第一篇:黄金周假期利弊英文
黄金周放假
Hi!Everyone.Today my topic is that whether we should cancel the golden week.During the golden week holiday, traveling has already become an important part of people's relaxation activities.The lengthy holidays have caused unexpected great travel craze and brisk economic activities.however, it also bring many problem and contradiction.so many people discuss whether it should be canceled.some people think golden week should be canceled.First, it puts a heavy burden on the traffic system, causing serious traffic jams.Second , tourist attractions is full of people,very crowed.we always standing in long line to buy tickets.And people do not enjoy the fun of travel.Third, During the golden week holiday, the fare of hetels and Tourist attractions increases, the quality of service is lower.It just waste money.But many people think it should not be canceled.They believe it has many advantages.first, tourism-based golden week holiday ,will
develop local economy.Then it also increases jobs.In addition, we don’t have to go to travel.We can stay at home, chat with our family and relax ourselves.It is very great time.It is hard say whose opinion is right, but I think the government should take effective measures to solve the problems in golden week holiday.
第二篇:黄金周高速公路免费利弊问题 立论稿
黄金周高速公路免费 立论稿
尊敬的各位主席、各位评委老师、同学们,大家晚上好!
很高兴今天能和大家齐聚一堂,共同探讨有关黄金周高速免公路费利大还是弊大的问题。而我方的一贯观点是,黄金周高速免公路费,利大于弊。
要探讨这个辩题,首先请让我们对这个辩题的概念有个清晰的解释。黄金周是指国庆节传统的七天假期。高速公路,是指“能适应年平均昼夜小客车交通量为25000辆以上、专供汽车分道高速行驶、并全部控制出入的公路”。
明晰了辩题,再阐述一下我方今天对辩题利弊的判断标准。我方对辩题的判断,主要是根据这项措施给社会带来的影响是利大还是弊大。同时我们要阐明的是,我方今天所提到的利益,并不是单指眼前的短期利益,更多还是未来的长远利益。基于此点,我方认为这项措施给社会带来的利益占更大多数,并坚定认为黄金周高速公路免费利大于弊。下面,就请让我对利弊各自的影响,做一个清晰的分析。
第一,弊造成的影响小。谈到弊端造成的影响,想必大家第一时间的反应就是黄金周堵车问题。但我们必须明晰的是,黄金周堵车加剧不能简单归结为免收公路费的原因,原因是多方面的!首先,我国每年私家车保有量的不断大幅增长,数据表明2012年我国私家车保有量增加23%,换而言之,车辆增加给道路拥堵带来的压力,是本身就存在且不断加剧的。其次,我国司机道德、驾驶文化尚处初级阶段,在高速公路上不规范驾驶、危险变道屡见不鲜。再次,高速公路的运营方因受到少收公路费的损失,消极疏导疏通车流放任堵塞。最后,新《旅游法》的出台,导致了团费增加,更多人选择自驾车方式出游,增加了道路车辆。甚至撇开上述主要几点,我们还可以列举出天气、路况、交通意外等一系列原因。这充分的告诉在座各位,堵车问题,由免公路费所带来的影响是微小的。
第二,利带来的影响大。首先,政府现在实行高速免费试运营,实际上是一种渐进式的免费政策。高速公路免费是趋势,但目前我们尚无能力做到。所以黄金周免公路费某种意义上来说是一种试点,假若在黄金周这种高流量高压力的代表时段,我们都可以探索出顺利解决免公路费所带来的一系列问题,那么这份数据对于我们将来高速公路免费规划是具有重大帮助意义的。况且,现下的高速免费又何尝不是一种对未来全面免收高速过路费而带来的种种问题的对策的演练呢。由此可知,这一试点对高速免公路费非常具有前瞻性、对长远规划是非常有利的。其次,在黄金周这一家人团圆的假期,省了这一份公路费,也算是政府送给公众的一份大礼。再次,黄金周的高速免费,大有利于社会的流动,拉动国内的内需,更别说对于保持每年国家经济增长目标所起到的重要性。
综上所述,实行黄金周免公路费,利带来的影响巨大。因此我方坚定认为,黄金周高速免公路费,利大于弊!
第三篇:各种假期英文表达:
各种假期兑英文表达:
假期: time off/leave
1.带薪假:paid leave 1)年假:annual leave 2)婚假:marital leave 3)产假:maternity leave
2.无薪假:unpaid leave 1)事假:personal leave 2)病假:sick leave
3.公众假期、法定假日:public holiday
1)春节(农历一月一日)the Spring Festival 2)清明节(4月5日)Ching Ming Festival;Tomb-sweeping Festival 3)端午节(农历五月初五)the Dragon Boat Festival 4)中秋节(农历八月十五)Mid-autumn(Moon)Festival 5)国庆节(10月1日)National Holiday 6)劳动节(5月1日)May Day
关于请假的几个例句:
He always takes sick leave on a Monday.Are you looking for time off? Well, I want to use my annual leave next Friday.
第四篇:全球化利弊的英文辩论
周:全球化利大于弊
丁:全球化弊大于利 立论陈词:
正方:大家好我方认为全球化利大于弊全球化可以解释为世界的压缩和视全球为一个整体。就全球化的必然性而言随着当今世界联系的越来越紧密全球化已经成为不可忽视的一个趋势就全球化的必要性而言全球化有利于每个国家之间的交流和发展所以我认为全球化利大于弊
反方:大家好,对方辩友你好,对于您的观点我方完全无法同意,我方认为,全球化弊大于利,您所谓利于国家间的交流与发展,但是国家间的交流与发展本身就有一个利弊的两面性,难道您无视了全球化下国家间的贫富差距吗?难道您看不到全球化下的政治经济冲突吗?这都是全球化下存在的现实问题,所以,我方坚持认为,全球化弊大于利。自由辩论:
正方:全球化带动着知识经济的发展,使经济资源概念的外延不断扩大,不仅自然财富是经济资源,精神财富同样也是带动国家经济发展的资源,而且是越来越重要的资源。1998年夏季,美国迪斯尼公司推出的影片《花木兰》,就借用中国的传说故事表现美国的文化理念。所以全球化可以加强各国文化的交流。
反方:对方辩友,第一,我觉得作为一个国人,您对于美国利用中国的文化聚敛财富一事居然如此欣赏,我实在佩服,尽管它确实有起到一些文化交流的作用,但您么觉得电影上映之后国内最激烈的反应不是欣赏而是愤恨吗?像当初的功夫熊猫一样。有一点跑题。但我想告诉您的是,我丝毫没有否定您所说的全球化的益处,但它确实弊大于利。第二,最重要的一点,我觉得您应该重新审视一下全球化这个词,经济全球化只是全球化的一部分,您却将它等同于了全球化。请您作出解释!正方:好的对方辩友经济全球化是全球化中的一个主要方面全球化使得各国、各地区之间的经济联系更加紧密,世界越来越成为一个整体,促进全球生产力的增长;有利于借助国际合作从而更好地应对当前人类面临的共同问题;有利于发达国家获得更大的销售、投资和劳动力市场;对于广大发展中国家,可以借助资源、经验求得发展。
反方:好的,既然您要讲经济全球化,我就跟您说说经济全球化的弊端,经济全球化使得国家的主权在一定程度上受到冲击,扩大了发展中国家与发达国家的经济差距,另外,还会给发展中国家的环境带来污染等问题,从而引发世界性的政治、社会、文化等问题。
正方:我想,您应该知道功能主义的观点,存在即合理,那既然我们的全球发展到了全球化的地步,而不是一个个保守的互不交往的国家的集合体,那必然是因为全球化比较保守主义益处更多。
反方:我觉得您的逻辑有问题,只要发展的趋势朝向哪一方就说哪一方是正确的吗?我完全无法认同。我想,我们所期盼的全球化下的状态应该是,幸福,和谐,没有冲突,但现实呢?现实是贫富的差距日益变大,由全球化导致的经济、政治、文化的冲突层出不穷,中东的石油冲突不就是由此引发吗? 总结陈词:
反方:各位好,正如我前面所说的,全球化的发生对于各方面都带来了极大的危害,经济方面,贫富差距大,文化方面,文化融合导致重要文化的流失,政治方面,国家地区间冲突不断,难道不是全球化造成的吗?同时,我方重申我们的立场,我们从没有否定全球化带来的好处,只是,相比较危害而言,它仅仅只有一点点。所以说,过分的全球化一定不能起到适当的作用,我方坚持认为,全球化弊大于利!Hello, as I said before, the various aspects of globalization have brought great harm。ineconomy, it madea big gap between rich and poor, in cultural integration lead to the loss of important cultural, political, countries and regions between conflicts, caused by globalization do not you? At the same time, our side to reiterate our position, we do not deny the benefits of globalization, but, compared to harm, it just only a little.Therefore, globalization must not be too appropriate role to play, our insists that globalization harm than good!正方:大家可以想一下,我们现在的日常生活哪一项不依赖于全球化,我们需要全球化的信息,各个国家的商品,并且我们已经习惯了全球文化的融合,试问一下,有谁想回到过去那种状态,nobody!全球化已经深入到了我们的生活,给我们带来的方便远大于它带来的负面影响,所以我方认为全球化利大于弊,谢谢大家!
辛苦了亲~爱你~有些你改一改,我挺抱歉的~
第五篇:英语学习的利弊(英文)
Is Learning English Good or Bad? With the advancement of globalization, more and more Chinese people are learning English, which makes much influence in on one side.Thus, is learning English is good or bad has become a hot topic to discuss.Some people, like CPPTT deputy, think that English language studies are “destructive” to Chinese education since schools are placing too much emphasis on English.Zhang Shuhua, the head of the Intelligence Research Committee, once said that many students with good academic performance have been blocked from universities because of poor English test scores in government news report.As the survey given by China Youth Daily showed that 80% respondents polled agreed that there is a language crisis and Chinese skills are destroying and more than half blamed the emphasis on foreign language studies.However, other people do not support the opinion that English studies are destroying Chinese skills but beneficial to our nation.They think learning any language including English is advantageous in and of itself.If the Chinese students just learn history in Chinese or in ancient Chinese language, they will only communicate with other Chinese and will remain within in China.Such doings may make them ignore the wealth of research carried out in other countries, especially in USA, which will block our nation’s academics’ healthy development and even our nations’ comprehensive improvement.As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter’s view that learning English is good for us.Besides the benefit to academic communication with other countries, encouraging Chinese people to learn English is helpful for our nation to promote international exchange in politic, economy, culture, technology and other field and is the requirement for our nation to keep up with the trend of globalization.What’s more, learning English can open Chinese people’s mind, increasing their storage of knowledge and enrich their daily life in the situation of understanding western English culture and language, which will play an active role in promoting Chinese all-round national quality.Learning English is a distinct advantage in international competition.Hence, Chinese government should encourage more people to learn English as there are many benefits for us.