英语辩论赛用稿 开车好还是不好5篇

第一篇：英语辩论赛用稿 开车好还是不好

A:With the development of social and living standards, more and more cars are widely used in the family.Despite the popularity of cars take a great convenience to people , but the other hand, it also caused great distress.Such as the status of the Beijing traffic jam.We found that traffic jams have become obstacles to social development now.Accroding to these,I have 3 points as follows.1,First, a large number of cars in use caused a lot of traffic accidents, personal injury and property damage,and this is the most important what I want to say.2,Certainly, accidents do not happen every day.But reduce our opportunities of training to go everywhere by car, and it is also bad for our health.3, Similarly, car tail gas makes air pollution and global warming.All in all,we can conclude that cars lead to traffic jams.This not only led to the loss of others, also led to the loss of our own.B:As you said, contemporary society is progressing, and the car's development is a sign of social progress.In my point of view, , people's lives of modern society are no longer fixed at a certain place, often requires long-distance migration, while cars can greatly reduce time on the road.Time is money, efficiency is life, the birth of the car can be a feat of human, and application of this feat, let us live better,.Then I have 4 points as follows;1 we can go convenience, anytime, anywhere.Improve efficiency, one month before the time to reach the destination, and now for a few days to complete.2 It can Reduce the distance of the world, driving the growth of national economy.And it also promote the invention of new technologies

So to sum up, we firmly believe that cars leads to convenience.A: Ok, I will not deny that cars make people's lives more convenient.I really want to crusade against driving private cars such this behavior.Bus, subway, taxis which constitute the public transport system has been able to fully meet our daily travel needs.B: I’m inclined to disagree with that.Cars not only provides convenient transportation,but also provide a comfortable environment.This is the subway and buses can not be compared.A: I’m afraid I don’t agree with you.A large number of private cars, public cars there, in addition to make road more block, and make the air even worse, the environment becomes more noisy, how can it have a comfortable environment?

B: In fact, more and more people concerned about the problem of automobile exhaust, so contemporary society has successfully developed zero pollution emissions from cars.In a convenient means of transport and a comfortable environment, r why do not we have it? A:That’s a good point.with the development of economic, and more and more people willing buy the car.Unfortunately, the majority of our houses are not having underground parking facilities.Although some houses have underground parking, a garage you may be able to buy two cars, so you can park your car in places like the next floor.This has indirectly caused another traffic jam B:A big city has perfect city planning and urban design practices,such as singapore.The total area of nearly 700 square kilometers but loaded with 4.5 million population, it also makes a good urban planning a lot better than the current situation in Beijing.

第二篇：英语辩论赛用稿 开车好还是不好

A:With the development of social and living standards, more and more cars are widely used in the family.Despite the popularity of cars take a great convenience to people , but the other hand, it also caused great distress.Such as the status of the Beijing traffic jam.We found that traffic jams have become obstacles to social development now.Accroding to these,I have 3 points as follows.1,First, a large number of cars in use caused a lot of traffic accidents, personal injury and property damage,and this is the most important what I want to say.2,Certainly, accidents do not happen every day.But reduce our opportunities of trainingto go everywhere by car, and it is also bad for our health.3, Similarly, car tail gas makes air pollution and global warming.All in all,we can conclude that cars lead to traffic jams.This not only led to the loss of others, also led to the loss of our own.B:As you said, contemporary society is progressing, and the car's development is a sign of social progress.In my point of view, , people's lives of modern society are no longer fixed at a certain place, often requires long-distance migration, while cars cangreatly reduce time on the road.Time is money, efficiency is life,the birth of the car can be a feat of human, and application of this feat, let us live better,.Then I have 4 points as follows;we can go convenience, anytime, anywhere.Improve efficiency, one month before the time to reach the destination, and now for a few days to complete.It can Reduce the distance of the world, driving the growth of national economy.And it also promote the invention of new technologies

So to sum up, we firmly believe that cars leads to convenience.A: Ok, I will not deny that cars make people's lives more convenient.I reallywant to crusade against driving private cars such this behavior.Bus, subway, taxis which constitute the public transport system has been able to fully meet our daily travel needs.B: I’m inclined to disagree with that.Cars not only provides convenient transportation,but also provide a comfortable environment.This is the subway and buses can not be compared.A: I’m afraid I don’t agree with you.A large number of private cars, public cars there, in addition to make road more block, and make the air even worse, the environment becomes more noisy, how can it have a comfortable environment?

B: In fact, more and more people concerned about the problem of automobile exhaust, so contemporary society has successfully

developed zero pollution emissions from cars.In a convenient means of transport and a comfortable environment, r why do not we have it?

A:That’s a good point.with the development ofeconomic, and more and more people willingbuy the car.Unfortunately, the majority of our houses are nothaving underground parking facilities.Although some houses have underground parking, a garage you may be able to buy two cars, so you can park your car in places like the next floor.This has indirectly caused anothertraffic jam

B:A big city has perfect city planning and urban design practices,such as singapore.The total area of nearly 700 square kilometers but loaded with 4.5 million population, it also makes a good urban planning a lot better than the current situation in Beijing.

第三篇：辩论赛先考研好还是先就业好

先工作才能先积累经验！先工作才能先磨练心志！先工作才能先培养能力！各位先工作才能先抢占先机所以大学本科毕业先工作好！

各位观众各位评委大家好，经过刚刚激烈的辩驳，结合我方观点，我方认为对方辩友有以下几个漏洞

第一是经济成本。毕业考研如果考得上，三年的学费和生活费也不是小数字。如果一次考不上，还要考第2次、第3次，成本更加惊人。我们已经是成年人，应该做的是为父母分担压力，排除他们生活上的困难，而不是再为他们增加经济上的负担。那么退一步讲，.就业之后也不意味着没有机会读研，如果真的想进一步深造的话，参加工作之后能更深刻的认识到市场的需求，学习更有目标性，对于家庭困难的人还能奠定经济基础，一边赚钱，一边读书，何乐而不为呢？

第二是能力成本。要想有好的工作我们首先要适应社会需求，现在大多数企业，他们都重视实际能力、实践经验和可塑性，你只有进入社会，你才知道你到底需要什么，你才有动力去做每一件事。现在学校学习的都是一些理论知识，与实践相差很远，只有真正去接触实践才能找到方向，知道在哪方面还有能力的欠缺，从而出现在学校时的那种迷茫感。因此一个新踏上社会的研究生并不一定比有着三年工作经验的本科生有太多优势。

第三是机会成本，这是很重要的一点。考研的准备期间已经错过了就业的最佳时机，很多考研失败的人开始找工作，时常会被用人单位拒绝，原因都只有一个，企业认为考研没成功的人在进入单位的第一年试用期中，离开的比例大得多。这时考研反而成了求职的绊脚石我想这些并不是大家所喜闻乐见的吧？此外国家也一直在鼓励大学生走出校园进行创业，难道这种机会还不值得我们去争取吗？

第四是社会成本，本科的知识已经能够满足我们在工作初期的需求，过高的学历并不能给我们带来明显的优势，正如前几年一个北大学生卖猪肉，对方辩友认为他的专业知识会给他带来什么优势呢？对方辩友不会是想告诉我他考的是杀猪系研究生吧？

第五是时间成本，时间就是金钱，这句话大家都已经耳熟能详了吧？在现在这个社会，年轻就是资本，企业和事业单位都在大胆启用新人，我们的领导阶层也在逐渐年轻化，我们不应该在还年轻的时候尽早起步，抓住先机吗？如果一味的追求高学历那为什么不在硕士之后接着考博士，考完博士再考斗士，最后爽快点，咱们直接考个烈士回家不就万事无忧了吗？

综上所述，我认为我们应该大学毕业之后先就业，等看清形势之后再做进一步的打算

最大的问题就是自己不明白自己到底是想要什么，一味的随社会上的考研热，而不结合自己的实际情况，这本身就是缺乏自信，缺乏主观意识，缺乏能力的表现。

考上研究生，去打工。那请问对方辩友你辛辛苦苦考上研究生是为了什么？难道就是去打工浪费你宝贵的时间？

第四篇：辩论赛正方用稿

辩论：小学生看电视的利与弊

正方：

主持人（主席）、对方辩友、各位同学:

大家好!我方观点认为小学生要多看电视。我认为小学生可以多看电视。因为电视可以教我们一些知识，有一些是教育方面的电视，所以我认为可以多看电视。以下是我方的观点:

1、看电视可以增长我们的知识。就拿CCTV-8的节目来说吧，每天都插放“探索、发现”，这就是一个有知识性的节目。而且我们还可以看一些新闻，比如新闻60分、生活在线等等。从中，我们可以了解一些发生在我们身边的事。

2、可以提高我们的想象力。在生活中处处都要有想象力，如果一个人没有想象力，那他就会很“傻”，而想象力除了看书看电视也可以培养孩子的想象力!首先，小孩子有玩的天性，你不可能让他自己一人违背自己的想法来满足你吧。何况现在从中央到地方都开通了少儿频道，让他多看看是有益无害的。

教育学家认为，电视对发展孩子的感知能力，提高记忆效果是有益的。电视的特色即动作和声音同时刺激感官能吸引儿童的注意力。同时，还因为动作本身容易感知、记忆、可以提高孩子的兴趣。如电视的动感特色可以使一颗小种子逐渐长成了参天大树，给孩子强烈的印象，看到了变化的全过程，从而深深地铭记在记忆中。有人说:“一张画胜过千言万语。”而一幅具有动感特色的电视画面，对语言发展尚不完善的幼儿来说，其意义和价值就不言而喻了。另外电视对提高孩子的思维能力，激发其想象力能起到积极作用。

3、可以了解一些国家大事。报告称，如果每天看两个小时的电视，那么他们在阅读、算术和词汇上的得分比不看电视的孩子高出10%，因为看电视可以让小孩子增长见闻，学习各种良好的社交和学习技巧，从而为他们今后的学习打下良好的基础。（这项研究报告是由美国得克萨斯大学的儿童发展教授阿莱莎·休斯顿撰写的）

综上所述，我方坚决认为小学生要多看电视。

正方：我方认为小学生看电视好处多。它可以开阔我们的视野，增长我们的知识。比如我，就喜欢看一些科学探秘方面的节目，懂得了许多书本上所没有的知识。

正方：这并不能否认看电视的好处。只要我们有选择的看，或者在家长的陪同下，就可以避免这些危害。

正方：看电视引起近视，这是由于长时间近距离看电视造成的，只要我们保持好距离，有节制地看，不仅能增长知识，还能消除一天学习带来的疲劳呢！

正方：同学们，电视在各家各户中都已是常见的家电，而看电视，有的同学说好，有的同学说坏，但我觉得看电视是好的。电视中的许多东西都是我们必须学习的，如新闻或是地方事情，天气预报；这些都给我们的生活提供了很大的方便，看电视又能扩大知识面，使我们对世界万物都有新的认识，所以，看电视是好的，也是对我们有益的。

正方：我觉得看电视不会近视，那些近视者许多都是因为太认真读书造成的，而因看电视造成近视者是极少数。你看，我喜欢看电视就没有近视。因此，只要控制好距离，选择好适当的节目，看电视是有益的。

正方：我觉得看电视是好的。因为它不仅能帮助我们学习，开拓视野，而且又给我们提供了许多方便。如果现在美国发生了什么事，难道我们要亲自到美国去了解情况吗？再例如，在“非典”时期，我们只能通过电视来了解“非典”患者的情况。

正方：看电视，我们可看到它的画面，这样我们才能更加深层地去了解他们的情况。反方说也可以通过报纸来了解，而今天所发生的事情，我们要等到第二天才能知道，但电视不同，它可以在第一时间播放出来。再说了，报纸的字太小了，我们要拿很近才能看清楚，这对我们的眼睛也是有伤害的。

正方：收音机只能听其声音，无法看到图象，而电脑，又要上网才可以。何况现在的许多儿童，上网只有一个目的，那就是打游戏。

正方：我觉得反方的说法是错的。因为我们可以从电视中学到许多的知识，有关于英语的，关于数学的，关于语文的，关于科学的„„应有尽有，无所不有。我们可以通过它们来做预习工作，增长见识，成绩不但不会下降，而且还会提高。

正方：我们的意思是说我们可以利用电视来提前预习。

正方：电视上的内容比较多，比较丰富，而课本上的内容有限制，但电视说得比较快，我们可以利用课本更加仔细地学会知识。

正方：如果我们没有从电视上学会知识，我们能知道怎么玩吗？

正方：这就要求我们学会自控，不然我们分那些品德书、政治书干什么。就是要在另一方面把扭曲的思想拉直。如果我们像书呆子一样，整天都在读书，没有休息，学习的范围只限制在课本上的话，那么就是死读书，难道我们要学习古代书生那样子：两耳不闻天下事，一心只读圣贤书吗？还有一点，看电视可以开拓我们的视野。

正方：两样都看。因为《粉红女郎》比《新闻联播》更早播放。而且《粉红女郎》只是搞笑而已，陶冶情操，而且一个健康的人还需要有幽默感。这样，我们既陶冶了情操又了解了国家大事。这样，岂不是两全齐美吗！

正方：我觉得看电视就象：“阅读不局限于书本”一样，可以更快地了解国家和世界的事情，看电视比读书、看报更通人情事故，更易使人理解接受，而且可吸取他人的经验教训，不再犯同样的错误，创造自己更好的将来。

正方：既然那么说，可见他是个不懂看电视者，我教一下对方，你该多看些中央台第10套的节目，即使你整天都看，也保准你不会误入歧途，它还会带你去观赏大自然，陶冶道德情操，使你的品格更加高尚，里面教育方面的信息也特多，有益我们的学习。

正方：如果看电视有害的话，为何国家要花那么多钱编越来越多的节目？为何老师允许我们看晚上十八点的电视节目和十九点的新闻呢？我佩服对方能去找到如此多的材料，而我却不敢苟同对方的观点。看电视是儿童学习生活的调味剂，不然，一味地学习实在太枯燥了。电视除了让你了解国内外的大事外，还可以让你静静地聆听现实生活的喧沸，从电视上了解了更多事情

正方：那是否我们该把电视给消灭了。

正方：我主张小学生要多看电视。电视是认识世界的窗口，小学生多看电视，可以及时了解国内外的大事，开阔视野，增长知识。再说，我们在学校学习很紧张，回家后，放松一下是非常必要的。而看电视就是一种很好的放松。

正方：我请反方同学注意，当今电视是传递信息、传播知识的重要渠道，难道我们多看电视，多掌握一些信息和知识不好吗？我在电视里看了《鸦片战争》，了解了鸦片战争的背景和经过，在学习《虎门硝烟》这课时，对理解课文帮助很大。因此，我觉得小学生还是多看电视好。

正方：你说看电视影响了学习，我觉得那只是个别现象。据我了解，我们班成绩优秀的同学看电视看得也很多，可他们的学习成绩不仅没有下降，还提高了呢！

正方：是啊，你不学习光看电视肯定不是好孩子，为什么不完成作业再看电视呢？没有人让你废寝忘食看电视，你自己管不住自己，还埋怨看电视，这不是强词夺理、胡搅蛮缠吗？

正方：影响视力的多了，躺着看书会影响视力，营养不良缺乏维生素AD也会影响视力，我没听说哪个孩子害怕影响视力不挑食、不吃饭啊！这和看电视有什么关系？只能说明你不懂得用眼卫生！

正方：我方认为：看电视好处多多、快乐多多。当你上了一天课，看看唐老鸭被米老鼠折磨的不像样子时肯定笑的前仰后合，放松了你的神经、忘记你的疲劳，何乐而不为？当你晚上给妈妈端一杯茶，陪妈妈看韩国连续剧，感受细腻的人间温情时，不觉得这本身就是一副天伦之乐的图画吗？你不看《铁嘴铜牙纪晓岚》怎么知道和珅是乾隆皇帝最宠爱的臣子，难道等到你能够通读满清历史的时候才去了解？你不看电视如何知道神六如何发射、定位、回收？如何知道航天员怎样在太空里生活？你不看电视知道萨达姆长什么样？知道樱木花道是谁？当人家说你像“大熊”一样的时候，你还不知道说你像“机器猫”里头脑简单、四肢发达的那个傻大个呢，那样的话别人还不认为是“弱智”？因此，看电视能跟上时代的潮流，能最快捷、全方位接受来自世界的信息，这是读书看报所望尘莫及的。所以说，多看电视好处多！

总结性发言

正方：通过采访，我们知道了小学生看电视确实有好处，看电视可以增长我们的知识，开阔我们的视界。电视上可以看到丰富的、形象的画面，又可以听到动听的声音，可以训练我们的各种能力，更是我们小学生容易接受的一种知识“充电”形式。如 “动画片、大风车节目、动物世界、祖国各地”等都可以看，但不要太迷恋，要有节制，否则对我们的视力和学习、身体都有影响。

第五篇：开车能否打电话-辩论赛相关总结

1、Maybe,not likely.I’m not sure whether it is dangerous or not.What I can surely say is that we won’t stop eating fish just because of the possibility of dying of the fishbone, and that we won’t stop swimming just because of the likelihoodof dying of a drowning accident.2、People always overstate the influence of talking on a cell phone while driving, and there are so many factors involved when an accident happened, such as the road situation, wet or dry;the weather, sunny or rainy;even the car-driver’s personal skills.We just cannot simply attribute any accidents to the telephone while driving.3、Due to the development of communication technology, a more convenient and more advanced technology called ‘hand-free phone’ has become part of people’s life especially those people who frequently drove.It needs you to do nothing except telling a name when you call on somebody.It’s like talking to others in your car, and people always talk to others while driving.Will talk to others while driving increase the likelihood of accidents? Do we need to make a law to stop talking while driving? Of course not,we just accept it as a way of life.4、I don’t think the problem is with the cell phones themselves.People can be distracted while driving by so many things: phones, food, drinking, putting on make-up, changing the radio-CDS, even talking to someone beside you.Do you really think it is possible that when you need doing something like those behaviors while driving,you would stop driving and then accomplish it?

5、Researches by scientists show that different person has different reaction time about the road situation, and that drivers are slower in their reactions when a phone conversation just has started, but the effect reduces over time.What I mean is that when you need talking on a cell phone, it’s OK after paying more attentions to the road situation and making sure no pedestrians and cars in your eyes or the rearview mirror.6、How many coutries in the world ? 226 including 199 countries and 27 areas.which coutries have laws related to cellphone use while driving ? 40 countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Botswana, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe.Just 18 percent of all countries in the world.Furthermore, most countries just prohibit the use of hand-held phones while driving, not including the hand-free phones.人们总是过度夸大开车打手机的影响，蓝牙的出现使得该影响微乎其微：

People always exaggerate the influence of talking on the cellphone while driving.Actually,with the invention of Bluetooth, drivers needn’t to use one hand to hold cellphone and just use another hand to drive.Now,they can just pay a little attention to the talking and keep to enjoy their driving.开车打电话的四点好处：

Talking on the cellphone while driving have many benifit to drivers.Firstly,it can help drivers to keep attention.For example:when a driver is fatigue,his father or mother give a call to remind him of attention,the driver will be more careful and energetic during the following few hours.Secondly, Talking on the cellphone makes driving more safety.Because drivers tend to reduce the speed when talking on the cellphone.As is know to everyone,the faster speed,the biger danger.So,Talking on the cellphone makes driving more safety.Thirdly, Talking on the cellphone while driving allow people to make full use of time.Maybe you want to tell your boss what have done today,a minutes talking is enough;Maybe you want to tell the girl that i love you,a minutes talking is enough;and maybe you want to tell your mother that i will be home,a minutes talking is also enough;Finally,Talking on the cellphone Improve the work efficiency.Because by cellphone talking, taxi drivers,ambulance drivers and policemen could communicate with colleagues to kown which routes has a small traffic flow,then,make the best choice and improve the work efficiency.In conclusion,Talking on the cellphone while driving have so many advantages,of course,It’s Ok!

有电话不接的坏处：不接比接更危险

If your cellphone is ringing while driving,will you anser the phone,yes or no?(对方说no以后）I am pity that your choice is so bad.Because during the following few hours,your attention will be absorbed in the missed call.You will think many questions such as who is calling me? What happened and why he calls me? Wow,I wonder that how can you concentrate on your driving in this situation?So,in order to ensure a safety driving,please use your bluetooth to answer the call,don't hesitate any more!Remember,for the cellphone ringing while driving,neglect is more dangerous than answer.对方说停车到路边安全的地方再接电话

Generally speaking,your method is usually not practical.On one hand,there are no parking districts on the midway of road in many situations,especially in the highway.As a result,it is likely to cause illegal parking problems.On the other hand,your method will lower traffic efficiency and increase traffic pressures,even cause a traffic jam.So,why don’t you talking on cellphone while driving? An accident is not because of your cellphone talking but your unnecessary worry.Don’t think too much,every drivers can do well with confidence.It is ok to Talking on the cellphone while driving 打电话和听广播一样对司机负面影响不大,并且都有正面影响。Do you agree drivers listening car radio?yes or no? 如果对面说YES：Thanks for your approvements.But what i want to tell you is that cellphone talking by bluetooth while driving have little difference with listening car radio.Because both of them can make a distraction from driving.But,this small distraction is affordable.So,if a driver can listen car radio while driving,why he can not to talking on the cellphone? 如果对面说NO：If a driver cannot listening car radio while driving，why radio device exist in every car？why our country did’t forbid listening car radio when forbiding talking on the cellphone? Let me tell you the reason,because listening car radio and talking on the cellphone,both of them have a little influence on the driving.问对方，任何时候开车都不能打电话吗？然后举例交通堵塞时可以打以说明已方观点

Do you think drivers should not Talking on the cellphone while driving in anytime? 如果对方说YES：OK,let me show you a picture.It is a sunny day,because of a traffic jam,a great many of cars are blocking in the road.But drivers feel happiness and not anxious at all.Because they are talking on the cellphone with friends or relatives.Don’t worry anything,a short-time cellphone talking during the long-time waiting is absolutely safety.So,Talking on the cellphone while driving is Ok!如果对方说NO：That is to say,talking on the cellphone while driving is ok,Thanks for your agreement.攻击对方论点的部分(攻辩在于攻击对方论点，使之以后不能使用，便于我方反击)Likely 和possible Q: Define “likely”.A: Which means “has a good chance of being the case or of coming about”, namely “probable”.(如果对方不回答或故意回答错，就加个“let me tell u”，自己回答)Q: How mang chance do you think talking on a cellphone while driving will cause accident? A:(对方的答案应该只有千分之几或万分之几)Q:So the chance is pretty small.Then it’s not likely, it’s possible,right?

Q:So your opinion should be “Talking on a cellphone while driving is possible to cause accidents”(这一点如果回答的是YES，攻辩完成，以后反击句就是，U just admit “Talking on a cellphone while driving is possible to cause accidents”, not likely.)

A:(如果对方给一个相对增加量，比如比不打手机增加了多少)Q:We are talking about whether Talking on a cellphone while driving is likely to cause accidents;Not how mang chance it will increase accidents.So instead of a relative number, please give me a absolute number.A:(如果还在纠缠)Q: Let me put it this way.If there are 1000 people Talking on a cellphone while driving, how many do u think will die?(然后回到绝对量)A:(如果对方还说可能性很大)Q:Likely means“at least more than a half”(偷换感念), are u saying If there are 1000 people Talking on a cellphone, more than 500 will get into an accident?(应该没人会说YES了，就说是possible ,not likely)

Cause accidents or not Q:Will u be more careful if u know the things u are doing might be dangerous? A:(没人会SAY No吧，除非是傻子。他要抓着dangerous的话，我们就说”I said maybe, possibly.Please answer my question”)

Q:Are there going to be more accidents when u are driving more careful? A:

Q:So if a man know Talking on a cellphone while driving might be dangerous, he will be more careful, and according to your opinion,there will be no more accidents.(辩论里面最好先问一些看似无关却密切相关的问题，然后让他们自相矛盾)A:(他们如果说大对数人不知道)Q: Then our job should be letting them no rather than forbid Talking on a cellphone while driving.(这个攻辩如果完成，以后他们在说会引起事故，我们就说。Maybe not if u aware of it.他们要是说，But they don ‘t know.我们就说，Then tell them instead of banning cellphone in a car, which will do us a lot of good.)

还有一种可能对方会逼着我们承认dangerous。我们可以说不能因为危险就不做了，因为他可以带来很多好处（好处我方立论会说）。Q:Is Nuclear leakage dangerous or not ? A: Q: Why would we build nuclear power station if it is dangerous?(可以让对方回答也可自答)Because it will do good to us.So if a thing will do us a lot of good and bring us a lot of convenience , Even if it is dangerous, we should do it ,it’s OK.预计辩论将会主要集中在这几个论题上： 1：开车是否应该打电话

2：打电话是否会将开车变得危险 3：这种危险是否就可能会引发事故

显然，论题一对我们最有利而论题三对对方最有利。我们应该准备如何将话题由三及二引导到一上来。对方观点：开车打电话很可能会引发事故 对方可能的论点：

最基本的，打电话会分神，分神就会有危险，有危险就有可能会引发事故。首先公共舆论及新闻媒体的宣传是对这一观点有利的。

比如，有关调查表明有多少比例的事故是因为开车打电话而导致的。进而有些地方甚至出台法律将开车打电话定为违法。

我方观点：

it is ok to talk on the cell phone when driving,开车打电话是Ok的。

我们并没有否定或者肯定打电话的危险性，我们只是说：开车打电话是Ok的。所以一开始我们应尽快把话题引到到底开车时应不应该打电话上。

避免讨论开车的危险性，我们承认开车打电话危险，那么事故就有可能会发生（不管是有可能还是非常有可能，没什么区别）；我们不承认开车打电话的危险性，这个太难了。

对方观点：开车打电话很可能会引发事故。质问：那是不是因为这个就不能打电话了？

对方三种回答1：不能打了——我们把他们逼到了一个极端，我们可以举出好多不得不打电话的例子。

2：看情况，道路情况允许则可以打，否则不可以——我们可以认为他们已经部分的承认的我方的观点。

3：可以打——直接KO 总结部分：

我方认为：开车时打电话是OK的，我方不否认开车打电话所隐含的潜在危险，但是更相信以人类的主观能动性可以很好的处理打电话与开车安全性之间的问题，对方辩友们明显低估了人类处理多任务的能力。我们反对因为几次事故就将打电话与开车这两件事情放到对立面上去。

至于有些地方政府立法禁止的问题，这就类似于因为有人用刀砍了人，于是政府就立法禁售菜刀一样。表面上是为了公共安全，实则是有关部门懒得寻找深层次原因，急忙出台一刀切式的政策为自己在某些方面的监管不到位而推卸责任。是典型的指标不治本。

对方辩友们根据一些数据就得出开车打电话与交通事故之间的对立关系未免太过草率，人们开车时可能受到的干扰来源非常多：收音机里引人入胜的节目、窗外有趣的东西、路边的美女等等，好吧，现在假设一下有人对上述的因素与交通事故之间的关系做些调查后，以对方辩友们的思路很可能最终会得出开车时必须犹如驾驶战斗机一样目不转睛全神贯注的荒谬结论。而现在为什么偏偏打电话就要成为替罪羊？反而我方认为，在认识到开车打电话的隐患后，人们会在接打电话时更加精力集中于安全驾驶，因为人们会产生：哦，接电话了，我得提起精神更加专心的去开车了这种想法。而对方辩友们这种头痛医头脚痛医脚的行为是典型的只见部分不见整体。它解决不了道路安全隐患，只是一些想法简单思维幼稚的人们以一种自以为是的角度所得出的所谓良心实则粗暴的做法。

我方再次重申：开车打电话是Ok的，那些驾驶素养不高，不遵守交法的司机即使听从了对方辩友的论点开车不接打电话，也会因为别的一千种原因而分神而导致事故。加强教育提高全社会尤其是司机的道路素养，远比简单的一个“禁止”或一个“不能”更能消除事故安全隐患。大禹治水，靠疏不靠堵。

老话说的好：Too young too simple, sometimes naïve.