辩论赛一辩开场

第一篇：辩论赛一辩开场

谢谢主席，大家好。我是正方一辩。来自----我方的观点是在创业的过程中人脉比技术更加的重要！创业就是创业者对自己拥有的资源或通过努力能够拥有的资源进行优化整合，从而创造出更大经济或社会价值的过程。在社会学中人际关系被定义为人们在生产或生活活动过程中所建立的一种社会关系。心理学将人际关系定义为人与人在交往中建立的直接的心理上的联系。中文常指人与人交往关系的总称，也被称为“人际交往”。从上述的定义不难看出人际关系本身便是建立在生产和生活活动，而我们的创业本身便是一种便是一种生产生活活动。我方认为在创业过程中是人脉重要还是技术重要我们完全可以以在创业所用的时间、创业过程所经历的难题、创业最终成功与否来决定。我方认为创业人脉比技术更为重要，其理由有； 第一点：在创业初期我们便要面对着比如资金、项目、市场等困难。而这些条件都是需要我们与外界交流，不是我们单纯靠能力便能解决的，因为市场瞬息万变等你在天时，地利，人和等方面认为准备充分的时候市场又有了很大的变化。在现在21世纪我们的信息传递方式已经十分的便捷了，但便捷的同时并不代表这我们能够随时取到我们有用的信息着。而当我们有了足够的人脉后这些信息便能够随时的关注到。这些可不是只靠工作能力强就能办到的！第二点； 相信大家在平时做小组作业的时候都有一种感觉，就是自己闭门做车不管是怎么的努力到最后却依然是失败。而这个时候便需要一个组长，他也许并不能做多少事情，但是当有了他以后事情便有了合理的分工。这样不需要每个人都能作很多，只要你会一部分，在组长的统一协作下我们就有了一个完整的作品。而这个和我们创业的过程是想通的，我们并不需要有多么大的能力，但是我们必定需要有足够的人脉能够协调统一，集合大家的能力。第三点； 就是我们的一些长辈他们的成功创业，无不都经营着完善丰富的人脉也正是这些人脉成就了他们的成功。曾任美国某大铁路公司总裁的史密斯说：“铁路的95％是人，5％是铁。”美国钢铁大王及成功学大师卡耐基经过长期研究得出结论说：“专业知识在一个人成功中的作用只占15％，而其余的85％则取决于人际关系。”所以说，无论你从事什么职业，学会处理人际关系，掌握并拥有丰厚的人脉资源，你就在成功路上走了85％的路程，在个人幸福的路上走了99％的路程了。无怪乎美国石油大王洛克菲勒说：“我愿意付出比天底下得到其他本领更大的代价来获取与人相处的本领。” 综上所述，我方认为，奥运商业化利大于弊。谢谢各位！

第二篇：英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词

OK.Thanks my fellow debater.Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.We are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’.However, I can’t agree with debaters’ opinion.We insist that upon death, each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ transplant.According to this topic, what is“should be given”? Is it a forced obligation? Donation has the firstly basic principle is voluntary.And what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with voluntary.If lack of voluntary,it is not the “donation” but robbery.The followings are the reasons for our opposition.First of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ transplant.Especially for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the transplant operation is so high even more than 30,000.Besides,after operation, medicine also spent a amount of overhead.All of cost goes beyond the ability to pay for a general family.Secondly, both people and the State do not have right to violate the value with another one.Forced corpse donation on the surface is to defend the patient's right to survival, but meanwhile it destroys the right the dead and his families to choose freely.In addition,the deceased's body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s successor.That is a performance of inherited relationship.However enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited system.The reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need it.Similarly,money is also need

urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO!They are all voluntary donations.Without will of the parties,the donation would become robbery.If we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from

infringement.But he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?

Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any comments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or not.Then,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use or organ donation.Thank you.Yes!The value of others lives is quite precious, but personal belief does not have signification? Chinese traditional belief is that "your body is something you receive from your parents”.Even death, leaving the whole body is not just only a formality,but it represents our respect for human rights, and respect for the deceased.

第三篇：英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词

OK.Thanks my fellow debater.Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.We are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’.However, I can’t agree with debaters’ opinion.We insist that upon death, each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ transplant.According to this topic, what is“should be given”? Is it a forced obligation? Donation has the firstly basic principle is voluntary.And what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with voluntary.If lack of voluntary,it is not the “donation” but robbery.The followings are the reasons for our opposition.First of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ transplant.Especially for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the transplant operation is so high even more than 30,000.Besides,after operation, medicine also spent a amount of overhead.All of cost goes beyond the ability to pay for a general family.Secondly, both people and the State do not have right to violate the value with another one.Forced corpse donation on the surface is to defend the patient's right to survival, but meanwhile it destroys the right the dead and his families to choose freely.In addition,the deceased's body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s successor.That is a performance of inherited relationship.However enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited system.The reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need it.Similarly,money is also need urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO!They are all voluntary donations.Without will of the parties,the donation would become robbery.If we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from infringement.But he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?

Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any comments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or not.Then,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use or organ donation.Thank you.Yes!The value of others lives is quite precious, but personal belief does not have signification? Chinese traditional belief is that "your body is something you receive from your parents”.Even death, leaving the whole body is not just only a formality,but it represents our respect for human rights, and respect for the deceased.

第四篇：辩论赛 一辩

谢谢主席，各位评委，各位来宾，对方辩友：

大家好！

2010年随着全球经济步入复苏关键时期,国际上对于人民币升值的压力不断加大,在这种国际环境下，我们针对人民币升值的利与弊，展开激烈的辩论，我方辩论主题是人民币升值利大于弊。

在辩论之前，我们首先要明确几个概念：

先来认识一下人民币升值的定义：人民币升值在中国解释为人民币走势更贴切，也就是说两种不同货币存款的利差应等同于市场预期的汇率变动的百分比。通俗的意思就是说，中国人的钱值钱了。比如在国际市场（只有在国际市场上才能体现出人民币购买力增强了）上原来一元人民币只能买到单位商品，人民币升值后就能买到更多单位的商品了，人民币升值或贬值是由汇率直观反映出来的。人民币升值用最通俗的话讲就是人民币的购买力增强。

下面，我方将从一下三个方面阐述我方观点：

首先，从宏观上说，人民币升值对航空、造纸、园区开发、房地产、通信运营、通信设备等行业很有利,其将明显受益,主要包括航空、贸易等行业。这些行业由于有较多的外汇负债(特别是美元负债),因此人民币升值将给这些行业带来汇兑损益,特别是像航空类公司,往往都有巨额的美元负债,因此

将明显受益。

其次，从微观上说，人民币升值意味着人民币地位的提高，中国经济在世界经济中地位的提升。而且也可以使中国外债压力减轻和购买力增强，不仅如此，这也意味着中国老百姓手中的财富更加值钱，人民币一升值，老百姓手里的钱就更值钱了，中国的人均GDP全球排名也可以往前挪一挪。只要有点经济常识的都知道，只有中国保持经济高增长，同时，推动人民币完全自由的兑换进程，那么，人民币升值，其成为区域乃至世界货币将为时不远。

再次，人民币升值，国外的能源、原料与生产资料价格都相对便宜了，这就降低了我国引进国外先进技术、设备以及很多重要战略物资的购买成本，增强了购买力。在我国，进口依存度较高的行业主要有石油、天然气、航空、电力设备等，人民币升值将使大宗交易的进口成本降低，进而增强相关行业部门的盈利能力，提高产品的竞争力。从长远看，人民币升值有助于我国外贸增长方式从原来的粗放型转向高质量和高效益的集约型，这会带来出口结构的改善，这符合中国产业结构转变的发展方向。同时，人民币升值会引起行业内更加激烈的竞争，激励企业通过自主研发和技术创新来提高其国际竞争力。

由此可见，人民币升值对于推动我国对外贸易结构的优化升级，激发国内企业自主创新，实现可持续发展都具有重要意义。

最后，我方从人民币升值对国际社会，对国家，对集体，对家庭，以及个人的重要性来证明我方观点。我方坚持认为人民币升值利大于弊。

谢谢!

第五篇：辩论赛一辩稿

谢谢主持人，各位老师，同学大家晚上好

很高兴在此与大家进行“在校大学生创业是利大还是弊大“的讨论。我方的观点是”利大于弊“。在校大学生，即在高等院校存在学籍的学生。创业，即创办事业，它不只是个结果，更是一个过程。在校大学生创业，是指那些有奋斗理想，适合创业的大学生，通过创业来实现自己梦想的过程。时代的变迁赋予了当代大学生不一样的涵义，也给予了当代大学生不一样的生活、思想和追求，创业的可能向广大在校学生提供了一条可行的发展道路，虽然大学生由于自身条件的缺陷，在这个过程中会遇到许多困难，但总的来说它是利大于弊的。

我将从几个方面来论证我方的观点。

第一，从学生自身来看，创业过程本身就是一个学习的过程，“纸上得来终觉浅，绝知此事要躬行“，专业知识学习与课外实践相互结合，是知识经济时代大学生充实自我的必由之路。创业不仅能提高大学生对专业知识的应用能力、实践能力，更能提高大学生的创新意识和创新能力。加入到创业团体中，还可以培养他们的团队精神和改善人际关系。因为年轻，大学生做事更投入，更有激情，更善于纠错和学习，他们中的很多人就是在创业过程中积累经验，健全心智的。

第二，从社会角度来说，大学生创业是解决就业难问题的有效途径。就业难表面上看是因为高校扩招而导致需就业人数剧增，但一个重要的深层次原因是大学生创业意识浅薄，创业能力不强。青年人是最少保守思想的，在大学就尝试创业，显然对今后的成功会奠定坚实的基础。即使十个人中有一个人成功，也会带来社会就业机会的增加，带来社会财富的增加。

第三，上升到民族国家层面，最有竞争力的民族是最具有创新精神的民族。而在校大学生是最具探索精神和创新精神的人群之一，他们对新发明新创造具有最旺盛的活力，对高新科技具有最敏锐的触觉，以及具有强烈的开拓进取意识。在校大学生尝试创业，对民族创新能力的提升，对经济发展新道路的开辟和产业模式的转换都将产生重要的影响。

综上所述，在校大学生创业利大于弊，谢谢。