商标评审规则(中英文对照)

第一篇：商标评审规则(中英文对照)

商标评审规则

(1995年11月2日原国家工商行政管理局第37号令公布；2002年9月17日国家工商行政管理总局令第3号第一次修订；2005年9月26日国家工商行政管理总局令第20号第二次修订)

第一章 总则

第一条 根据《中华人民共和国商标法》(以下简称商标法)和《中华人民共和国商标法实施条例》(以下简称实施条例)的规定，制定本规则。

第二条 依据商标法及其实施条例的规定，国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会(以下简称商标评审委员会)负责处理下列商标评审案件：

(一)不服国家工商行政管理总局商标局(以下简称商标局)驳回商标注册申请的决定，依据商标法第三十二条规定申请复审的案件；

(二)不服商标局的异议裁定，依据商标法第三十三条规定申请复审的案件；

(三)对已经注册的商标，依据商标法第四十一条规定请求裁定撤销的案件；

(四)不服商标局依照商标法第四十一条第一款、第四十四条、第四十五条的规定作出撤销或者维持注册商标的决定，依据商标法第四十九条规定申请复审的案件。

第三条 当事人参加商标争议案件的评审活动，应当以书面形式办理。

第四条 商标评审委员会审理商标争议案件实行书面审理，但依据实施条例第三十三条规定决定公开评审的情形除外。

第五条 商标评审委员会依据商标法、实施条例和本规则作出的决定和裁定，应当以书面形式通知有关当事人，并说明理由。

第六条 除本规则另有规定外，商标评审委员会审理商标争议案件实行合议制度，由商标评审人员组成合议组进行审理。

合议组审理案件，实行少数服从多数的原则。

第七条 当事人或者利害关系人依据实施条例第九条的规定申请商标评审人员回避的，应当以书面形式办理，并说明理由。

第八条 在商标评审期间，当事人有权依法处分自己的商标权和与商标评审有关的权利。在顾及社会公共利益、第三方权利的前提下，当事人之间可以自行以书面形式达成和解，商标评审委员会也可以进行调解。

第九条 共有商标的当事人参加商标评审活动，应当指定一人为代表人；没有指定代表人的，以其在商标注册申请书或者商标注册簿中载明的顺序第一人为代表人。代表人参与评审的行为对其所代表的当事人发生效力，但代表人变更、放弃评审请求或者承认对方当事人的评审请求，必须有被代表的当事人书面授权。

第十条 外国人或者外国企业办理商标评审事宜，在中国有经常居所或者营业所的，可以委托国家认可的具有商标代理资格的组织代理，也可以直接办理；在中国没有经常居所或者营业所的，应当委托国家认可的具有商标代理资格的组织代理。

代理权限发生变更、代理关系解除或者变更代理人的，当事人或者代理人应当及时书面告知商标评审委员会。

第十一条 当事人及其代理人可以申请查阅本案有关材料。

第二章 申请与受理

第十二条 申请商标评审，应当符合下列条件：

(一)申请人须有合法的主体资格；

(二)在法定期限内提出；

(三)属于商标评审委员会的评审范围；

(四)依法提交符合规定的申请书及有关证据材料；

(五)有明确的评审请求、事实根据和理由；

(六)依法缴纳评审费用。

第十三条 申请商标评审，应当向商标评审委员会提交申请书；有被申请人的，应当按照被申请人的数量提交相应份数的副本；申请人的商标发生转让、移转，已向商标局提出申请但是尚未核准公告的，申请人应当提供相应的证明文件；基于商标局的决定书或者裁定书申请复审的，还应当同时附送商标局的决定书或者裁定书。

第十四条 申请书应当载明下列事项：

(一)申请人的名称、住所地、通讯地址、联系人和联系电话。评审申请有被申请人的，应当载明被申请人的名称和住所地。委托商标代理组织办理商标评审事宜的，还应当载明商标代理组织的名称、通讯地址、联系人和联系电话；

(二)争议商标及其申请号或者初步审定号、注册号和刊登该商标的《商标公告》的期号；

(三)明确的评审请求和所根据的事实、理由及法律依据。

第十五条 商标评审申请不符合本规则第十二条第(一)、(二)、(三)项规定条件之一的，商标评审委员会不予受理，书面通知申请人，并说明理由。

第十六条 商标评审申请不符合本规则第十二条第(四)、(五)、(六)项规定条件之一的，或者未按照实施条例和本规则规定提交有关证明文件的，商标评审委员会应当向申请人发出补正通知，限其自收到补正通知之日起30日内补正。

经补正仍不符合规定的，商标评审委员会不予受理，书面通知申请人，并说明理由。期满未补正的，依据实施条例第三十条规定，视为申请人撤回评审 申请，商标评审委员会应当书面通知申请人。

第十七条 商标评审申请经审查符合受理条件的，商标评审委员会应当在30日内向申请人发出《受理通知书》。

第十八条 商标评审委员会已经受理的商标评审申请，有下列情形之一的，属于不符合受理条件，应当依据实施条例第三十条规定予以驳回：

(一)违反商标法第四十二条规定，对核准注册前已经提出异议并经裁定的商标，又以相同的事实和理由申请裁定的；

(二)违反实施条例第三十五条规定，申请人撤回商标评审申请后，又以相同的事实和理由再次提出评审申请的；

(三)违反实施条例第三十五条规定，对商标评审委员会已经作出的裁定或者决定，以相同的事实和理由再次提出评审申请的；

(四)其他不符合受理条件的情形。

商标评审委员会驳回商标评审申请，应当书面通知申请人，并说明理由。

第十九条 评审申请有被申请人的，商标评审委员会受理后，应当及时将申请书副本及有关证据材料送达被申请人，限其自收到申请书副本之日起30日内向商标评审委员会提交答辩书，并按照申请人的数量提交相应份数的副本；期满未提交或逾期提交的，视为放弃答辩。

第二十条 当事人需要在提出评审申请或者答辩后补充有关证据材料的，应当在申请书或者答辩书中声明，并自提交申请书或者答辩书之日起3个月内一次性提交与申请书或答辩书相同份数的证据材料；未在申请书或答辩书中声明或者期满未提交的，视为放弃补充有关证据材料。但是，期满后基于新的事实形成的证据或者确有其他正当理由的除外。

对当事人在法定期限内提供的证据材料，有对方当事人的，商标评审委员会应当将该证据材料发送给对方当事人，限其在指定期限内进行质证。

第二十一条 申请人提交申请书或者被申请人提交答辩书时，应当同时提交能够证明其身份的有效证件。申请人或者被申请人的名称应当与所提交的证件相一致。

当事人名称或者住所等事项发生变更的，应当提供相应的证明文件。

第二十二条 当事人应当对其提交的证据材料逐一分类编号和制作目录清单，对证据材料的来源、证明的具体事实作简要说明，并签名盖章。

商标评审委员会收到当事人提交的证据材料后，应当按目录清单核对证据材料，并由经办人员在回执上签收，注明提交日期。

第二十三条 商标评审申请书及有关证据材料应当按照规定的格式和要求填写、提供。未按照规定格式和要求填写、提供的，商标评审委员会向申请人发出补正通知，限其自收到补正通知之日起30日内补正。经补正仍不符合规定或者期满未补正的，适用本规则第十六条第二款的规定处理。

商标评审答辩书及有关证据材料应当按照规定的格式和要求填写、提供。未按照规定格式和要求填写、提供的，商标评审委员会向被申请人发出补正通知，限其自收到补正通知之日起30日内补正。经补正仍不符合规定或者期满未补正的，不影响商标评审委员会的评审。

第三章 审理

第二十四条 商标评审委员会审理商标评审案件应当组成合议组进行审理。合议组由商标评审人员3人以上的单数组成。但有下列情形之一的案件，可以由商标评审人员一人独任评审：

(一)商标局作出驳回决定、异议裁定所引证的商标在评审时已经丧失专用权或者在先权利的；

(二)被请求裁定撤销的商标已经丧失专用权的；

(三)商标局作出驳回决定所引证的商标归申请人所有，因申请人未及时办理变更手续被商标局驳回，评审时申请人已向商标局申请办完变更手续的；

(四)商标局作出驳回决定所引证的他人在先申请或者注册商标，评审时已核准转让给申请人的；

(五)其他可以独任评审的案件。

第二十五条 当事人或者利害关系人依据实施条例第九条和本规则第七条的规定对商标评审人员提出回避申请的，被申请回避的商标评审人员在商标评审委员会作出是否回避的决定前，应当暂停参与本案的审理工作。

商标评审委员会在作出决定、裁定后收到当事人或者利害关系人提出的回避申请的，不影响评审决定、裁定的有效性。但评审人员确实存在需要回避的情形的，商标评审委员会应当依法作出处理。

第二十六条 商标评审委员会对当事人提出的回避申请，应当在收到申请后7日内，以书面形式作出决定，并书面通知申请人。申请人对商标评审委员会作出的不回避决定不服的，可以在收到决定后3日内申请复议一次。复议期间，被申请回避的商标评审人员，不停止参与本案的审理工作。商标评审委员会对复议申请应当在3日内作出复议决定，并书面通知复议申请人。

第二十七条 商标评审委员会审理不服商标局驳回商标注册申请决定的复审案件，除应当适用商标法第十条、第十一条、第十二条和第十六条第一款规定外，应当针对商标局的驳回决定和申请人申请复审的事实、理由、请求以及评审时的事实状态进行评审。商标评审委员会根据本条前述规定作出复审决定前应当听取申请人的意见。

第二十八条 商标评审委员会审理不服商标局异议裁定的复审案件，应当针对当事人复审申请和答辩的事实、理由及请求进行评审。

第二十九条 商标评审委员会审理依据商标法第四十一条请求裁定撤销注册商标的案件，应当针对当事人申请和答辩的事实、理由及请求进行评审。

第三十条 商标评审委员会审理不服商标局依照商标法第四十一条第一款规定作出撤销注册商标决定的复审案件，应当针对商标局的决定和申请人申请复审的事实、理由及请求进行评审。

商标评审委员会审理不服商标局依照商标法第四十四条、第四十五条规定作出撤销或者维持注册商标决定的复审案件，应当针对商标局作出撤销或者维持注册商标决定时所依据的事实、理由和法律适用进行评审。但是，依据商标法第四十四条第(四)项申请复审的案件当事人需要补充证据且有正当理由的除外。

第三十一条 在商标评审程序中，当事人的商标权发生转让、移转的，受让人或者承继人应当及时以书面形式声明承受转让人的地位，参加后续评审程序并承担相应的评审后果。

第三十二条 有下列情形之一的，终止评审：

(一)申请人死亡或者终止后没有继承人或者继承人放弃评审权利的；

(二)申请人撤回评审申请的；

(三)当事人自行和解或者经商标评审委员会调解后达成协议的；

(四)其他应当终止评审的情形。

终止评审的，商标评审委员会予以结案，书面通知有关当事人，并说明理由。

第三十三条 合议组审理案件应当制作合议笔录，并由合议组成员签名。合议组成员有不同意见的，应当如实记入合议笔录。

经审理终结的案件，商标评审委员会依法作出决定、裁定。

第三十四条 商标评审委员会作出的决定书、裁定书应当载明下列内容：

(一)评审请求、争议的事实和理由；

(二)决定或者裁定认定的事实、理由和适用的法律依据；

(三)决定或者裁定结论；

(四)可供当事人选用的后续程序和时限；

(五)决定、裁定作出的日期。

决定书、裁定书由合议组成员署名，加盖商标评审委员会印章。

第三十五条 对商标评审委员会作出的决定、裁定，当事人不服向人民法院起诉的，应当在向人民法院递交起诉状的同时或者至迟15日内将该起诉状副本抄送或者另行书面告知商标评审委员会。

商标评审委员会自所作出的决定、裁定发出之日起60日内未收到来自人民法院或者案件当事人任何有关该决定、裁定之起诉信息的，视为有关当事人未向法院起诉，该决定、裁定移送商标局执行。

第三十六条 商标评审委员会根据当事人的请求或者实际需要，可以决定对评审申请进行公开评审。

第三十七条 当事人请求进行公开评审的，应当提出需要进行公开评审的具体理由。

第三十八条 申请人请求进行公开评审的，应当自收到被申请人的答辩书副本之日起15日内以书面形式向商标评审委员会提出；被申请人请求进行公开评审的，应当在向商标评审委员会提交答辩书或者补充有关证据材料时一并提出。

第三十九条 公开评审的具体程序由商标评审委员会另行规定。

第四章 证据规则

第四十条 当事人对自己提出的评审请求所依据的事实或者反驳对方评审请求所依据的事实有责任提供证据加以证明。没有证据或者证据不足以证明当事人的事实主张的，由负有举证责任的当事人承担不利后果。

一方当事人对另一方当事人陈述的案件事实明确表示承认的，另一方当事人无需举证。

对一方当事人陈述的事实，另一方当事人既未表示承认也未否认的，视为对该项事实的承认。

当事人委托代理人参加评审的，代理人的承认视为当事人的承认。但未经特别授权的代理人对事实的承认直接导致承认对方评审请求的除外；当事人在 场但对其代理人的承认不作否认表示的，视为当事人的承认。

第四十一条 下列事实，当事人无需举证证明：

(一)众所周知的事实；

(二)按照法律规定推定的事实；

(三)已经依法证明的事实；

(四)根据日常生活经验法则推定的事实；

(五)其他依法无需举证的事实。

但当事人有相反证据足以推翻的除外。

第四十二条 当事人向商标评审委员会提供书证的，应当提供原件，包括原本、正本和副本。提供原件有困难的，可以提供相应的复印件、照片、节录本；提供由有关部门保管的书证原件的复制件、影印件或者抄录件的，应当注明出处，经该部门核对无异后加盖其印章。

当事人向商标评审委员会提供物证的，应当提供原物。提供原物有困难的，可以提供相应的复制件或者证明该物证的照片、录像等其他证据；原物为数量较多的种类物的，提供其中的一部分。

一方当事人对另一方当事人所提书证、物证的复制件或者照片等存在怀疑并有相应证据支持的，或者商标评审委员会认为有必要的，被质疑的当事人应当提供或者出示有关证据的原件或经公证的复印件。

第四十三条 当事人向商标评审委员会提供的证据系在中华人民共和国领域外形成，或者在香港、澳门、台湾地区形成，对方当事人对该证据的真实性存在怀疑并有相应证据支持的，或者商标评审委员会认为必要的，应当依照有关规定办理相应的公证认证手续。

第四十四条 当事人向商标评审委员会提供外文书证或者外文说明资料，应当附有中文译文。提交外文证据的当事人未提交中文译文的，该外文证据视为未提交。

对方当事人对译文具体内容有异议的，应当对有异议的部分提交中文译 文。必要时，可以委托双方当事人认可的单位对全文、或者所使用部分或者有异议的部分进行翻译。

双方当事人对委托翻译达不成协议的，商标评审委员会可以指定专业翻译单位对全文、或者所使用部分或者有异议部分进行翻译。委托翻译所需费用由双方当事人各承担50％；拒绝支付翻译费用的，视为其承认对方提交的译文。

第四十五条 对单一证据有无证明力和证明力大小可以从下列方面进行审核认定：

(一)证据是否原件、原物，复印件、复制品与原件、原物是否相符；

(二)证据与本案事实是否相关；

(三)证据的形式、来源是否符合法律规定；

(四)证据的内容是否真实；

(五)证人或者提供证据的人，与当事人有无利害关系。

第四十六条 评审人员对案件的全部证据，应当从各证据与案件事实的关联程度、各证据之间的联系等方面进行综合审查判断。

第四十七条 下列证据不能单独作为认定案件事实的依据：

(一)未成年人所作的与其年龄和智力状况不相适应的证言；

(二)与一方当事人有亲属关系、隶属关系或者其他密切关系的证人所作的对该当事人有利的证言，或者与一方当事人有不利关系的证人所作的对该当事人不利的证言；

(三)应当参加公开评审作证而无正当理由不参加公开评审作证的证人证言；

(四)难以识别是否经过修改的视听资料；

(五)无法与原件、原物核对的复制件或者复制品；

(六)经一方当事人或者他人改动，对方当事人不予认可的证据材料；

(七)其他不能单独作为认定案件事实依据的证据材料。

第四十八条 一方当事人提出的下列证据，对方当事人提出异议但没有足以反驳的相反证据的，商标评审委员会应当确认其证明力：

(一)书证原件或者与书证原件核对无误的复印件、照片、副本、节录本；

(二)物证原物或者与物证原物核对无误的复制件、照片、录像资料等；

(三)有其他证据佐证并以合法手段取得的、无疑点的视听资料或者与视听资料核对无误的复制件。

第四十九条 一方当事人委托鉴定部门作出的鉴定结论，另一当事人没有足以反驳的相反证据和理由的，可以认定其证明力。

第五十条 一方当事人提出的证据，另一方当事人认可或者提出的相反证据不足以反驳的，商标评审委员会可以确认其证明力。

一方当事人提出的证据，另一方当事人有异议并提出反驳证据，对方当事人对反驳证据认可的，可以确认反驳证据的证明力。

第五十一条 双方当事人对同一事实分别举出相反的证据，但都没有足够的依据否定对方证据的，商标评审委员会应当结合案件情况，判断一方提供证据的证明力是否明显大于另一方提供证据的证明力，并对证明力较大的证据予以确认。

因证据的证明力无法判断导致争议事实难以认定的，商标评审委员会应当依据举证责任分配原则作出判断。

第五十二条 评审过程中，当事人在申请书、答辩书、陈述及其委托代理人的代理词中承认的对己方不利的事实和认可的证据，商标评审委员会应当予以确认，但当事人反悔并有相反证据足以推翻的除外。

第五十三条 当事人对自己的主张，只有本人陈述而不能提出其他相关证据的，其主张不予支持。但对方当事人认可的除外。

第五十四条 商标评审委员会就数个证据对同一事实的证明力，可以依照下列原则认定：

(一)国家机关以及其他职能部门依职权制作的公文文书优于其他书证；

(二)鉴定结论、档案材料以及经过公证或者登记的书证优于其他书证、视听资料和证人证言；

(三)原件、原物优于复制件、复制品；

(四)法定鉴定部门的鉴定结论优于其他鉴定部门的鉴定结论；

(五)原始证据优于传来证据；

(六)其他证人证言优于与当事人有亲属关系或者其他密切关系的证人提供的对该当事人有利的证言；

(七)参加公开评审作证的证人证言优于未参加公开评审作证的证人证言；

(八)数个种类不同、内容一致的证据优于一个孤立的证据。

第五章 期间、送达

第五十五条 期间包括法定期间和商标评审委员会指定的期间。

期间以日、月、年计算。期间开始的当日，不计算在期间内。

期间届满的最后一日是节假日的，以节假日后的第一个工作日为期间届满的日期。

第五十六条 当事人向商标评审委员会提交的文件或者材料的日期，直接递交的，以递交日为准；邮寄的，以寄出的邮戳日为准；邮戳日不清晰或者没有邮戳的，以商标评审委员会实际收到日为准，但是当事人能够提出实际邮戳日证据的除外。

第五十七条 商标评审委员会的各种文件，可以通过邮寄、直接递交或者其他方式送达当事人。当事人委托商标代理组织的，文件送达商标代理组织视为送达当事人。

商标评审委员会向当事人送达各种文件的日期，邮寄的，以当事人收到的邮戳日为准；邮戳日不清晰或者没有邮戳的，或者没有被邮局退回的，自文件发出之日起满15日，视为送达当事人；直接递交的，以递交日为准。文件无法 邮寄或者无法直接递交的，可以通过公告方式送达当事人，自公告发布之日起满30日，该文件视为已经送达。

第五十八条 当事人是在中华人民共和国没有经常居所或者营业所的外国人或者外国企业的，由商标注册档案中载明的商标代理组织承担商标评审程序中该商标的有关法律文件的签收义务；商标评审委员会将有关法律文件送达该商标代理组织，视为送达当事人。

商标代理组织在前款所述有关法律文件送达之前已经与有关外国当事人解除商标代理关系的，应当以书面形式向商标评审委员会说明有关情况，并自收到文件之日起10日内将有关法律文件交回商标评审委员会，由商标评审委员会另行送达。

马德里国际注册商标涉及国际局转发相关书件的，应当提交相应的送达证据。未提交的，应书面说明原因，自国际局发文之日起满15日视为送达。

上述方式无法送达的，公告送达。

第六章 附则

第五十九条 对商标法修改决定于2001年12月1日施行前发生，属于修改后商标法第四条、第五条、第八条、第九条第一款、第十条第一款第(一)、(三)、(四)项、第十条第二款、第十一条、第十二条、第十三条、第十五条、第十六条、第二十四条、第二十五条、第三十一条所列举的情形，商标评审委员会在商标法修改决定施行后进行评审的，依据修改后商标法的相应规定进行评审；属于其他情形的，商标评审委员会适用修改前商标法的相应规定进行评审。

当事人就商标法修改决定施行时注册已满一年的商标产生争议，向商标评审委员会申请评审的，适用修改前商标法第二十七条第二款规定的提出申请的期限处理；当事人就商标法修改决定施行时注册不满一年的商标产生争议，向商标评审委员会申请评审的，适用修改后商标法第四十一条第三款规定的提出申请的期限处理。

有关单位或者个人在商标法修改决定施行前依照修改前商标法第二十七条及其实施细则第二十五条的规定提出评审申请，属于修改后商标法第十三条、第十五条、第十六条和第三十一条规定情形的，不适用修改后商标法第四十一条第二款规定的提出评审申请的期限规定。

第六十条 办理商标评审事宜的文书格式，由国家工商行政管理总局制定并公布。

第六十一条

第六十二条

本规则由国家工商行政管理总局负责解释。本规则自2005年10月26日起施行。14 Rules for Trademark Review and Adjudication

(Promulgated on 2 November 1995 in the Order No.37 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce;revised for the first time on 17 September 2002 in the Order No.3 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce;revised for the second time on 26 September 2005 in the Order No.20 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce)

Chapter I General Provisions

Rule 1 These Rules are hereby formulated in accordance with the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Law)and the Regulations for the Implementation of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Implementing Regulations).Rule 2 Under the Trademark Law and the Implementing Regulations thereof, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board)shall be responsible for handling the following cases of trademark dispute:(1)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 32 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with decisions made by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Office)on rejection of applications for trademark registration;(2)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 33 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with opposition adjudication made by the Trademark Office;(3)cases of request for adjudication on cancellation of registered trademarks filed according to the provision of Article 41 of the Trademark Law;and(4)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 49 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with a decision to cancel or uphold a registered trademark made by the Trademark Office according to the provisions of Articles 41, paragraph one, 44 and 45 of the Trademark Law.Rule 3 The review and adjudication activities in which an interested party participates in cases of trademark dispute shall proceed in writing.Rule 4 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall hear cases of trademark dispute in writing, except the circumstances where it decides to publicly review and adjudicate a case according to the provision of Article 33 of Implementing Regulations.Rule 5 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify, in writing, the interested parties of, and explain the reason for, the decisions and adjudication made according to the Trademark Law, the Implementing Regulations and these Rules.Rule 6 Unless otherwise provided for in these Rules, the collegial system shall be adopted for the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board to hear cases of trademark dispute, and the examiners for the trademark review and adjudication shall make a collegial panel to conduct the hearing of a case.When the collegial panel hears a case, the principle is adopted that the minority are subordinate to the majority.Rule 7 An interested party who applies for withdrawal of an examiner for trademark review and adjudication according to the provision of Article 9 of the Implementing Regulations shall file the application in writing, and explain the reason therefor.Rule 8 During the review and adjudication, an interested party shall have the right to dispose of, according to law, his trademark right and the right relating to trademark review and adjudication.Provided that public interests and a third party’s rights are taken into consideration, interested parties may reach an amicable settlement agreement in writing by themselves.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may conduct mediation.Rule 9 Where interested parties who are co-owners of a trademark participate in the review and adjudication, they shall designate a representative;where no representative is designated, the first person indicated in the trademark registration application or in the Trademark Register shall be the representative.The action of the representative to participate in the review and adjudication shall have effect on the interested parties he represents, but change of the representative, waiver of the review and adjudication request or acknowledgement of the other party's review and adjudication request must be authorized in writing by the interested parties represented.Rule 10 Where a foreign person or enterprise attending to matter of review and adjudication has habitual residence or place of business in China, he or it may entrust a qualified trademark agency authorised by the State with, or directly attend to, the matter.Where a foreign person or enterprise attending to the matter of review and adjudication does not have habitual residence or place of business in China, he or it shall entrust a qualified trademark agency authorised by the State.Where there is a change in the scope of power of agency, the agent relations terminate, or there is a change of agent, the interested party or its agent shall inform the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in writing in a timely manner.Rule 11 Interested parties and agents may apply for consulting documents relevant to a case.Chapter II Application and Acceptance

Rule 12 Applications for trademark review and adjudication shall conform to the requirements as follows:(1)The applicants must be lawfully qualified subjects;(2)The applications are filed within the statutory time limit;(3)The applications fall within the scope of review and adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;(4)Applications and the relevant proofs that conform to the requirement are submitted according to law;(5)There are specific requests, factual bases and grounds for the review and adjudication;and(6)The review and adjudication fees are paid according to law.Rule 13 To apply for trademark review and adjudication, one shall file an Application with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.If there is(are)a respondent/respondents, the applicant shall file as many copies of the Application as there are respondents.Where a trademark has been assigned or transferred and an application for the assignment has been filed with the Trademark Office, and not approved and published, the applicant shall submit relevant documents as proof.To apply for reexamination in respect of a decision or adjudication made by the Trademark Office, one shall also submit the Decision or Adjudication made by the Trademark Office along with the Application.Rule 14 Following information shall be indicated in the Application:(1)the applicant’s name, address of residence, mailing address, the name of the person to be contacted, and telephone number.Where the respondent(s)is(are)indicated in the review and adjudication application, the name and address thereof shall be indicated.Where a trademark agency is appointed to attend to the matter of the trademark review and adjudication, the name, mailing address, the name of the person to be contacted, and telephone number of the agency shall also be indicated.(2)the trademark in dispute and its application number or preliminary approval number, registration number and the issue number of the Trademark Gazette;(3)specific request for the review and adjudication, and the facts, grounds and legal bases for the request;Rule 15 Where a trademark review and adjudication application does not conform to any one of the requirements set forth in Rule 12(1),(2)and(3)of these Rules, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not accept the application and shall notify the applicant in writing of the non-acceptance, and explain the reason.Rule 16 Where a trademark review and adjudication application does not conform to any one of the requirements set forth in Rule 12(4),(5)and(6)of these Rules or where the relevant certificates or proofs are not submitted according to the Implementing Regulations and these Rules, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant to make rectification and require him to comply within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notification on rectification.Where an application remains contrary to the requirements upon rectification, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not accept the application and shall notify the applicant in writing of the non-acceptance and explain the reason.Where no rectification is made at the expiration of the time limit, the review and adjudication application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn by the applicant and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant in writing according to the provision of Article 30 of the Implementing Regulations.Rule 17 Where a trademark review and adjudication application conforms to the requirement for acceptance, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall issue to the applicant the Acceptance Notification within thirty days.Rule 18 In any one of the following circumstances, any trademark review and adjudication application that has been accepted by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is deemed not to conform to the requirements for acceptance, and shall be refused according to Article 30 of the Implementing Regulations:(1)contrary to the provision of Article 42 of the Trademark Law in that against a trademark to which an opposition was raised and on which adjudication(on reexamination of the opposition)was made before it was approved of registration, an application for adjudication is filed on the basis of the same facts and grounds;(2)contrary to the provision of Article 35 of the Implementing Regulations in that an application for review and adjudication has been voluntarily withdrawn and the applicant files another application on the basis of the same facts and grounds thereafter;(3)contrary to the provision of Article 35 of the Implementing Regulations in that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board has made adjudication or decision on an application for review and adjudication and the applicant files another application on the basis of the same facts and grounds;or(4)any other circumstance under which an application does not conform to the requirements for acceptance;The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, when rejecting a trademark review and adjudication application, shall notify the applicant in writing, and explain the reason.Rule 19 Where there is/are a respondent/respondents indicated in a Review and Adjudication Application, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, upon acceptance, shall forward the copies of the Application and the relevant proofs thereto in a timely manner, and require him/them to submit the Reply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board within thirty days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Application, and submit the same number of copies thereof as that of the applicants.Where a respondent does not submit a Reply or fails to submit the Reply before the expiration of the time limit, he shall be deemed to have given up making the Reply.Rule 20 Any interested party who needs to supplement relevant proofs after filing a Review and Adjudication Application or a Reply shall make a statement in the Application/Reply and submit altogether the same number of copies of the proofs as that of the Application/Reply within three months from the date of filing.Where the applicant/respondent does not make the statement or fails to submit the relevant proofs at the expiration of the time limit, he shall be deemed to have given up supplementing the relevant proofs, with the exception that the evidence is based on the new facts that occur after the expiration of the time limit or there is any other justifiable reason.Where there is an opposite party involved, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall communcate the proofs submitted by an interested party within the statutory time limit to the opposite party, and request him/it for cross-examination within a specified period of time.Rule 21 The applicant, when filing an Application or respondent, when filing a Reply, shall, meanwhile, submit valid certificates capable of proving his identification.The name of the applicant or the respondent shall be consistent with that indicated in the certificates submitted.Where there is a change in the name or address of an interested party, relevant proofs to this effect shall be submitted.Rule 22 The interested party shall categorise, number and list each proof he submits, briefly explain the source thereof, and specific facts of the evidence, and sign and seal them.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, after receiving the proofs submitted by an interested party, shall check the proofs according to the list thereof, and the staff member receiving the proofs shall sign his name on the receipt and indicate the date of submission.Rule 23 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Application and relevant proofs shall be filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Application and relevant proofs are not filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant to make rectification, requiring him to do so within thirty dates from the date of receipt of the rectification notification.Failure for the amended Application and relevant proofs to conform to the prescription or failure to make the rectification at the expiration of the time limit shall be governed by Rule 16, paragraph two, of these Rules.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Reply and relevant proofs shall be filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Reply and relevant proofs are not filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the respondent to make rectification, requiring him to do so within thirty dates from the date of receipt of the rectification notification.Failure for the amended Reply and relevant proofs to conform to the prescription or failure to make the rectification at the expiration of the time limit shall not affect the review and adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Chapter III Hearing

Rule 24 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall set up a collegial panel to hear a case of trademark review and adjudication.The collegial panel shall be composed of an odd number of more than three trademark review and adjudication examiners.In any one of the following circumstances, an individual trademark review and adjudication examiner may solely review and adjudicate a case:(1)where a trademark cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision or opposition adjudication has lost the exclusive right or the right of priority therein;(2)where a trademark of which a request for cancellation has been filed has lost the exclusive right therein;(3)where a trademark cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision is actually owned by an applicant, but rejected by the Trademark Office because the applicant fails to go through the formalities for a change in time, and the applicant applies, during the review and adjudication, to the Trademark Office to complete the formalities for the change;(4)where a third party’s trademark of prior filing or registration, cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision, has been approved to be assigned to the applicant during the review and adjudication;or(5)any other cases that may be under the sole review and adjudication by an individual trademark review and adjudication examiner.Rule 25 Where an interested party applies for the withdrawal of a trademark review and adjudication examiner according to the provision of Article 9 of the Implementing Regulations and Rule 7 of these Rules, the trademark review and adjudication examiner shall suspend his participation in the hearing of the case before the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board decides whether or not he should withdraw.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board receives an application for withdrawal from an interested party after it makes decision or adjudication, the validity of the review and adjudication decision or adjudication shall not be affected.However, where the review and adjudication examiner indeed needs to withdraw, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall treat the matter according to law.Rule 26 In respect of a party's application for withdrawal, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make its decision within seven days after the date of the receipt of the application, and notify the applicant in writing.Where an applicant is not satisfied with the decision on non-withdrawal made by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, it or he may apply for reconsideration once within three days after the date of the receipt of the decision.During the reconsideration, the trademark review and adjudication examiner whose withdrawal is requested shall not suspend his participation in the hearing of the case.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make its reconsideration decision within three days, and notify the reconsideration applicant in writing.Rule 27 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision by the Trademark Office on the rejection of trademark registration, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall, besides applying Articles 10, 11, 12 and 16, paragraph one, of the Trademark Law, review and adjudicate the case in connection with the rejection decision made by the Trademark Office, the facts of, grounds on, and requests for, the reexamination application by the applicant and the factual situation in the course of review and adjudication.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall listen to what the applicant has to say before making a decision according to the proceeding provision of this Rule.Rule 28 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with an adjudication made by the Trademark Office on opposition, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts of, grounds on, and requests for, the reexamination application and reply made by the interested parties.Rule 29 In hearing a case of adjudication requested according to the provision of Article 41 of the Trademark Law on cancellation of a registered trademark, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts of, grounds on and requests for, the application and reply by the interested parties.Rule 30 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision by the Trademark Office on cancellation of a registered trademark according to the provision of Article 41, paragraph one, of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the decision made by the Trademark Office and the facts of, grounds on and requests for, the reexamination application by the applicant.In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision on canceling or upholding of a registered trademark made by the Trademark Office according to the provisions of Articles 44 and 45 of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts, grounds and application of law on the basis of which the Trademark Office made the decision to cancel or uphold the registered trademark, except that an interested party to a case in which the reexamination has been applied for under Article 44(4)of the Trademark Law needs to submit additional evidence with justification.Rule 31 Where an interested party’s trademark right has been assigned or transferred during the trademark review and adjudication, the assignee or the transferee shall make a statement in writing on its or his assignee or transferee status in a timely manner, participate in the follow-up reexamination proceedings, and take the corresponding consequences.Rule 32 In any one of the following circumstances, the review and adjudication shall terminate:(1)where the applicant dies or terminates and there is no inheritor, or the inheritor abandons its or his right for review and adjudication;(2)where the applicant withdraws its or his application for review and adjudication;(3)where the interested parties reach an amicable agreement by themselves or through mediation by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;or(4)any other circumstance requiring the termination of the review and adjudication.Where the review and adjudication terminates, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall close the case, notify the interested parties in writing, and explain the reason.Rule 33 The collegial panel shall put down in writing the case it hears, and the written record shall be signed by the members thereof.Where the members of a collegial panel are divided in their opinions, the divided opinions shall be indicated in the collegial record.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make decision or adjudication according to law on a case the examination of which has been closed.Rule 34 The following shall be indicated in the decision or adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board:(1)request for review and adjudication and facts at issue and grounds;(2)facts ascertained, reasons and grounds for the application of law in the decision or adjudication;(3)conclusion made in the decision or adjudication;(4)the follow-up procedure and time limit available to interested parties;and(5)date of the decision or adjudication.The decision or adjudication shall be signed by the members of the collegial panel and sealed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Rule 35 Where an interested party institutes proceedings in a people's court out of dissatisfaction with a decision or adjudication made by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the interested party shall, at the time of submitting a complaint to the people’s court or within fifteen days from the date of the submission at the latest, send a copy of the complaint, or separately notify the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in writing.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, within sixty days from the date of issuing its decision or adjudication, is not informed by the people’s court or any interested party of a lawsuit directed to the decision or adjudication, it shall be deemed that the interested party has not instituted legal proceedings in the court, and the decision or adjudication will be transferred to Trademark Office for enforcement.Rule 36 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may, at the request of an interested party or according to practical needs, decide to conduct a public review and adjudication of the application therefor.Rule 37 If an interested party requests for public review and adjudication, he shall give specific reasons that the public review and adjudication is necessary.Rule 38 An applicant requesting for the public review and adjudication shall file the request in writing with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Reply made by the respondent;and a respondent requesting for the public review and adjudication shall file the request together with the submission to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the Reply or additional relevant proofs.Rule 39 Specific procedures for public review and adjudication will be separately set forth by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Chapter IV Rules on Evidence

Rule 40 An interested party shall be under the burden of proof to testify the facts on the basis of which he requests for the review and adjudication or on the basis of which one rebuts the other party's review and adjudication request.Where there is no evidence or there is not sufficient evidence to attest to the factual claims by an interested party, the interested party under the burden of proof shall bear the adverse consequences.Where one interested party expressly acknowledges the facts in a case as stated by the other party, the latter is not under the burden of proof.The other party's neither acknowledging nor denying the facts claimed by an interested party shall be deemed acknowledgement thereof.Where an interested party appoints an attorney to attend the review and adjudication, the attorney's admission shall be deemed the interested party's admission, except that the attorney's unauthorized admission of any facts directly results in the admission of the other party’s review and adjudication request.The interested party’s failure to express objection to its or his attorney's admission on site shall be deemed to be the the interested party’s admission.Rule 41 An interested party does not need to adduce evidence to prove the following facts:(1)facts known to all;(2)facts deducted from the law;(3)facts proven according to the law;(4)facts deducted on the basis of experience and laws of the daily life;and(5)other facts in respect of which adduction of evidence is not required under the law.except that an interested party has evidence to the contrary which is sufficient to upset the facts.Rule 42 An interested party who furnishes the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board with documentary evidence shall furnish the original, including the original text, the authentic text, and the copy.The interested party who has difficulty furnishing the original may furnish the corresponding Xerox copies, photographs or extracts.Where the furnished documents are Xerox copies, photographs or extracts of the original documentary evidence kept by a relevant department, the sources shall be indicated, and the documents be sealed by the department upon verification.An interested party who furnishes the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board with material evidence shall furnish the original material.The interested party who has difficulty furnishing the original may furnish the corresponding reproduction or other evidence such as photographs or video-recordings of said material evidence.Where the original is of relatively many varieties, a part thereof shall be furnished.Where an interested party has doubt about the Xerox copies or photographs of the documentary evidence and material evidence furnished by the other party, and has relevant proofs in support of the doubt, or where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board deems necessary, the doubted interested party shall furnish or show the original or the notarised copy of the relevant evidence.Article 43 Where the evidence furnished by an interested party to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is evolved outside the territory of the People’s Republic of China, or in the region of Hong Kong, Macau or Taiwan and where the other party has doubt for its authenticity and has relevant proofs in support of the doubt, or where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board deems necessary, the evidence shall be notarized and or legalized according to the relevant regulations.Rule 44 Where an interested party furnishes to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board instruments or explanatory material in a foreign language, he shall attach the Chinese translation thereof.Where an interested party who has furnished evidence in a foreign language fails to submit the Chinese translation thereof, the evidence in the foreign language shall be deemed not to have been submitted.Where the other party has objection to the specific content of the translation, he shall submit the Chinese translation of the part to which the objection is raised.If necessary, an entity accepted by both parties may be entrusted with the translation of the entire text or the part of the text which has been used or to which objection has been raised.Where both parties fail to reach an agreement on the translation entrustment, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may entrust a professional translation entity with the translation of the entire text or the part of the text which has been used or to which objection has been raised.Each party shall bear 50 percent of the fees necessary for the entrusted translation.A party's refusal to pay the translation fee shall be deemed its acceptance of the translation submitted by the other party.Rule 45 A single piece of evidence may be verified and confirmed as to the presence and strength of evidential force in relation to the following aspects:(1)whether the evidence is the original text, original material;whether the copy or reproduction of the evidence is consistent with the original;(2)whether the evidence is relevant to the facts of a case;(3)whether the evidence conforms to the law in terms of form or source;(4)whether the evidence is true in content;and(5)whether the witness or the person furnishing the evidence has interest in an interested party.Rule 46 The review and adjudication examiners shall comprehensively examine and evaluate all the evidence as to the degree of relevance of the various pieces of the evidence to the facts of a case and the relationship of these pieces of evidence.Rule 47 The following evidence alone shall not serve as the basis for ascertaining facts in a case:(1)oral evidence from a minor which does not match his age or intelligence;(2)oral evidence in favour of one interested party from a witness who is a relative, affiliate or otherwise closely related to the interested party or oral evidence against one interested party from a witness who is adversely-related thereto;(3)oral evidence from a witness who should attend the public review and adjudication but fails to without justification;(4)Audiovisual reference material difficult to be detected as to whether it is modified or not;(5)Copy or reproduction impossible to be verified with the original;(6)Proofs which one party or another person has modified and which the other party does not accept;and(7)Any other proofs that, alone, cannot serve as the basis for ascertaining the facts in a case.Rule 48 The following evidence furnished by an interested party, to which the other party objects but fails to rebut with sufficient evidence to the contrary, shall be established by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as having its evidential force:(1)the original documentary evidence or the Xerox copies, photographs, copies or extracts thereof which are verified to be consistent with the original documentary evidence;(2)the original material evidence or the copies, photographs or video-recording materials thereof which are verified to be consistent with the original material evidence;(3)the audiovisual reference material which is supported by other evidence and obtained by legal means and free of any doubt or the reproduction thereof verified without any inconsistency found.Rule 49 Where a appraisal conclusion made by an appraisal organisation with entrustment by an interested party is not rebutted by the other party with sufficient evidence and reason to the contrary, the evidential force of the appraisal conclusion may be confirmed.Rule 50 In respect of the evidence one interested party has furnished and the other party accepts or fails to rebut with sufficient evidence to the contrary, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may confirm its evidential force.Where in respect of the evidence one interested party has furnished, the other party has objection thereto and presents evidence to rebut it, and the opposite party accepts the rebutting evidence, the evidential force of the rebutting evidence may be confirmed.Rule 51 Where both parties furnish evidence to the contrary in respect of the same fact, neither has sufficient ground for the denial of the evidence of the other party, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall evaluate, considering the circumstances of a case, whether or not the evidence furnished by one party is obviously more valid in evidential force than that by the other party, and confirm the evidence carrying more valid evidential force.Where it is impossible to evaluate the evidential force of the evidence, and, as a result, it is difficult to ascertain the facts in dispute, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make determination according to the doctrine for distribution of burden of proof.Rule 52 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall confirm the facts and evidence which are unfavorable to an interested party, but have been accepted by the interested party in its or his Application, Reply, Written Statement, or statements made by his appointed attorney in the course of review and adjudication, except that the party goes back on his words and has sufficient evidence to the contrary to rebut them.Rule 53 Where an interested party has made his own statement of, but cannot furnish other relevant evidence to back up, his claim, the claim shall not be supported, except that the other party otherwise accepts the claim.Rule 54 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may determine the evidential force of several pieces of evidence as to the same fact according to the following principles:(1)Documents and instruments prepared, ex officio, by a State agency and any other competent department prevail over other documentary evidence;(2)Appraisal conclusions, materials kept on file and notarized or registered documentary evidence prevail over other documentary evidence, audiovisual reference evidence and oral evidence from a witness;(3)Original documents or materials prevail over copies or reproductions;(4)Appraisal conclusions made by statutory appraisal departments prevail over those by other appraisal departments;(5)Original evidence prevails over derivative evidence;(6)Oral evidence of other witnesses prevails over oral evidence, in favor of an interested party, from a witness who is a relative or otherwise closely related to the party;(7)Oral evidence from a participant of the public review and adjudication prevails over that from a non-participant;and(8)Several pieces of evidence variant in category and consistent in content prevail over a single isolated piece of evidence.Chapter V Time Limit and Service

Rule 55 The time limit includes the statutory time limit and that fixed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.The time limit is counted in days, months and years.The beginning day of a time limit is not counted.Where the last day on which a time limit expires is a public holiday, the first workday following the public holiday is the date on which the time limit expires.Rule 56 Where any document or material is sent to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the date of receipt shall be the date of delivery where it is delivered personally, or the date of posting indicated by the postmark if it is sent by post;where the date of posting indicated by the postmark is illegible, or there is no postmark, the date of receipt shall be the date on which the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board actually receives the document or material, except that the interested party is able to present evidence as to the actual date of posting indicated by the postmark.Rule 57 Any document of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may be served by post, by personal delivery or by other means.Where an interested party entrusts a trademark agency, delivery of the document to the trademark agency shall be deemed delivery thereof to the interested party.Where any document is sent to an interested party by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the date of receipt shall be the date of receipt indicated by the postmark on which the interested party receives it if it is sent by post;where the date of posting indicated by the postmark is illegible, or where there is no postmark, or it is not returned to the addressor by the Post Office the document shall be deemed to have been delivered to the interested party on the fifteenth day from the date of posting the document;the date of receipt shall be the date of delivery if it is delivered personally.Where any document cannot be sent by post or by personal delivery, the document may be served through publication on the Trademark Gazette.At the expiration of the thirtieth day from the date of the publication, the document shall be deemed to have been served.Rule 58 Where an interested party is a foreign person or enterprise having no habitual residence or place of business in China, the trademark agency acting on its or his behalf as indicated in the relevant official record of trademark registration shall receive, with acknowledgement, the delivered legal documents in relation to the trademark in the proceedings of trademark review and adjudication;delivery of the documents to the trademark agency shall be deemed delivery thereof to the interested party.Where a trademark agency has terminated its agent relation with the relevant foreign interested party before the delivery of the legal documents mentioned in the preceding paragraph, it shall inform in writing the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board about it, and return the legal documents, within ten days from the receipt thereof, to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for another service to the proper addressee.Where a trademark of international registration under the Madrid system involves communication of the relevant forms and documents by the International Bureau, proof of service of the documents shall be submitted.If no such proof is furnished, the reason shall be explained in writing, and the forms and documents shall be deemed to have been served at the expiration of the fifteenth day from the date of issuance thereof by the International Bureau.If a document can not be delivered by any of the above means, it will be served through publication on the Trademark Gazette.Chapter VI Supplementary Provisions

Rule 59 The circumstances having arisen before entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law on 1 December 2001 that are listed in Articles 4, 5, 8, 9, paragraph one, 10, paragraph one(2),(3)and(4), 10, paragraph two, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 24, 25 and 31 of the revised Trademark Law and that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board reviewed and adjudicated after entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law shall be reviewed and adjudicated pursuant to the relevant provisions of the revised Trademark Law.In respect of other circumstances, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall apply the relevant provisions of the former Trademark Law to the review and adjudication thereof.Where an interested party applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication in respect of a dispute over a trademark that had been registered for a year when the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law entered into force, the time limit for filing the application provided for in Article 27, paragraph two, of the former Trademark Law shall apply.Where an interested party applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication in respect of a dispute over a trademark that had been registered for less than a year when the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law entered into force, the time limit for filing the application provided for in Article 41, paragraph three, of the revised Trademark Law shall apply in handling the application to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication.Where an relevant entity or person files an application for review and adjudication according to the provisions of Article 27 of the former Trademark Law and Rule 25 of the Implementing Regulations thereof before entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law, and the application falls into the provisions of Articles 13, 15, 16 or 31 of the revised Trademark Law, the provision for the time limit for filing application for review and adjudication of Article 41, paragraph two, of the revised Trademark Law does not apply.Rule 60 The documents or forms for handling review and adjudication matters shall be formulated and published by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce.Rule 61 The State Administration for Industry and Commerce shall be responsible for the interpretation of these Rules.Rule 62 These Rules shall enter into force on 26 October 2005.31

第二篇：商标术语中英文对照

商标术语中英文对照

知识产权 INTELLECTURL PROPERTY 工业产权 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 外观设计 DESIGN 发明 INVENTION 发明人 INVENTOR 货源标记 INDICATION OF SOURCE 原产地名称 APPELLATION OF ORIGIN（AOS）地理标记 GEOPRAPHICAL INDICATION（GIS）世界贸易组织《WTO》 WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION 关税及贸易总协定《GATT》 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 亚太经济合作组织《APEC》 ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION 与贸易有关的知产权协议《TRIPS》 AGREEMENT ON TRADE RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 世界知识产权组织《WIPO》 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION 保护知识产权联合国际局 INTERNATIONAL BOARD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT 保护工业产权巴黎公约 PARIS CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 商标际注册马德里协定 MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS 商标注册条约《TRT》 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION TREATY 商注册用商品与国际分类尼斯协定 NICE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSFICATION OF GGODS AND SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE REGISTRATION OF MARKS 建立商标图形要素国际分类维也纳协定 VIENNA AGREEMENT FR ESTABLISHING AND INTERNATIONAL CLASSFICATION OF THE FIGURATIVE ELEMENTS OF MARKS 专利合作条约《PCT》 PATENT CO－OPERATION TREATY 共同体专利公约 COMMUNITY产PATENT CONVENTION 斯特拉斯堡协定《SA》 STRASBOURG AGREEMENT 工业外观设计国际保存海协定 THE HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL DEPOSIT OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS 工业外观设计国际分类洛迦诺协定 LOCARNO GREEMENT ON ESTABLISHING AND INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS 商标，外观设计与地理标记法律常设委员会（SCT）STANDING COMMITTE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS，INDUSTRIAL DESIGN AND GERGRAPHICAL INDICATION 国际专利文献中心《INPADOC》 INTERNATIONAL PATENT DOCUMENTATION CENTER 欧洲专利局《EPO》 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE 欧洲专利公约 EUROPEAN PATENT CONVENTION 比荷卢商标局 TRADE MARK OFFIICE OF BELGIUM－HOLLAND－LUXEMBURG 法语非洲知识产权组织 ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 国际商标协会 THE INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION 中华人民共和国商标法 TTRADEMARK LAW OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA 英国商标法 TRADEMARK LAW OF UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND 美国商标法 TRADEMARK LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 日本商标法 JAPANESE TRADEMARK LAW 商标 TRADE MARK

商标局 TRADE MARK OFFICCE 商标法 TRADEMARK LAW 文字商标 WORD MARK 图形商标 FIGURATIVE MARK 组合商标 ASSOCIATED MARK 保证商标 CERTIFICATION MARK 集体商标 COLLECTIVE MARK 驰名商标 WELL－KNOWN MARK 著名商标 FAMOUYS MARK近似商标 SIMILAR MARK 防御商标 DEFENSIVE MARK 服务标记 SERVICE MARK 注册商标 REGISTERED MARK 商标注册申请人 TRADE MARK REGISTRANT 注册申请日 APPLICATION DATE OF TRADE MARK 注册申请号 APPLICATION NUMBER 商标注册证 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE 商标注册号 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION NUMBER 商标注册日 TRADE MARK REGISTRATION DATE 商标注册簿 TRADE MARK REGISTERED BOOK 注册有效期 THE TERM OF VALIDITY 商标注册官 EXAMINATION FOR TRADE MARK REGISTRATION 注册查询 TRADE MARK ENQUIRIES 注册续展 RENEWAL OF TRADE MARK 分别申请 SEPARATE APPLICATION 重新申请 NEW REGISTRATION 别行申请 NEW APPLICATION 变更申请 APPLICATION REGARDING CHANGES 注册代理 TRADE MARK AGENCY 注册公告 TRADE MARK PUBLICATION 申请注册 APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION 续展注册 RENEWAL OF REGISTRATION 转让注册 REGISTRATION OF ASSIGNMENT 变更注人名义／地址／其它注册事项 MODIFICATION OF NAME／ADDRESS OF REGISTRANT／OTHER MATTERS 补发商标证书 REISSUANCE OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE 注销注册商标 REMOVAL 证明 CERTIFICATION 异议 OPPOSITION 使用许可合同备案 RECORDAL OF LICENSE CONTRACT 驳回商标复审 REVIEW OF REFUSED TRADEMARK 驳回续展复审 REVIEW OF REFUSED RENEWAL

驳回转让复审 REVIEW OF REFUSED ASSIGNMENT 撤销商标复审 REVIEW OF ADJUDICATION ON OPPOSITION 异议复审 REVIEW OF ADJUDICATION ON OPPOSITION 争议裁定 ADJUDICATION ON DISPUTED REGISTERED TRADEMARK 撤销注册不当裁定 ADJUDICATION ON CANCELLATION OF IMPROPERLY REGISTERED TRADEMARK 撤销注册不当复审 REVIEW ON CANCELLATION OF IMPROPERLY REGISTERED TRADEMARK 处理商标纠纷案件 DEALING WITH INFRINGEMENT 优先权 PRIORITY 注册申请优先日 DATE OF PRIORITY 注册商标使用人 USER OF REGISTERED TRADE MARK 注册商标专用权 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE REGISTERED TRADE MARK 注册商标的转让 ASSIGNMENT OF REGISTERED TRADE MARK 商标的许可使用 LICENSING OF REGISTERED TRADE MARK 使用在先原则 PRINCIPLE OF FIRST TO USE 注册在先原则 PRINCIPLE OF FIRST APPLICATION 商标国际分类 INTERNATIONAL CLASSFICATION OF GOODS 专利 PATENT 专利权 PATENT RIGHT 专利权人 PATENTEE 专利代理 PATENT AGENCY 产品专利 PRODUCT PATENT 专利性 PATENTABLITY 专利申请权 RIGHT TO APPLY FOR A PATENT 实用新颖 UTILITY MODEL 专有性 MONOPOLY 专利的新颖性 NOVELTY OF PATENT 专利的实用性 PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY 专利的创造性 INVENTIVE 专利文件 PATENT DOCUMENT 专利申请文件 PATENT APPLICATION DOCUMENT 专利请求书 PATENT REQUEST 专利说明书 PATENT SPECIFICATION 专利要求书 PATENT CLAIM 专利证书 LETTER OF PATENT 商标淡化法 TRADEMARK DILUTION ACT 商标权的权利穷竭 EXHAUSTION TRADEMARK 平行进口 PARALLEL IMPORT 灰色进口 GRAY IMPORT 反向假冒 REVERSE PASSING－OFF 显行反向假冒 EXPRESS REVERSE PASSING－OFF 隐形反向假冒 IMPLIED REVERSE PASSING－OFF 附带使用 COLLATERAL USE 3

第三篇：质量评审技术术语 中英文对照

A

AC 允收

AFR Annualized Failure Rate

APQP Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan 产品质量先期策划 AQL 可接收质量水平

AVL Approved Vendor List合格供应商目录

B

C

C＝0 零缺陷接收抽样案

CA Corrective Action

CET Customer Experience Test

CAR 改正措施报告

CLCA Closed Loop Corrective Action循环改善措施（8D格式 问题描述－应急处理－根本原因分析－短期纠正措施－长期预防措施－效果追踪－效果确认及标准化－教育训练）CR 严重缺点

CIP Continuous Improvement Program 持续改善

CPK 制程能力指数

CQA 顾客品质保证

Customer Complaint 客户抱怨

D

DOE Design of Experiments 实验设计（对关键控制因素设计实验，包括实验的种类，步骤和影响因素）

DOE Dorian Shainin 谢宁DOE 美国人 七种DOE应用技术：多变图，零件搜索，成对比

较，变量搜索，完全析因，改进效果检查，实验设计的回归分析

（戴明――美国质量哲学，朱兰――美国质量方向，谢宁――美国解决质量问题方法）DPPM：每百万的不良数量

DQA 新产品开发质量保证

DVT

Design Verification Test

E

ECN Engineering Change Notice 工程变更通知书

EVT Engineering Verification Test

F

FAE Field Application Engineer

FAI First Article Inspection首件检验

Field Service市场服务

Field Reject Rate 市场不良率

FMEA Failure Mode Effect Analysis失效模式分析（1.DFMEA: 设计失效模式及后果分析

2.PFMEA: 过程失效模式及后果分析）

FQC 最终检验

G

GP 绿色产品（绿色伙伴环境品质认定）

GQAMGlobal Quality Account Manager

GSQE/WWSQE Global or World Wide Supplier Quality Engineer

Gauge R&R计量器具的重复性与重现性

H

HSE健康（Health）、安全（Safety）和环境(Environment）三位一体的管理体系。危害识别和风险控制是HSE管理核心所在。

I

IFIR Initial Field Incident Rate初始市场不良率（前30天）

IQC Incoming Quality Control来料质量控制（进货检验员）

IPQC 制程检验

J

JQE Joint Quality Engineer项目协调员

K

L

Lead Time 供应周期时间

Lean Management 精益管理

Line Reject Rate 生产线不良率

M

5M1E 人、机器、材料、方法、量测、环境

MA 主要缺点

MI 次要缺点

MIT Monitor IFIR Test

MTBF Mean Time Between Failure

MQA 制造品质保证

MSA Measurement System Analysis 测量系统分析（工具：数理统计和图表）N

NPI 新产品导入

NPRR 新产品准备会

O

OBA Out of Box Audit

On Time Delivery：及时交货

OSD On Screen Display

ORT 可靠性测试

OQC Outgoing Quality Control最终检验控制程序

Overall Supply Capability 综合供应能力

P

PA Preventive Action

PCBA Printed Circuit Board Assembly

PCNProcess Change Notification

PDG Product Development Group

PPID Piece Part Identification

PPAP Production Parts Approval Process生产件批准程序

PPM 交付质量

PID Production Induce Defect 生产方缺陷（生产线自身造成）

poka-yoke 防错

Q

QA 品质保证

QBR 季度业务审查

QC 质量控制

QIT Quality Improvement Team 质量改进小组

QMP Quality Management Plan 品质管理计划

Quality System Audit 品质系统稽核

Quality Process Audit 品质过程稽核

R

RE 拒收

RSQE Regional Supplier Quality Engineer

RTS Ready To Ship

Repair Rework Replacement 3R 返修 返工 更换

5RRight Time 适时Right Quality 适质Right Quantity 适量 Right Price 适价Right Place 始地

RMA 客户退回维修水平

RPN(risk priority number)风险系数

S

SMART（Specific特定性 Measurable 度量性 Achievable 可达性 Relevant 相关性 Time Bound 时间性）

6Sigma 六西格玛品质管理 每百万个机会里的误差：4Sigma 6210次 6Sigma 3次 1986年摩托罗拉比尔史密斯提出，90年代通用电气杰克韦尔奇全面完善发展

SPC Statistical Process Control统计过程控制 利用统计技术对过程的各个阶段监控 1920S美国休哈特提出

SQE Supplier Quality Engineer 供应商质量工程师

SQS 供应商质量标准

Supplier 供应商

－Leverage Supplier 杠杆型供应商（采购方主导 常规物料）

－Routine Supplier 例行供应商（配套供应）

－Strategic Supplier 战略供应商（市场领导者）

－Bottleneck Supplier 瓶颈供应商（供应商主导）

T

TQC 全面质量控制

U

V

VID Vendor Induce Defect 卖方缺陷

VLRR Verify Lots Reject Rate 确认的批退率

VQA 供应商质量保证

VRR供应商供货批退率(主要指进料的批退率）

W

5W1H（what事件when时间where地点who谁why为什么how怎样）

X

Y

Z

第四篇：中英文对照

Text5_EN

I don't know why I overlooked that problem.I haven't overlooked Chinese achievements in science.Sometimes you are too frank.High birthrates cannot be changed overnight.That book only told a pack of lies.They searched my room and found nothing.When it rained people in that small town had to stay in the house.

第五篇：中英文对照

AEROFLEX “亚罗弗”保温 ALCO “艾科”自控 Alerton 雅利顿空调 Alfa laval阿法拉伐换热器 ARMSTRONG “阿姆斯壮”保温 AUX 奥克斯

BELIMO 瑞士“搏力谋”阀门 BERONOR西班牙“北诺尔”电加热器 BILTUR 意大利“百得”燃烧器 BOSIC “柏诚”自控 BROAD 远大

Burnham美国“博恩汉”锅炉 CALPEDA意大利“科沛达”水泵 CARLY 法国“嘉利”制冷配件 Carrier 开利 Chigo 志高

Cipriani 意大利斯普莱力

CLIMAVENETA意大利“克莱门特” Copeland“谷轮”压缩机 CYRUS意大利”赛诺思”自控 DAIKIN 大金空调

丹佛斯自控 Dorin “多菱”压缩机

DUNHAM-BUSH 顿汉布什空调制冷 DuPont美国“杜邦”制冷剂 Dwyer 美国德威尔 EBM “依必安”风机

ELIWELL意大利“伊力威”自控 Enfinilan 英国“英菲尼兰“阀门 EVAPCO美国“益美高”冷却设备 EVERY CONTROL意大利“美控” Erie 怡日

FRASCOLD 意大利“富士豪”压缩机 FRICO瑞典“弗瑞克”空气幕 FUJI “富士”变频器

FULTON 美国“富尔顿”锅炉 GENUIN “正野”风机 GREE 格力

GREENCOOL格林柯尔 GRUNDFOS “格兰富”水泵 Haier 海尔 Hisense 海信 HITACHI 日立

霍尼韦尔自控 Johnson 江森自控 Kelon 科龙

KRUGER瑞士“科禄格”风机 KU BA德国“库宝”冷风机 Liang Chi 良机冷却塔 LIEBERT 力博特空调 MARLEY “马利”冷却塔 Maneurop法国“美优乐”压缩机 McQuary 麦克维尔 Midea 美的 MITSUBISHI三菱

Munters 瑞典“蒙特”除湿机 Panasonic 松下 RANCO “宏高”自控

REFCOMP意大利“莱富康”压缩机 RIDGID 美国“里奇”工具 RUUD美国“路德”空调 RYODEN “菱电”冷却塔 SanKen “三垦”变频器 Samsung 三星 SANYO 三洋

ASWELL英国森威尔自控 Schneider 施耐德电气 SenseAir 瑞典“森尔”传感器 SIEMENS 西门子

SINKO ",28商机网;新晃“空调 SINRO “新菱”冷却塔 STAND “思探得”加湿器 SWEP 舒瑞普换热器 TECKA “台佳”空调 Tecumseh“泰康”压缩机 TRANE 特灵

TROX德国“妥思”风阀 VASALA芬兰“维萨拉”传感器 WILO德国“威乐”水泵 WITTLER 德国”威特”阀门 YORK 约克

ZENNER德国“真兰”计量