第一篇:雅思作文:看电视对孩子影响(高分范例)
Topic: Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children.Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that using computers can facilitate children’s study, enrich their social life, broaden their knowledge and provide many other benefits.Yet, using computers on a daily basis introduces more problems than benefits on young children.First of all, using computers everyday causes health problems.We all know that looking at computer screen for a long time will weaken children’s eyesight.Moreover, once a child gets used to this sedentary lifestyle, he or she would exercise less than used to be, and this unhealthy lifestyle will accompany he/she for long.Secondly, computers usually lead to poor academic performance.It is undeniable that students can use computers to gathering information needed by their study.But do young children really need to use computers to do their homework everyday? We all have the experience that primary school or kindergarten homework can be easily finished by using paper and pens.So most children just use computers to play video games or watch Youtube.These activities will lower their interests on study.After all computer games or funny videos are much more interesting than learning math or history.Finally, using computers can lead to the result of isolating children in a small world or
discouraging real interactions.An increasing number of children nowadays prefer to stay at home and play computer games or make friends online through social networks, like Facebook, rather than mixing with their peers.These ‘virtual’ relationships are poor substitute for real friendships.In conclusion, young children can benefit from using computers, but they should avoid overusing computers.
第二篇:雅思大作文:看电视对孩子的影响
最权威的国际教育服务平台
雅思大作文范文:看电视对孩子的影响
本文是雅思大作文范文:看电视对孩子的影响,供大家阅读参考。认真研读一定的雅思范文及作文模板可以帮助我们检验自己的写作水平,并能很好地吸收和应用优秀范文里的优秀内容。
Is watching TV harmful or beneficial for children’s creativity?
TV is an essential part of leisure activities in most families.However, some parents decide not to have a TV set in their homes, in order that their children will devote enough time to invention and creation.Do you agree or disagree with this attitude?
The invention of television, one of the products of modern civilization, has made an enormous change in the lifestyle of human beings.TV has been playing more and more important role in most families after work.Yet, as to whether it is a blessing or a curse, parents often hold widely different opinions and take totally different attitudes.There is suspicion in some parents’ minds that TV might retard their children’s creative ability or restrain kids’ imagination because TV viewers tend to receive information in a passive way instead of discovering things by themselves.Although people working in the TV
资料来源:教育优选 http://www.xiexiebang.com/
最权威的国际教育服务平台
资料来源:教育优选 http://www.xiexiebang.com/
第三篇:雅思高分 广告对孩子影响
2014.4.26
Advertising aimed at children is increasing.Some people think this has negative effects and should be controlled.To what extent do you agree or disagree?faculty of judgment whilst they are making up their minds on what merchandise they should buy, gorgeous advertising lead to the unnecessary consumption.an increasing number of advertising companies without enough consideration.attractive and tastefulmost children have no consuming capacity.desire of purchasing may force children to commit a crime.a child offender who was arrested in a cell phone store stole much money from classmates to
too much concentration on advertising will surely distract children’s attention fromeducation, reading and physical training, which can not only help them do analysis from objective perspective, but enable them to lay a solid foundation to bright future as well.all the influence it brings to children is damaging and negative.
第四篇:雅思高分作文
The increase of food production owns much to fertilizers and better machinery, but some people say it has a negative impact on human health and community.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words.It it evidentially true that advanced machinery and fertilizers, to a large degree, optimize food production.However, by giving it all negative comments, I believe it unreasonable and irrational since it merely represents only one single step rather than the entire processing procedure.It cannot be repudiated that side-effects fertilizers and machinerybring about are somehow obvious.For instance, the chemical substances detrimental to health seep into crops and vegetables along withfertilizers.Sometimes, overdose of any chemical may directly result in certain degrading of body organs.More seriously, the universal application of machinery may replace human labor force as a more efficient substitute, which may lead to the rise of unemployment.Besides, the waste gas generated by all those units will definitely contribute to local air quality or perhaps global warming.Nevertheless, is it true that we, as human beings, should leave all these inventions behind and pretend they have never made a great difference?
On the other side, it is a logical error to take one certain step as the whole process.Currently, along with scientific advancement, people rarely take raw food as in the past.Thanks to the perfection of food processing industry, there are more procedures, such as filtering, degerming, or low-temperature evaporating, to guarantee food quality harmless to human bodies.In addition, many trace elements and other nutrient vitamins are, through advanced operation, compoundedin the food in order to improve the nutrient composition of the food itself.Therefore, it is fairly assertive and parochial to claim fertilizers and machinery have a negative impact.And more ironically, if human beings did not apply them in food production today,there would be no way to feed growing world population.As was previously stated and well discussed, the role and function of fertilizers and machinery in food production is overgeneralized and misinterpreted.Personally, they both serve well in food production, and their flaws are avoidable most of time.
第五篇:雅思高分作文- 教育类
1.It is generally believed that education is of vital importance in individuals’ development and well-being of societies.What should education consist of to fulfill both these functions?
With the rapid development of modern society, education is becoming more and more crucial to both individuals and societies.The issue over what education should consist of has considerably aroused people’s wide concern.In this essay, I seek to explore this complicated topic from diverse perspectives and what influence could be brought.Among the most important aspects education should consist of, one should be stressed is professional knowledge education.On one hand, under the fierce competitive circumstance, people who have professional skills and experience attract many big companies.Therefore, study about one special area gives people more opportunities to hurt an ideal job.On the other hand, this education is also significant to develop societies in a long run.At the second place, what is also worth noticing is that physical education is necessary for students, especially for teenagers.If you want to achieve successfully in the modern societies, strong body is the first premise, which makes you always in sharp.So education should push people to take care themselves and this could bring great benefits to the healthy society.Last but not least, we should not lose sight of psychological education.Psychological problems are serious nowadays and a sizable percentage of people suffer from them.A survey conducted by a famous research organization indicates that over 40 percent of students have various psychological problems, who really need help from school and society.Even worse, if such problems cannot be solved, they could hamper the progress of well-being society.Judging from what I have been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that three aspects cannot be separated in education, which play vital important roles in the growth of individuals and societies.The fulfillment of both people and societies can be done as long as we lay emphasis on three aspects mentioned above.2.Human Society is a long period of building and developing.From
the time man lived in dank caves to nowadays when he lives in such a
modern life with a lot of excellent facilities.The modern life, the
excellent facilities was not a present from god.It was made by people of
all generations who always learned from the past and developed
everything they had learned from it.Thus, I totally disagree with the
statement above that learning about the past has no value.The first reason for this is that learning about the past brings us all the
knowledge and information in the past.Without yesterday, there is no
today.A society can develop only when its people inherit and
understand the achievements of the precursors because the precursors'
achievements were the foundation for everything to develop..For
example, before 1964 there was only black-and-white television but
until now there are kinds of colour televisions that are slim and
innovative such as LCD TV...The black-and-white television made the
basis and gave inventors idea to develop the modern TV nowadays.Consequently our knowledge, success today is the result of constant
work of our ancestors before.Secondly, learning about the past is very essential because it makes us
doubt and take consideration into earlier assumptions.For that reason,people will find out mistakes that were made in the past.This will show
us which roads not to ever go down again and put human in a right way
to develop.Learning about the past is not only learning about the
history but also is learning from our and the others' mistakes.By this
way of learning, people will become more and more experienced and
never make the same mistakes again.Additionally, if learning about the past has no value, people in the world
could speak, could write by themselves without learning from anyone.This is impossible so the value of the past, in this case are the parents,are undeniable.In a nutshell, the past is always a good teacher and we are still bad
students who crave for knowledge.Denying the past also means that we
are destroying the present and our future because no one can jump
without ground to stand on.3.When it comes to the value of history, the discussion of this issue
among individuals and in society as a whole has come into vogue during
the last decade.The statement declares that “learning about the past
has no value for those of us living in the present.” I disagree with
the...there is a thing you have to know.The main reason for my propensity to the importance of history is
that in the business world, there is a saying that you have to know
where you have been and where you are in order to know where you are
going...Furthermore, I agree that business corporations find it critical to
have regular views of the past business performance without
reservations since each corporation has to see what mistakes were
made in order to avoid repeating them.Naturally, they learn from the
past mistakes which prepare them for the future.Let’s bring our discussion to a more present and practical context.It can be given an example that Microsoft usually has regular views of
its past performance, usually in the form of quarterly or annual review.Another equally essential aspect accounting for why I advocate the
value of learning about the past involves the realm of politics and
society.No one can deny that in the international arena, one must
possess a thorough knowledge of history in order to understand the
current dynamics and complex relationships among countries.Obviously, it is imperative that the politicians should learn from the
past political mistakes.History is replete with evidence to demonstrate
this point that the world community learned the great lesson from WWII
that there must not be another world war thus we entered into 40 plus
years of the cold war.However, we should concede that despite the merits of learning
about the past, over extended referring to the past will be indeed
counterproductive, even harmful.The harm it produces is, in my view,both palpable and profound.For the individual, it has a debasing
impact on people’s originality;for the society, it may promote a
tendency toward mechanism ossification.In sum, the advantages of referring to the past outweigh the
disadvantages, but it is imperative to point out that whether historical
information can actively affect our present life depends on whether we
could take rational cognizance of the past and whether we could try to
make breakthrough and whether we could learn from the past failures
and success, especially from the failures.