第一篇：土木工程毕业论文中英文翻译
外文翻译
班级：xxx 学号：xxx 姓名：xxx
一、外文原文：
Structural Systems to resist lateral loads Commonly Used structural Systems With loads measured in tens of thousands kips, there is little room in the design of high-rise buildings for excessively complex thoughts.Indeed, the better high-rise buildings carry the universal traits of simplicity of thought and clarity of expression.It does not follow that there is no room for grand thoughts.Indeed, it is with such grand thoughts that the new family of high-rise buildings has evolved.Perhaps more important, the new concepts of but a few years ago have become commonplace in today’ s technology.Omitting some concepts that are related strictly to the materials of construction, the most commonly used structural systems used in high-rise buildings can be categorized as follows: 1.Moment-resisting frames.2.Braced frames, including eccentrically braced frames.3.Shear walls, including steel plate shear walls.4.Tube-in-tube structures.5.Core-interactive structures.6.Cellular or bundled-tube systems.Particularly with the recent trend toward more complex forms, but in response also to the need for increased stiffness to resist the forces from wind and earthquake, most high-rise buildings have structural systems built up of combinations of frames, braced bents, shear walls, and related systems.Further, for the taller buildings, the majorities are composed of interactive elements in three-dimensional arrays.The method of combining these elements is the very essence of the design process for high-rise buildings.These combinations need evolve in response to environmental, functional, and cost considerations so as to provide efficient structures that provoke the architectural development to new heights.This is not to say that imaginative structural design can create great architecture.To the contrary, many examples of fine architecture have been created with only moderate support from the structural engineer, while only fine structure, not great architecture, can be developed
without the genius and the leadership of a talented architect.In any event, the best of both is needed to formulate a truly extraordinary design of a high-rise building.While comprehensive discussions of these seven systems are generally available in the literature, further discussion is warranted here.The essence of the design process is distributed throughout the discussion.Moment-Resisting Frames Perhaps the most commonly used system in low-to medium-rise buildings, the moment-resisting frame, is characterized by linear horizontal and vertical members connected essentially rigidly at their joints.Such frames are used as a stand-alone system or in combination with other systems so as to provide the needed resistance to horizontal loads.In the taller of high-rise buildings, the system is likely to be found inappropriate for a stand-alone system, this because of the difficulty in mobilizing sufficient stiffness under lateral forces.Analysis can be accomplished by STRESS, STRUDL, or a host of other appropriate computer programs;analysis by the so-called portal method of the cantilever method has no place in today’s technology.Because of the intrinsic flexibility of the column/girder intersection, and because preliminary designs should aim to highlight weaknesses of systems, it is not unusual to use center-to-center dimensions for the frame in the preliminary analysis.Of course, in the latter phases of design, a realistic appraisal in-joint deformation is essential.Braced Frames The braced frame, intrinsically stiffer than the moment –resisting frame, finds also greater application to higher-rise buildings.The system is characterized by linear horizontal, vertical, and diagonal members, connected simply or rigidly at their joints.It is used commonly in conjunction with other systems for taller buildings and as a stand-alone system in low-to medium-rise buildings.While the use of structural steel in braced frames is common, concrete frames are more likely to be of the larger-scale variety.Of special interest in areas of high seismicity is the use of the eccentric braced frame.Again, analysis can be by STRESS, STRUDL, or any one of a series of two –or three dimensional analysis computer programs.And again, center-to-center dimensions are used commonly in the preliminary analysis.Shear walls The shear wall is yet another step forward along a progression of ever-stiffer structural systems.The system is characterized by relatively thin, generally(but not always)concrete elements that provide both structural strength and separation between building functions.In high-rise buildings, shear wall systems tend to have a relatively high aspect ratio, that is, their height tends to be large compared to their width.Lacking tension in the foundation system, any structural element is limited in its ability to resist overturning moment by the width of the system and by the gravity load supported by the element.Limited to a narrow overturning, One obvious use of the system, which does have the needed width, is in the exterior walls of building, where the requirement for windows is kept small.Structural steel shear walls, generally stiffened against buckling by a concrete overlay, have found application where shear loads are high.The system, intrinsically more economical than steel bracing, is particularly effective in carrying shear loads down through the taller floors in the areas immediately above grade.The system has the further advantage of having high ductility a feature of particular importance in areas of high seismicity.The analysis of shear wall systems is made complex because of the inevitable presence of large openings through these walls.Preliminary analysis can be by truss-analogy, by the finite element method, or by making use of a proprietary computer program designed to consider the interaction, or coupling, of shear walls.Framed or Braced Tubes The concept of the framed or braced or braced tube erupted into the technology with the IBM Building in Pittsburgh, but was followed immediately with the twin 110-story towers of the World Trade Center, New York and a number of other buildings.The system is characterized by three –dimensional frames, braced frames, or shear walls, forming a closed surface more or less cylindrical in nature, but of nearly any plan configuration.Because those columns that resist
lateral forces are placed as far as possible from the cancroids of the system, the overall moment of inertia is increased and stiffness is very high.The analysis of tubular structures is done using three-dimensional concepts, or by two-dimensional analogy, where possible, whichever method is used, it must be capable of accounting for the effects of shear lag.The presence of shear lag, detected first in aircraft structures, is a serious limitation in the stiffness of framed tubes.The concept has limited recent applications of framed tubes to the shear of 60 stories.Designers have developed various techniques for reducing the effects of shear lag, most noticeably the use of belt trusses.This system finds application in buildings perhaps 40stories and higher.However, except for possible aesthetic considerations, belt trusses interfere with nearly every building function associated with the outside wall;the trusses are placed often at mechanical floors, mush to the disapproval of the designers of the mechanical systems.Nevertheless, as a cost-effective structural system, the belt truss works well and will likely find continued approval from designers.Numerous studies have sought to optimize the location of these trusses, with the optimum location very dependent on the number of trusses provided.Experience would indicate, however, that the location of these trusses is provided by the optimization of mechanical systems and by aesthetic considerations, as the economics of the structural system is not highly sensitive to belt truss location.Tube-in-Tube Structures The tubular framing system mobilizes every column in the exterior wall in resisting over-turning and shearing forces.The term‘tube-in-tube’is largely self-explanatory in that a second ring of columns, the ring surrounding the central service core of the building, is used as an inner framed or braced tube.The purpose of the second tube is to increase resistance to over turning and to increase lateral stiffness.The tubes need not be of the same character;that is, one tube could be framed, while the other could be braced.In considering this system, is important to understand clearly the difference between the shear and the flexural components of deflection, the terms being taken from beam analogy.In a framed tube, the shear component of deflection is associated with the bending deformation of columns and girders(i.e, the webs of the framed tube)while the flexural component is associated with the axial shortening and lengthening of columns(i.e, the flanges of the framed tube).In a
braced tube, the shear component of deflection is associated with the axial deformation of diagonals while the flexural component of deflection is associated with the axial shortening and lengthening of columns.Following beam analogy, if plane surfaces remain plane(i.e, the floor slabs),then axial stresses in the columns of the outer tube, being farther form the neutral axis, will be substantially larger than the axial stresses in the inner tube.However, in the tube-in-tube design, when optimized, the axial stresses in the inner ring of columns may be as high, or even higher, than the axial stresses in the outer ring.This seeming anomaly is associated with differences in the shearing component of stiffness between the two systems.This is easiest to under-stand where the inner tube is conceived as a braced(i.e, shear-stiff)tube while the outer tube is conceived as a framed(i.e, shear-flexible)tube.Core Interactive Structures Core interactive structures are a special case of a tube-in-tube wherein the two tubes are coupled together with some form of three-dimensional space frame.Indeed, the system is used often wherein the shear stiffness of the outer tube is zero.The United States Steel Building, Pittsburgh, illustrates the system very well.Here, the inner tube is a braced frame, the outer tube has no shear stiffness, and the two systems are coupled if they were considered as systems passing in a straight line from the “hat” structure.Note that the exterior columns would be improperly modeled if they were considered as systems passing in a straight line from the “hat” to the foundations;these columns are perhaps 15% stiffer as they follow the elastic curve of the braced core.Note also that the axial forces associated with the lateral forces in the inner columns change from tension to compression over the height of the tube, with the inflection point at about
5/8 of the height of the tube.The outer columns, of course, carry the same axial force under lateral load for the full height of the columns because the columns because the shear stiffness of the system is close to zero.The space structures of outrigger girders or trusses, that connect the inner tube to the outer tube, are located often at several levels in the building.The AT&T headquarters is an example of an astonishing array of interactive elements: 1.The structural system is 94 ft(28.6m)wide, 196ft(59.7m)long, and 601ft(183.3m)high.2.Two inner tubes are provided, each 31ft(9.4m)by 40 ft(12.2m), centered 90 ft(27.4m)apart in the long direction of the building.3.The inner tubes are braced in the short direction, but with zero shear stiffness in the long direction.4.A single outer tube is supplied, which encircles the building perimeter.5.The outer tube is a moment-resisting frame, but with zero shear stiffness for the center50ft(15.2m)of each of the long sides.6.A space-truss hat structure is provided at the top of the building.7.A similar space truss is located near the bottom of the building 8.The entire assembly is laterally supported at the base on twin steel-plate tubes, because the shear stiffness of the outer tube goes to zero at the base of the building.Cellular structures A classic example of a cellular structure is the Sears Tower, Chicago, a bundled tube structure of nine separate tubes.While the Sears Tower contains nine nearly identical tubes, the basic structural system has special application for buildings of irregular shape, as the several tubes need not be similar in plan shape, It is not uncommon that some of the individual tubes one of the strengths and one of the weaknesses of the system.This special weakness of this system, particularly in framed tubes, has to do with the concept of differential column shortening.The shortening of a column under load is given by the expression
△=ΣfL/E For buildings of 12 ft(3.66m)floor-to-floor distances and an average compressive stress of 15 ksi(138MPa), the shortening of a column under load is 15(12)(12)/29,000 or 0.074in(1.9mm)per story.At 50 stories, the column will have shortened to 3.7 in.(94mm)less than its unstressed length.Where one cell of a bundled tube system is, say, 50stories high and an adjacent cell is, say, 100stories high, those columns near the boundary between.the two systems need to have this differential deflection reconciled.Major structural work has been found to be needed at such locations.In at least one building, the Rialto Project, Melbourne, the structural engineer found it necessary to vertically pre-stress
the lower height columns so as to reconcile the differential deflections of columns in close proximity with the post-tensioning of the shorter column simulating the weight to be added on to adjacent, higher columns.二、原文翻译：
抗侧向荷载的结构体系
常用的结构体系
若已测出荷载量达数千万磅重，那么在高层建筑设计中就没有多少可以进行极其复杂的构思余地了。确实，较好的高层建筑普遍具有构思简单、表现明晰的特点。
这并不是说没有进行宏观构思的余地。实际上，正是因为有了这种宏观的构思，新奇的高层建筑体系才得以发展，可能更重要的是：几年以前才出现的一些新概念在今天的技术中已经变得平常了。
如果忽略一些与建筑材料密切相关的概念不谈，高层建筑里最为常用的结构体系便可分为如下几类：
1． 抗弯矩框架。
2． 支撑框架，包括偏心支撑框架。3． 剪力墙，包括钢板剪力墙。4． 筒中框架。5． 筒中筒结构。6． 核心交互结构。
7． 框格体系或束筒体系。
特别是由于最近趋向于更复杂的建筑形式，同时也需要增加刚度以抵抗几力和地震力，大多数高层建筑都具有由框架、支撑构架、剪力墙和相关体系相结合而构成的体系。而且，就较高的建筑物而言，大多数都是由交互式构件组成三维陈列。
将这些构件结合起来的方法正是高层建筑设计方法的本质。其结合方式需要在考虑环境、功能和费用后再发展，以便提供促使建筑发展达到新高度的有效结构。这并不是说富于想象力的结构设计就能够创造出伟大建筑。正相反，有许多例优美的建筑仅得到结构工程师适当的支持就被创造出来了，然而，如果没有天赋甚厚的建筑师的创造力的指导，那么，得以发展的就只能是好的结构，并非是伟大的建筑。无论如何，要想创造出高层建筑真正非凡的设计，两者都需要最好的。
虽然在文献中通常可以见到有关这七种体系的全面性讨论，但是在这里还值得进一步讨论。设计方法的本质贯穿于整个讨论。设计方法的本质贯穿于整个讨论中。
抗弯矩框架
抗弯矩框架也许是低，中高度的建筑中常用的体系，它具有线性水平构件和垂直构件在接头处基本刚接之特点。这种框架用作独立的体系，或者和其他体系结合起来使用，以便提供所需要水平荷载抵抗力。对于较高的高层建筑，可能会发现该本系不宜作为独立体系，这是因为在侧向力的作用下难以调动足够的刚度。
我们可以利用STRESS，STRUDL 或者其他大量合适的计算机程序进行结构分析。所谓的门架法分析或悬臂法分析在当今的技术中无一席之地，由于柱梁节点固有柔性，并且由于初步设计应该力求突出体系的弱点，所以在初析中使用框架的中心距尺寸设计是司空惯的。当然，在设计的后期阶段，实际地评价结点的变形很有必要。
支撑框架
支撑框架实际上刚度比抗弯矩框架强，在高层建筑中也得到更广泛的应用。这种体系以其结点处铰接或则接的线性水平构件、垂直构件和斜撑构件而具特色，它通常与其他体系共同用于较高的建筑，并且作为一种独立的体系用在低、中高度的建筑中。
尤其引人关注的是，在强震区使用偏心支撑框架。
此外，可以利用STRESS，STRUDL，或一系列二维或三维计算机分析程序中的任何一种进行结构分析。另外，初步分析中常用中心距尺寸。
剪力墙
剪力墙在加强结构体系刚性的发展过程中又前进了一步。该体系的特点是具有相当薄的，通常是（而不总是）混凝土的构件，这种构件既可提供结构强度，又可提供建筑物功能上的分隔。
在高层建筑中，剪力墙体系趋向于具有相对大的高宽经，即与宽度相比，其高度偏大。由于基础体系缺少应力，任何一种结构构件抗倾覆弯矩的能力都受到体系的宽度和构件承受的重力荷载的限制。由于剪力墙宽度狭狭窄受限，所以需要以某种方式加以扩大，以便提从所需的抗倾覆能力。在窗户需要量小的建筑物外墙中明显地使用了这种确有所需要宽度的体系。
钢结构剪力墙通常由混凝土覆盖层来加强以抵抗失稳，这在剪切荷载大的地方已得到应用。这种体系实际上比钢支撑经济，对于使剪切荷载由位于地面正上方区域内比较高的楼层向下移特别有效。这种体系还具有高延性之优点，这种特性在强震区特别重要。
由于这些墙内必然出同一些大孔，使得剪力墙体系分析变得错综复杂。可以通过桁架模似法、有限元法，或者通过利用为考虑剪力墙的交互作用或扭转功能设计的专门计处机程序进行初步分析
框架或支撑式筒体结构：
框架或支撑式筒体最先应用于IBM公司在Pittsburgh的一幢办公楼，随后立即被应用于纽约双子座的110层世界贸易中心摩天大楼和其他的建筑中。这种系统有以下几个显著的特征：三维结构、支撑式结构、或由剪力墙形成的一个性质上差不多是圆柱体的闭合曲面，但又有任意的平面构成。由于这些抵抗侧向荷载的柱子差不多都被设置在整个系统的中心，所以整体的惯性得到提高，刚度也是很大的。
在可能的情况下，通过三维概念的应用、二维的类比，我们可以进行筒体结构的分析。不管应用那种方法，都必须考虑剪力滞后的影响。
这种最先在航天器结构中研究的剪力滞后出现后，对筒体结构的刚度是一个很大的限制。这种观念已经影响了筒体结构在60层以上建筑中的应用。设计者已经开发出了很多的技术，用以减小剪力滞后的影响，这其中最有名的是桁架的应用。框架或支撑式筒体在40层或稍高的建筑中找到了自己的用武之地。除了一些美观的考虑外，桁架几乎很少涉及与外
墙联系的每个建筑功能，而悬索一般设置在机械的地板上，这就令机械体系设计师们很不赞成。但是，作为一个性价比较好的结构体系，桁架能充分发挥它的性能，所以它会得到设计师们持续的支持。由于其最佳位置正取决于所提供的桁架的数量，因此很多研究已经试图完善这些构件的位置。实验表明：由于这种结构体系的经济性并不十分受桁架位置的影响，所以这些桁架的位置主要取决于机械系统的完善，审美的要求，筒中筒结构：
筒体结构系统能使外墙中的柱具有灵活性，用以抵抗颠覆和剪切力。“筒中筒”这个名字顾名思义就是在建筑物的核心承重部分又被包围了第二层的一系列柱子，它们被当作是框架和支撑筒来使用。配置第二层柱的目的是增强抗颠覆能力和增大侧移刚度。这些筒体不是同样的功能，也就是说，有些筒体是结构的，而有些筒体是用来支撑的。
在考虑这种筒体时，清楚的认识和区别变形的剪切和弯曲分量是很重要的，这源于对梁的对比分析。在结构筒中，剪切构件的偏角和柱、纵梁（例如：结构筒中的网等）的弯曲有关，同时，弯曲构件的偏角取决于柱子的轴心压缩和延伸（例如：结构筒的边缘等）。在支撑筒中，剪切构件的偏角和对角线的轴心变形有关，而弯曲构件的偏角则与柱子的轴心压缩和延伸有关。
根据梁的对比分析，如果平面保持原形（例如：厚楼板），那么外层筒中柱的轴心压力就会与中心筒柱的轴心压力相差甚远，而且稳定的大于中心筒。但是在筒中筒结构的设计中，当发展到极限时，内部轴心压力会很高的，甚至远远大于外部的柱子。这种反常的现象是由于两种体系中的剪切构件的刚度不同。这很容易去理解，内筒可以看成是一个支撑（或者说是剪切刚性的）筒，而外筒可以看成是一个结构（或者说是剪切弹性的）筒。
核心交互式结构：
核心交互式结构属于两个筒与某些形式的三维空间框架相配合的筒中筒特殊情况。事实上，这种体系常用于那种外筒剪切刚度为零的结构。位于Pittsburgh的美国钢铁大楼证实了这种体系是能很好的工作的。在核心交互式结构中，内筒是一个支撑结构，外筒没有任何剪切刚度，而且两种结构体系能通过一个空间结构或“帽”式结构共同起作用。需要指出的是，如果把外部的柱子看成是一种从“帽”到基础的直线体系，这将是不合适的；根据支撑核心的弹性曲线，这些柱子只发挥了刚度的15%。同样需要指出的是，内柱中与侧向力有关的轴向力沿筒高度由拉力变为压力，同时变化点位于筒高度的约5/8处。当然，外柱也传
递相同的轴向力，这种轴向力低于作用在整个柱子高度的侧向荷载，因为这个体系的剪切刚度接近于零。
把内外筒相连接的空间结构、悬臂梁或桁架经常遵照一些规范来布置。美国电话电报总局就是一个布置交互式构件的生动例子。
1、结构体系长59.7米，宽28.6米，高183.3米。
2、布置了两个筒，每个筒的尺寸是9.4米×12.2米，在长方向上有27.4米的间隔。
3、在短方向上内筒被支撑起来，但是在长方向上没有剪切刚度。
4、环绕着建筑物布置了一个外筒。
5、外筒是一个瞬时抵抗结构，但是在每个长方向的中心15.2米都没有剪切刚度。
6、在建筑的顶部布置了一个空间桁架构成的“帽式”结构。
7、在建筑的底部布置了一个相似的空间桁架结构。
8、由于外筒的剪切刚度在建筑的底部接近零，整个建筑基本上由两个钢板筒来支持。
框格体系或束筒体系结构：
位于美国芝加哥的西尔斯大厦是箱式结构的经典之作，它由九个相互独立的筒组成的一个集中筒。由于西尔斯大厦包括九个几乎垂直的筒，而且筒在平面上无须相似，基本的结构体系在不规则形状的建筑中得到特别的应用。一些单个的筒高于建筑一点或很多是很常见的。事实上，这种体系的重要特征就在于它既有坚固的一面，也有脆弱的一面。
这种体系的脆弱，特别是在结构筒中，与柱子的压缩变形有很大的关系，柱子的压缩变形有下式计算：
△=ΣfL/E 对于那些层高为3.66米左右和平均压力为138MPa的建筑，在荷载作用下每层柱子的压缩变形为15（12）/29000或1.9毫米。在第50层柱子会压缩94毫米，小于它未受压的长度。这些柱子在50层的时候和100层的时候的变形是不一样的，位于这两种体系之间接近于边缘的那些柱需要使这种不均匀的变形得以调解。
主要的结构工作都集中在布置中。在Melbourne的Rialto项目中，结构工程师发现至少有一幢建筑，很有必要垂直预压低高度的柱子，以便使柱不均匀的变形差得以调解，调解的方法近似于后拉伸法，即较短的柱转移重量到较高的邻柱上。
第二篇：土木工程专业毕业论文中英文摘要
XX大学毕业设计（论文）
摘要
本文主要针对新建铁路精伊线莫仁至阿恰勒段的初步设计及相关程序设计。设计的具体内容由以下几个部分组成：结合地形、地质条件，在带状等高线地形图上，按初步设计的步骤，选定线路的基本走向，并进行路基设计，包括线路的平面定线、平面设计、纵断面设计、横断面设计、路基土石方计算程序设计、平面坐标计算程序设计、及相关外文科技文献翻译一篇。
平面定线过程中，根据坡度的变化，注意紧坡地段和缓坡地段的定线要求及定线技巧，在设计过程中，由于两站之间有较大的高程差，所以为了减少挖方量和争取最大高程，线路采用较大的坡度上坡，并注意使直线与曲线相互协调，充分考虑夹直线和缓和曲线长度的要求；纵断面设计中，注意最大坡度、坡段长度、坡段连接与坡度折减等问题，在变坡点处应合理设置竖曲线 ；在平面坐标计算程序设计中，对两种方法进行比较，采用Fortran语言编制计算程序；在横断面设计过程中，考虑曲线地段路基面加宽等问题。
整个设计分几个阶段进行，每一阶段的工作都需要综合考虑、精心设计。设计的前后都要进行必要的比较、检算，符合标准以后，提交有关设计成果，完成设计。
关键词：平面纵断面竖曲线路基横断面
XX大学毕业设计（论文）
Abstract
The article aims in designing new-built railway preliminarily for JingYi line from Moren to Aqiale section and relevant programs.The concrete contents of the design are as follows : Following the procedures of preliminary design , combine the topography、geology condition , select the basic trend of the line on the topographic map of belt contour , and start the subgrade design，including level location、level section design、profile design、cross section design、subgrade cubic meter of earth and stone calculation program and design、level coordinate calculation program of line and design、translating a relevant foreign technological bibliography.During the course of level location, follow the gradient changes to locate the line;pays attention to the tight slope land sector and the gentle slope land sector decides the line request and decides the line skill, in design process between, because two stands has a bigger elevation difference, therefore in order to reduce the volume of excavation the quantity and strives for the maximum elevation, the line uses an greater slope uphill, and the attention causes the straight line and the curveinter coordination, the full consideration clamps the straight line to be gentle and the length of curve request;In profile design , we must pay attention to the maximum grade、the connection of grade section and compensation of gradient etc;On the grade change point, we should dispose the vertical curve reasonably.During the course of level coordinate calculation program and design, compare thee two methods and use the C Language to program;In the cross section design, consider the problems of broadening subgrade on curve section.The whole design is divided into several stages to conduct.Every stage requires integrated consideration and careful design.The essential comparison and checkout both are required to do before and after designing.When the design conforms to the standard, submit relevant achievements of design, and then finish the design
Key Words:Level section、Profile、Vertical curve、Subgrade、Cross Section-2-
第三篇：行政管理专业毕业论文中英文翻译
新公共管理的现状
欧文·E·休斯
(澳大利亚莫纳什大学管理系)
毫无疑问,世界上许多国家,无论是发达国家还是发展中国家,在20世纪80年代后期和90年代初期都开始了一场持续的公共部门管理变革运动。这场改革运动至今仍在很多方面继续对政府的组织和管理产生着影响。人们对于这些改革的看法众说纷纭,莫衷一是。批评家尤其是英国和美国的批评家们认为,新模式存在着各种各样的问题,而且也不具有国际普遍性的改革意义,公共管理不可能被称为范式。批评几乎涵盖了变化的各个方面。大多数批评都属于学术上的吹毛求疵。不同的思想流派讨论着细枝末节;学术期刊上的文章也越来越抽象,远离现实。同时,公共管理者在实践中不断推动和实施着这项变化和改革。正如我在其他文章中所认为的那样,在大多数国家,传统的公共行政模式已经为公共管理模式所取代。公共部门的变革回应了几个相互联系的重大现实问题,包括:职能公共部门提供公共服务的低效率;经济理论的变化;私营部门相关变化产生的影响,尤其是全球化作为一种经济力量的兴起;技术变化使得分权同时又能更好地控制全局成为可能。行政管理可以分为三个鲜明的发展阶段:前传统阶段、公共行政传统模式阶段和公共管理改革阶段。每个阶段都有自己的管理模式。从上一个阶段过渡到下一个阶段并非轻而易举,从传统的公共行政到公共管理的过渡至今尚未完成。但这只是时间的问题。因为新模式背后的理论基础非常强大。这场变革运动以“新公共管理”著称,尽管这个名称引起了争论,然而它不但在蓬勃发展着,而且是对大多数发达国家已经采取的管理模式的最佳表述。传统的行政模式相对于它所处的时代是一项伟大的改革,但是,那个时代已经过去了。
一、前传统模式
很显然,在19世纪末官僚体制理论尚未健全之前,已经存在着某种形式的行政管理。公共行政已经有很长的历史了,它与政府这一概念以及文明的兴起一样历史悠久。正如格拉登(Glad2den)指出的那样,行政的某种模式自从政府出现之后就一直存在着。首先是创始者或领导者赋予社会以可能,然后是组织者或行政者使之永恒。行政或事务管理是所有社会活动中的中间因素,虽然不是光彩夺目,但对社会的持续发展却是至关重要的。公认的行政体制在古埃及就已经存在了,其管辖范围从每年的尼罗河泛滥引起的灌溉事务到金字塔的建造。中国在汉朝就采用了儒家规范,认为政府应当是民选的,不是根据出身,而是根据品德和能力,政府的主要目标是谋取人民的福利。在欧洲,各种帝国——希腊、罗马、神圣罗马、西班牙等首先是行政帝国,它们由中央通过各种规则和程序进行管理。韦伯认为,中世纪“现代”国家的发展同时伴随着“官僚治理结构的发展”。尽管这些国家以不同的方式进行管理,但它们具有共同的特点,这可以称为前现代。也就是说,早期的行政体制本质上是人格化的,或者说是建立在韦伯所说的“裙带关系”的基础上,也就是说以效忠国王或大臣等某个特定的人为基础,而不是非人格化的;以效忠组织或国家为基础而不是以个人为基础。尽管存在着这么一种观点,即认为行政管理本身不为人赞许的特点仅仅来自于传统模式,但早期的做法常常导致谋求个人利益的贪污行为或滥用职权。在早期行政体制下,我们现在看来觉得很奇怪的做法曾是当时执政政府职能的普遍行为。那些一心走仕途的人往往依靠朋友或亲戚获取工作或买官,这就是说先以钱来收买海关官员或税收官员,然后再向客户伸手要钱,从而既回收了最初的买官投资成本,又可以大赚一笔。美国19世纪的“政党分肥制度”意味着在执政党发生了变化的同时,政府中的所有行政职位也发生了变化。前现代官僚体制是“个人的、传统的、扩散的、同类的和特殊的”,而按照韦伯的论证,现代官僚体制应当是“非人格化的、理性的、具体的、成就取向的和普遍的”。个人化政府往往是低效率的:裙带关系意味着无能的而不是能干的人被安排到领导岗位上;政党分肥制常常导致腐败,此外还存在着严重的低效率。传统行政模式的巨大成功使得早期做法看起来很奇怪。专业化、非政治化行政在我们看来是如此顺理成章,以至难以想象到会有别的制度存在。西方的行政制度即使简单到通过考试选拔官员的想法,也是直到1854年英国的诺思科特—屈维廉报告出台后才开始建立,尽管这种制度在中国早已通行很久了。
二、传统的公共行政模式
在19世纪末期,另外一种模式开始在全世界流行,这就是所谓的传统行政模式。它的主要理论基础来源于几个国家的学者,即,美国的伍德罗·威尔逊和德国的马克斯·韦伯,人们把他们和官僚制模式相联系;弗雷德里克·泰勒系统地阐述了科学管理理论,该理论也来源于对美国私营部门的运用,为公共行政提供了方 法。与其他理论家不同,泰勒没有着力关注公共部门,可是他的理论却在该领域具有广泛影响。这三位理论家是传统公共行政模式的主要影响者。对于其他国家来说,还要加上诺思科特和屈维廉,他们对美国之外的国家的行政尤其是威尔逊的行政体制产生了重要影响。在19世纪中期,诺思科特和屈维廉最先提出了通过考试和品德来任命官员的主张,并提出了无偏见和行政中立的观点。传统的行政模式有以下几个主要特点: 1.官僚制。政府应当根据等级、官僚原则进行组织。德国社会学家马克斯·韦伯对官僚制度有一个经典的、清晰的分析。虽然这种官僚制思想在商业组织和其他组织中采用过,但它在公共部门得到了更好和更长久的执行。
2.最好的工作方式和程序都在详尽全面的手册中加以规定,以供行政人员遵循。严格地遵守这些原则将会为组织运行提供最好的方式。
3.官僚服务。一旦政府涉足政策领域,它将成为通过官僚体制提供公共产品和服务的提供者。
4.在政治、行政二者的关系中,行政管理者一般认为政治与行政事务是可以分开的。行政就是贯彻执行指令,而任何事关政策或战略事务的决定都应当由政治领导者做出,这可以确保民主责任制。
5.公共利益被假定为公务员个人的惟一动机,为公众服务是无私的付出。6.职业化官僚制。公共行政被看作是一种特殊活动,因而要求公务员保持中立、默默无闻、终身雇用以及平等地服务于任何一个政治领导人。
7.行政任务的书面含义是执行他人的指令而不承担由此而致的个人责任。通过对比早期的行政模式,我们可以更好地理解韦伯体系的主要优点和不同点。韦伯制度和它以前的各种模式最重要的区别在于:以规则为基础的非人格化的制度取代了人格化的行政管理制度。一个组织及其规则要比组织中的任何个人都重要。官僚制度就其运作以及如何对客户做出反应方面必须是非人格化的。正如韦伯所论证的那样“:将现代公职管理归并为各种规定深深地触及了它的本质。现代公共行政理论认为,以法令形式来命令执行某些事务的权威已被合法地授予了公共机关。这并没有授予某机构具体情况下通过指令实施某种事务的权力。它只能是抽象地管制某种事务。与此形成鲜明对比的是,通过个人特权和赋予特许权管制所有事务。后者的情况完全是由世袭制支配的,至少就这些事务不是不可 3 被侵犯的传统而言是这种情况。”
这一点非常重要。早期的行政管理以人际关系为基础,个人要忠诚于亲戚、保护人、领导人或政党,而不是对体制负责。有时,早期行政管理在政治上是比较敏感的,因为行政机关的人员是任命的,他们更是政客的臂膀或主流阶级。但是,它也常常是专制的,专制的行政可能是不公平的,特别是对那些不能够或者不愿意投入个人政治游戏的人来说更是如此。一个以韦伯原则为基础的非人格化的制度可以完全消除专制——至少在理想情况下是如此。档案的存在、前例原则的参照和法律依据意味着在相同的环境中总是会做出相同的决策。在这种情况下不仅效率更高,而且公民和官僚等级制中的人员都知道自己所处的立场。
其他的差别均与此相联系。在各种规定和非人格化的基础上,会很自然地形成严格的等级制度。等级制度及其规定在个人离开组织后保持不变。虽然韦伯强调的是整个制度,但他也注意到了官僚制组织中的个人任期和条件。
传统行政模式获得了极大的成功,它为全世界各国政府所广泛采用。无论是从理论上还是从实践上看,它都显示出了优势。与以前腐败盛行的制度相比,它更具效率,而且职业化公务员的思想对个人以及业余服务都是一个巨大的进步。然而,该模式现在也暴露出了问题,这些问题表明该模式即使不能说已经过时了,也可以说即将过时。
公共行政的理论支柱已经难以描述政府现实了。政治控制理论已经问题重重。行政意味着遵从他人的指令,因此要求有一个秩序井然的收发方法。指令的发出者与实施者之间有一个明确的划分。但是这并不现实,并且随着公共服务规模和领域的扩大而愈加不可能。传统模式的另一理论支柱——官僚制理论也不再被认为是组织的特别有效形式。正式的官僚体制可能有它的优势,但人们也认为它往往培养墨守成规者而不是创新者;鼓励行政人员规避风险而不是勇于冒险,鼓励他们浪费稀缺资源而不是有效利用。韦伯曾把官僚制看成是“理想类型”,但现在这种理想类型却培养了惰性、丧失进取心、导致平庸和低效率,这些被认为是公共部门的特有病。它也由此遭受批评。实际上“,官僚”这个词在今天更多地被看成是低效率的同义词。
三、新公共管理模式
20世纪八九十年代,在公共部门出现了一种针对传统行政模式的缺陷的新 管理方法。这种方法可以缓解传统模式的某些问题,同时也意味着公共部门运转方面发生了引人注目的变化。这种新的管理方法有很多名称“:管理主义”、“新公共管理”“、以市场为基础的公共行政”“、后官僚制典范”或“企业型政府”。到90年代后期,人们越来越倾向于使用“新公共管理”的概念。
尽管新公共管理的名称众多,但对于公共部门管理发生的实际变化而言,人们还是有一种共识。第一,无论这种模式叫什么,它都代表着一种与传统公共行政不同的重大变化,它更为关注结果的实现和管理者的个人责任。第二,它明确表示要摆脱古典官僚制,从而使组织、人事、任期和条件更加灵活。第三,它明确规定了组织和人事目标,这就可以根据绩效指标测量工作任务的完成情况。同样,还可以对计划方案进行更为系统的评估,也可以比以前更为严格地确定政府计划是否实现了其预定目标。第四,高级行政管理人员更有可能带有政治色彩地致力于政府工作,而不是无党派或中立的。第五,政府更有可能受到市场的检验,将公共服务的购买者与提供者区分开,即将“掌舵者与划桨者区分开”。政府介入并不一定总是指政府通过官僚手段行事。第六,出现了通过民营化和市场检验、签订合同等方式减少政府职能的趋势。在某种情况下,这是根本性的。一旦发生了从过程向结果转化的重要变革,所有与此相连的连续性步骤就都是必要的。
霍姆斯(Holmes)和尚德(Shand)对这次改革的特点作了一个特别有用的概括。他们把新公共管理视作范式,这种好的管理方法具有以下特点:(1)这是一种更加富有战略性或结构导向型的决策方法(强调效率、结果和服务质量)。(2)分权式管理环境取代了高度集中的等级组织结构。这使资源分配和服务派送更加接近供应本身,由此可以得到更多相关的信息和来自客户及其他利益团体的反馈。(3)可以更为灵活地探索代替直接供应公共产品的方法,从而提供成本节约的政策结果。(4)关注权威与责任的对应,以此作为提高绩效的关键环节,这包括强调明确的绩效合同的机制。(5)在公共部门之间和内部创造一个竞争性的环境。(6)加强中央战略决策能力,使其能够迅速、灵活和低成本地驾驭政府对外部变化和多元利益做出反应。(7)通过要求提供有关结果和全面成本的报告来提高责任度和透明度。(8)宽泛的服务预算和管理制度支持和鼓励着这些变化的发生。
新公共管理并没有认为实现某结果有一条最好的途径。管理者在被赋予责任之前并没有被告知如何获得结果。决定工作方式是管理者的一个职责,如果没有 5 实现预定的目标,管理者对此应当承担责任。
四、结论
政府管理在过去的一百五十年里经历了三种模式。首先是人格化或前现代行政模式,当该模式日益暴露其缺陷以及出于提高效率的目的,它就被第二种模式即传统的官僚行政模式所取代。同样,当传统行政模式问题重重时,它就为第三种模式即新公共管理取代,从政府转向替代性市场。20世纪80年代以来,市场的主导地位就如同20世纪20年代到60年代官僚制度居主导地位一样。在任何一种政府制度中,官僚和市场都是共存的,只是在某个阶段一种形式占主导地位,而在另一阶段,另一种形式占主导地位。新公共管理时代是官僚制日益削弱而市场在公共行政领域占据统治地位的时期。
在现实中,市场和官僚体制相互需要,相互补充。新公共管理不可能完全代替官僚制,正如1989年以前的东欧,官僚制不可能代替市场一样。但新公共管理运动表明的是,早期传统官僚制的许多功能都可以而且现在经常由市场来执行。在一个官僚制作为组织原则日益削弱的环境下,市场解决方案就会被推出。当然不是所有的市场药方都能成功,但这不是问题的核心。政府将从新公共管理这一工具箱中探寻到解决方案。如果这些方案行之无效,政府就会从同一来源中寻找其他方案。政府管理背后的理论基础已经发生了变革,我们完全可以用“范式”这一术语来描述它。在公共行政学术界,有许多对新公共管理持否定态度的批评家。但是他们的批评对迅速开展的政府改革影响很小。在新公共管理模式之后,会出现另一种新的模式,但肯定不会回到传统的行政模式。The New Public Management Situation
Owen E.Hughes Monash University Management(Australia)
No doubt, many countries in the world, and both developed countries and developing countries, in the late 1980s and early 1990s began a continuous public sector management reform movement.The reform movement is still in many aspects government continue to the organization and management of the influence.People in these reforms view repudiating them.Critics especially in Britain and the United States, critics say the new mode of various problems exist, but also does not have the international prevailing reform of public management, could not be called paradigm.Criticism from almost every aspect of the change.Most of the academic criticism belong to the mouth.Different schools of thought in detail discussion, The academic journal articles and abstraction, from reality.At the same time, in the practice of public management and implementation of the reform and the change.As I in other articles in the thought, in most countries, the traditional public administrative mode for public management mode has been replaced.The reform of public department responded to the realities of several interrelated problems, including: the function of public sector provide public services of low efficiency, Economic theory of change, Private sector related changes impact of globalization, especially as a kind of economic power, Technology changes made decentralization and better control globally becomes possible.The administrative management can be divided into three stages: the development of distinct phases, and public administration before traditional pattern and public management reform stage.Each stage has its own management mode.From a stage of transition to the next stage is not easy, from the traditional public administration to public administration has not yet completed the transition.But it was only a matter of time.Because the new mode of theoretical basis is very strong.The new public management movement “, ”although this name, but it is not only a debate in the booming, and in most developed countries have taken the best management mode of expression.The traditional administrative mode than it's age is a great reform, but that time has passed.A traditional pattern Obviously, in the late 19th century bureaucracy system theory, not sound already exists some form of administrative management.Public administration has a long history, and it is the concept of a government and the rise of civilization as history.As the case Glad2den Osama bin laden(point), a model of administrative since the government appears has existed.First is endowed with founder or leader, then is the social or administrative person to organizers of eternity.Administration management or business is all in social activities, although not among factors, but the glow of social sustainable development is of vital importance.Recognized administrative system in ancient Egypt is already exists, its jurisdiction from the Nile flooding caused by the year to build the pyramids irrigation affairs.China is adopted in the han dynasty, Confucian norms that government should be elected, not according to the background, but according to the character and ability, the government's main goal is to seek the welfare of the people.In Europe, various empirebegan to establish in China, although the system has long passage.The traditional public administrative pattern In the late 19th century, additionally one kind of pattern on the world popular, this is the so-called traditional administrative pattern.Its main theoretical basis from several countries, namely, the American scholars and Germany Woodrow Wilson of Max Weber's, people put their associated with bureaucracy model, Frederick Tyler systematically elaborated the scientific management theory, the theory of the private sector from America, for public administration method was provided.And the other theorists, Taylor without focusing on public sector, but his theory was influential in this field.The three traditional public administration mode is theorist of main effect.In other countries, plus G..M.Trevelyan and North America, the state administration of administrative system, especially the Wilson has produced important influence.In the 19th century, the north G..M.Trevelyan and put forward through the examination and character, and appointed officials put forward bias and administrative neutral point of view.The traditional administrative pattern has the following features: 1.The bureaucracy.The government shall, according to the principle of bureaucratic rank and organization.The German sociologist Max Weber bureaucracy system of a classic, and analysis.Although the bureaucracy in business organizations and other tissues, but it is in the public sector got better and longer.2.The best way of working and procedures are in full manual detail codes, for administrative personnel to follow.Strictly abide by these principles will run for the organization provides the best way.3.Bureaucratic service.Once the government policy areas in, it will be through the bureaucracy to provide public products and service providers.4.In political and administrative two relations, political and administrative managers generally think of administrative affairs can be separated.Administration is the implement instruction, and any matter policy or strategic affairs shall be decided by the political leaders, which can ensure that the democratic system.5.Public interests are assumed to individual civil servants, the only motive for public service is selfless paying.6.Professional bureaucracy.Public administration is viewed as a kind of special activities, thus requirements, obscure, civil servants neutral equal employment and lifelong service to any political leaders.7.The administrative task is to carry out the meaning of the written instructions and not others assume the personal responsibility.Through the comparison of the early administrative pattern, we can better understand the main advantages and Webber system differences.Webber system and it is the most important mode of various before the difference: the rule-based impersonal system replaced the personification of administrative management system.An organization and its rules than any of the people are important organization.Bureaucracy is its operation and how to respond to customer must is personified.As Weber has demonstrated that the modern office management “, will be incorporated into various regulations deeply touched it.The modern public administration by law theory, to command certain affairs authority has been awarded the legitimate public authority.This does not grant an institution specific cases through some instructions.It only matters is abstractly control some issues.In contrast, through personal privileges and give concession regulation of all affairs.The latter is completely dominated by the hereditary system, at least these affairs is not the traditional infringement is this situation.” It is very important.Early administration based on personal relationships, be loyal to relatives, protect, leaders or political, rather than on the system.Sometimes, the early administration is politically sensitive, because of the administrative organs of the staff is appointed, they also politicians arms or mainstream class.However, it is often autocratic, autocratic administration may be unfair, especially for those who can't or unwilling to input personal and political game.One of the basic principles for with weber impersonal system to completely eliminate autocraticbureaucracy theory is no longer considered particularly effective form of organization.Formal bureaucracy could have its advantages, but people think it often training to routineer and innovators, Encourage executives rather than risk aversion risk-taking, encourage them to waste instead of effective use of scarce resources.Webb was the bureaucracy is regarded as an ideal type “, ”but now this ideal type is inert, cultivate the progressive, leads to low efficiency, these mediocrity and is believed to be the public sector of the special disease.It is also criticized.Actually, the word “bureaucracy in today's more likely as low efficiency of synonyms.The new public management mode In the 1980s, the public sector is a traditional administrative pattern of new management methods of defects.This method can alleviate some of the problems of traditional pattern, also means that the public sector operation aspects has changed significantly.The new management method has many names: management of ”individualism“, ”the new public administration“, based on the market of public administration ”, after the bureaucracy model “or” entrepreneurial government “.To the late 1990s, people tend to use ”and the concept of new public administration“.Although the new public management, but for many of the names of public management of department of actual changes happened, people still have a consensus.First, no matter what, it is called mode with traditional represents a significant change of public administration, different more attention and managers of the individual responsibility.Second, it is clear to get rid of the classical bureaucracy, thereby organization, personnel, term and conditions more flexible.Third, it stipulates the organization and personnel, and it can target according to the performance indicators measuring task completion.Also, to plan the assessment system for more than ever before, and also can be more strictly determine whether the government plans to achieve its objectives.Fourth, the senior executives are more likely to color with political government work, rather than independent or neutral.Fifth, the more likely the inspection by the market, buyers of public service provider and distinguish ”helmsman, with the rower to distinguish“.Government intervention is not always refers to the government by means of bureaucracy.Sixth, appeared through privatization and market means such as inspection, contract of government function reduce trend.In some cases, it is fundamental.Once happened during the transformation from the important changes to all connected with this, the continuity of the steps are necessary.Holmes and Shand as a useful characteristics of generalization.They put the new public management paradigm, the good as management method has the following features:(1)it is a more strategic or structure of decision-making method(around the efficiency, quality and service).(2)decentralization type management environment replaced concentration level structure.The resource allocation and service delivery closer to supply, we can get more itself from the customers and related information and other interest groups.(3)can be more flexible to replace the method of public products supply directly, so as to provide cost savings of the policy.(4)concerned with the responsibility, authority as the key link of improving performance, including emphasize clear performance contract mechanism.(5)in the public sector, and between internal to create a competitive environment.(6)strengthen the strategic decision-making ability, which can quickly, flexible and low cost to manage multiple interests outside change and the response.(7)by request relevant results and comprehensive cost reports to improve transparency and responsibility.(8)general service budget and management system to support and encourage the change.The new public management and realize a result that no one in the best way.Managers in endowed with responsibility and without being told to get results.Decision is a management job duties, if not for achieving goals, managers should assume responsibility.Conclusion The government management over the past 150 years experienced three modes.First is the personification of modern administrative mode, or when the pattern of its defects and increasingly exposed to improve efficiency, it is the second mode of traditional bureaucracy model is replaced.Similarly, when the traditional administrative mode problems, it is the third model is the new public management, from the government to alternative market.Since 1980s, the dominance of the market as the 1920s to 1960s dominant bureaucracy.In any kind of government, market and bureaucratic system are coexisting, just a form at some stage dominant, and in another stage of another kind of form, the dominant.The new public management is increasingly weakened and bureaucracy in the public administration field market dominant period.In reality, the market and bureaucracy, mutual complement each other.The new public management may not be completely replace the bureaucracy, as in 1989, the eastern Europe before bureaucracy could not instead of the market.But the new public management movement is early traditional bureaucracy, many functions can be and often by market now.In a bureaucracy system for organizational principle is weakened environment, market solutions will be launched.Of course not all market prescription can succeed, but this is not the issue.The government of new public management will be a toolbox dowsed solutions.If the scheme of the ineffective, the government will from the same source for other solutions.The theory behind the government management has already happened, we can use the term ”paradigm" to describe it.In public administration academia, many of the new public management denial of critics.But their criticism of the government reform quickly.In the new public management mode, another a kind of new mode, but certainly not returned to the traditional administrative pattern.
第四篇：土木工程毕业论文摘要(中英文)
摘要
随着社会经济的不断发展，房地产的开发处于上升空间。伴随而来的是人们对商业用房、住宅越来越高的要求，这主要表现在环境、经济、功能和舒服度等方面。所以现在对项目编制者来说有了更高的要求。工程项目的开发一般分为项目前期计划阶段，项目实施阶段和项目竣工交付使用段。在编制项目策划书过程中，我们要详细介绍这三个阶段考虑的问题以及解决方案。项目的前期策划主要是识别项目的需要，确定项目的方向，对项目作出决策，是项目的孕育阶段。工程项目前期策划过程中可以按以下方法：项目构思的产生和选择、项目目标设计和项目定义、可行性研究、评价和决策。同时在这个阶段中对项目实施的成本和工期有一定的计划。项目实施阶段是把平面实现立体复杂的过程，里面包含了项目的管理模式和技术要领。确立这些关键性的事物才能高效的实现目标。项目实施过程中主要考虑到工程进度控制、工程成本控制以及工程项目质量管理。最后，项目经过各方验收达到标准以后交付使用。在接下去的章节中详细项目策划书的各个过程。
关键字：项目概况；项目计划；工作目标；成本控制；工作程序；工程管理；
Abstract
With the continuous development of the socio-economic, the real estate development is raising space.Accompanied by the pursuit of commercial buildings, residential increasing, this was reflected in the environmental, economic, functional and comfortable degree.So now,on project preparation for higher requirements.Project development generally divided into pre-project planning phase, the project implementation stage and project complete consign is used section.In the process of compiling project planning book, we will detail the three stage considering problems and solutions.The planning stage of the project is to identify the needs of the project, to determine the direction of the project, to make decisions on the project, is a nascent stage of the project.Project early in the planning process by the following methods: idea generation and selection of the project, the design of the project objectives and the project definition, feasibility study, evaluation and decision-making.At the same time in the stages of project implementation cost and time limit for a project has a certain plan.The project implementation phase plane dimensional complex process, contains the project management mode and technical main point.We establish these critical things to achieve goals efficiently.In the process of project implementation main consideration to project progress control, engineering cost control and project quality management.Finally, project delivered after the acceptance of all parties to achieve the standard.Project planning book described in detail in the next chapter.Key words：Project Overview；Project plan；Work target； Cost control；Working procedures； Project management；
第五篇：室内设计中英文翻译【适用于毕业论文外文翻译】
毕业设计英文资料翻译
Translation of the English Documents for Graduation Design
课题名称
院（系）专 业 姓 名 学 号 起讫日期 指导教师
2011 年 02 月 20 日
Interior Design
Susan Yelavich
Interior design embraces not only the decoration and furnishing of space, but also considerations of space planning, lighting, and programmatic issues pertaining to user behaviors, ranging from specific issues of accessibility to the nature of the activities to be conducted in the space.The hallmark of interior design today is a new elasticity in typologies, seen most dramatically in the domestication of commercial and public spaces.Interior design encompasses both the programmatic planning and physical treatment of interior space: the projection of its use and the nature of its furnishings and surfaces, that is, walls, floors, and ceilings.Interior design is distinguished from interior decoration in the scope of its purview.Decorators are primarily concerned with the selection of furnishings, while designers integrate the discrete elements of décor into programmatic concerns of space and use.Interior designers generally practice collaboratively with architects on the interiors of spaces built from the ground up, but they also work independently, particularly in the case of renovations.There is also a strong history of architect-designed interiors, rooted in the concept of Gesamtkunstwerk, the total work of art, that came out of the Arts & Crafts movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.It is no accident that its strongest proponents(from Frank Lloyd Wright to Mies van der Rohe)extended their practices to include the realm of interiors during the nascency of the interior-design profession.Indeed, it was a defensive measure taken by architects who viewed formal intervention by an interior decorator or designer as a threat to the integrity of their aesthetic.Today, apart from strict modernists like Richard Meier who place a premium on homogeneity, architects who take on the role of interior designer(and their numbers are growing)are more likely to be eclectic in philosophy and practice, paralleling the twenty-first century's valorization of plurality.Nonetheless, the bias against interior designers and the realm
of the interior itself continues to persist.Critical discussions of the interior have been hampered by its popular perception as a container of ephemera.Furthermore, conventional views of the interior have been fraught with biases: class biases related to centuries-old associations with tradesmen and gender biases related to the depiction of the decorating profession as primarily the domain of women and gay men.As a result, the credibility of the interior as an expression of cultural values has been seriously impaired.However, the conditions and the light in which culture-at-large is understood are changing under the impact of globalization.The distinctions between “high” culture and “low” culture are dissipating in a more tolerant climate that encourages the cross-fertilization between the two poles.Likewise, there are more frequent instances of productive borrowings among architecture, design, and decoration, once considered exclusive domains.And while the fields of architecture, interior design, and interior decoration still have different educational protocols and different concentrations of emphasis, they are showing a greater mutuality of interest.Another way to think of this emergent synthesis is to substitute the triad of “architecture, interior design, and decoration” with “modernity, technology, and history.” One of the hallmarks of the postmodern era is a heightened awareness of the role of the past in shaping the present.In the interior, this manifests itself in a renewed interest in ornament, in evidence of craft and materiality, and in spatial complexities, all running parallel to the ongoing project of modernity.Even more significantly, there is a new elasticity in typologies.Today, the traditional typologies of the interior—house, loft, office, restaurant, and so on—strain to control their borders.Evidence of programmatic convergences can clearly be seen in public and commercial spaces that aspire to be both more user-friendly and consumer-conscious.Growing numbers of private hospitals(in competition for patients)employ amenities and form languages inspired by luxury spas;at the same time, many gyms and health clubs are adopting the clinical mien of medical facilities to convince their clients of the value of their services.The same relaxation of interior protocols can be seen in offices that co-opt the informal, live-work ethic of the artist's loft, and in hotels that use the language(and contents)of galleries.Similarly, increasing numbers of grocery stores and bookstores include spaces and furniture for eating and socializing.Likewise, there is a new comfort with stylistic convergences in interiors that appropriate and recombine disparate quotations from design history.These are exemplified in spaces such as Rem Koolhaas' Casa da Musica(2005)in Porto, Portugal(with its inventive use of traditional Portuguese tiles), and Herzog & de Meuron's Walker Art Center(2005)in Minneapolis, Minnesota(where stylized acanthus-leaf patterns are used to mark gallery entrances).These interiors make an art out of hybridism.They do not simply mix and match period furnishings and styles, but refilter them through a contemporary lens.Another hallmark of the contemporary interior is the overt incorporation of narrative.Tightly themed environments persist in retail spaces such as Ralph Lauren's clothing stores and in entertainment spaces like Las Vegas casinos.However, a more playful and less linear approach to narrative is increasingly common.Of all the typologies of the interior, the residence has been least affected by change, apart from ephemeral trends such as outdoor kitchens and palatial bathrooms.However, the narrative of the residence dominates interior design at large.It has become the catalyst for rethinking a host of spaces once firmly isolated from it, ranging from the secretary's cubicle, to the nurse's station, to the librarian's reading room.Considerations such as the accommodation of personal accessories in the work space, the use of color in hospitals, and the provision of couches in libraries are increasingly common, to cite just three examples.The domestication of such environments(with curtains and wallpaper, among other residential elements)provides more comfort, more reassurance, and more pleasure to domains formerly defined by institutional prohibitions and social exclusions.Unquestionably, these changes in public and commercial spaces are indebted to the liberation movements of the late 1960s.The battles fought against barriers of race, class, gender, and physical ability laid the groundwork for a larger climate of hospitality and accommodation.It is also possible to detect a wholly other agenda in the popularity of the residential model.The introduction of domestic amenities into commercial spaces, such as recreation spaces in office interiors, can also be construed as part of a wider attempt to put a more acceptable face on the workings of free-market capitalism.In this view, interior design dons the mask of entertainment.There is nothing new about the charade.Every interior is fundamentally a stage set.Nor is it particularly insidious—as long as the conceit is transparent.Danger surfaces，however, when illusion becomes delusion—when design overcompensates for the realities of illness with patronizing sentiment, or when offices become surrogate apartments because of the relentless demands of a round-the-clock economy.In these instances, design relinquishes its potential to transform daily life in favor of what amounts to little more than a facile re-branding of space.Another force is driving the domestication of the interior and that is the enlarged public awareness of design and designers.There is a growing popular demand for design as amenity and status symbol, stimulated by the proliferation of shelter magazines, television shows devoted to home decorating, and the advertising campaigns of commercial entities such as Target and Ikea.In the Western world, prosperity, combined with the appetite of the media, has all but fetishized the interior, yielding yet another reflection of the narcissism of a consumer-driven society.On the one hand, there are positive, democratic outcomes of the growing public profile of design that can be seen in the rise of do-it-yourself web sites and enterprises like Home Depot that emphasize self-reliance.It can also be argued, more generally, that the reconsideration of beauty implicit in the valorization of design is an ameliorating social phenomenon by virtue of its propensity to inspire improvement.On the other hand, the popularization of interior design through personas such as Philippe Starck, Martha Stewart, and Barbara Barry has encouraged a superficial understanding of the interior that is more focused on objects than it is on behaviors and interactions among objects.For all the recent explosion of interest in interior design, it remains, however, a fundamentally conservative arena of design, rooted as it is in notions of enclosure, security, and comfort.This perception has been exacerbated by the growth of specialized practices focused, for example, on healthcare and hospitality.While such firms offer deep knowledge of the psychology, mechanics, and economies of particular environments, they also perpetuate distinctions that hinder a more integral approach to the interior as an extension of architecture and even the landscape outside.One notable exception is the growth of design and architecture firms accruing expertise in sustainable materials and their applications to the interior.At the same time that design firms are identifying themselves with sustainability and promoting themselves as environmentalists, a movement is building to incorporate environmental responsibility within normative practice.Over the past four decades, efforts have intensified to professionalize the field of interior design and to accord it a status equal to that of architecture.In the US and Canada the Council for Interior Design Accreditation, formerly known as FIDER, reviews interior design education programs at colleges and universities to regulate standards of practice.Furthermore, the International Council of Societies of Industrial Design(ICSID)embraces interior design within its purview, defining it as part of “intellectual profession, and not simply a trade or a service for enterprises.”
Yet, the education of interior designers remains tremendously variable, with no uniformity of pedagogy.Hence, interior design continues to be perceived as an arena open to the specialist and the amateur.This perception is indicative of both the relatively short history of the profession itself and the broader cultural forces of inclusion and interactivity that mark a global society.原文来源：
Board of International Research in Design，Design Dictionary Perspectives on Design Terminology，Birkhäuser Verlag AG 2008
点击咨询 