商标评审规则（精选5篇）

第一篇：商标评审规则

【时效性】有效

【颁布单位】国家工商局

【颁布日期】 1995110

2【实施日期】 19951102

【文号】中华人民共和国国家工商行政管理局令第37号

【名称】商标评审规则

【题注】

【章名】全文

第一条为保证正确、及时地处理商标评审事宜，保护当事人的合法权益，维护和监督国家工商行政管理局商标局（以下简称商标局）依法行使职权，根据《中华人民共和国商标法》（以下简称《商标法》）、《中华人民共和国商标法实施细则》（以下简称《商标法实施细则》），制定本规则。

第二条国家工商行政管理局商标评审委员会（以下简称商标评审委员会）是国家工商行政管理局设定的负责商标确权评审的行政机构，依法对商标评审事宜行使终局裁决权。

第三条商标评审委员会依法对商标评审事宜独立行使裁决权。

第四条商标评审委员会以事实为根据、以法律为准绳处理商标评审事宜。

第五条当事人在商标评审中的法律地位平等。

第六条中华人民共和国缔结或者参加的国际条约同《商标法》、《商标法实施细则》有不同规定的，适用该国际条约的规定。中华人民共和国声明保留的条约款除外。

第七条商标评审委员会处理商标评审事宜，采取委员投票表决制，遵循少数服从多数的原则。

第八条商标评审委员会对商标评审事宜实行书面审理。

第九条当事人申请或者参加商标评审，可以委托国家工商行政管理局认可的商标代理组织代理，也可以直接办理。外国人或者外国企业申请或者参加商标评审，应当委托国家工商行政管理局指定的商标代理组织代理。

第十条商标评审委员会受理就下列事宜提出的评审申请：

（一）对商标局驳回商标注册申请不服的；

（二）对商标局异议裁定不服的；

（三）对商标局驳回注册商标转让申请不服的；

（四）对商标局驳回注册商标续展申请不服的；

（五）对商标局撤销注册商标不服的；

（六）对注册商标提出争议的；

（七）对认为注册不当商标提出撤销的；

（八）法律、法规规定的其他商标确权评审事宜。

第十一条商标评审委员会由主任委员、副主任委员、委员组成，其中委员为十五至十七人。

第十二条商标评审委员会委员应当符合下列条件：

（一）熟悉商标法律；

（二）从事商标审查工作满三年或者从事其他法律事务工作满五年的；

（三）系国家工商行政管理局的公务员。

第十三条商标评审委员会主任委员、副主任委员和委员由国家工商行政管理局任命。

第十四条商标评审委员会主任委员行使铝兄叭ǎ?br>

（一）主持商标评审委员会的日常工作；

（二）决定商标评审委员会委员的回避；

（三）审核签发商标评审裁决书。商标评审委员会主任委员可以委托副主任委员代行职权。

第十五条商标评审委员会设立专家咨询小组，就商标评审事宜中的有关问题征求意见。

专家咨询小组由知识产权界法律专家若干人组成，其成员由商标评审委员会聘任。

第十六条申请商标评审，应当符合下列条件：

（一）申请人须有合法的主体资格；

（二）在法定期限内提出；

（三）依法提交符合规定的申请书及有关书件；

（四）有具体的评审请求和事实根据；

（五）属于商标评审委员会的评审范围；

（六）依法缴纳评审费用。

第十七条当事人委托商标代理组织申请或者参加商标评审事宜的，应当交送代理人委托书一份。代理人委托书应当载明代理内容及权限，外国人或者外国企业的代理人委托书还应当载明委托人的国籍。外国人或者外国企业申请或者参加商标评审，应当使用中文。代理人委托书和有关证明的公证、认证手续，按照对等原则办理。外文书件应当附中文译本。

第十八条当事人申请商标评审，因不可抗拒的事由或者其他正当理由，无法按照规定的期限办理的，可以在期满前申请延期三十日。是否准许，由商标评审委员会决定。

第十九条当事人对注册核准前已经提出异议并经商标评审委员会裁定的商标，不得再以相同的事实和理由，就本规则第十条第（六）、（七）项所规定的事宜，向商标评审委员会申请评审。

第二十条商标评审委员会自收到商标评审申请书之日起三十日内，经审查认为符合法定条件的，应当受理，并书面通知当事人；认为不符合法定条件的，应当书面通知当事人不予受理，并说明理由。商标评审委员会认为当事人的申请基本符合法定条件，但需要补正的，可以限当事人在规定的期限内补正；限期内未作补正的，不予受理，书面通知当事人，并退回全部申请书件。

第二十一条对本规则第十条第（二）、（五）、（六）、（七）项所规定的事宜提出评审申请的，商标评审委员会应当自受理之日起十五日内，将申请书副本寄送被申请人，被申请人应当在商标评审委员会规定的期限内提交答辩书。对被申请人提交的答辩书，商标评审委员会认为有必要的，可以将答辩书副本寄送申请人。被申请人不提交或者超过期限提交答辩书的，不影响商标评审委员会对案件的裁决。经商标评审委员会许可，申请人、被申请人（含代理人）可以查阅本案材料，但涉及对方商业秘密的除外。

第二十二条商标评审委员会对商标评审事宜未做出裁决前，当事人可以撤回评审申请。

第二十三条商标评审委员会处理商标评审事宜，应当有三分之二以上的委员参加，并根据投票表决结果作出裁定。

第二十四条商标评审委员会委员认为自己与本案有利害关系或者其他关系的，应当申请回避。当事人认为商标评审委员会委员与本案有利害关系或者有其他关系可能影响公正处理的，在评审裁决作出前，有权申请商标评审委员会委员回避。

第二十五条商标评审委员会有权要求当事人提供或者补充证据。

第二十六条商标评审事宜案情复杂、事实不清的，商标评审委员会可以进行调查，必要时可以召集双方当事人举行听证调查会。

第二十七条商标评审委员会举行听证调查会，应当至少于会前一个月将开会日期通知双方当事人。当事人有正当理由的，可以在开会十日前请求延期，是否延期，由商标评审委员会决定。当事人无正当理由不到会或者未经许可中途退会的，视为放弃申辩的权利。

第二十八条商标评审委员会举行听证调查会，应当制作笔录。当事人或者其他评审参加人认为对自己陈述的记录有遗漏或者差错的，有权申请补正。不予补正的，应当记录该申请。笔录由到会的商标评审委员会委员、记录人员、当事人和其他评审参加人签名或者盖章。

第二十九条裁决书应当写明评审请求、评审事实、评审理由、评审结果和裁决日期，加盖商标评审委员会印章。

第三十条对裁决书中的文字错误或者商标评审委员会已经裁决但在裁决书中遗漏的内容，商标评审委员会应当补正；当事人在收到裁决书之日起三十日内，可以申请补正。

第三十一条裁决书自签发之日起发生法律效力。

第三十二条商标评审委员会作出的终局裁决，需要由商标局办理的，应当移交商标局办理。

第三十三条评审裁决对于已经执行或者处理的涉及商标财产权益的事项，不具有追溯力。

第三十四条当事人提出证据证明已经发生法律效力的裁决有下列情形之一的，可以向商标评审委员会重新提出申请，但不停止裁定的执行：

（一）裁决的事项不属于商标评审委员会的评审范围的；

（二）评审程序违反《商标法》及《商标法实施细则》的；

（三）裁决所根据的证据是当事人伪造的；

（四）对方当事人隐瞒了足以影响公正裁决的证据的。

当事人重新提出评审申请，应当在裁决发生法律效力后一年内提出。

第三十五条商标评审委员会对当事人重新提出的评审申请，应当在三十日内就是否受理作出决定。符合受理条件的，应当受理，并书面通知申请人和有关当事人；不符合受理条件的，不予受理，书面通知申请人并说明理由。申请事由经审核不成立的，商标评审委员会应当书面通知申请人。申请事由经审核成立的，商标评审委员会应当撤销已经作出的裁决，并重新裁决。

第三十六条本规则未尽事宜，依照有关法律、法规和规章的规定执行。

第三十七条商标评审文书的内容和式样，由国家工商行政管理局制定并公布。

第三十八条当事人应当按照规定交纳商标评审费用。具体标准和范围，由国家工商行政管理局与有关部门制定并公布。

第三十九条本规则由国家工商行政管理局负责解释。

第四十条本规则自发布之日起施行。

第二篇：商标评审代理委托书

商标评审代理委托书

商标评审代理委托书1

委托人：

法定代表人／负责人姓名：职务：

受托人：

委托人是国家／地区的公民／法人，现委托上述受委托人代理对第类第号商标进行如下“√”评审事宜：

驳回商标注册申请复审案商标异议复审案

撤销注册商标复审案注册商标争议裁定案

受托人代理上述评审事宜的权限为：参与《中华人民共和国商标法》及其《实施条例》和《商标评审规则》规定的本案有关评审活动。委托人特别声明包括下列第项权限：

①承认对方评审请求

②放弃或者变更评审请求

③撤销商标评审申请

委托人签字（盖章）

年月日

附：

商标代理组织地址：

联系人：

联系电话：

说明：

1。商标评审代理委托书须由委托人签名或盖章，并注明委托事项和权限后方有效。

2。委托授权的商标评审代理权限未经特别声明的均为一般代理，即不包括商标代理组织代为①承认对方评审要求；②放弃或者变更评审请求；③撤销商标评审申请。如包括前述某项或多项权限，应在指定的空格内填写上述权限的相应序号；否则，视为不包括上述权限。

3。委托人为法人或其他组织的，应填写有关法定代表人或负责人的姓名、职务栏目，并应在委托人签字盖章处由法定代表人或者负责人签名。

4。商标评审代理权限发生变更或者解除商标代理关系的，委托人应当书面告知商标评审委员会。

5。此委托书一式二份，一份由委托人存查，一份由委托人交由受委托的商标代理组织提交给商标评审委员会。

商标评审代理委托书2

委托人：法定代表人／负责人姓名：职务：受托人：委托人是国家／地区的公民／法人，现委托上述受委托人代理对第类第号商标进行如下“√”评审事宜：驳回商标注册申请复审案商标异议复审案撤销注册商标复审案注册商标争议裁定案受托人代理上述评审事宜的权限为：参与《中华人民共和国商标法》及其《实施条例》和《商标评审规则》规定的本案有关评审活动。委托人特别声明包括下列第项权限：①承认对方评审请求②放弃或者变更评审请求③撤销商标评审申请

委托人签字（盖章）

年月日

附：商标代理组织地址：

联系人：

联系电话：

说明：

1.商标评审代理委托书须由委托人签名或盖章，并注明委托事项和权限后方有效。

2.委托授权的商标评审代理权限未经特别声明的均为一般代理，即不包括商标代理组织代为①承认对方评审要求；②放弃或者变更评审请求；③撤销商标评审申请。如包括前述某项或多项权限，应在指定的`空格内填写上述权限的相应序号；否则，视为不包括上述权限。

3.委托人为法人或其他组织的，应填写有关法定代表人或负责人的姓名、职务栏目，并应在委托人签字盖章处由法定代表人或者负责人签名。

4.商标评审代理权限发生变更或者解除商标代理关系的，委托人应当书面告知商标评审委员会。

5.此委托书一式二份，一份由委托人存查，一份由委托人交由受委托的商标代理组织提交给商标评审委员会。

商标评审代理委托书3

委托人：_________________________

法定代表人负责人姓名：__________

职务：_________________________

受托人：_________________________

参与《中华人民共和国商标法》及其《实施条例》和《商标评审规则》规定的本案有关评审活动。委托人特别声明包括下列第项权限：

①承认对方评审请求

②放弃或者变更评审请求

③撤销商标评审申请

委托人签字____

___年____月____日

商标评审代理委托书4

委托人：

法定代表人／负责人姓名：职务：

受托人：

委托人是国家／地区的公民／法人，现委托上述受委托人代理对第类第号商标进行如下“√”评审事宜：

驳回商标注册申请复审案商标异议复审案

撤销注册商标复审案注册商标争议裁定案

①承认对方评审请求

②放弃或者变更评审请求

③撤销商标评审申请

委托人签字（盖章）

年月日

附：

商标代理组织地址：

联系人：

联系电话：

说明：

1.商标评审代理委托书须由委托人签名或盖章，并注明委托事项和权限后方有效。

2.委托授权的商标评审代理权限未经特别声明的均为一般代理，即不包括商标代理组织代为①承认对方评审要求；②放弃或者变更评审请求；③撤销商标评审申请。如包括前述某项或多项权限，应在指定的空格内填写上述权限的相应序号；否则，视为不包括上述权限。

3.委托人为法人或其他组织的，应填写有关法定代表人或负责人的姓名、职务栏目，并应在委托人签字盖章处由法定代表人或者负责人签名。

4.商标评审代理权限发生变更或者解除商标代理关系的，委托人应当书面告知商标评审委员会。

5.此委托书一式二份，一份由委托人存查，一份由委托人交由受委托的商标代理组织提交给商标评审委员会。

第三篇：商标评审代理委托书

赢了网s.yingle.com

遇到产权纠纷问题？赢了网律师为你免费解惑！访问>>

http://s.yingle.com

商标评审代理委托书

委托人：

法定代表人/负责人姓名：职务：

受托人：

委托人是国家/地区的公民/法人，现委托上述受委托人代理对第类第号商标进行如下“√”评审事宜：

驳回商标注册申请复审案商标异议复审案

撤销注册商标复审案注册商标争议裁定案

受托人代理上述评审事宜的权限为：参与《中华人民共和国商标法》及其《实施条例》和《商标评审规则》规定的本案有关评审活动。

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

委托人特别声明包括下列第项权限：

①承认对方评审请求

②放弃或者变更评审请求

③撤销商标评审申请

委托人签字(盖章)

年月日

附：

商标代理组织地址：

联系人：

联系电话：

说明：

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

1.商标评审代理委托书须由委托人签名或盖章，并注明委托事项和权限后方有效。

2.委托授权的商标评审代理权限未经特别声明的均为一般代理，即不包括商标代理组织代为①承认对方评审要求;②放弃或者变更评审请求;③撤销商标评审申请。如包括前述某项或多项权限，应在指定的空格内填写上述权限的相应序号;否则，视为不包括上述权限。

3.委托人为法人或其他组织的，应填写有关法定代表人或负责人的姓名、职务栏目，并应在委托人签字盖章处由法定代表人或者负责人签名。

4.商标评审代理权限发生变更或者解除商标代理关系的，委托人应当书面告知商标评审委员会。

5.此委托书一式二份，一份由委托人存查，一份由委托人交由受委托的商标代理组织提交给商标评审委员会。

 扬州欣欣食品有限公司与李利群侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524694.html

 上诉人常熟市虞山得雨茶厂因与被上诉人江西得雨活茶股份有限公司商标侵权及 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524693.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 爱国者商标案宣判北京海尔判赔http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524692.html

50万

 日本铃木状告长春铃木郑州销售商受牵连 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524691.html

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与范福来侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524690.html

 原告耐克国际有限公司与被告台州市聚龙贸易有限公司向宁波海关申报出口的凉 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524689.html

 安徽金种子酒业股份有限公司与阮怀云 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524688.html

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与南通祥弘机电有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524687.html

 原告广州市电筒工业公司与被告宁波晓晓塑料电器有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524686.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告余

秋

燕

商

标

权

侵

权

纠

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524685.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与祝亮 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524684.html

 上海英雄（集团）有限公司与陕西三棵树超市商贸有限责任公司侵犯商标专用权 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524683.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 台湾地区“苏菲雅”状告上海“苏菲雅”胜诉 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524682.html

 上海美邦教育信息咨询有限公司与武汉爱婴蒙氏教育咨询有限公司注册商标使用 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524681.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与北京京客隆

（廊

坊）

有

限

公

司

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524680.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告永

康

市

环

城

供

销

有

限

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524679.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告金

中

平

侵

犯

商

标

专

用

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524678.html

 原告浙江诸暨明光机械有限公司与被告诸暨市三德机械有限公司商标侵权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524677.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告杜敏 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524676.html

 恒源祥商标案搁浅国家商标局介入 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524675.html

 原告济南沃德汽车零部件有限公司与被告忻芳定侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524674.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 南通金美罗家用纺织品有限公司与汤云兰侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524673.html

 广交会涉日注册商标侵权案最多

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524672.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与邵坚 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524671.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告陈珠凤 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524670.html

 贾建斌与重庆刘一手餐饮管理有限公司 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524669.html

 上海大众汽车有限公司诉天津市百车汇轿车配具有限公司商标侵权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524668.html

 东源工商查处一宗侵犯商标专用权案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524667.html

 一盘“凉菜”引发的商标争议案

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524666.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告杭

州

联

华

商

集

团

永

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524665.html

 上诉福建凯大体育用品有限公司与被上诉人耐克国际有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524664.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 申请注册豆捞商标被驳火锅酒家告商评委败诉 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524663.html

 原告北新集团建材股份有限公司与被告南京赛思隆装饰吸音板有限公司 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524662.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告林

候

程

侵

犯

商

标

专

用

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524661.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告新

昌

县

佳

乐

服

饰

商

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524660.html

 上海派克笔有限公司诉赣州新永安南城实业发展有限公司等商标侵权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524659.html

 跨国零售企业家乐福起诉安徽阜阳多家超市侵权 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524658.html

 上海上岛咖啡食品有限公司诉天津鑫琅商贸有限公司喜璐士餐饮分公司及吴卫国 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524657.html

 原告上海英雄（集团）有限公司与被告重庆市航顺商贸有限公司万盛万德超市案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524656.html

 原告上海大众汽车有限公司与被告济南精汇伟业汽车配件有限公司商标侵权纠纷 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524655.html

 中国贵州茅台酒厂有限责任公司与安徽文星阁大酒店有限责任公司侵犯商标专用 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524654.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与上海新盛鑫瓦轴机电设备有限公司侵犯商标专用 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524653.html

 原告温州市爱眼城经贸有限公司与被告陈玉安侵犯商标专用权及不正当竞争纠纷 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524652.html

 恒源祥陷商标纠纷遭索赔千万羊头花落谁家成谜 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524651.html

 佛山市豹王滤芯制造有限公司与天津市哈飞汽车配件有限公司假冒注册商标纠纷 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524650.html

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与徐州市振达机电设备有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524649.html

 勐焕工商分局查获一商标侵权案

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524648.html

 澳门终审法院裁定香港置地在澳商标注册无效 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524647.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与廊坊华联商

厦

有

限

责

任

公

司

侵

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524646.html

 新天国际葡萄酒业有限公司与陈荣 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524645.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份有限公司与被

告

温

岭

百

亿

达

鞋

业

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524644.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 原告许嘉帏与被告楼叔明

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524643.html

 “肯德鸡”非“肯德基”薯条“傍名牌”引误会 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524642.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与郭强 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524641.html

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与上海利奔商贸有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524640.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与华普超市有

限

公

司

廊

坊

新

开

路

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524639.html

 上海派克笔有限公司诉百大超市有限公司商标侵权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524638.html

 福州工商清查假冒耗材

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524637.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告项

修

君

商

标

权

侵

权

纠

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524636.html

 江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司与严红芳侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524635.html

 商标权案难有定论三联集团与国美的恩怨是非 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524634.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 上诉人王小林与被上诉人鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波

马

股

份

公

司

侵

犯

商

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524633.html

 新乡市三力塑料门窗五金配件有限公司与马占坡侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524632.html

 中山市好太太电器有限公司与韩继文侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524631.html

 原告德力西集团有限公司与被告苏依敏侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524630.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与刘宣宣 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524629.html

 上海上汽大众汽车销售有限公司与徐州北区大众汽车维修有限公司侵犯商标专用 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524628.html

 “车”商标侵权纠纷案宣判新浪属正当使用 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524627.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告周萍

商

标

权

侵

权

纠

纷

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524626.html

 原告阿迪达斯有限公司与被告温州大世界超市有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524625.html

 重庆获10余万远假“冠生园”月饼

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524624.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 上海“外滩十八号”告温州“外滩十八号”经营者侵权 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524623.html

 世界五百强企业在沪维权温州一企业仿冒商标赔 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524622.html

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与上海晓雨机械设备有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524621.html

 上海朗通餐饮管理有限公司与吴君伟侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524620.html

 上海派克笔有限公司诉赣州豪通国际百货有限公司商标侵权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524619.html

 上海派克笔有限公司与兰州华联综合超市有限公司侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524618.html

 原告PUMAAktiengesellschaftRudolfDasslerSport与被告湖北省黄梅县进

出口公司

侵犯商标

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524617.html

 广东乐美文具有限公司与心连心集团湖南长沙超市有限公司宁乡购物广场和心连 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524616.html

 上海派克笔有限公司诉湖南中南富森工贸有限公司 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524615.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与周根宝 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524614.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 Twitter禁止第三方开发者使用官方商标

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524613.html

 我国全社会商标维权意识明显增强2018年主动投诉商标案件数量突破1万件 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524612.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告吴

小

巧

侵

犯

商

标

专

用

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524611.html

 鲁道夫.达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与郴州市黄公平超市有限公司侵犯商标专 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524610.html

 瓦房店轴承集团有限责任公司与徐州市腾辉工矿机电设备有限公司侵犯商标专用 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524609.html

 莱山查获一批假冒“肠炎宁”

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524608.html

 鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与湖南家润

多

超

市

有

限

公

司

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524607.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告江

苏

时

代

超

市

有

限

公

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524606.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告郑

志

坝

侵

犯

商

标

专

用

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524605.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

赢了网s.yingle.com

 佛山市豹王滤芯制造有限公司与阎伟假冒注册商标纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524604.html

 江西双飞人医药科技有限公司

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524603.html

 安庆帝伯格茨活塞环有限公司与上海卫海汽车配件市场经营管理有限公司侵犯商 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524602.html

 上海派克笔有限公司诉兰红卫商标侵权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524601.html

 原告立邦涂料（中国）有限公司与被告金渭芳侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524600.html

 原告济南沃德汽车零部件有限公司与被告顾国忠侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524599.html

 原告罗良忠与被告义乌市文林制线厂侵犯商标专用权纠纷案 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524598.html

 上诉人江苏新海花啤酒有限公司与被上诉人杭州千岛湖啤酒有限公司 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524597.html

 原告鲁道夫•达斯勒体育用品波马股份公司与被告黄

金

华

侵

犯

商

标

专

用

http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524596.html

 原告北新集团建材股份有限公司与被告南京市浦口区财港装饰材料经营部 http://s.yingle.com/w/cq/524595.html

法律咨询s.yingle.com

第四篇：商标转让流程规定有哪些？

律伴网（www.lvban365.net）律伴让法律服务更便捷！

商标转让流程规定有哪些？

在经济市场中，转让人有时为了能获得更多的利益，在符合条件的情况下需要对商标进行转让。而受让人考虑到如果重新注册一个新商标，势必在竞争激烈的市场中要磨合一段时间。因此，受让人会接受转让而来的旧商标。看到这里，大家一定想知道商标在转让流程中的具体规定。那么，商标转让流程规定有哪些?由小编带领着大家接着往下看。

一、商标转让的基本流程

1、商标转让流程包括：申请→受理→审查→公告→核发转让证明。

2、商标转让所需文件：

(1)《转让申请/注册商标申请书》;

(2)转让人和受让人的身份证明文件(复印件);

(3)委托代理的提交出转让方与受让人分别出具的《代理委托书》，直接在受理大厅办理的提交受让方经办人的身份证原件和复印件;

(4)申请移转的，还应当提交有关证明文件;

(5)申请文件为外文的，还应提供经翻译机构签章确认的中文译本。

3、商标转让时间：大约需要6-10个月左右。

二、商标转让形式

1、注册商标的转让形式有合同转让和继承转让。合同转让是指转让人和受让人之间通过签订转让合同的方式转让注册商标的;继承转让是指个人及依法登记的个体工商户死亡或丧失行为能力，由法定继承人继受其注册商标的。

2、在实践中，大量的转让注册商标都是以合同方式转让注册的。转让注册商标，应依法履行一定的手续，且必须经商标局核准后，转让注册才能生效。转让注册商标而不向商标局办理有关手续的，属于自行转让注册商标的行为，根据《商标法》第四十四条的规定，将受到行政处罚，严重时还可能导致注册商标被撤销。

三、商标转让途径

1、申请人可以委托国家工商行政管理总局认可的具有商标代理资格的组织代理，也可以到国家商标局商标注册大厅直接办理，申请人应当根据自己的具体情况决定

律伴让法律服务更便捷！律伴网（www.lvban365.net）律伴让法律服务更便捷！

2、如果申请人熟悉商标法律法规及相关程序，经常居所或者营业场所的通邮状况良好的，可以直接到商标局办理;若不具备上述条件，最好还是委托商标代理组织代理;在中国没有经常居所或者营业场所的外国人或者外国企业在中国申请转让注册应当委托商标代理组织代为办理。

四、商标转让的注意事项

1、转让注册商标的，商标注册人对其在相同或类似商品上注册的相同或近似商标应当一并转让。

2、转让申请提交一个月后，商标局将按照申请书上填写的地址，以邮寄方式发给受让人《受理通知书》，同时按照转让商标在商标局记录的注册人地址给注册人抄送一份《受理通知书》。

3、如果转让申请有不符合法律规定的，商标局将按照申请书上填写的地址，以邮寄方式书面通知申请人限期补正。

4、转让申请核准后，商标局将按照申请书上填写的地址，以邮寄方式发给受让人转让证明，并将该商标的转让事宜刊登公告。证明上的落款日期为公告之日，受让人自该日起享有商标专用权。

5、转让申请因其他原因不能核准的，商标局将按照申请书上填写的地址，以邮寄方式书面通知申请人。

6、转让申请书中的受让人为多个人共有的，商标局的有关通知或证明仅发给代表人。其他共有人需要证明的，应申请补发。

7、如果是申请人委托商标代理机构办理转让申请的，商标局不会直接与申请人发生任何书件往来，所有书件都寄发给该商标代理机构。

8、申请书的类别应按照《商标注册证》核定的国际分类类别填写。

以上就是商标转让流程规定的全部内容，在进行商标转让的过程中，转让人要事先整理好需要的材料及证明，就可以向商标局或者代理机构办理，千万不要去没有任何资质认证的中介公司办理。律伴的律师提醒您，现在有很多骗子团伙打着高效率低费用的幌子来蒙骗群众，如果您身边有朋友不小心被骗了，要保留好证据，并当即报警，等待警方来处理。

文章来源：律伴网 http://www.lvban365.net/

律伴让法律服务更便捷！律伴网（www.lvban365.net）律伴让法律服务更便捷！

律伴让法律服务更便捷！

第五篇：商标评审规则(中英文对照)

商标评审规则

(1995年11月2日原国家工商行政管理局第37号令公布；2002年9月17日国家工商行政管理总局令第3号第一次修订；2005年9月26日国家工商行政管理总局令第20号第二次修订)

第一章总则

第一条根据《中华人民共和国商标法》(以下简称商标法)和《中华人民共和国商标法实施条例》(以下简称实施条例)的规定，制定本规则。

第二条依据商标法及其实施条例的规定，国家工商行政管理总局商标评审委员会(以下简称商标评审委员会)负责处理下列商标评审案件：

(一)不服国家工商行政管理总局商标局(以下简称商标局)驳回商标注册申请的决定，依据商标法第三十二条规定申请复审的案件；

(二)不服商标局的异议裁定，依据商标法第三十三条规定申请复审的案件；

(三)对已经注册的商标，依据商标法第四十一条规定请求裁定撤销的案件；

(四)不服商标局依照商标法第四十一条第一款、第四十四条、第四十五条的规定作出撤销或者维持注册商标的决定，依据商标法第四十九条规定申请复审的案件。

第三条当事人参加商标争议案件的评审活动，应当以书面形式办理。

第四条商标评审委员会审理商标争议案件实行书面审理，但依据实施条例第三十三条规定决定公开评审的情形除外。

第五条商标评审委员会依据商标法、实施条例和本规则作出的决定和裁定，应当以书面形式通知有关当事人，并说明理由。

第六条除本规则另有规定外，商标评审委员会审理商标争议案件实行合议制度，由商标评审人员组成合议组进行审理。

合议组审理案件，实行少数服从多数的原则。

第七条当事人或者利害关系人依据实施条例第九条的规定申请商标评审人员回避的，应当以书面形式办理，并说明理由。

第八条在商标评审期间，当事人有权依法处分自己的商标权和与商标评审有关的权利。在顾及社会公共利益、第三方权利的前提下，当事人之间可以自行以书面形式达成和解，商标评审委员会也可以进行调解。

第九条共有商标的当事人参加商标评审活动，应当指定一人为代表人；没有指定代表人的，以其在商标注册申请书或者商标注册簿中载明的顺序第一人为代表人。代表人参与评审的行为对其所代表的当事人发生效力，但代表人变更、放弃评审请求或者承认对方当事人的评审请求，必须有被代表的当事人书面授权。

第十条外国人或者外国企业办理商标评审事宜，在中国有经常居所或者营业所的，可以委托国家认可的具有商标代理资格的组织代理，也可以直接办理；在中国没有经常居所或者营业所的，应当委托国家认可的具有商标代理资格的组织代理。

代理权限发生变更、代理关系解除或者变更代理人的，当事人或者代理人应当及时书面告知商标评审委员会。

第十一条当事人及其代理人可以申请查阅本案有关材料。

第二章申请与受理

第十二条申请商标评审，应当符合下列条件：

(一)申请人须有合法的主体资格；

(二)在法定期限内提出；

(三)属于商标评审委员会的评审范围；

(四)依法提交符合规定的申请书及有关证据材料；

(五)有明确的评审请求、事实根据和理由；

(六)依法缴纳评审费用。

第十三条申请商标评审，应当向商标评审委员会提交申请书；有被申请人的，应当按照被申请人的数量提交相应份数的副本；申请人的商标发生转让、移转，已向商标局提出申请但是尚未核准公告的，申请人应当提供相应的证明文件；基于商标局的决定书或者裁定书申请复审的，还应当同时附送商标局的决定书或者裁定书。

第十四条申请书应当载明下列事项：

(一)申请人的名称、住所地、通讯地址、联系人和联系电话。评审申请有被申请人的，应当载明被申请人的名称和住所地。委托商标代理组织办理商标评审事宜的，还应当载明商标代理组织的名称、通讯地址、联系人和联系电话；

(二)争议商标及其申请号或者初步审定号、注册号和刊登该商标的《商标公告》的期号；

(三)明确的评审请求和所根据的事实、理由及法律依据。

第十五条商标评审申请不符合本规则第十二条第(一)、(二)、(三)项规定条件之一的，商标评审委员会不予受理，书面通知申请人，并说明理由。

第十六条商标评审申请不符合本规则第十二条第(四)、(五)、(六)项规定条件之一的，或者未按照实施条例和本规则规定提交有关证明文件的，商标评审委员会应当向申请人发出补正通知，限其自收到补正通知之日起30日内补正。

经补正仍不符合规定的，商标评审委员会不予受理，书面通知申请人，并说明理由。期满未补正的，依据实施条例第三十条规定，视为申请人撤回评审申请，商标评审委员会应当书面通知申请人。

第十七条商标评审申请经审查符合受理条件的，商标评审委员会应当在30日内向申请人发出《受理通知书》。

第十八条商标评审委员会已经受理的商标评审申请，有下列情形之一的，属于不符合受理条件，应当依据实施条例第三十条规定予以驳回：

(一)违反商标法第四十二条规定，对核准注册前已经提出异议并经裁定的商标，又以相同的事实和理由申请裁定的；

(二)违反实施条例第三十五条规定，申请人撤回商标评审申请后，又以相同的事实和理由再次提出评审申请的；

(三)违反实施条例第三十五条规定，对商标评审委员会已经作出的裁定或者决定，以相同的事实和理由再次提出评审申请的；

(四)其他不符合受理条件的情形。

商标评审委员会驳回商标评审申请，应当书面通知申请人，并说明理由。

第十九条评审申请有被申请人的，商标评审委员会受理后，应当及时将申请书副本及有关证据材料送达被申请人，限其自收到申请书副本之日起30日内向商标评审委员会提交答辩书，并按照申请人的数量提交相应份数的副本；期满未提交或逾期提交的，视为放弃答辩。

第二十条当事人需要在提出评审申请或者答辩后补充有关证据材料的，应当在申请书或者答辩书中声明，并自提交申请书或者答辩书之日起3个月内一次性提交与申请书或答辩书相同份数的证据材料；未在申请书或答辩书中声明或者期满未提交的，视为放弃补充有关证据材料。但是，期满后基于新的事实形成的证据或者确有其他正当理由的除外。

对当事人在法定期限内提供的证据材料，有对方当事人的，商标评审委员会应当将该证据材料发送给对方当事人，限其在指定期限内进行质证。

第二十一条申请人提交申请书或者被申请人提交答辩书时，应当同时提交能够证明其身份的有效证件。申请人或者被申请人的名称应当与所提交的证件相一致。

当事人名称或者住所等事项发生变更的，应当提供相应的证明文件。

第二十二条当事人应当对其提交的证据材料逐一分类编号和制作目录清单，对证据材料的来源、证明的具体事实作简要说明，并签名盖章。

商标评审委员会收到当事人提交的证据材料后，应当按目录清单核对证据材料，并由经办人员在回执上签收，注明提交日期。

第二十三条商标评审申请书及有关证据材料应当按照规定的格式和要求填写、提供。未按照规定格式和要求填写、提供的，商标评审委员会向申请人发出补正通知，限其自收到补正通知之日起30日内补正。经补正仍不符合规定或者期满未补正的，适用本规则第十六条第二款的规定处理。

商标评审答辩书及有关证据材料应当按照规定的格式和要求填写、提供。未按照规定格式和要求填写、提供的，商标评审委员会向被申请人发出补正通知，限其自收到补正通知之日起30日内补正。经补正仍不符合规定或者期满未补正的，不影响商标评审委员会的评审。

第三章审理

第二十四条商标评审委员会审理商标评审案件应当组成合议组进行审理。合议组由商标评审人员3人以上的单数组成。但有下列情形之一的案件，可以由商标评审人员一人独任评审：

(一)商标局作出驳回决定、异议裁定所引证的商标在评审时已经丧失专用权或者在先权利的；

(二)被请求裁定撤销的商标已经丧失专用权的；

(三)商标局作出驳回决定所引证的商标归申请人所有，因申请人未及时办理变更手续被商标局驳回，评审时申请人已向商标局申请办完变更手续的；

(四)商标局作出驳回决定所引证的他人在先申请或者注册商标，评审时已核准转让给申请人的；

(五)其他可以独任评审的案件。

第二十五条当事人或者利害关系人依据实施条例第九条和本规则第七条的规定对商标评审人员提出回避申请的，被申请回避的商标评审人员在商标评审委员会作出是否回避的决定前，应当暂停参与本案的审理工作。

商标评审委员会在作出决定、裁定后收到当事人或者利害关系人提出的回避申请的，不影响评审决定、裁定的有效性。但评审人员确实存在需要回避的情形的，商标评审委员会应当依法作出处理。

第二十六条商标评审委员会对当事人提出的回避申请，应当在收到申请后7日内，以书面形式作出决定，并书面通知申请人。申请人对商标评审委员会作出的不回避决定不服的，可以在收到决定后3日内申请复议一次。复议期间，被申请回避的商标评审人员，不停止参与本案的审理工作。商标评审委员会对复议申请应当在3日内作出复议决定，并书面通知复议申请人。

第二十七条商标评审委员会审理不服商标局驳回商标注册申请决定的复审案件，除应当适用商标法第十条、第十一条、第十二条和第十六条第一款规定外，应当针对商标局的驳回决定和申请人申请复审的事实、理由、请求以及评审时的事实状态进行评审。商标评审委员会根据本条前述规定作出复审决定前应当听取申请人的意见。

第二十八条商标评审委员会审理不服商标局异议裁定的复审案件，应当针对当事人复审申请和答辩的事实、理由及请求进行评审。

第二十九条商标评审委员会审理依据商标法第四十一条请求裁定撤销注册商标的案件，应当针对当事人申请和答辩的事实、理由及请求进行评审。

第三十条商标评审委员会审理不服商标局依照商标法第四十一条第一款规定作出撤销注册商标决定的复审案件，应当针对商标局的决定和申请人申请复审的事实、理由及请求进行评审。

商标评审委员会审理不服商标局依照商标法第四十四条、第四十五条规定作出撤销或者维持注册商标决定的复审案件，应当针对商标局作出撤销或者维持注册商标决定时所依据的事实、理由和法律适用进行评审。但是，依据商标法第四十四条第(四)项申请复审的案件当事人需要补充证据且有正当理由的除外。

第三十一条在商标评审程序中，当事人的商标权发生转让、移转的，受让人或者承继人应当及时以书面形式声明承受转让人的地位，参加后续评审程序并承担相应的评审后果。

第三十二条有下列情形之一的，终止评审：

(一)申请人死亡或者终止后没有继承人或者继承人放弃评审权利的；

(二)申请人撤回评审申请的；

(三)当事人自行和解或者经商标评审委员会调解后达成协议的；

(四)其他应当终止评审的情形。

终止评审的，商标评审委员会予以结案，书面通知有关当事人，并说明理由。

第三十三条合议组审理案件应当制作合议笔录，并由合议组成员签名。合议组成员有不同意见的，应当如实记入合议笔录。

经审理终结的案件，商标评审委员会依法作出决定、裁定。

第三十四条商标评审委员会作出的决定书、裁定书应当载明下列内容：

(一)评审请求、争议的事实和理由；

(二)决定或者裁定认定的事实、理由和适用的法律依据；

(三)决定或者裁定结论；

(四)可供当事人选用的后续程序和时限；

(五)决定、裁定作出的日期。

决定书、裁定书由合议组成员署名，加盖商标评审委员会印章。

第三十五条对商标评审委员会作出的决定、裁定，当事人不服向人民法院起诉的，应当在向人民法院递交起诉状的同时或者至迟15日内将该起诉状副本抄送或者另行书面告知商标评审委员会。

商标评审委员会自所作出的决定、裁定发出之日起60日内未收到来自人民法院或者案件当事人任何有关该决定、裁定之起诉信息的，视为有关当事人未向法院起诉，该决定、裁定移送商标局执行。

第三十六条商标评审委员会根据当事人的请求或者实际需要，可以决定对评审申请进行公开评审。

第三十七条当事人请求进行公开评审的，应当提出需要进行公开评审的具体理由。

第三十八条申请人请求进行公开评审的，应当自收到被申请人的答辩书副本之日起15日内以书面形式向商标评审委员会提出；被申请人请求进行公开评审的，应当在向商标评审委员会提交答辩书或者补充有关证据材料时一并提出。

第三十九条公开评审的具体程序由商标评审委员会另行规定。

第四章证据规则

第四十条当事人对自己提出的评审请求所依据的事实或者反驳对方评审请求所依据的事实有责任提供证据加以证明。没有证据或者证据不足以证明当事人的事实主张的，由负有举证责任的当事人承担不利后果。

一方当事人对另一方当事人陈述的案件事实明确表示承认的，另一方当事人无需举证。

对一方当事人陈述的事实，另一方当事人既未表示承认也未否认的，视为对该项事实的承认。

当事人委托代理人参加评审的，代理人的承认视为当事人的承认。但未经特别授权的代理人对事实的承认直接导致承认对方评审请求的除外；当事人在场但对其代理人的承认不作否认表示的，视为当事人的承认。

第四十一条下列事实，当事人无需举证证明：

(一)众所周知的事实；

(二)按照法律规定推定的事实；

(三)已经依法证明的事实；

(四)根据日常生活经验法则推定的事实；

(五)其他依法无需举证的事实。

但当事人有相反证据足以推翻的除外。

第四十二条当事人向商标评审委员会提供书证的，应当提供原件，包括原本、正本和副本。提供原件有困难的，可以提供相应的复印件、照片、节录本；提供由有关部门保管的书证原件的复制件、影印件或者抄录件的，应当注明出处，经该部门核对无异后加盖其印章。

当事人向商标评审委员会提供物证的，应当提供原物。提供原物有困难的，可以提供相应的复制件或者证明该物证的照片、录像等其他证据；原物为数量较多的种类物的，提供其中的一部分。

一方当事人对另一方当事人所提书证、物证的复制件或者照片等存在怀疑并有相应证据支持的，或者商标评审委员会认为有必要的，被质疑的当事人应当提供或者出示有关证据的原件或经公证的复印件。

第四十三条当事人向商标评审委员会提供的证据系在中华人民共和国领域外形成，或者在香港、澳门、台湾地区形成，对方当事人对该证据的真实性存在怀疑并有相应证据支持的，或者商标评审委员会认为必要的，应当依照有关规定办理相应的公证认证手续。

第四十四条当事人向商标评审委员会提供外文书证或者外文说明资料，应当附有中文译文。提交外文证据的当事人未提交中文译文的，该外文证据视为未提交。

对方当事人对译文具体内容有异议的，应当对有异议的部分提交中文译文。必要时，可以委托双方当事人认可的单位对全文、或者所使用部分或者有异议的部分进行翻译。

双方当事人对委托翻译达不成协议的，商标评审委员会可以指定专业翻译单位对全文、或者所使用部分或者有异议部分进行翻译。委托翻译所需费用由双方当事人各承担50％；拒绝支付翻译费用的，视为其承认对方提交的译文。

第四十五条对单一证据有无证明力和证明力大小可以从下列方面进行审核认定：

(一)证据是否原件、原物，复印件、复制品与原件、原物是否相符；

(二)证据与本案事实是否相关；

(三)证据的形式、来源是否符合法律规定；

(四)证据的内容是否真实；

(五)证人或者提供证据的人，与当事人有无利害关系。

第四十六条评审人员对案件的全部证据，应当从各证据与案件事实的关联程度、各证据之间的联系等方面进行综合审查判断。

第四十七条下列证据不能单独作为认定案件事实的依据：

(一)未成年人所作的与其年龄和智力状况不相适应的证言；

(二)与一方当事人有亲属关系、隶属关系或者其他密切关系的证人所作的对该当事人有利的证言，或者与一方当事人有不利关系的证人所作的对该当事人不利的证言；

(三)应当参加公开评审作证而无正当理由不参加公开评审作证的证人证言；

(四)难以识别是否经过修改的视听资料；

(五)无法与原件、原物核对的复制件或者复制品；

(六)经一方当事人或者他人改动，对方当事人不予认可的证据材料；

(七)其他不能单独作为认定案件事实依据的证据材料。

第四十八条一方当事人提出的下列证据，对方当事人提出异议但没有足以反驳的相反证据的，商标评审委员会应当确认其证明力：

(一)书证原件或者与书证原件核对无误的复印件、照片、副本、节录本；

(二)物证原物或者与物证原物核对无误的复制件、照片、录像资料等；

(三)有其他证据佐证并以合法手段取得的、无疑点的视听资料或者与视听资料核对无误的复制件。

第四十九条一方当事人委托鉴定部门作出的鉴定结论，另一当事人没有足以反驳的相反证据和理由的，可以认定其证明力。

第五十条一方当事人提出的证据，另一方当事人认可或者提出的相反证据不足以反驳的，商标评审委员会可以确认其证明力。

一方当事人提出的证据，另一方当事人有异议并提出反驳证据，对方当事人对反驳证据认可的，可以确认反驳证据的证明力。

第五十一条双方当事人对同一事实分别举出相反的证据，但都没有足够的依据否定对方证据的，商标评审委员会应当结合案件情况，判断一方提供证据的证明力是否明显大于另一方提供证据的证明力，并对证明力较大的证据予以确认。

因证据的证明力无法判断导致争议事实难以认定的，商标评审委员会应当依据举证责任分配原则作出判断。

第五十二条评审过程中，当事人在申请书、答辩书、陈述及其委托代理人的代理词中承认的对己方不利的事实和认可的证据，商标评审委员会应当予以确认，但当事人反悔并有相反证据足以推翻的除外。

第五十三条当事人对自己的主张，只有本人陈述而不能提出其他相关证据的，其主张不予支持。但对方当事人认可的除外。

第五十四条商标评审委员会就数个证据对同一事实的证明力，可以依照下列原则认定：

(一)国家机关以及其他职能部门依职权制作的公文文书优于其他书证；

(二)鉴定结论、档案材料以及经过公证或者登记的书证优于其他书证、视听资料和证人证言；

(三)原件、原物优于复制件、复制品；

(四)法定鉴定部门的鉴定结论优于其他鉴定部门的鉴定结论；

(五)原始证据优于传来证据；

(六)其他证人证言优于与当事人有亲属关系或者其他密切关系的证人提供的对该当事人有利的证言；

(七)参加公开评审作证的证人证言优于未参加公开评审作证的证人证言；

(八)数个种类不同、内容一致的证据优于一个孤立的证据。

第五章期间、送达

第五十五条期间包括法定期间和商标评审委员会指定的期间。

期间以日、月、年计算。期间开始的当日，不计算在期间内。

期间届满的最后一日是节假日的，以节假日后的第一个工作日为期间届满的日期。

第五十六条当事人向商标评审委员会提交的文件或者材料的日期，直接递交的，以递交日为准；邮寄的，以寄出的邮戳日为准；邮戳日不清晰或者没有邮戳的，以商标评审委员会实际收到日为准，但是当事人能够提出实际邮戳日证据的除外。

第五十七条商标评审委员会的各种文件，可以通过邮寄、直接递交或者其他方式送达当事人。当事人委托商标代理组织的，文件送达商标代理组织视为送达当事人。

商标评审委员会向当事人送达各种文件的日期，邮寄的，以当事人收到的邮戳日为准；邮戳日不清晰或者没有邮戳的，或者没有被邮局退回的，自文件发出之日起满15日，视为送达当事人；直接递交的，以递交日为准。文件无法邮寄或者无法直接递交的，可以通过公告方式送达当事人，自公告发布之日起满30日，该文件视为已经送达。

第五十八条当事人是在中华人民共和国没有经常居所或者营业所的外国人或者外国企业的，由商标注册档案中载明的商标代理组织承担商标评审程序中该商标的有关法律文件的签收义务；商标评审委员会将有关法律文件送达该商标代理组织，视为送达当事人。

商标代理组织在前款所述有关法律文件送达之前已经与有关外国当事人解除商标代理关系的，应当以书面形式向商标评审委员会说明有关情况，并自收到文件之日起10日内将有关法律文件交回商标评审委员会，由商标评审委员会另行送达。

马德里国际注册商标涉及国际局转发相关书件的，应当提交相应的送达证据。未提交的，应书面说明原因，自国际局发文之日起满15日视为送达。

上述方式无法送达的，公告送达。

第六章附则

第五十九条对商标法修改决定于2001年12月1日施行前发生，属于修改后商标法第四条、第五条、第八条、第九条第一款、第十条第一款第(一)、(三)、(四)项、第十条第二款、第十一条、第十二条、第十三条、第十五条、第十六条、第二十四条、第二十五条、第三十一条所列举的情形，商标评审委员会在商标法修改决定施行后进行评审的，依据修改后商标法的相应规定进行评审；属于其他情形的，商标评审委员会适用修改前商标法的相应规定进行评审。

当事人就商标法修改决定施行时注册已满一年的商标产生争议，向商标评审委员会申请评审的，适用修改前商标法第二十七条第二款规定的提出申请的期限处理；当事人就商标法修改决定施行时注册不满一年的商标产生争议，向商标评审委员会申请评审的，适用修改后商标法第四十一条第三款规定的提出申请的期限处理。

有关单位或者个人在商标法修改决定施行前依照修改前商标法第二十七条及其实施细则第二十五条的规定提出评审申请，属于修改后商标法第十三条、第十五条、第十六条和第三十一条规定情形的，不适用修改后商标法第四十一条第二款规定的提出评审申请的期限规定。

第六十条办理商标评审事宜的文书格式，由国家工商行政管理总局制定并公布。

第六十一条

第六十二条

本规则由国家工商行政管理总局负责解释。本规则自2005年10月26日起施行。14 Rules for Trademark Review and Adjudication

(Promulgated on 2 November 1995 in the Order No.37 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce;revised for the first time on 17 September 2002 in the Order No.3 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce;revised for the second time on 26 September 2005 in the Order No.20 of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce)

Chapter I General Provisions

Rule 1 These Rules are hereby formulated in accordance with the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Law)and the Regulations for the Implementation of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China(hereinafter referred to as the Implementing Regulations).Rule 2 Under the Trademark Law and the Implementing Regulations thereof, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board)shall be responsible for handling the following cases of trademark dispute:(1)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 32 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with decisions made by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce(hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Office)on rejection of applications for trademark registration;(2)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 33 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with opposition adjudication made by the Trademark Office;(3)cases of request for adjudication on cancellation of registered trademarks filed according to the provision of Article 41 of the Trademark Law;and(4)cases of application for reexamination filed according to the provision of Article 49 of the Trademark Law out of dissatisfaction with a decision to cancel or uphold a registered trademark made by the Trademark Office according to the provisions of Articles 41, paragraph one, 44 and 45 of the Trademark Law.Rule 3 The review and adjudication activities in which an interested party participates in cases of trademark dispute shall proceed in writing.Rule 4 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall hear cases of trademark dispute in writing, except the circumstances where it decides to publicly review and adjudicate a case according to the provision of Article 33 of Implementing Regulations.Rule 5 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify, in writing, the interested parties of, and explain the reason for, the decisions and adjudication made according to the Trademark Law, the Implementing Regulations and these Rules.Rule 6 Unless otherwise provided for in these Rules, the collegial system shall be adopted for the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board to hear cases of trademark dispute, and the examiners for the trademark review and adjudication shall make a collegial panel to conduct the hearing of a case.When the collegial panel hears a case, the principle is adopted that the minority are subordinate to the majority.Rule 7 An interested party who applies for withdrawal of an examiner for trademark review and adjudication according to the provision of Article 9 of the Implementing Regulations shall file the application in writing, and explain the reason therefor.Rule 8 During the review and adjudication, an interested party shall have the right to dispose of, according to law, his trademark right and the right relating to trademark review and adjudication.Provided that public interests and a third party’s rights are taken into consideration, interested parties may reach an amicable settlement agreement in writing by themselves.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may conduct mediation.Rule 9 Where interested parties who are co-owners of a trademark participate in the review and adjudication, they shall designate a representative;where no representative is designated, the first person indicated in the trademark registration application or in the Trademark Register shall be the representative.The action of the representative to participate in the review and adjudication shall have effect on the interested parties he represents, but change of the representative, waiver of the review and adjudication request or acknowledgement of the other party's review and adjudication request must be authorized in writing by the interested parties represented.Rule 10 Where a foreign person or enterprise attending to matter of review and adjudication has habitual residence or place of business in China, he or it may entrust a qualified trademark agency authorised by the State with, or directly attend to, the matter.Where a foreign person or enterprise attending to the matter of review and adjudication does not have habitual residence or place of business in China, he or it shall entrust a qualified trademark agency authorised by the State.Where there is a change in the scope of power of agency, the agent relations terminate, or there is a change of agent, the interested party or its agent shall inform the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in writing in a timely manner.Rule 11 Interested parties and agents may apply for consulting documents relevant to a case.Chapter II Application and Acceptance

Rule 12 Applications for trademark review and adjudication shall conform to the requirements as follows:(1)The applicants must be lawfully qualified subjects;(2)The applications are filed within the statutory time limit;(3)The applications fall within the scope of review and adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;(4)Applications and the relevant proofs that conform to the requirement are submitted according to law;(5)There are specific requests, factual bases and grounds for the review and adjudication;and(6)The review and adjudication fees are paid according to law.Rule 13 To apply for trademark review and adjudication, one shall file an Application with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.If there is(are)a respondent/respondents, the applicant shall file as many copies of the Application as there are respondents.Where a trademark has been assigned or transferred and an application for the assignment has been filed with the Trademark Office, and not approved and published, the applicant shall submit relevant documents as proof.To apply for reexamination in respect of a decision or adjudication made by the Trademark Office, one shall also submit the Decision or Adjudication made by the Trademark Office along with the Application.Rule 14 Following information shall be indicated in the Application:(1)the applicant’s name, address of residence, mailing address, the name of the person to be contacted, and telephone number.Where the respondent(s)is(are)indicated in the review and adjudication application, the name and address thereof shall be indicated.Where a trademark agency is appointed to attend to the matter of the trademark review and adjudication, the name, mailing address, the name of the person to be contacted, and telephone number of the agency shall also be indicated.(2)the trademark in dispute and its application number or preliminary approval number, registration number and the issue number of the Trademark Gazette;(3)specific request for the review and adjudication, and the facts, grounds and legal bases for the request;Rule 15 Where a trademark review and adjudication application does not conform to any one of the requirements set forth in Rule 12(1),(2)and(3)of these Rules, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not accept the application and shall notify the applicant in writing of the non-acceptance, and explain the reason.Rule 16 Where a trademark review and adjudication application does not conform to any one of the requirements set forth in Rule 12(4),(5)and(6)of these Rules or where the relevant certificates or proofs are not submitted according to the Implementing Regulations and these Rules, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant to make rectification and require him to comply within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notification on rectification.Where an application remains contrary to the requirements upon rectification, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall not accept the application and shall notify the applicant in writing of the non-acceptance and explain the reason.Where no rectification is made at the expiration of the time limit, the review and adjudication application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn by the applicant and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant in writing according to the provision of Article 30 of the Implementing Regulations.Rule 17 Where a trademark review and adjudication application conforms to the requirement for acceptance, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall issue to the applicant the Acceptance Notification within thirty days.Rule 18 In any one of the following circumstances, any trademark review and adjudication application that has been accepted by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is deemed not to conform to the requirements for acceptance, and shall be refused according to Article 30 of the Implementing Regulations:(1)contrary to the provision of Article 42 of the Trademark Law in that against a trademark to which an opposition was raised and on which adjudication(on reexamination of the opposition)was made before it was approved of registration, an application for adjudication is filed on the basis of the same facts and grounds;(2)contrary to the provision of Article 35 of the Implementing Regulations in that an application for review and adjudication has been voluntarily withdrawn and the applicant files another application on the basis of the same facts and grounds thereafter;(3)contrary to the provision of Article 35 of the Implementing Regulations in that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board has made adjudication or decision on an application for review and adjudication and the applicant files another application on the basis of the same facts and grounds;or(4)any other circumstance under which an application does not conform to the requirements for acceptance;The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, when rejecting a trademark review and adjudication application, shall notify the applicant in writing, and explain the reason.Rule 19 Where there is/are a respondent/respondents indicated in a Review and Adjudication Application, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, upon acceptance, shall forward the copies of the Application and the relevant proofs thereto in a timely manner, and require him/them to submit the Reply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board within thirty days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Application, and submit the same number of copies thereof as that of the applicants.Where a respondent does not submit a Reply or fails to submit the Reply before the expiration of the time limit, he shall be deemed to have given up making the Reply.Rule 20 Any interested party who needs to supplement relevant proofs after filing a Review and Adjudication Application or a Reply shall make a statement in the Application/Reply and submit altogether the same number of copies of the proofs as that of the Application/Reply within three months from the date of filing.Where the applicant/respondent does not make the statement or fails to submit the relevant proofs at the expiration of the time limit, he shall be deemed to have given up supplementing the relevant proofs, with the exception that the evidence is based on the new facts that occur after the expiration of the time limit or there is any other justifiable reason.Where there is an opposite party involved, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall communcate the proofs submitted by an interested party within the statutory time limit to the opposite party, and request him/it for cross-examination within a specified period of time.Rule 21 The applicant, when filing an Application or respondent, when filing a Reply, shall, meanwhile, submit valid certificates capable of proving his identification.The name of the applicant or the respondent shall be consistent with that indicated in the certificates submitted.Where there is a change in the name or address of an interested party, relevant proofs to this effect shall be submitted.Rule 22 The interested party shall categorise, number and list each proof he submits, briefly explain the source thereof, and specific facts of the evidence, and sign and seal them.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, after receiving the proofs submitted by an interested party, shall check the proofs according to the list thereof, and the staff member receiving the proofs shall sign his name on the receipt and indicate the date of submission.Rule 23 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Application and relevant proofs shall be filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Application and relevant proofs are not filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the applicant to make rectification, requiring him to do so within thirty dates from the date of receipt of the rectification notification.Failure for the amended Application and relevant proofs to conform to the prescription or failure to make the rectification at the expiration of the time limit shall be governed by Rule 16, paragraph two, of these Rules.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Reply and relevant proofs shall be filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Reply and relevant proofs are not filled out and submitted in the prescribed form and in conformity with the requirements, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall notify the respondent to make rectification, requiring him to do so within thirty dates from the date of receipt of the rectification notification.Failure for the amended Reply and relevant proofs to conform to the prescription or failure to make the rectification at the expiration of the time limit shall not affect the review and adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Chapter III Hearing

Rule 24 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall set up a collegial panel to hear a case of trademark review and adjudication.The collegial panel shall be composed of an odd number of more than three trademark review and adjudication examiners.In any one of the following circumstances, an individual trademark review and adjudication examiner may solely review and adjudicate a case:(1)where a trademark cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision or opposition adjudication has lost the exclusive right or the right of priority therein;(2)where a trademark of which a request for cancellation has been filed has lost the exclusive right therein;(3)where a trademark cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision is actually owned by an applicant, but rejected by the Trademark Office because the applicant fails to go through the formalities for a change in time, and the applicant applies, during the review and adjudication, to the Trademark Office to complete the formalities for the change;(4)where a third party’s trademark of prior filing or registration, cited by the Trademark Office in its rejection decision, has been approved to be assigned to the applicant during the review and adjudication;or(5)any other cases that may be under the sole review and adjudication by an individual trademark review and adjudication examiner.Rule 25 Where an interested party applies for the withdrawal of a trademark review and adjudication examiner according to the provision of Article 9 of the Implementing Regulations and Rule 7 of these Rules, the trademark review and adjudication examiner shall suspend his participation in the hearing of the case before the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board decides whether or not he should withdraw.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board receives an application for withdrawal from an interested party after it makes decision or adjudication, the validity of the review and adjudication decision or adjudication shall not be affected.However, where the review and adjudication examiner indeed needs to withdraw, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall treat the matter according to law.Rule 26 In respect of a party's application for withdrawal, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make its decision within seven days after the date of the receipt of the application, and notify the applicant in writing.Where an applicant is not satisfied with the decision on non-withdrawal made by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, it or he may apply for reconsideration once within three days after the date of the receipt of the decision.During the reconsideration, the trademark review and adjudication examiner whose withdrawal is requested shall not suspend his participation in the hearing of the case.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make its reconsideration decision within three days, and notify the reconsideration applicant in writing.Rule 27 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision by the Trademark Office on the rejection of trademark registration, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall, besides applying Articles 10, 11, 12 and 16, paragraph one, of the Trademark Law, review and adjudicate the case in connection with the rejection decision made by the Trademark Office, the facts of, grounds on, and requests for, the reexamination application by the applicant and the factual situation in the course of review and adjudication.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall listen to what the applicant has to say before making a decision according to the proceeding provision of this Rule.Rule 28 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with an adjudication made by the Trademark Office on opposition, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts of, grounds on, and requests for, the reexamination application and reply made by the interested parties.Rule 29 In hearing a case of adjudication requested according to the provision of Article 41 of the Trademark Law on cancellation of a registered trademark, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts of, grounds on and requests for, the application and reply by the interested parties.Rule 30 In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision by the Trademark Office on cancellation of a registered trademark according to the provision of Article 41, paragraph one, of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the decision made by the Trademark Office and the facts of, grounds on and requests for, the reexamination application by the applicant.In hearing a case of reexamination applied for out of dissatisfaction with a decision on canceling or upholding of a registered trademark made by the Trademark Office according to the provisions of Articles 44 and 45 of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall review and adjudicate the case in connection with the facts, grounds and application of law on the basis of which the Trademark Office made the decision to cancel or uphold the registered trademark, except that an interested party to a case in which the reexamination has been applied for under Article 44(4)of the Trademark Law needs to submit additional evidence with justification.Rule 31 Where an interested party’s trademark right has been assigned or transferred during the trademark review and adjudication, the assignee or the transferee shall make a statement in writing on its or his assignee or transferee status in a timely manner, participate in the follow-up reexamination proceedings, and take the corresponding consequences.Rule 32 In any one of the following circumstances, the review and adjudication shall terminate:(1)where the applicant dies or terminates and there is no inheritor, or the inheritor abandons its or his right for review and adjudication;(2)where the applicant withdraws its or his application for review and adjudication;(3)where the interested parties reach an amicable agreement by themselves or through mediation by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;or(4)any other circumstance requiring the termination of the review and adjudication.Where the review and adjudication terminates, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall close the case, notify the interested parties in writing, and explain the reason.Rule 33 The collegial panel shall put down in writing the case it hears, and the written record shall be signed by the members thereof.Where the members of a collegial panel are divided in their opinions, the divided opinions shall be indicated in the collegial record.The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make decision or adjudication according to law on a case the examination of which has been closed.Rule 34 The following shall be indicated in the decision or adjudication by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board:(1)request for review and adjudication and facts at issue and grounds;(2)facts ascertained, reasons and grounds for the application of law in the decision or adjudication;(3)conclusion made in the decision or adjudication;(4)the follow-up procedure and time limit available to interested parties;and(5)date of the decision or adjudication.The decision or adjudication shall be signed by the members of the collegial panel and sealed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Rule 35 Where an interested party institutes proceedings in a people's court out of dissatisfaction with a decision or adjudication made by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the interested party shall, at the time of submitting a complaint to the people’s court or within fifteen days from the date of the submission at the latest, send a copy of the complaint, or separately notify the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in writing.Where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, within sixty days from the date of issuing its decision or adjudication, is not informed by the people’s court or any interested party of a lawsuit directed to the decision or adjudication, it shall be deemed that the interested party has not instituted legal proceedings in the court, and the decision or adjudication will be transferred to Trademark Office for enforcement.Rule 36 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may, at the request of an interested party or according to practical needs, decide to conduct a public review and adjudication of the application therefor.Rule 37 If an interested party requests for public review and adjudication, he shall give specific reasons that the public review and adjudication is necessary.Rule 38 An applicant requesting for the public review and adjudication shall file the request in writing with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Reply made by the respondent;and a respondent requesting for the public review and adjudication shall file the request together with the submission to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the Reply or additional relevant proofs.Rule 39 Specific procedures for public review and adjudication will be separately set forth by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.Chapter IV Rules on Evidence

Rule 40 An interested party shall be under the burden of proof to testify the facts on the basis of which he requests for the review and adjudication or on the basis of which one rebuts the other party's review and adjudication request.Where there is no evidence or there is not sufficient evidence to attest to the factual claims by an interested party, the interested party under the burden of proof shall bear the adverse consequences.Where one interested party expressly acknowledges the facts in a case as stated by the other party, the latter is not under the burden of proof.The other party's neither acknowledging nor denying the facts claimed by an interested party shall be deemed acknowledgement thereof.Where an interested party appoints an attorney to attend the review and adjudication, the attorney's admission shall be deemed the interested party's admission, except that the attorney's unauthorized admission of any facts directly results in the admission of the other party’s review and adjudication request.The interested party’s failure to express objection to its or his attorney's admission on site shall be deemed to be the the interested party’s admission.Rule 41 An interested party does not need to adduce evidence to prove the following facts:(1)facts known to all;(2)facts deducted from the law;(3)facts proven according to the law;(4)facts deducted on the basis of experience and laws of the daily life;and(5)other facts in respect of which adduction of evidence is not required under the law.except that an interested party has evidence to the contrary which is sufficient to upset the facts.Rule 42 An interested party who furnishes the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board with documentary evidence shall furnish the original, including the original text, the authentic text, and the copy.The interested party who has difficulty furnishing the original may furnish the corresponding Xerox copies, photographs or extracts.Where the furnished documents are Xerox copies, photographs or extracts of the original documentary evidence kept by a relevant department, the sources shall be indicated, and the documents be sealed by the department upon verification.An interested party who furnishes the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board with material evidence shall furnish the original material.The interested party who has difficulty furnishing the original may furnish the corresponding reproduction or other evidence such as photographs or video-recordings of said material evidence.Where the original is of relatively many varieties, a part thereof shall be furnished.Where an interested party has doubt about the Xerox copies or photographs of the documentary evidence and material evidence furnished by the other party, and has relevant proofs in support of the doubt, or where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board deems necessary, the doubted interested party shall furnish or show the original or the notarised copy of the relevant evidence.Article 43 Where the evidence furnished by an interested party to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board is evolved outside the territory of the People’s Republic of China, or in the region of Hong Kong, Macau or Taiwan and where the other party has doubt for its authenticity and has relevant proofs in support of the doubt, or where the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board deems necessary, the evidence shall be notarized and or legalized according to the relevant regulations.Rule 44 Where an interested party furnishes to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board instruments or explanatory material in a foreign language, he shall attach the Chinese translation thereof.Where an interested party who has furnished evidence in a foreign language fails to submit the Chinese translation thereof, the evidence in the foreign language shall be deemed not to have been submitted.Where the other party has objection to the specific content of the translation, he shall submit the Chinese translation of the part to which the objection is raised.If necessary, an entity accepted by both parties may be entrusted with the translation of the entire text or the part of the text which has been used or to which objection has been raised.Where both parties fail to reach an agreement on the translation entrustment, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may entrust a professional translation entity with the translation of the entire text or the part of the text which has been used or to which objection has been raised.Each party shall bear 50 percent of the fees necessary for the entrusted translation.A party's refusal to pay the translation fee shall be deemed its acceptance of the translation submitted by the other party.Rule 45 A single piece of evidence may be verified and confirmed as to the presence and strength of evidential force in relation to the following aspects:(1)whether the evidence is the original text, original material;whether the copy or reproduction of the evidence is consistent with the original;(2)whether the evidence is relevant to the facts of a case;(3)whether the evidence conforms to the law in terms of form or source;(4)whether the evidence is true in content;and(5)whether the witness or the person furnishing the evidence has interest in an interested party.Rule 46 The review and adjudication examiners shall comprehensively examine and evaluate all the evidence as to the degree of relevance of the various pieces of the evidence to the facts of a case and the relationship of these pieces of evidence.Rule 47 The following evidence alone shall not serve as the basis for ascertaining facts in a case:(1)oral evidence from a minor which does not match his age or intelligence;(2)oral evidence in favour of one interested party from a witness who is a relative, affiliate or otherwise closely related to the interested party or oral evidence against one interested party from a witness who is adversely-related thereto;(3)oral evidence from a witness who should attend the public review and adjudication but fails to without justification;(4)Audiovisual reference material difficult to be detected as to whether it is modified or not;(5)Copy or reproduction impossible to be verified with the original;(6)Proofs which one party or another person has modified and which the other party does not accept;and(7)Any other proofs that, alone, cannot serve as the basis for ascertaining the facts in a case.Rule 48 The following evidence furnished by an interested party, to which the other party objects but fails to rebut with sufficient evidence to the contrary, shall be established by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as having its evidential force:(1)the original documentary evidence or the Xerox copies, photographs, copies or extracts thereof which are verified to be consistent with the original documentary evidence;(2)the original material evidence or the copies, photographs or video-recording materials thereof which are verified to be consistent with the original material evidence;(3)the audiovisual reference material which is supported by other evidence and obtained by legal means and free of any doubt or the reproduction thereof verified without any inconsistency found.Rule 49 Where a appraisal conclusion made by an appraisal organisation with entrustment by an interested party is not rebutted by the other party with sufficient evidence and reason to the contrary, the evidential force of the appraisal conclusion may be confirmed.Rule 50 In respect of the evidence one interested party has furnished and the other party accepts or fails to rebut with sufficient evidence to the contrary, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may confirm its evidential force.Where in respect of the evidence one interested party has furnished, the other party has objection thereto and presents evidence to rebut it, and the opposite party accepts the rebutting evidence, the evidential force of the rebutting evidence may be confirmed.Rule 51 Where both parties furnish evidence to the contrary in respect of the same fact, neither has sufficient ground for the denial of the evidence of the other party, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall evaluate, considering the circumstances of a case, whether or not the evidence furnished by one party is obviously more valid in evidential force than that by the other party, and confirm the evidence carrying more valid evidential force.Where it is impossible to evaluate the evidential force of the evidence, and, as a result, it is difficult to ascertain the facts in dispute, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make determination according to the doctrine for distribution of burden of proof.Rule 52 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall confirm the facts and evidence which are unfavorable to an interested party, but have been accepted by the interested party in its or his Application, Reply, Written Statement, or statements made by his appointed attorney in the course of review and adjudication, except that the party goes back on his words and has sufficient evidence to the contrary to rebut them.Rule 53 Where an interested party has made his own statement of, but cannot furnish other relevant evidence to back up, his claim, the claim shall not be supported, except that the other party otherwise accepts the claim.Rule 54 The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may determine the evidential force of several pieces of evidence as to the same fact according to the following principles:(1)Documents and instruments prepared, ex officio, by a State agency and any other competent department prevail over other documentary evidence;(2)Appraisal conclusions, materials kept on file and notarized or registered documentary evidence prevail over other documentary evidence, audiovisual reference evidence and oral evidence from a witness;(3)Original documents or materials prevail over copies or reproductions;(4)Appraisal conclusions made by statutory appraisal departments prevail over those by other appraisal departments;(5)Original evidence prevails over derivative evidence;(6)Oral evidence of other witnesses prevails over oral evidence, in favor of an interested party, from a witness who is a relative or otherwise closely related to the party;(7)Oral evidence from a participant of the public review and adjudication prevails over that from a non-participant;and(8)Several pieces of evidence variant in category and consistent in content prevail over a single isolated piece of evidence.Chapter V Time Limit and Service

Rule 55 The time limit includes the statutory time limit and that fixed by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.The time limit is counted in days, months and years.The beginning day of a time limit is not counted.Where the last day on which a time limit expires is a public holiday, the first workday following the public holiday is the date on which the time limit expires.Rule 56 Where any document or material is sent to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the date of receipt shall be the date of delivery where it is delivered personally, or the date of posting indicated by the postmark if it is sent by post;where the date of posting indicated by the postmark is illegible, or there is no postmark, the date of receipt shall be the date on which the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board actually receives the document or material, except that the interested party is able to present evidence as to the actual date of posting indicated by the postmark.Rule 57 Any document of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may be served by post, by personal delivery or by other means.Where an interested party entrusts a trademark agency, delivery of the document to the trademark agency shall be deemed delivery thereof to the interested party.Where any document is sent to an interested party by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the date of receipt shall be the date of receipt indicated by the postmark on which the interested party receives it if it is sent by post;where the date of posting indicated by the postmark is illegible, or where there is no postmark, or it is not returned to the addressor by the Post Office the document shall be deemed to have been delivered to the interested party on the fifteenth day from the date of posting the document;the date of receipt shall be the date of delivery if it is delivered personally.Where any document cannot be sent by post or by personal delivery, the document may be served through publication on the Trademark Gazette.At the expiration of the thirtieth day from the date of the publication, the document shall be deemed to have been served.Rule 58 Where an interested party is a foreign person or enterprise having no habitual residence or place of business in China, the trademark agency acting on its or his behalf as indicated in the relevant official record of trademark registration shall receive, with acknowledgement, the delivered legal documents in relation to the trademark in the proceedings of trademark review and adjudication;delivery of the documents to the trademark agency shall be deemed delivery thereof to the interested party.Where a trademark agency has terminated its agent relation with the relevant foreign interested party before the delivery of the legal documents mentioned in the preceding paragraph, it shall inform in writing the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board about it, and return the legal documents, within ten days from the receipt thereof, to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for another service to the proper addressee.Where a trademark of international registration under the Madrid system involves communication of the relevant forms and documents by the International Bureau, proof of service of the documents shall be submitted.If no such proof is furnished, the reason shall be explained in writing, and the forms and documents shall be deemed to have been served at the expiration of the fifteenth day from the date of issuance thereof by the International Bureau.If a document can not be delivered by any of the above means, it will be served through publication on the Trademark Gazette.Chapter VI Supplementary Provisions

Rule 59 The circumstances having arisen before entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law on 1 December 2001 that are listed in Articles 4, 5, 8, 9, paragraph one, 10, paragraph one(2),(3)and(4), 10, paragraph two, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 24, 25 and 31 of the revised Trademark Law and that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board reviewed and adjudicated after entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law shall be reviewed and adjudicated pursuant to the relevant provisions of the revised Trademark Law.In respect of other circumstances, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall apply the relevant provisions of the former Trademark Law to the review and adjudication thereof.Where an interested party applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication in respect of a dispute over a trademark that had been registered for a year when the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law entered into force, the time limit for filing the application provided for in Article 27, paragraph two, of the former Trademark Law shall apply.Where an interested party applies to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication in respect of a dispute over a trademark that had been registered for less than a year when the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law entered into force, the time limit for filing the application provided for in Article 41, paragraph three, of the revised Trademark Law shall apply in handling the application to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review and adjudication.Where an relevant entity or person files an application for review and adjudication according to the provisions of Article 27 of the former Trademark Law and Rule 25 of the Implementing Regulations thereof before entry into force of the Decision on the Amendment of the Trademark Law, and the application falls into the provisions of Articles 13, 15, 16 or 31 of the revised Trademark Law, the provision for the time limit for filing application for review and adjudication of Article 41, paragraph two, of the revised Trademark Law does not apply.Rule 60 The documents or forms for handling review and adjudication matters shall be formulated and published by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce.Rule 61 The State Administration for Industry and Commerce shall be responsible for the interpretation of these Rules.Rule 62 These Rules shall enter into force on 26 October 2005.31

商标评审规则（精选5篇）

第一篇：商标评审规则

第二篇：商标评审代理委托书

第三篇：商标评审代理委托书

第四篇：商标转让流程规定有哪些？

第五篇：商标评审规则(中英文对照)

相关范文推荐

商标评审代理委托书（共5则）

撤回商标评审申请书（优秀范文五篇）

商标评审申请书式应注意哪些事项？

中细软撤回商标评审申请书样式

商标评审申请书式应注意哪些事项？(精)

浅谈商标

关于规范商标代理组织提交商标评审申请材料的办法

商标评审代理委托书-广州华昊商标代理有限公司