罪与罚英文个人评论

第一篇：罪与罚英文个人评论

A: 看了部小说《罪与罚》

B:Year,I read it before.It should be a social novel.A: 恩，是的。我还记得小说场景：草市场上眼睛被打得发青的妓女，污浊的河水中挣扎着的投河自尽的女工，被马车撞倒在街头的穷困潦倒的小公务员，带着孩子沿街乞讨的发疯女人。高利贷老太婆凶狠的眼睛，满身铜臭的市侩，荒淫无度的贵族地主。

C: 确实是一部典型的social novel。那些震撼人心的悲惨画面深深印在人们心中。连绵的悬念，跌宕的情节和急促的文字，使小说始终具有紧张感、压抑感，具有震撼人心的艺术力量。B：en, description of reality of this novel is really good.But I have something opposite to the author.A:我也有这种感觉。比如那个索尼娅。作者把她写得如此高尚，把她看作人类苦难的象征，甚至让她最终将主人公唤回上帝的怀抱。我觉得不恰当。统治者一边压迫人民，一边用宗教告诉他们要忍。那个索尼娅就是愚民工具的产物。

C: 这点我赞成。小说通过索尼娅式的屈从,宣扬逆来顺受鼓吹以宗教信仰来代替反抗,这无疑是反动的。应该反抗才是。

B:I have aquestion.It’s right for the hero to kill the Hostess of Pawnshop ? I feel it very contradictory.C: 这个嘛。当然，我很厌恶她，我觉得当铺老板娘该死，但这不是杀人的理由。法律上，她是无罪的。何况主人公杀她只是为了私欲，为了证明自己是个“不平凡的人”。B:You mean it’s about Morality and law.Maybe you are right.uhn when it's to“extraordinary person”,in this novel, the hero trying to prove that he is not a ordinary people.This “ not ordinary ” should be the oppressors mentioned by the author.As Tuo Dostoevsky wrote in his notes : “ slave or the rulers.” This sentence may be a creation of his apothegms.A: 我觉得这里是作者思想的又一局限

B: The same idea with me.He believes that in such a societythere was only two possibilities: oppression and the oppressed;only two kinds of people: the oppressors and the oppressed;not, nor can there be a third possibility, and the third force.I think there is a third way: revolution.C: 这个也不能怪作者，毕竟那个时代人们思想较保守。何况西方基督教义实在是“深入人心”。人在无路可走时，也只有这一条出路。这何尝不是一种悲哀呢。

A: 嘿，你这个看法很具有历史性。总的来说，这是一部不错的小说，值得一看。喔，对了，我还得去取邮件，你们慢慢聊，再见了。

B: hei, bring me a bottle of water.See you in the Canteen.

第二篇：《罪与罚》英文读后感

The main character of the novel Crime and Punishment by Feodor Dostoevsky, Raskolnikov, is in reality two totally contradicting personalities.One part of him is the the intellectual.He is cold, unfeeling and inhumane.He exibits tremendous self-will.It is this side that enables him to commit the most terrible crime imaginablewhat is it to me? At one time Raskolnikov is both caring and concerned and yet he is able to push aside the whole affair by being totally indifferent.The goal of the novel is to make Raskolnikov into one character.Sonya helps bring Raskolnikov back into his emotional, humane side.Through her suffering, she shows him that it is important to have a love for all humanity and that no person should ever be able to exist like a parasite off of another person.Porifery, the official investigating the crime, acts as the intellectual who shows Roskolnikov that all intellect must be used for the good of mankind.

第三篇：乔布斯英文评论

经济学人》上乔布斯生平这篇文章会不会出考研英语阅读题?转载了这篇文章的中英文对照版，希望对你有所帮助。

《经济学人》网络版发表评论文章，对乔布斯的逝世做出了默哀，并对乔布斯的生平进行了总结。指出乔布斯非凡的成就源于其丰富的经历，而乔布斯将科学技术与人文科学和人性相结合是其产品成功的根本所在。

NOBODY else in the computer industry, or any other industry for that matter, could put on a show like Steve Jobs.His product launches, at which he would stand alone on a black stage and conjure up a “magical” or “incredible” new electronic gadget in front of an awed crowd, were the performances of a master showman.All computers do is fetch and shuffle numbers, he once explained, but do it fast enough and “the results appear to be magic”.He spent his life packaging that magic into elegantly designed, easy to use products.He had been among the first, back in the 1970s, to see the potential that lay in the idea of selling computers to ordinary people.In those days of green-on-black displays, when floppy discs were still floppy, the notion that computers might soon become ubiquitous seemed fanciful.But Mr Jobs was one of a handful of pioneers who saw what was coming.Crucially, he also had an unusual knack for looking at computers from the outside, as a user, not just from the inside, as an engineer—something he attributed to the experiences of his wayward youth.Mr Jobs caught the computing bug while growing up in Silicon Valley.As a teenager in the late 1960s he cold-called his idol, Bill Hewlett, and talked his way into a summer job at Hewlett-Packard.But it was only after dropping out of college, travelling to India, becoming a Buddhist and experimenting with psychedelic drugs that Mr Jobs returned to California to co-found Apple, in his parents’ garage, on April Fools’ Day 1976.“A lot of people in our industry haven’t had very diverse experiences,” he once said.“So they don’t have enough dots to connect, and they end up with very linear solutions.” Bill Gates, he suggested, would be “a broader guy if he had dropped acid once or gone off to an ashram when he was younger”.Dropping out of his college course and attending calligraphy classes instead had, for example, given Mr Jobs an apparently useless love of typography.But support for a variety of fonts was to prove a key feature of the Macintosh, the pioneering mouse-driven, graphical computer that Apple launched in 1984.With its windows, icons and menus, it was sold as “the computer for the rest of us”.Having made a fortune from Apple’s initial success, Mr Jobs expected to sell “zillions” of his new machines.But the Mac was not the mass-market success Mr Jobs had hoped for, and he was ousted from Apple by its board.Yet this apparently disastrous turn of events turned out to be a blessing: “the best thing that could have ever happened to me”, Mr Jobs later called it.He co-founded a new firm, Pixar, which specialised in computer graphics, and NeXT, another computer-maker.His remarkable second act began in 1996 when Apple, having lost its way, acquired NeXT, and Mr Jobs returned to put its technology at the heart of a new range of Apple products.And the rest is history: Apple launched the iMac, the iPod, the iPhone and the iPad, and(briefly)became the world’s most valuable listed

company.“I’m pretty sure none of this would have happened if I hadn’t been fired from Apple,” Mr Jobs said in 2005.When his failing health forced him to step down as Apple’s boss in 2011, he was hailed as the greatest chief executive in history.Oh, and Pixar, his side project, produced a string of hugely successful animated movies.In retrospect, Mr Jobs was a man ahead of his time during his first stint at Apple.Computing’s early years were dominated by technical types.But his emphasis on design and ease of use gave him the edge later on.Elegance, simplicity and an understanding of other fields came to matter in a world in which computers are fashion items, carried by everyone, that can do almost anything.“Technology alone is not enough,” said Mr Jobs at the end of his speech introducing the iPad, in January 2010.“It’s technology married with liberal arts, married with humanities, that yields the results that make our hearts sing.” It was an unusual statement for the head of a technology firm, but it was vintage Steve Jobs.His interdisciplinary approach was backed up by an obsessive attention to detail.A carpenter making a fine chest of drawers will not use plywood on the back, even though nobody will see it, he said, and he applied the same approach to his products.“For you to sleep well at night, the aesthetic, the quality, has to be carried all the way through.” He insisted that the first Macintosh should have no internal cooling fan, so that it would be silent—putting user needs above engineering convenience.He called an Apple engineer one weekend with an urgent request: the colour of one letter of an on-screen logo on the iPhone was not quite the right shade of yellow.He often wrote or rewrote the text of Apple’s advertisements himself.His on-stage persona as a Zen-like mystic notwithstanding, Mr Jobs was an autocratic manager with a fierce temper.But his egomania was largely justified.He eschewed market researchers and focus groups, preferring to trust his own instincts when evaluating potential new products.“A lot of times, people don’t know what they want until you show it to them,” he said.His judgment proved uncannily accurate: by the end of his career the hits far outweighed the misses.Mr Jobs was said by an engineer in the early years of Apple to emit a “reality distortion field”, such were his powers of persuasion.But in the end he changed reality, channelling the magic of computing into products that reshaped music, telecoms and media.The man who said in his youth that he wanted to “put a ding in the universe” did just that.到目前为止，世界上还没有哪个计算机行业或者其他任何行业的领袖能够像乔布斯那样举办出一场万众瞩目的盛会。在每次苹果推出新产品之时，乔布斯总是会独自站在黑色的舞台上，向充满敬仰之情的观众展示出又一款“充满魔力”而又“不可思议”的创新电子产品来，他的发布方式充满了表演的天赋。计算机所做的无非是计算，但是经过他的解释和展示，高速的计算就“仿佛拥有了无限的魔力”。乔布斯终其一生都在将他的魔力包装到了设计精美、使用简便的产品当中去。

乔布斯早在20世纪70年代便已经看到了向普通大众出售计算机这块业务的潜力。在当年世界还在使用绿黑相间的屏幕、5寸软盘的时代，让电脑成为家家户户必备的设备似乎还是一

个遥不可及的梦想。但是乔布斯是少数几位具有远见卓识的先驱之一。而更为重要的是，乔布斯拥有一个不寻常的本领，即他不仅会从工程开发人员的角度从内审视电脑，同时他还会从用户的角度来从外界观察人们对电脑的需求——他将这一本领归功于他自己任性的青年时代。

丰富的经历塑造了非凡的成就

乔布斯从小在硅谷长大，使得他从小便有机会耳濡目染到计算机的世界。在20世纪60年代末，他有幸认识了自己心目中的偶像比尔·休利特(Bill Hewlett)，并成功地为自己获得了到休利特创办的惠普做暑期兼职的机会。此后他在读了1年大学后辍学、前往印度、开始笃信佛教并尝试了迷幻药剂，最终他选择回到了加利福尼亚州并与好友联合创办了苹果。他的公司于1976年的愚人节当天在他的父母的车库里正式开张。他曾经表示：“很多在我们这个行业的人都没有过如此复杂的经历，因此他们没有足够的经验来推出非线性的解决方案。”他表示比尔·盖斯“如果在年轻的时候吸吸迷幻药或者经常去花天酒地一下的话，他的眼界肯定将会更加开阔。”

例如乔布斯从大学辍学并去参加了书法班，使得乔布斯对排版产生了浓厚的兴趣。但是他学习各种字体的目的却是使之成为麦金塔(Macintosh)系统的核心卖点，这款由苹果于1984年推出的电脑产品还具有开拓了鼠标驱动、图形优化的特性。其中的窗口、图标以及菜单等用户友好的界面和功能被外界视为一款“给大众使用的电脑”。乔布斯在通过苹果挖得了第一桶金子之后，便期望着通过未来新的机型获得“数以亿计”的收益。但是Mac并没有像乔布斯的想象那样大获成功，而他自己也被苹果踢出了董事会。

然而塞翁失马焉知非福，乔布斯在多年以后谈到被踢出苹果董事会这件事情的时候表示，“这是我人生经历当中最令人高兴的一件事。”他在离开苹果后又联合创办了皮克斯动画公司(Pixar)，专攻电脑动画业务;并又创办了另外一家从事电脑产品生产的企业NeXT。他于苹果在1996年陷入困境的时候再度出山，在苹果收购了NeXT之后再度将自己的创意注入到了苹果的系列产品当中。之后的历史便成为了经典：苹果先后推出了iMac、iPod、iPhone以及iPad，并且很快便成为了全世界市值最高的企业之一。乔布斯在2005年表示：“我敢肯定，如果苹果当年没有开除我的话，这一切都不会发生。”直到他于2011年8月由于健康原因辞去CEO职务之前，他一直被外界视为最杰出的CEO。而皮克斯作为乔布斯的一个副业产品，也为大众带来了大量精彩的动画电影。

将技术与人性结合，追寻内心的直觉

回顾乔布斯的一生，乔布斯早在开发出第一款苹果电脑时便已经远远地走在了时代的前沿。早年的计算机技术主要是强调技术，而乔布斯则率先关注了设计以及使用的便捷性，这也为他在后来推出产品的特性奠定了基础。在他心目当中，电脑应该是一款优雅、简洁并且可以轻松方便地用来了解世界的时尚产品，而大众应该人手一份，同时可以用它来做任何事情。乔布斯在2010年1月发布iPad时，在演说收尾时指出：“单靠科技是远远不够的，必需要让科技与人文科学以及人性相结合，其成果必需能够让用户产生共鸣。”这段台词对于科技业的领袖来说十分不可思议，但是如果了解了乔布斯的背景的话，这也不难理解他为何会如此表述了。

他将自己把不同行业和学科集成的思维归功于自己关注细节。他表示，“为了让自己能够睡个好觉，我必须确保所有产品的外观美学、设备质量都必须一丝不苟地完成。”他在开发第一台麦金塔电脑的时候曾经强烈要求电脑不能内置冷却扇，以确保电脑运行的时候能够足够安静——他将用户的需求凌驾于了工程设计之上。他还曾经命令一位苹果的工程师花一个周末的时间加班解决iPhone的屏幕上一个字母的颜色不显示精确的问题。同时他还会经常自己撰写或者修改苹果的广告文字。

乔布斯在公众场合上是一个如禅宗一般神秘的人物。他是一个专制而脾气暴躁的经理人。但是他是有狂妄的本钱的。他在评估和开发潜在新产品的时候总是拒绝使用市场调研以及观察机构，而更乐意相信他自己的直觉。他表示：“很多情况下，人们在见到一件新事物之前是很难说出自己到底想要什么的。”而他的观点在大多数情况下毫无疑问是正确的：在他的职业生涯中，他的成功远远超过了失败。一位苹果的早期员工称乔布斯拥有“屏蔽现实”的本领，以便追寻自己的内心直觉，但是最终他却能够改变现实，通过魔法般的手段重塑了电脑与音乐、通讯以及媒体的关系。乔布斯在年轻的时候曾经表示“希望能够做出一番让宇宙为之一震的事业。”而他也的确做到了。

第四篇：三个火枪手 英文评论

The Three Musketeers

Title（English and Chinese）：The Three Musketeers

三个火枪手/三剑侠3D：双城暗战(香港译名)/3D剑客联盟：云端之战(台湾译名)Company ：Summit Entertainment

Director：Paul W.S.Anderson

Scriptwriter：Alex Litvak, Andrew Davies

Cast：Logan Lerman....D'Artagnan

Milla Jovovich....Milady de Winter

Matthew Macfadyen....Athos

Luke Evans....Aramis

Ray Stevenson....Porthos

Orlando Bloom....Duke of Buckingham

Christoph Waltz....Richelieu

Freddie Fox....King Louis XIII of France

Juno Temple....Queen

The year：2011

1.Introduction

This movie talks about that in the 17th century French Catholic and

protestant fighting for the historical context, the protagonist D'Artagnan and other three musketeers try to retrieve the queen's necklace and break the many obstacles set by the cardinal Richelieu, finally saved the reputation of the queen's and the peace of their country.2.Argumentation

In act I the director set a hook which is in a dive into Da Vinci chamber of the action the three musketeers Athos, Aramis, Porthos who are betrayed by Milady and Buckingham.They have to prowl the country.After successfully attract the attention of the audience, the protagonist D'Artagnan comes to the stage: Three years later, three people meet the young knight errant D'Artagnan in Paris, all of them are no discord, no concord.The key line is four people for the same hatred of evil master education in cardinal Richelieu and freemasonry.They form into an elusive swordsman alliance, punishing evil eliminating traitors and completing secret missions.In act II shortly they accidentally know the cardinal plans to provoke the Anglo-French relations and destroy their own countries with making a royal scandal which is to make a misunderstanding between King Louis and Queen Anna.In addition to timely preventing Richelieu’s rebellion plan, saving the people suffering from war, and taking a revenge to Buckingham and Milady, the three musketeers decide to across the English Channel and fight from Paris to London, from the land to the sky with D'Artagnan.In act III the denouement is looks like eventually they shatter Richelieu’s

intrigues which is maintaining the queen Anna innocence, keeping peaceful relations of Britain and France, however, in the last scene, Buckingham led his flybrow army already to attract France which left to the audience infinite imaginary space.3.Conclusion

This movie is adapted from Alexandre Dumas’ famous novel The Three Musketeers.Dumas try to transmit the knight creed: One for all, all for one

which lasted till today.The Three Musketeers is a marvelous journey and should be appreciated foremost for its engaging story.The techniques Dumas employed to such success in 1840--particularly his mastery of the form of the

Romance--still work in this movie.The director said” The content of the whole novel is very compact and almost flawless.So I removed some too wordy and aggravating plots and background, make the film into a risk as the main line of the story”.In this movie, France and England very nearly fight a war simply because the Duke of Buckingham loves Anne of Austria and so on.The dramatic plots and continuous suspense make the audiences cannot help carrying on.References

Alexandre Dumas．The Three Musketeers[M]．Lowell Bair，translated．New York：Bantam Books，1984．

樊丽芳.《三个火枪手》——法国历史通俗小说典范之作[D].湘潭大学，2009.影视歌空间：http://hi.baidu.com/chinagcw/item/f9d8b61bea6fdcf587ad4ea0

第五篇：《罪与罚》读后感

《罪与罚》读后感范文三篇

《罪与罚》读后感范文1

对莉扎韦塔的人物理解

高中时就听说过俄国著名作家陀思妥耶夫斯基的著作《罪与罚》然而真正拿起这个沉甸甸的书则是在大一，但是我读得囫囵吞枣，只是把大致的情节啃完。时隔半年再拿起这本书，又有另外的感觉。才发现《罪与罚》像一剂中药，刚开始喝感觉苦涩难以下咽但细细品味那份甘甜才在口中蔓延，最后达到了健强筋骨的功效。

在罪与罚中最值得探究的角色我认为除了拉斯科尔尼科夫外首推莉扎韦塔。全本莉扎韦塔的着墨并不多，只有在第一章有较多的描写，中间完全没有提及，只在最后索尼娜把莉扎韦塔的铜质十字架交给拉斯科尔尼科夫时略有提及。

细细阅读全文之后我对其中的一个细节感觉十分奇怪。拉斯科尔尼科夫用斧子不但劈死了放高利贷的老太婆阿廖娜，也劈死了偶然看到拉斯科尔尼科夫残忍举动的无辜的老太婆的妹妹莉扎韦塔。作者为什么要安排拉斯科尔尼科夫杀死两个人？既然安排男主人公杀死两个人，那为什么后文对于莉扎韦塔的死却很少提及，莉扎韦塔可以说似乎被完全忽视了呢？在拉斯科尔尼科夫几次叙事中也只是一再强调阿廖娜的死，当他对索尼娅坦白的时候，他说“我不过杀了一只虱子，索尼娅，我杀了一只不中用的、讨厌的、有害的虱子。“连负责行刑的波尔菲里·彼得洛维奇在劝拉斯科尔尼科夫自首的时候也说：“幸好，您只杀死了一个老太婆，如果您想出另一套理论，也许您会干出要坏一万万倍的事情来。“整部小说就算删掉莉扎韦塔这个人故事似乎完全没有影响，那么作者为何要安排莉扎韦塔这个人物呢？

莉扎韦塔在我看来是个大个子的傻女人。她虽然和她的同父异母的姐姐阿廖娜一起生活，相依为命，两人之间却不是相互扶持相互帮助而更像是上下级的关系。莉扎韦塔起早贪黑为姐姐做事，平日的生意由姐姐阿廖娜做主，所得钱全数交给阿廖娜，就连阿廖娜死后的财产她也一个子都得不到。但她似乎毫无怨言。更让人惊奇的是她经常怀孕，用书中大学生的话来说“她是如此温柔、柔顺、驯服、随和；什么都能答应“.所以无论男子是真心对她还是只是将她当作泄欲的工具，她都没有拒绝。她像是一个苦难的黑洞，什么压迫和欺凌她都能吞下去，都能消化掉。她低到尘埃里但没能开出花来，她的沉默和隐忍让她所做在一切在别人看来是理所应当的，像自然法规一样顺理成章。而正因为如此，她才会越发的受人怠慢，被人遗忘，以至于就连她的死也经不起一丝波澜。由此可看作者写莉扎韦塔的.篇幅较少也正符合了人物性格和地位的设定。

因此拉斯科尔尼科夫在后文没有提及莉扎韦塔可能有两个原因。第一个原因是在拉斯科尔尼科夫心里认为无论在他自己看来还是其他人看来莉扎韦塔都是一个可有可无的存在，就算她消失了也不会有人记得。因此也不用在意她的死亡，甚至无需掩藏。莉扎韦塔的死就像是一片苇叶落在水面引不起太大波澜反而会随着水的流逝彻底消失在人们的视线中。第二个原因可能是莉扎韦塔在他心里始终是一根不愿提及的刺。他的无政府主义和激进的思想促使他把自己想成像拿破仑一样，他认为杀掉像蚊子一样不断吸食人血和像帝王般肆意掌握租客生死阿廖娜是正义之举，是勇敢的行为，是历史赋予他的使命。但是莉扎韦塔是一个像白纸一样人，她是一个全然无辜的人。只是在偶然的情况下她看到了拉斯科尔尼科夫的罪行然后被灭口了。这在拉斯科尔尼科夫的心里留下了一个裂痕，使他的壮举，那本应该被人赞颂的行为染上了污点。他那被激进所蒙蔽的良心受到了第一轮的重击，他不愿意去想莉扎韦塔更不愿意承认莉扎韦塔的死亡。因为他不愿意去承认自己的错误和罪行。这有点像宗教里的“原罪“,宗教里认为人生来就是有罪的。莉扎韦塔就像是拉斯科尔尼科夫的“原罪“,拉斯科尔尼科夫对她没有任何恶意因为本能而杀了她。

莉扎韦塔在我看来象征着最广大的底层人民，他们像组成这个世界的一粒粒尘埃，必不可少但是默默无闻。他们是这个社会的基石，却也是最容易被忽视的存在。他们勤勤恳恳，安分守己，善良淳朴但是被所谓的上层压迫剥削甚至被肆意的杀戮。他们的悲惨甚至引不起应有的同情和帮助，即使是在同阶层的人之中。而他们本身自己对自己的状况也是不自知的，即使知道他们也认为自己无法反抗而一味的去承受了。

莉扎韦塔在我看来是个大个子的傻女人。她虽然和她的同父异母的姐姐阿廖娜一起生活，相依为命，两人之间却不是相互扶持相互帮助而更像是上下级的关系。莉扎韦塔起早贪黑为姐姐做事，平日的生意由姐姐阿廖娜做主，所得钱全数交给阿廖娜，就连阿廖娜死后的财产她也一个子都得不到。但她似乎毫无怨言。更让人惊奇的是她经常怀孕，用书中大学生的话来说“她是如此温柔、柔顺、驯服、随和；什么都能答应“.所以无论男子是真心对她还是只是将她当作泄欲的工具，她都没有拒绝。她像是一个苦难的黑洞，什么压迫和欺凌她都能吞下去，都能消化掉。她低到尘埃里但没能开出花来，她的沉默和隐忍让她所做在一切在别人看来是理所应当的，像自然法规一样顺理成章。而正因为如此，她才会越发的受人怠慢，被人遗忘，以至于就连她的死也经不起一丝波澜。由此可看作者写莉扎韦塔的篇幅较少也正符合了人物性格和地位的设定。

因此拉斯科尔尼科夫在后文没有提及莉扎韦塔可能有两个原因。第一个原因是在拉斯科尔尼科夫心里认为无论在他自己看来还是其他人看来莉扎韦塔都是一个可有可无的存在，就算她消失了也不会有人记得。因此也不用在意她的死亡，甚至无需掩藏。莉扎韦塔的死就像是一片苇叶落在水面引不起太大波澜反而会随着水的流逝彻底消失在人们的视线中。第二个原因可能是莉扎韦塔在他心里始终是一根不愿提及的刺。他的无政府主义和激进的思想促使他把自己想成像拿破仑一样，他认为杀掉像蚊子一样不断吸食人血和像帝王般肆意掌握租客生死阿廖娜是正义之举，是勇敢的行为，是历史赋予他的使命。但是莉扎韦塔是一个像白纸一样人，她是一个全然无辜的人。只是在偶然的情况下她看到了拉斯科尔尼科夫的罪行然后被灭口了。这在拉斯科尔尼科夫的心里留下了一个裂痕，使他的壮举，那本应该被人赞颂的行为染上了污点。他那被激进所蒙蔽的良心受到了第一轮的重击，他不愿意去想莉扎韦塔更不愿意承认莉扎韦塔的死亡。因为他不愿意去承认自己的错误和罪行。这有点像宗教里的“原罪“,宗教里认为人生来就是有罪的。莉扎韦塔就像是拉斯科尔尼科夫的“原罪“,拉斯科尔尼科夫对她没有任何恶意因为本能而杀了她。

莉扎韦塔在我看来象征着最广大的底层人民，他们像组成这个世界的一粒粒尘埃，必不可少但是默默无闻。他们是这个社会的基石，却也是最容易被忽视的存在。他们勤勤恳恳，安分守己，善良淳朴但是被所谓的上层压迫剥削甚至被肆意的杀戮。他们的悲惨甚至引不起应有的同情和帮助，即使是在同阶层的人之中。而他们本身自己对自己的状况也是不自知的，即使知道他们也认为自己无法反抗而一味的去承受了。

《罪与罚》读后感范文2

《罪与罚》这本书主要讲述了一个极其穷困的大学生，因痛恨当铺老板娘的盘剥，愤而行凶——杀了老板娘，却自以为是伸张正义。但以后的日子里，他饱受杀人的恐惧，良心的谴责。最后，他醒悟了。在家人、朋友的帮助下，投案自首。

其实那位大学生有正义感是好事，可我认为他用了一种最极端的方式去伸张正义，结果事得其反。变成了杀人凶手。有时候，在做一些事情之前，要想清楚这些事该怎么做，事情才能做得更好，更完美。而那位大学生正是因为太恨老板娘，头脑发热，才杀人行凶的。

但主人公毕竟是受过教育，有良知的一个人。他在杀人后十分不安，就怕自己被抓。这时，我想他已经明白，自己即使逃脱了，也会不安地度过一生。于是，大学生首先把杀人的事实告诉了自己的爱人、亲人、朋友。并最后告诉了警官。这也是这本书要告诉我们的第二个道理：在你犯错后，一定要勇于去承担责任，而并不是去逃避。因为这样，你的一生都会充满恐惧。

所以，我们一定要用大脑思考后才能做事。哪怕做错了，也要敢于承认事实。这也就是《罪与罚》要告诉我们的道理。

《罪与罚》读后感范文3

最近我读了一部有关社会心理的小说。小说描写了贫困交迫的大学生罗佳·拉斯柯尼柯夫因痛恨放贷款的老板娘的盘剥，愤而行凶，却自认为是伸张正义。然而由于杀人的恐惧、良性的谴责，使其饱受心灵的煎熬，整日心惊胆战，最终在爱人、朋友、家人和警官的帮助下投案自首。

这部小说谱写了不朽的长歌。小说中的罗佳啊!你是个大学生应该很有自判能力的，当我读到：“他们说的没错我这么做是为了伸张正义，是为了补救更多的贫困大学生，就不会有那么多跟我一样的大学生受苦受难了。”这句话你表面上是在在同情别人，其实你是在虚掩自己脆弱不敢的负面心理。后来我又读到：“卡琳达——你的妹妹，比尔——你的妹夫他们整天奔波在外是为了什么，是为了你啊。”罗佳你有那么多的亲人、朋友，你为什么不珍惜却去干出那么蠢的事。而且那老太婆有肺炎过不了多久就会死的你想为了一个对社会百害无一利的人需要用一个英才去除掉他呢?