and loving heart indeed made a difference.It was Katherine that helped students in

Wellesley College shake off the yoke of traditional Feudalism.I am happy to see that Betty marched toward her own life bravely, and no longer was in the charge of her mother.Katherine lelt Wellesley College with smile, which was so warm that affected many people, including me.Eight years ago, I have a good friend named Lucy, whose family ties always made her somber.Her father had sweetheart ectad and hadly went home.When he return home, there must be a drastic war.Her poor mother always grined and beared it.I had ever asked Lucy’s mother why she didn’t get a divorce.In fact, she could live a happy life independently.She had a good job with high income and had no need relying on her husband.She said she could bear any grievance as long as Lucy had a integrated famiy.When I was young, I regarded her as a great mother for her spirt of sacrifice.However, when I grew up little by little, I realized that her sacrifice was meaningless.It is no good to have a home which exists in name only.It brought to children only agony rather than happiness.Lucy was driven to terrible depressive illness and hardly communicate with any one, expecially her mother.It was Lucy’s mother’s sacrifice and forbearance that ruin Lucy and herself happiness.Last winter vacation, I visit Lucy and her mother.Lucy had discontinued her studies due to her depressive illness, although had ever been a top student.Her mother, who was ever a beautiful women with professional competence, had lost job and became more decrepit than women in her group of age.How can a mother, who always inhibit her desire to seek happy life, bring up amentally health child? How can a child cultivited a healthy mind educated by a

unbalanced and painful mother? How can a person who not loves herself loves others? How can a women who dares not be herself becomes succeful?

In fact, the tragedy is inevitable owing to Lucy’s Mother’s traditional thought.Women are never inferior compared with men.They are not appendage of men, although the story that Adam’s rib created Eve are still widely circulated.We have right to do what we want, to seek freedom, happiness, success.What we need is independent personality rather than blind forbearance.I don’t mean being a housewife was bad than being a able women or famous women.I only hope that whatever choice we had made, we are always loyal to our mind, rather than other thing forces us to make decision.Like Joan, although she finally gave up enterprise and chosen family, can we say she was incorrect or unsuccessful? Everyone has right to chossen their own road.Live our lives by our own definition, and this is life.