环境优于经济发展辩论

第一篇：环境优于经济发展辩论

Good afternoon everyone.We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, in our mind, it is environment growth that should be chosen.China is a developing country, economic development and environmental protection are often conflict.We agree economy growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local region environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great to our existence

We need to do the environment protecting first.My reasons are as followsFirstly, environment protection is the essential requirement of economic development.Economic development is to improve people's living standards, to solve the conflict of people's increasing material and cultural needs.Some measures on economic development especially in heavy industry have a negative impact on the lives of the residents and the situation in the countryside is more dangerous.They are contrary to the original intent of economic development.Secondly, environment protection is the strategy of sustainable development requirements.We live in the environment which our future generations will live in.Suppose that we destroy the environment and the damage is irreparable, this is a crime to the future generations.Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development researchso do our country and to leave our future generations a better living space.Finally, environment protection is a natural requirements.If the damage is huge, we will be severely punished by the nature and cause inevitable consequence like some major floods.We spend more in relief than we earned from the development of economic.The laws of nature is merciless.We must pay more attention on protecting environment.

第二篇：英语辩论环境保护与经济发展

Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection or

economic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgent

affair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop

our economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of

“first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in a

completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of

development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty

good, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t afford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?

：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food

and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130

million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is also important.And our government has

already realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve some

good results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic and

environmental protection.

第三篇：英语辩论——环境保护VS经济发展

英语辩论——环境保护VS经济发展(经济发展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辩陈词：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辩陈词：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.自由辩论

正方二辩：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live.Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies?

反方二辩：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

正方三辩：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.反方三辩：Environmental protection needs economy.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the

environment.Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important?

正方四辩：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy.We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.反方四辩：We admit economic construction is our country’s principle task.But we have to insist on sustainable development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development.总结：

正方总结：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方总结: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises.As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration.Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy.If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it.But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust.The urgency like this can’t wait.So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China.Thank you.补充及参考材料

二辩盘问 Two debate questioned 反方二辩：请问对方二辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济 发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？
My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the
environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经 济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，跟中国现状一样，政策虽 然说要重视环保，但一般县区还是经济发展优先的，也就有资本的大城市才 比较重视搞环保，相信大家心知肚明
Sorry, I'm

afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy
development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the
environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China,
although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely
take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经 济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退？
Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely
the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辩： 这种情况确实有存在，但并不是每时每刻都存在。各个行业情况不同，我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改 行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。to cause This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辩： 我们知道环境的保护是预防为主，防治结合，而预防和治理都要依 靠技术的发展，那请问对方二辩，如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技术 发展，那么以科技为支撑的环保从何谈起呢？
We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辩：你的问题未免抽象了点。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，什么 时候算得上是“强有力”呢？但是环境保护是迫在眉睫，耽误不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is
imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辩：请问反方三辩，经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容，包括衣食 住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗？
Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the
people's universal desire? 反方三辩：人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人们更倾向于在一个既 能享受到生活乐趣，同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment
自由辩论 正方一辩： 请问对方辩友，原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作做得可谓好了吧，而他们 经济发展很落后，所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活，按你们的 意思我们应该回归这种生活吗？
Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?
反方一辩：人类祖先确实需要发展经济，但若是在这个过程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也无法发展下去了。我想问的是，核电站是 经济发展的产物，但众所周知，几次核电站的泄漏带来了环境的极度恶化，请问 你怎么看？
Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the

outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?
正方二辩：首先，我方并没有承诺经济发展就一定会破坏到环境；其次，对方所 说的情况只是凤毛麟角；第三，核电站泄漏是科技不力，而经济是科学研究 的基础。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation
of scientific research.反方二辩：但是核电站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么办？没有了这 些，我们的生活怎么办？你愿意生活在核电站附近，还是一片山清水秀之 间？
But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?
正方三辩：但是对方辩友请注意，核电站的建造，正是为了千千万万人类的生活 用电得到满足。有了电，我们的机器可以运作，生产可以兴起，环境总会有 办法弥补，我也想问，你愿意生活在两小时停一次电的地方还是用电无忧之 处？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the
environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辩：你的意思是破坏了环境然后再去弥补。为什么要先污染后治理？为什 么要兜这么大一个圈子呢？而且我国的经济建设里程已经证明，先污染后治 理是错的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辩：我不得不说我方真冤枉。是你给的前提，说核电站泄漏了，严重污染 了环境，而我方坚信是可以挽救的。而且事实上，包括核电站在内的很多工 业厂子，都种有青草绿树，他们在搞经济的同时，并没有放弃环境的保护。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辩：但是仅仅不放弃就可以吗？再怎么注意也无法保证无污染，这样日积 月累下来，依然会是一片惨状。必须把环境保护放在第一位，每个工厂都严 抓，才能从根本上阻止环境的恶化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辩：对方辩友请从事实出发，经济发展必然会付出代价，我们已经在努力 使代价降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辩：降低应该有个标准吧，这不是你我能定的，是自然环境定的，等到他 揭示这个标准时，只怕为时已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

第四篇：英语辩论——环境保护VS经济发展

英语辩论——环境保护VS经济发展(经济发展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辩陈词： we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辩陈词：We agree economic growth is needed.But the environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.反方二辩：请问对方二辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济 发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？
My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the
environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经 济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy
development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the
environmental protection is just in the inferior position.、反方三辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经 济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退？
Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely
the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辩： 这种情况确实有存在，但并不是每时每刻都存在。各个行业情况不同，我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改 行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.反方四辩：你的问题未免抽象了点。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，但是环境保护是迫在眉睫，耽误不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, But environmental protection is
imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方四辩：请问反方四辩，经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容，包括衣食 住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗？Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the
people's universal desire?

反方一辩：人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人们更倾向于在一个既 能享受到生活乐趣，同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

正方一辩： 请问对方辩友，原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作做得可谓好了吧，而他们 经济发展很落后，所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活，按你们的 意思我们应该回归这种生活吗？
Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

正方总结：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方总结: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life ？

第五篇：改善经济发展环境

改善经济发展环境

改善经济发展环境

为了认真贯彻落实市委一届十一次全会精神，为实现“规模推进年”的各项任务目标创造良好的经济发展环境，由市人大常委会副主任带队，协调组织人大内司委、市经贸委等有关部门，组成专题调研组，走访市直有关部门，深入县区，对我市经济建设的政策、法制、服务等环境建设进行了认真的调查研究。现将调研情况报告如下：

一、我市经济发展环境的现状

年初以来，我市的经济发展环境，经过市、县两级党委和政府的共同努力，全市上下方方面面的积极推进和整治，呈现出越来越好的发展态势。各项优惠政策逐步得到了落实，“三乱”问题得到了

有效遏制，工作效率有所提高，服务质量进一步优化，行政执法逐步规范，监督力度不断加大，有力地促进了市域经济和社会事业的健康发展。

1、领导重视层次高，推进力度大。市委市政府高度重视我市的经济南市展环境工作。年初发绥发[]3号文件下发了《全市整冶经济发展环境工作方案》，明确了工作总体思路，重点任务，时间步骤，保证措施和要达到的目标。二月份，市委市政府又召开电视电话会议，对全市集中整冶经济发展环境工作进行了专题部署。此外市人大、政协召开的“两会”上、市纪委四次全会和市本级规模推进工作会议等大型会议上，市级几大班子都对改善经济发展环境工作做出了部署，提出了明确要求。各县区都成立了由书记为组长，主管经济工作的副书记为副组长，相关部门为成员单位的改善经济发展环境专题领导小组，下设专项推进办公室。层层落实了目标责任，制定了具体的工作措施，建立健全了各项

规章制度。形成了领导小组统一协调、牵头部门和责任部门齐抓共管的领导机制和组织体系，为改善经济发展环境提供了强有力的组织保障。

2、宣传教育工作抓得实，舆论氛围浓。一是全市广泛利用各种新闻媒体开展了改善经济发展环境的宣传教育活动，极大地调动了广大干部群众参与改善经济发展环境的积极性和主动性，初步形成了领导重视、群众关心、全社会参与的改善经济发展环境的浓厚社会舆论氛围；二是加强了对各级领导干部和工作人员的法律、法规和政策教育，提高了领导者和行政执法人员的政策水平和法律意识；三是强化了对公务员、企业厂长wto知识的培训，提高了他们的竞争意识和驾驭市场经济的能力；四是加强了对青少年法制教育，从基础、源头上预防了犯罪，减少了社会不稳定因素。

3、法制环境得到有效治理，取得了阶段性成果。纪检监察机关加大了对影响经济发展的违法违纪案件的查处力度。

上半年，全市共查处破坏经济发展环境案件64件，处分89人。法院加大了执法和审判工作力度，对涉及经济犯罪的案件做到了从快从速处理。全市法院系统共受理各类案件29,256件，审结28,508件，结案标的额达亿元。两年来全市法院为企业减缓免诉讼费20多万元，减负3亿元。检察院加大了对各类犯罪的查处力度，加强了对经济案件的诉讼监督，主动为企业提供法律服务。，共办理国有资产流失案件6件，提起抗拆100多件，查办经济犯罪120件，挽回经济损失100多万元。公安部门加大了“扫黑除恶”和对经济案件的侦破力度，有效地震慑了犯罪，规范了行政执法人员行为，维护了政治稳定和社会安定。工商、税务、环保、交通、城建等其它行政执法部门也都从本部门职能出发，制定了多项改善经济发展环境的措施，受到群众好评。

4、服务环境有了较大改善，服务质量逐步提高。全市各行政执法、综合管理、社会服务部门不断加强队伍建设，深入开展双评活动，积极推行政务公开和承诺制，着力提高服务效率和服务水平，树立了良好的部门形象和行业形象。各地进一步加大了行政审批改革力度，规范了审批行为，减少了审批环节，普遍实行了“一站式”办公。各县区还强化了对服务中心的投资建设，大大提高了工作效率。庆安县实行了行政机关审批事项首问负责制和限时办结制。全市在各行业开展了治乱减负工作，对企业加大了扶持力度，对域外企业实行零干扰、免打扰。，市本级仅为三精药业、银娃乳业、客运枢纽工程减免基础建设配套费400万元，减免排污费38万元。各地还深入开展了对行政执法的评议监督工作。庆安县的季度评议，肇东市的全行业评议，都是成功的范例。通过评议，对执法部门形成了有效的监督约束机制，促进了服务质量和服务水平的提高。

5、政策环境进一步放宽，对招商引资工作起到了助推作用。全市结合实际制

定有利于企业和外商生产经营的优惠政策文件148份1340多条；共清理文件3000余份，废止制约经济发展的政策性文件60多份。肇东市制定了《改善经济发展环境六项制度》、《肇东市创建优良发展环境“十条禁令”》等多方面的政策措施，在改善经济发展环境上迈出了较大步伐。庆安县先后出台了《庆安县招商引资优惠政策》、《庆安县鼓励房地产开发优惠政策》等，极大地增强了招商引资的吸引力，促进了地方经济快速发展。我市对招商引资政策进一步放宽，特别是对进入开发区的企业，在办理手续、土地使用、税费收缴等方面给予了极大的优惠。一系列政策的出台和落实，推动了招商引资工作的深入开展。上半年，全市共引进项目226个，到位资金亿元，同比增长％。宽松的投资环境，为实现规模推进目标，加快经济发展提供了强有力的政策支持和动力支持。

二、改善经济发展环境存在的问题及成因

我市的经济发展环境虽然有了较大改善，但与发达地区相比，与我市加快发展的要求相比，尚有一定的差距，还存在一些亟待解决的问题。

一是服务意识不强，执法工作的整体水平和执法人员的整体素质有待于进一步提高。有些地方存在说功好、做功差，喊的多、干的少，上热下冷现象。有些行政职能部门轻管理、轻服务，存有较严重的以罚代管，只罚不帮的现象，错误地认为管理就是处罚，服务就是收费，导致管理职能弱化和执法目的扭曲。有的行政执法行为不规范，文明执法意识不强。有些执法人员在执法过程中，言行粗鲁，态度冷、横、硬、冲，勒拿卡要报等不正之风较为严重，该办的事顶着不办，可办可不办的事拖着不办，可这么办可那么办的事卡着不办。有的部门队伍建设抓得不力，对职工干部疏于教育、疏于管理、疏于监督，导致一些工作人员素质差，不懂政策，不熟业务，甚至违法违纪。

二是行政管理体制不理顺，给部门执法带来了一定难度，同时也导致“三乱”加剧，加重了企业负担。如审计部门，由于双重管理体制的束缚，对地方政府和行政执法等部门的审计监督受到了很大限制，难以充分发挥职能作用。还有一些部门在执法过程中，也遇到了同样问题。我们现行的管理体制，存在差额拨款和自收自支事业单位，自收自支人员比例过高。据调查，市直机关事业单位，全额拨款的3763人，自收自支的3097人，差额拨款的2730人。这些自收自支和差额拨款的事业单位为了保开支，想方设法加重收费。还有的个别单位自行制定收费标准，确定收费项目，使“三乱”现象久禁不止，企业负担减而不轻。

三是政府职能转变不到位，个别地方参与竞争，背离了市场经济规律。政府在市场经济条件下，一般规则应当是政府调控市场，市场引导企业。便我们有些政府部门还不适应驾驭市场经济规律的工作方法，不能为企业搭台唱戏，造成

市场的无序竞争和不平等竞争，违背了市场规律。

四是对行政执法的监督力度不够。人大的法律监督、政协和人民群众的民主监督、纪检部门的纪律监督和新闻单位的舆论监督，这些层级监督都发挥了很大作用，但还须进一步加大力度。目前，这些监督还没有真正形成制度化，缺乏统一的协调推进机制。行政执法责任追究制度落实不到位，对一些违法违纪问题惩处的力度不够，往往是大事化小、小事化了，致使一些违法违纪的人和事得不到及时有效查处。

五是基础设施及公共环境建设投入不足，硬环境建设滞后。据调查，市本级用于基础设施建设费用3000万元，占市本级全口径财政总收入亿元的15%。全市人均拥有城市维护建设资金204元，在全省排第8位，处于下游。南方一些发达城市的开发区已经实现了“九通一平”，可我们现在只达到“六通一平”，个别县“三通一平”也没有达到，而且标准

较低。全市现有城市绿地面积仅公顷，占建成区面积的%。学校、医院、公园、商店、宾馆、饭店等公共环境建设与发达城市比，明显落后。公共秩序和公共卫生状况有待于进一步改善。

通过调查分析，我市经济发展环境存在问题的主要原因：一是思想观念滞后。由于在一部分行政管理和执法部门中存在较严重的全局与局部利益错位、管理与服务职能错位，特别是某些领导干部对改善经济发展环境思想上存在误区，没有树立环境就是生产力和“人人是环境，事事是环境”的观念，不能站在全市经济社会发展的高度抓环境建设，因而导致政府某些部门服务意识淡薄，服务职能弱化，服务质量和水平也存在较大差距。二是部门利益至上。有些有行政执法执罚权的职能部门，为了本部门利益，为了小集团或个人利益，在行政执法中，违规执法、越权执法、有令不行、有禁不止、乱收乱罚，给企业增加了沉重的负担。三是行政审批制度改革不到

位。在一些部门和单位，行政审批事项该下放的没有下放，该精简的没有精简，对保留的审批项目缺乏严格规范，审批环节过多，审批程序过于繁杂。一些过时的政策，没有及时清理、修订，个别地方还存在用已经明令废止的政策文件收费的现象。四是社会监督机制不健全。目前，还没有真正形成政府部门为纳税人服务，纳税人有权力监督政府工作的良好社会环境。

三、对策建议

针对我市经济发展环境存在的问题，我们应立足市情，狠抓当前，着眼长远，摆正局部和整体、管理和服务、监督和扶持的关系，进一步强化环境意识，树立环境就是生产力的理念。重点应抓好以下工作：

1、抓领导，确保政令畅通。实践证明，一个地方的经济发展环境如何，关键在领导。因此，各级领导要把改善经济发展环境工作摆上更加突出的位置，精心研究部署，层层落实责任，加强督办检

查，狠抓工作落实。特别是经济管理部门、行政执法部门和条条部门的领导，要进一步深化对改善经济发展环境重要性的认识，从放宽经济发展环1 2 下一页