比尔盖茨谈能源(TED字幕)[小编整理]

第一篇：比尔盖茨谈能源(TED字幕)

I’m going to talk today about energy and climate.And that might seem a bit surprising because my full-time work at the foundation is mostly about vaccines and seeds,about the things that we need to invent and deliver to help the poorest two billion live better lives.But energy and climate are extremely important to these people,in fact,more important than anyone else on the planet.The climate getting worse means that many years that many years,their crops won’t grow.There will be too much rain,not enough rain,things will change in ways that their fragile environment simply can’t support.And that leads to starvation,it leads to uncertainty,it leads to unrest.So, the price of energy is very important to them.In fact, if you could pick just one thing to lower th-e price of, to reduce poverty, by far you would pick energy.Now ,the price of energy has become down over time.Really advanced civilization is based on advances in energy.The coal revolution fueled the Industrial Revolution, and,even in 1990s we’ve seen a very rapid decline in the price of electricity, and that’s why we have refrigerators,air-conditioning, we can make modern materials and do so many things.And so ,we’re in a wonderful situation with electricity in the rich world.But, as we make it cheaper-and let’s go for making it twice as cheap-we need to meet a new constrain,and that constrain has to do with CO2.CO2 is warning the planet, and the equation on CO2 is actually a very straightforward one.If you sum up the CO2 that gets emitted,that leads to a temperature increase, and that temperature increase leads to some very negative effects: the effects on the weather, perhaps worse, the indirect effects,in that the nature ecosystems can’t adjust to these rapid changes, and so you get ecosystem collapses.Now, the exact amount of how you map from a certain increase of CO2 to what temperature will be and where the positive feedback are, there’s some uncertainty there,but not very much.And there’s certainly uncertainty about how bad those effects will be, but they will be extremely bad.I asked the top scientists on this several times.Do we really have to get down to near zero? Can’t we just cut it in half or a quarter? And the answer is that until we get near to zero,the temperature will continue to rise.And so that’s a big challenge.It’s very different than saying “We’re a twelve-foot-high truck trying to get under a ten-foot bridge, and we can just sort of squeeze under.” This is something that has to get to zero.Now,we put out of a lot of carbon dioxide every year, over 26 billion tons.For each American, it’s about 20 tons;for people in poor countries,it’s less than one ton.It’s an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet.And, somehow, we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero.It’s been constantly going up.It’s only various economic changes that have been flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapid rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication: So, you’re got a thing on the left,CO2,that you want to get to zero,and that’s going to be based on the number of people,the services each person’s using on average,the energy on average for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.So ,let’s look at each one of these and see how we get this down to zero.Probably, one of this number is going to have to get pretty near to zero.Now that’s back from high school algebra,but let’s take a look.First, we’ve got population.The world today has 6.8 billion people.That’s headed up to about nine billion.Now ,if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by ,perhaps, 10 or 15 percent, but there we see an increase of about 1.3.The second factor is the services we use.This encompass everything: the foot we eat, clothing, TV,heating.These are very good things:getting rid of poverty means providing these services to almost everyone on the planet.And it’s a great thing for this number to go up.In the rich world,perhaps the top one billion,we probably could cut back and use less,but every year, this numer, on average,is going to go up,and so, over all,that will more than double,the services delivered per person.Here we have a very basic service: Do you have lighting in your house to be able to read your homework? And, in fact,these kids don’t,so they’re going out and reading their school work under the street lamps.Now, efficiency,E,the energy for each service,here finally we have some good news.We have something that’s not going up.Through various inventions and new ways of doing lighting through different types of car,different ways of building--there are a lot of services where you can bring the energy for that service down quite substantially.There are other services like how we make fertilizer,or how we do air transport,where the rooms for improvement are far ,far less.And so,overall here,if we’re optimistic,we may get a reduction of a factor of three to even,perhaps, a factor of six.But for these first three factors now,we’ve gone from 26billion to, at best,may 13 billion tons, and that just won’t cut it.So let’s look at this fourth factor-this is going to be a key one-and this is the amount of CO2 put out per each unit of energy.And so the question is:can you actually get that to zero? If you burn coal,no.If you burn natural gas,no.Almost every way make electricity today,except for the emerging renewables and nuclear,puts out CO2.And so,what we’re going to have to do at a global scale,is create a new system.And so,we need energy miracles.Now, when I use the term “miracle,” I don’t mean something that’s impossible.The microprocessor is a miracle.The personal computer is a miracle.The Internet and its services are miracles.So, the people here have participated in the creation of many miracles.Usually, we don’t have a deadline,where you have to get the miracle by a certain date.Usually, you just kind of stand by and some come along.This is a case where we actually have to drive at full speed and get a miracle in a pretty tight timeline.Now I thought, “how could I really capture this?Is there some kind of natural illustration,some demonstration that would grab people’s imagination here?” I thought back to a year ago when I brought mosquitos, and somehow people enjoyed that.It really got them involved in the ideal of, you know,there are people who live with mosquitos.So, with energy, all I could come up with is this.I decided that releasing fireflies would be my contribution to the environment here this year.So here we have some natural fireflies.I’m told they don’t bite, in fact,they might not even leave that jar.Now,there all sorts of gimmicky solutions like that one,but they don’t really add up to much.We need solutions-either one or several-that have unbelievable scale and unbelievable reliability, and, although there’s many directions people are seeking, I really only see five that can achieve the big numbers.I’ve left out tide, geothermal,fusion, biofuels.Those may make some contribution, and if they can do better than I expect, so much the better, but my key point here is that we’ve going to have to work on each of these five, and we can’t give up any of them because they look daunting,because they all have significant challenges.Let’s look first at the burning fossil fuels,either burning coal or burning natural gas.What you need to do there,seems like it might be simple,but it’s not, and that’s to take all the CO2, after you’ve burned it, going out the flue,pressurize it, create a liquid, put it somewhere,and hope it stays there.Now we have some pilot things that do this at the 60 to 80 percent level, but getting to that full percentage,that will be very tricky, and agreeing on where these CO2 quantities should be put will be hard, but the toughest one here is this long-term issue.Who’s going to be sure? Who’s going to guarantee something that is literally billions of time large than any type of of wasted you think of in terms of nuclear or other things? This is a lot of volume.So that’s a tough one.Next would be nuclear.It also has three big problems: Cost, particularly in highly regulated countries,is high, the issue of the the safety, really feeling good about nothing could go wrong ,that,even though you have these human operators,that the fuel doesn’t get used for weapons.And then what do you do with the waste? And ,although it’s not very large, there are a lot of concerns about that.People need to feel good about it.So three very tough problems that might be solvable,and so ,should be worked on.The last three of the five,I’ve grouped together.These are what people often refer to as the renewable.And they actually--although it’s great they don’t require fuel-they have some disadvantages.One of that the density of energy gathered in these technologies is dramatically less than a power plan.This is energy farming, so you’re talking about many square miles, thousands of time more area than you think of as a normal energy plant.Also, these are intermittent sources.The sun doesn’t shine all day,it doesn’t shine every day, and,likewise,the wind doesn’t blow all the time.And also, if you depend on these sources,you have to have some way of getting the energy during those time period that’s it’s not a available.So, we’ve got big cost challenges here,we have transmission challenges: for example,say this energy source is outside your country;you not only need the technology, but you have to deal with the risk of the energy coming from elsewhere.And finally, this storage problem.And, to dimensionalize this, I went through and looked at all types of batteries that get made--for cars, for computers, for phones, for flashlights, for everything--and compared that to the amount of electricity energy the world uses,and what found is that all the batteries we make now could store less than 10 minutes of all the energy.And so, in fact, we need a big breakthrough here, something that’s going to be a factor of 100 better than the approaches we have now.It’s not impossible, but it’s not a easy thing.Now, this shows up when you try to get the intermittent source to be above,say, 20 to 30 percent of what you’re using.If you’re counting on it for 100 percent,you need a miracle battery.Now, how we’re going to go forward on this--what’s the right approach? Is it a Manhattan Project? What’s the thing that can get using.What’s the thing that can get us there? Well, we need lots of companies working on this,hundreds.In each of these five paths, we need at less a hundred people.And a lot of them,you’ll look at and say, “they’re crazy”.That’s good.And, I think, here in the TED group.We have many people who are already pursuing this.Bill Gross has several companies, including one called eSolar that has some great solar thermal technologies.Vinod Khosla’s investing in dozens of companies that are doing great things and have interesting possibilities, and I’m trying to help back that.Nathan Myhrvold and I actually are backing a company that, perhaps surprisingly,is actually taking the nuclear approach.There are some innovation in nuclear: modular, liquid.And innovation really stopped in this industry quite some ago, so the idea that there’s some good ideas laying around is not all that surprising.The idea of TerraPower is that, instead of burning a part of uranium-the one percent, which is the U235-we decided, “Let’s burn the 99 percent, the U238.” It’s kind of crazy idea.In fact,people had talked about it for a long time, but they could never simulate properly whether it would work or not, and so it’s through the advent of modern supercomputers that now you can simulate and see that, yes, with the right material’s approach, this looks like it would work.And, because you’re burning that 99 percent you have greatly improved cost profile.You actually burn up the waste, and you can actually use as fuel all the leftover waste from today’s reactors.So, instead of worrying about them, you just take that.It’s a great thing.It breathes this uranium as it goes along, so it’s kind of like a candle.You can see it’s a log here, often referred to as a traveling wave reactor.In terms of fuel, this really solves the problem.I’ve got a picture here of a place in Kentucky.This is the leftover, the 99 percent, where they’ve taken out the part they burn now, so it’s called depleted uranium.That would power the U.S for hundreds of years.And, simply by filtering seawater in an inexpensive process, you’d have enough fuel for the entire lifetime of the rest of the planet.So, you know, it’s got lot’s of challenges ahead,but it is an example of the many hundreds and hundreds of ideas that we need to move forward.So let’s think:How should we measure ourselves? What should our report card look like? Well, let’s go out to where we really need to get, and then look at the intermediate.For 2050, you’ve heard many people talk about this 80 percent reduction.That really is very important,that we get there.And that 20 percent will be used up by things going on in poor countries, still some agriculture, hopefully we will have cleaned up forestry, cement.So, to get that percent, the developed countries, including countries like China, will have had to switch their electricity generation altogether.So, the other grade is: Are we deploying this zero-emission technology, have we deployed in all the developed countries and we’re in the process of getting it elsewhere? That’s super important.That’s a key element of making the report card.So, backing up from there,what should the 2020 report card look like? Well, again, it should go through these efficiency measures to start getting reductions.The less we emit, the less that sum will be of CO2, and, therefore, the less the temperature.But in some ways, the grade we get there,doing things that don’t get us all the way to the big reductions,is only equally, or maybe even slightly less,important than the other, which is the piece of innovation on these breakthroughs.These breakthroughs, we need to move those at full speed, and we can measure that in terms of companies, pilot projects, regulatory things that have been changed.There’s a lot of great books that have been written about this.The Al Gore, “our choice” and the David Mckay book, “Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air.” They really go through it and created a framework that this can be discussed broadly,because we need broad backing for this.There’s a lot that has to come together.So this is a wish.It’s a very concrete wish that we invent this technology.If you gave me only one wish for the next 50 years-I can pick who’s president, I can keep a vaccine, which is something I love, or I could pick that this thing that’s half the cost with no CO2 gets invented-this is the wish I would pick.This is the one with the greatest impact.If we don’t get this wish, the division between the people who think short term and long term will be terrible, between the U.S.and China ,between poor countries and rich, and most of all the lives of those two billion will far worse.So, what do we have to do ? What am I appealing you to step forward and drive? We need to go for more research funding.When countries get together in places like Copenhagen, they shouldn’t just discuss the CO2.They should discuss this innovation agenda, and you’d be stunned at the ridiculously low level of spending on these innovation approaches.We do need the market incentives-CO2 tax,cap and trade something that gets that price signal out there.We need to get the massage out.We need to have this dialogue to be a more rational, more understandable dialogue, including the steps that the government takes.This is an important wish, but it is one think we can achieve.Thank you!

第二篇：比尔盖茨夫妇 TED演讲稿（最终版）

Melinda Gates: This is in Africa, our very first trip, the first time either of us had ever been to Africa, in the fall of 1993.We were already engaged to be married.We married a few months later, and this was the trip where we really went to see the animals and to see the savanna.It was incredible.Bill had never taken that much time off from work.But what really touched us, actually, were the people, and the extreme poverty.We started asking ourselves questions.Does it have to be like this? 梅琳达·盖茨：这是我们第一次旅行，在非洲拍的。我们俩都是第一次去非洲，那是1993年的秋天，我们已经订婚。几月后，我们结婚了，我们想通过这次旅行看看野生动物和热带草原。真是太美了。比尔和我从来没有放过这么长的假。但是真正让我们深受触动的是那儿的人，那儿的贫穷。我们开始扪心自问，一切只能是这样吗？ Bill Gates: Well, we decided that we'd pick two causes, whatever the biggest inequity was globally, and there we looked at children dying, children not having enough nutrition to ever develop, and countries that were really stuck, because with that level of death, and parents would have so many kids that they'd get huge population growth, and that the kids were so sick that they really couldn't be educated and lift themselves up.So that was our global thing, and then in the U.S., both of us have had amazing educations, and we saw that as the way that the U.S.could live up to its promise of equal opportunity is by having a phenomenal education system, and the more we learned, the more we realized we're not really fulfilling that promise.比尔·盖茨：我们决定选择两个方面：任何世界上最不公平的事，这指的是垂死的儿童，营养跟不上的儿童，因为高死亡率发展停滞不前的国家，国家人口剧长，孩子病得太重，他们没法受教育养活自己。这是世界的情况，而在美国，我们夫妻俩都受过良好的教育，我们看到美国实现“机会平等”这一承诺的途径就是其良好的教育体系。我们了解的越多，就越深刻地意识到我们并没有完全兑现我们的承诺。So this is a story largely of vaccines.Smallpox was killing a couple million kids a year.That was eradicated, so that got down to zero.Measles was killing a couple million a year.That's down to a few hundred thousand.Anyway, this is a chart where you want to get that number to continue, and it's going to be possible, using the science of new vaccines, getting the vaccines out to kids.We can actually accelerate the progress.所以这个故事主要说的是疫苗。以前，每年有几百万的儿童死于天花。现在我们摆脱它了，死亡数变成了零。每年有百万人死于麻疹，现在这个数字是几十万。总之，在这张图表中，如果你让数字继续下去，就有可能利用新疫苗技术为儿童提供疫苗。我们可以加快这个进程。Because we built this thing together from the beginning, it's this great partnership.I had that with Paul Allen in the early days of Microsoft.I had it with Steve Ballmer as Microsoft got bigger, and now Melinda, and in even stronger, equal ways, is the partner, so we talk a lot about which things should we give more to, which groups are working well? She's got a lot of insight.She'll sit down with the employees a lot.We'll take the different trips she described.So there's a lot of collaboration.I can't think of anything where one of us had a super strong opinion about one thing or another? 因为我们从零开始建立了它，这是一种绝妙的伙伴关系。微软早期，我曾和保罗·艾伦有那种伙伴关系。微软的成长期我有史蒂夫·巴摩，现在微软更强了，梅琳达以一种更稳固，更平等的方式成为了我的伙伴。我们谈论了很多，哪些事情更应该重视，哪一个团队运作的很好？她有很多深刻见解。她能和员工打成一片。我们各自出行，就像她说的，我们也有很多合作。我想不出有哪件事一方的主张特别强烈。Well, I would say a huge lesson for us out of the early work is we thought that these small schools were the answer, and small schools definitely help.They bring down the dropout rate.They have less violence and crime in those schools.But the thing that we learned from that work, and what turned out to be the fundamental key, is a great teacher in front of the classroom.If you don't have an effective teacher in the front of the classroom, I don't care how big or small the building is, you're not going to change the trajectory of whether that student will be ready for college.我想说的是一个深刻的教训，工作早期，我们以为小规模的学校就是解决办法，当然小规模学校有一定作用，可以减少辍学率。学校内的暴力事件和犯罪比较低。但是我们从工作中学到的，也是最重要的一件事就是课堂上必须有个好老师。如果没有有效率的老师，无论教室大或小，你都不可能改变学生是否已经准备好上大学的轨迹。

第三篇：TED演讲——不要固执于英语英文字幕

不要固执于英语

I know what you’re thinking.You think I’ve lost my way, and somebody’s going to come on the stage in a minute and guide me gently back to my seat.I get that all thetimein Dubai.“Here on holiday are you, dear?”“Come to visit the children?”“How long are you staying?”Well actually, I hope for a while longer yet.I have been living and teaching in Gulf for over 30 years.And in that time, I have seen a lot of changes.Now that statistic is quit shocking.And I want to talk to you today about language loss and the globalization of English.I want to tell you about my friend who was teacher English to adults in Abu Dhabi.And one fine day, she decided to take them into the garden to teach them some nature vocabulary.But it was she who ended up learning all the Arabic words for the local plants, as well as their uses, medicinal uses, cosmetics, cooking, herbal.How did those students get all that knowledge? Of course, from their grandparentsand even their great-grandparents.It’s not necessary to tell you how important it is to be able to communicate across generation.But sadly, today, languages are dying at an unprecedented rate.A language dies every 14 days.Now at the same time, English is the undisputed global language.Could there be a connection? We don’t know.But I do knowthat I’ve seen a lot of changes.When I first came out to the Gulf, I came to Kuwait in the days it was still a hardship post.Actually, not that long ago.That is a little bit too early.But nevertheless, I was recruited by the British Council along with about 25 other teachers.And we were the first non-Muslims to teach in the state schools there in Kuwait.We were brought to teach English because the government wanted to modernize the country and empower the citizens through education.And of course, the U.K.benefited from some of that lovely oil wealth.Okay.Now this is the major change that I’ve seen how teaching English has morphed from being a mutually beneficial practice to becoming a massive international business that it is today.No longer just a foreign language on the school curriculum.And no longer the sole domain of mother England.It has become a bandwagon for every English-speaking nation on earth.And why not? After all, the best education according to the latest World University Rankings is to be found in the universities of the U.K.and the U.S.So everybody wants to have an English education, naturally.But if you’re not a native speaker, you have to pass a test.Now can it be right to reject a student on linguistic ability alone? Perhaps you have a computer scientist who’s a

genius.Would he need the same language as a lawyer, for example? Well, I don’t think so.We English teachers reject them all the time.We put a stop sign, and we stop them in their tracks.They can’t pursue their dream any longer, till they get English.Now let me put it this way, if I met a monolingual Dutch speakerwho had the cure for cancer, would I stop him from entering my British University? I don’t think so.But indeed, that is exactly what we do.We English teachers are the gatekeepers.And you have to satisfy us first that your English is good enough.Now it can be dangerous to give too much power, to a narrow segment of society.Maybe the barrier would be too university.Okay.“But,” I hear you say, “What about the research? It’s all in English.” So the books are in English, the journals are done in English, but that is self-fulfilling prophecy.It deeds the English requirement.And so it goes on.I ask you, what happened to translation? If you think about the Islamic Golden Age, there was lots of translation then.They translate from Latin and Greek into Arabic, into Persian, and then it was translated on into the Germanic languages of Europe and the Romance languages.And so light shone upon the Dark Ages of Europe.Now don’t get me wrong.I am not against teaching English, all you English teachers out there.I love thatwe have a global language.We need one today more than ever.But I am against using it as a barrier.Do we really want to end up with 600 languages and the main one being English and Chinese? We need more than that.Where do we draw the line? This system equates intelligence with a knowledge of English which is quite arbitrary.And I want to remind you that the giant upon whose shoulders today’s intelligentsia stand did not have to have English, they didn’t have to pass an English test.Case in point, Einstein.He, by the way, was considered remedial at school because he was, in fact, dyslexic.But fortunately for the world, he did not have to pass an English test.Because they didn’t start until 1964 with TOEFL, the AmericanTest of English.Now it’s exploded.There are lots and lots of tests of English.And millions and millions of students take these tests every year.Now you might think, you and me, those fees aren’t bad, they’re okay, but they are prohibitive to so many millions of poor people.So immediately, we’re rejecting them.It brings to mind a headline I saw recently: “Education: The Great Divide.” Now I get it, I understand why people would focus on English.They want to give their children the best chance in the life.And to do that, they need a Western education.Because, of course, the best jobs go to people out of the Western Universities, that I put on earlier.It’s a circular thing.Okay.Let me tell you a story about two scientists, two English scientists.They were doing an experiment to do with genetics and the forelimbs and the hind limbs of animals.But they couldn’t get the results they wanted.They really didn’t know what to do, until along came a German scientist who realized that they were using two words for forelimb and hind limb, whereas genetics does not differentiate and neither does German.So bingo, problem solved.If you can’t think a thought, you are stuck.But if another language can think that thought, then, by cooperating, we can achieve and learn so much more.My daughter, came to England from Kuwait.She had studied science and mathematics in Arabic.It’s an Arabic medium school.She had to translate it into English at her grammar school.And she was the best in the class at those subjects.Which tells us, that when students come to us from abroad, we may not be giving them enough credit for what they know.And they know it in their own language.When a language dies, we don’t know what we lose with that language.This is –I don’t know if you saw it on CNN recently—they give the Heroes Award to a young Kenyan shepherd boy who couldn’t study at night in his village like all the village children, because the Kerosene lamp, it had smoke and it damaged his eyes.And anyway, there was never enough kerosene, because what does a dollar a day buy for you? So he invented a cost-free solar lamp.And now the children in his village get the same grades at school as the children who have electricity at home.When he received his award, he said these lovely words: The children can lead Africa from a dark continent, to a light continent.A simple idea, but it could have such fat-reaching consequences.Peoplewho have no light, whether it’s physical or metaphorical, cannot pass our exam, and we can never know what they know.Let us not keep them and ourselves in the dark.Let us celebrate diversity.Mind your language.Use it to spread great ideas.

第四篇：最酷的TED名人精英演讲集锦(中英字幕)(持续更新……)

最酷的TED名人精英演讲集锦（中英字幕）（持续更新„„）

ED是一个会议的名称，它是英文technology, entertainment, design三个单词的首字母缩写。TED是社会各界精英交流的盛会，它鼓励各种创新思想的展示、碰撞。TED创始于1984年，现在由Chris Anderson创立的非营利机构种子基金会主办。

大会邀请世界上的思想领袖与实干家来分享他们最热衷从事的事业，美国前总统比尔·克林顿、世界首富比尔·盖茨、维珍品牌创始人理查德·布兰森、国际设计大师菲利普·斯达克以及U2乐队主唱Bono 都曾经担任过演讲嘉宾。参加者们称赞它为“ 超级大脑SPA”和“未来四日游。2001 年，克里斯·安德森创立的种子基金会几经周折，从温曼手中买下TED。“我记得杰夫·贝索斯(注：亚马逊创始人)跟我说过，‘TED 大会是一个非常了不起的聚会，你要把它搞糟了都不是很容易的事。’所以我给自己一个称号：‘TED 大会的守护人’。”在安德森的看护下，TED 成长为一个超越会议性质的世界品牌。

本页面视频为专辑示范视频，本专辑更多视频演讲请点击视频下面的节目列表观看。将此教程分享到：2分类综合资料标签: 设计, 技术, 娱乐, TED, TED演讲, TED中文字幕收藏此教程 同专题视频TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--11岁小学生谈论自己如何为iOS开发软件TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--Aimee.Mullins和她的十二双腿TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--一个广告人的领悟TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--一种更宽容、更温和的成功哲学TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--下定的目标可别告诉别人（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--世界英语热TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--为什么世界需要维基泄密网TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--为什么我们会快乐和不快乐TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--为什么要储存数以十亿计的种子TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--了解中国的崛起TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--人们为什么会喜欢买彩票？TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--人类想象力图书馆TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--人际关系的潜在影响（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--伟大创新的诞生TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--伟大的领袖如何激励行动（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--传奇大师的魔术催眠秀TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--你现在和猪一起生活着TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--保持听力的八个步骤TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--倾听twitter用户的心声TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--做生活的高手TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--做生活的高手（下）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--健康取决于你居住的地方TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--关于最近气候变化的警告TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--关于维基百科诞生的演讲TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--内向的力量TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--净水装置救生瓶TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--劉若瑀：行腳、修行、自我覺醒TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--包益民:重新定义设计师TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--四轴机器人编队、合作、弹奏、三维建模TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--大度人生之启发TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--大脑如何学会看TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--天才少女小提琴家技精TED大会TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--天才鹦鹉逗乐无极限TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--如人类一般不理性的猴子经济TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--如何解读别人的心思TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--对抗贪污的新方法TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--对最新气候的趋势发出的警告TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--将OLPC带到哥伦比亚TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--工作万岁 不分贵贱TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--希勒尔库伯曼谈成年人的乐高TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--建设绿色环保的未来TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--性高潮的秘密TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--成功是趟持续的旅程TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--成年人能从孩子那里学到什么（邹奇奇）（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--我们为什么快乐（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--我得到过的最好礼物（让你感动）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--改变世界的照片（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--放风筝迎来新净能源时代TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--教育扼杀创意TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--数学课程必须改头换面TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--未来不再遥远TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--未来网络5000天TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--本世纪最大的不公平TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--杨澜:中国的新一代TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--每颗花粉都有一个故事TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--比尔盖茨TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--泡妞妙招:找个更丑的同伴陪你（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--活出人生的极致（斯蒂芬乔布斯）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--混沌与和谐之音TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--爱就像上膛的手枪TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--犯错的价值TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--用视频与不公平斗争TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--电影级数字化头像的秘密TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--當脑中的概念交配起來TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--癌症战争新政策TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--看美**亲怎样回答孩子是怎样来到这个世界上的？（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--示范无线电力传输TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--究竟Youtube 如何看待影音版权问题TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--穿着翼装滑翔TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--第六感官技术的惊异潜力TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--第六感装置演示TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--给你一个更健康的时间观TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--网游改变世界TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--致男人的宣言TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--艾滋病毒与流感TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--艾瑟_本德演示人类外骨骼TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--英国首相卡梅伦:谈下一代的政府TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--解恒益智游戏之美TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--許芳宜:不怕和世界不一樣TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--让人快乐的好设计TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--记忆与经验的争斗之谜TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--谈简单生活TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--谈跑步TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--资深外教:不要执意要求英语TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--走向简单的本质TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--转变心态的珠峰旅游TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--选择的艺术（推荐）TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--选择越多 困惑越多TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--避免气候危机TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--阿凡达之前一个好奇的男孩TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--阿拉伯世界流行文化TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--陶喆: 放下才能获得更多TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--霍金 我们的宇宙如何开始TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--顶尖设计师与你讲述人生TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）--颠覆爵士乐TED名人演讲集锦（中英字幕）（持续更新„„）

第五篇：谈我国能源相关企业的企业文化

谈我国能源相关企业的企业文化

U201211540热动1208闫晓龙

摘要：能源作为人类社会发展的三大支柱之一，对人类生活有至关重要的影响。能源行业特殊的地位决定着与能源相关企业独特的企业文化：追求节能减排高效收益目标，贯行企业能源管理，培养独具特色的“能”精神。

关键字：能源，企业，能源管理，“能”文化

在讨论能源相关企业的文化之前，先要认清中国能源现状。一是能源以煤炭为主，可再生资源开发利用程度很低。二是能源消费总量不断增长，能源利用效率较低。三是能源消费以国内供应为主，环境污染状况加剧，优质能源供应不足。鉴于中国特殊的国情，能源相关企业势必有特殊的，与其他类型企业相异的企业文化。

首先，绝大多数能源相关企业都是国有企业。这是企业的基本性质，这是由能源在国民经济，国家安全的特殊地位所决定的。此外，我国企业能源垄断几乎垄断了市场能源资源，这与能源行业的丰厚利益是分不开的。当然，现在社会上对这样的能源结构的反对声音越来越大。

不可否认，我国能源国有企业中确实存在一些消极因素，但我们也应该看到，各企业之间确确实实存在的激烈竞争。能源企业中存在特别的管理理念——企业能源管理。什么是企业能源管理？1.合理组织生产：提高劳动生产效率，提高产品产量和质量，减少残次品率，利用电网低谷组织生产，均衡生产，减少机器空转，各种用能设备是

否处在最佳经济运行状态，排查生产管理方面的“跑冒滴漏”，提高生产现场的组织管理水平，减少各种直接和间接能耗、物耗损失等。2.合理分配能源：不同品种、质量的能源应合理分配使用，减少库存积压和能源、物资的超量储备，提高能源和原材料的利用效率。3.加强能源购进管理：提高运输质量，减少装运损耗和亏吨，强化计量和传递验收手续、提高理化检验水平，按规定合理扣水扣杂等。4.加强项目的节能管理：新上和在建、已建项目是不是做了“节能篇”论证，核算其经济效果、环境效果和节能效益是否达标。5.规章制度落实情况：企业能源管理各种规章制度是否健全合理，是否落实到位，如能源、物资的招标采购竟价制度，对质量、计量、定价、验收、入库、票据、成本核算是否严格把关，要认真细致地排查、分析、诊断问题。一般企业在管理方面存在的问题比较多，漏洞多，浪费大，管理节能是不花钱的节能，只要加强管理，严格制度，就能见效。

下面我就以中石化为例，走进中国能源企业文化中。

一、企业宗旨

中国石化以“发展企业、贡献国家、回报股东、服务社会、造福员工”作为企业宗旨。

发展企业——始终把发展作为第一要务，不断做强做大主业、提高发展质量和效益，努力增强国际竞争力，实现永续发展。

贡献国家——牢记国有骨干企业的责任和使命，不断加快发展、创造财富，努力为维护国家能源安全、增强综合国力做贡献。

回报股东——致力于资产保值增值，以良好的业绩回报股东，努力保障股东稳定而长期的利益。

服务社会——致力于以安全、清洁的方式提供产品和服务，积极参与社会公益事业，服务社会发展。

造福员工——坚持以人为本，维护员工合法权益，积极为员工的全面发展创造条件，共享企业发展成果，实现员工同企业共同发展。

上述五个方面的有机统一，体现了国家、股东、企业与员工利益相协调，当前与长远发展相协调，企业与社会、环境相协调，是集团公司生存发展的意义所在和自觉追求。

二、企业愿景

中国石化以“建设具有较强国际竞争力的跨国能源化工公司”作为企业愿景。通过不懈努力，使公司的产业结构、资产结构更加合理，主业经营规模、盈利能力、创新能力明显提升，国际化程度明显提高，人才队伍结构合理、素质优良，企业凝聚力、竞争力明显增强，跻身世界能源化工公司前列。

三、企业精神

中国石化传承、丰富和弘扬“爱我中华、振兴石化”的企业精神。以“爱我中华、振兴石化”为精神支柱、力量源泉，顾全大局，勇担重任，爱岗敬业，奋发图强，努力创造一流的业绩和水平，不断发展和振兴中国石化的能源之业、石化之业、跨国之业。

四、企业作风

中国石化继承和发扬“精细严谨、务实创新”的优良作风。

精细严谨——以严格的要求和一丝不苟的态度，追求生产上精耕细作、经营上精打细算、管理上精雕细刻、技术上精益求精，努力提升经营管理水平。

务实创新——始终当老实人、说老实话、办老实事，脚踏实地，艰苦奋斗，务科学之实、发展之实、作风之实，与时俱进，勇于创新，敢于超越，努力创造卓越业绩。

五、经营理念

中国石化以“诚信规范、合作共赢”作为企业经营理念。

诚信规范——以信用立企、制度治企作为企业的立身之本和发展之基，坚持以诚相待、重信守诺，认真负责、规范运作，做到言必行、行必果，有法必依、有章必循。

合作共赢——以开放、合作作为持续发展的必由之路，坚持互相尊重、包容并蓄，取长补短、精诚合作，遵循和尊重业务所在国（地区）法律法规、文化习俗，汲取、融汇合作方的优秀文化和先进经验，做到企业与利益相关方合作发展、互利共赢。在遵循集团公司核心价值理念统一性的基础上，各单位可结合实际培育具有自身特点的经营管理等理念，更好地发挥企业文化的引导、凝聚和激励作用。

除了中石化，冀中能源也值得我们去了解。冀中能源的企业文化：企业愿景：建设具有国际竞争力的大型企业集团

企业使命：奉献优质产品创造幸福生活

企业战略：一体两翼多元发展

企业目标：挺进世界500强

企业核心价值观：不断创造历史

企业精神：敢为人先奋发图强

企业作风：雷厉风行执行到位

企业安全理念：生命高于一切

企业人才理念：干好本职就是人才

“能”文化

爱维龙媒根据中国传统文化及内蒙电业的优良传统，借鉴现代管理思想与国内外优秀企业文化，结合内蒙古能源发电投资有限公司组建的历史背景和成长历程，总结、提炼出“能文化”。“能文化”是源于“能源、能量、能力”的能本管理理念和“没有如果，只有我能，释放能量，抒发豪情”的企业精神的概括和总结。能文化增补了以能力为导向的国内企业文化空白，倍受业内知名人士推崇。“能文化”是最能突出表现整个能源企业的整体文化。“能”是月亮之上的平台，要想实现心中的梦想，只有站得高，才能看得远，就要为自己插上腾飞的双翼。能源发电内涵着“能源、能量、能力”的企业文化，体现了“天时、地利、人和”的哲学思想，表达了能源企业抢抓机遇、发挥优势、成就事业的决心。能文化的内涵：能源发电人是这样认识的。标识以“能”字和“龙”字构成象形图案，形似能、神似龙、意能成。形似能，又似电，寓意公司核心业务；神似龙，寓意行业龙头地位及吉祥如意、向上腾飞之意；意能成，寓意公司“能”字当头，定能成功；标志造型内方外圆，符合中国传统“智欲圆而行必方”的古训；标志整体构图对称和谐，寓意企业稳健发展，四通八达；标志整体恢弘厚重，全面彰显公司强大的凝聚力、厚重的文化底蕴、辉煌的发展前景。

结语：我国能源企业存在着激烈的竞争，身为华科能源人，心系能源，心忧天下是我们的责任。希望在通过自己的努力，为中国的能源事业增添一份光彩。