第一篇：APEC 夏威夷 2011 当代经典书画展的意义
APEC 夏威夷 2011 当代经典书画展的意义
谢柏毅
由中国当代杰出的国画大家、中国国家画院院长杨晓阳先生担纲高端学术主持，中国国家画院长青轩艺术中心艺术总监王恒安先生出任艺术顾问，中国国家画院长青轩艺术中心首席顾问谢柏毅先生和执行理事长常泽女士作为联合策展人的“魅力中华.--当代经典书画展”在APEC夏威夷2011当地时间11月11日下午在夏威夷大学建筑学院开幕。
由于第19届APEC会议也在同一天开幕，原拟出席书画展的政要无法到场，夏威夷州长，檀香山市长分别派出代表出席书画展开幕式。孙中山和平教育基金会主席孙穗芳在和连战伉俪会面后推掉其他约会，专程前来书画展为开幕式主礼。中国驻美国大使
张业遂派出一等秘书林瑞华，中国驻美国洛杉矶领事馆总领事邱绍芳派出领事衔文化参赞车兆和前来书画展开幕式并致辞祝贺。11月11日下午15：00时，展开开幕式在夏威夷大学建筑学院画廊举行了隆重的开幕式，由夏威夷州长夫人Nancy
Arbercombie致开幕词。夏威夷州長夫人南施亞伯肯比代表州長出席祝賀畫展成功。夏威夷州长夫人南施亚伯肯比代表州长出席祝贺画展成功。出席開幕儀式者尚包括檀香山市長代表苑丹，夏州眾議員Awana，檀香山市議員張培志，中國駐洛杉磯文化參事邱領事，國父孫女孫穗芳博士，外曾孫王祖耀，夏大建築學院院長，中華總商會會長許允莊，孔子學院代表等。出席开幕仪式者尚包括檀香山市长代表苑丹，夏州众议员Awana，檀香山市议员张培志，中国驻洛杉矶文化参事邱领事，国父孙女孙穗芳博士，外曾孙王祖耀，夏大建筑学院院长，中华总商会会长许允庄，孔子学院代表等。他們均對此次的畫展表示祝賀與肯定，並感謝夏威夷八達旅行社承辦此次展覽，及策展人中國國家畫院常青軒藝術中心執行理事長常澤女士和首席顧問謝柏毅先生。应邀出席展览开幕式的贵宾有：夏威州长代表、州议员Karen Awana女士，檀香山市长代表、市议员Stanley Chang先生；夏威夷大学校长代表、研究生院主席Spencer Leineweber先生，夏威夷大学孔子学院中方院长李期铿教授，美国国际教育基金会主席周晓博士；中国驻美国大使馆文化处一等秘书林瑞华先生，中国驻洛杉矶总领事馆文化参赞车兆和先生；孙中山和平教育基金会主席，孙中山的孙女孙穗芳博士，中华总商会会长许允庄先生，华人联合总会会长李子健先生；出席APEC的中国企业家代表，也专程到现场对画展在夏威夷APEC会议期间召开表示祝贺。
开幕式进行中，两位艺术家向画展的主办单位、夏威夷州政府和市政府、中国驻洛杉矶总领馆、孙中山和平教育基金会赠送了艺术作品，美国多家华文媒体，华夏电视台、世界日报、檀报、侨报、星岛日报、做了现场报道。
此次画展展出了中国国家画院国画院副院长、院委李宝林先生的画作，他是中国国家画院国家一级画家，在中国画最高学术单位——中国美术家协会中国画艺术委员会担任副主任，并且在汇集了中国最优秀的一批山水画家的中国美术家协会河山画会里担任会长。他的作品被中国各大博物馆、奥林匹克艺术中心、各国收藏家、博物馆收藏。李宝林先生以“师承不仅是技艺的传承，更重要的是事业和精神的传承。”的信念执着地攀登一座又一座艺术大山，不断地丰富、涵养自己，半个世纪的艺术生涯，在人格完善的同时，成就着中国画在二十一世纪的变革与发展。此次画展同时展出了全国政协委员，中国国家画院院委、中国书法家协会副主席言恭达先生（国家一级美术师，享受国务院特殊贡献津贴专家）的经典书画作品《世纪脊梁——言恭达书推动百年中国历史进程人物诗抄》巨幅书法长卷，长卷共选择了孙中山、秋瑾、李大钊、陈独秀、蔡元培、毛泽东、朱德、刘少奇、周恩
来、张澜、李济深、沈钧儒、黄炎培、马叙伦、鲁迅、胡适、陶行知、聂耳、李四光、钱学森、邓小平等二十一位伟人诗文，以中国书法的最高艺术形式——大草书写。世纪伟人们虽已离我们而去，但他们为中华民族的独立与强大，不懈奋斗的革命精神与人文品格，永远为我们后来者所敬仰与怀念，他们是20世纪中华民族的灵魂和脊梁，他们的英名永载史册！
最近国家做出《关于深化文化体制改革推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣若干重大问题的决定》，部署“文化兴国”战略，推动中国文化“走出去”。全面认识祖国传统文化，加强对优秀传统文化思想价值的挖掘和阐发，维护民族文化基本元素，加强文物保护和非物质优秀文化遗产传承，加强对优秀传统文化思想价值的挖掘和发展，使优秀传统文化成为新时代鼓舞中国人民和全体华侨，华人前进的精神力量。
此次画展是实践《关于深化文化体制改革推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣若干重大问题的决定》推动中华文化走向世界，开展多渠道多形式多层次对外文化交流，实施文化走出去工程的先行先试。为今后在夏威夷定期，寻址举办中美文化交流，培育在美华侨华人举办学习交流中国书法绘画规划的第一步。
此次画展也是中国画画界推动中华文化走向世界，开展多渠道多形式多层次对外文化交流，实施文化走出去工程，培育具有国际竞争力的外向型文化企业和中介机构的有益尝试。
本次画展将借APEC会议的契机借助高端性及媒体的国际影响力，旨在弘扬中华传统文化、传播中国书画艺术，以艺术家的经典作品为载体，展示中国软实力。
第二篇：迎新春当代名人书画展
迎新春当代名人书画展！
苗老师的章法，马利的鱼，贾洪吏的猫眼，祝秀琴的虎„，今天各路书画名家作品云集在政协礼堂，为新春到来，为十八大提出推动文化繁荣隆重献礼！因为有了历史的王羲之，才有了今天的兰亭序；也因为今天的兰亭序，才有了历史的王羲之。书画艺术创作固然重要，媒体传播更加不容忽视，没有了传播，也就没有了交流和沟通，同样也没有了作品的优胜比较，再好的作品也只是“养在深润人未识”，而成为被埋没的艺术。“仓廪实而知礼节，衣食足则知荣辱”，是春秋时期管子提出的，意思是物质上富足了，精神上也要相应发展。精神是文化的体现，物质也是文化的体现，社会更是文化的体现。改革开放30余年，我们国家取得了经济建设的空前繁荣，中国人在世界的地位却没有同步提高，因为精神文明建设却明显滞后，人民享受富裕生活的同时，没有感到幸福，经历了十年文化浩劫，文化方向依然迷茫。
2011年10月18日中国共产党第十七届六中全会提出推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣，2012年党的十八大又重新提出推进文化繁荣，这是历史性高瞻远瞩，今天正是在这样的大好环境下，我们推出本次迎新春书画展，它是迎接文化新春的到来，迎接文化新纪元的到来，迎接文化新繁荣时期的到来。“继承与传承”，是苗培红老师对书法艺术的指导思想，今天的书展既是继承与传承的延续，也是拉开世界华侨华人社团联合总会与北京梁邹书画院文化之旅联谊的序幕，优秀的书画作品和书法艺术将为海外出展奠定基础。借助世侨会在世界各地的华人侨领走向世界，推进中国书法文明影响世界。中国汉字是唯一的象形文字，每一个字都是一篇文章和一个故事，演变和发展承载着一个民族独有的文明，惟妙惟肖、美轮美奂，象舞蹈一样在艺术家笔峰演绎着现代和复古的穿梭。
“兰亭一序醉千年，何愁今日不羲之”。今天成千上万的书法爱好者，书画艺术家正在演绎着“洛阳纸贵”历史文化盛景，文化的繁荣何愁不会到来呢，影响历史的书画大家时代也一定会浮现。
拾金不昧是人类崇尚的生活文明，而中华文明却阐释着“路不拾遗”另一个高度，就像同样是歌曲，一个是儿歌，而一个却是美声，这就是中华傲视世界的文明，这一点，书画艺术以独有的方式承载着。人生漫长却难足百年，而百年人生在五千年历史长河中只是昙花一现，我们没有理由去争议经过了历史筛选沉淀下来的优秀文化，却有义务将民族的精华传承下去，对子孙后代负责。对今天短暂的文化沧桑一定抱有信心，老祖宗创造的文明在经济繁荣之后一定会回归。
物质世界的满足永远不能填补精神世界的空虚，经济的腾飞也不是一个民族真正的崛起，老祖宗不会欺骗子孙后代，就像父母不会欺骗自己的孩子，继承老祖宗的文化，传承民族文化的文明，精神文明与物质文明的同步发展，让诚信回归、让文化繁荣，才是实现中华民族的真正复兴！
预祝本次书画展取得圆满成功！预祝大家新春快乐、和谐幸福！
第三篇：奥巴马在夏威夷apec会议上的演讲
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Good afternoon, everybody.Aloha.I want to begin by thanking the people of Hawaii for their extraordinary hospitality.Usually when Michelle and I and our daughters come back to visit, it's just one President, and this time we brought 21.So thank you so much for the incredible graciousness of the people of Hawaii--and their patience, because I know that traffic got tied up a little bit.Now, the single greatest challenge for the United States right now, and my highest priority as President, is creating jobs and putting Americans back to work.And one of the best ways to do that is to increase our trade and exports with other nations.Ninety-five percent of the world's consumers are beyond our borders.I want them to be buying goods with three words stamped on them: Made in America.So I've been doing everything I can to make sure that the United States is competing aggressively for the jobs and the markets of the future.No region will do more to shape our long-term economic future than the Asia Pacific region.As I've said, the United States is, and always will be, a Pacific nation.Many of our top trading partners are in this region.This is where we sell most of our exports, supporting some 5 million American jobs.And since this is the world's fastest growing region, the Asia Pacific is key to achieving my goal of doubling U.S.exports--a goal, by the way, which we are on track right now to meet.And that's why I've been proud to host APEC this year.It's been a chance to help lead the way towards a more seamless regional economy with more trade, more exports, and more jobs for our people.And I'm pleased that we've made progress in three very important areas.First, we agreed to a series of steps that will increase trade and bring our economies even closer.We agreed to a new set of principles on innovation to encourage the entrepreneurship that creates new businesses and new industries.With simplified customs and exemptions from certain tariffs we'll encourage more businesses to engage in more trade.And that includes our small businesses, which account for the vast majority of the companies in our economies.We agreed to a new initiative that will make it easier and faster for people to travel and conduct business across the region.And yesterday, I was pleased to sign legislation, a new travel card that will help our American businessmen and women travel more easily and get deals done in this region.I'd note that we also made a lot of progress increasing trade on the sidelines of APEC.As I announced yesterday, the United States and our eight partners reached the broad outlines of an agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership.And today I’m pleased that Japan, Canada and Mexico have now expressed an interest in this effort.This comes on the heels of our landmark trade agreements with South Korea, Panama and Colombia, which will support tens of thousands of American jobs.And in my meeting with President Medvedev, we discussed how to move ahead with Russia’s accession to the WTO, which will also mean more exports for American manufacturers and American farmers and ranchers.Second, APEC agreed on ways to promote the green growth we need for our energy security.We agreed to reduce tariffs on environmental goods and make it easier to export clean energy technologies that create green jobs.We raised the bar on ourselves and we’ll aim for even higher energy efficiencies.And we’re moving ahead with the effort to phase out fossil fuel subsidies.This would be a huge step toward creating clean energy economies and fighting climate change, which is a threat to both the beauty and the prosperity of the region.Third, we’re redoubling our efforts to make sure that regulations are encouraging trade and job creation, not discouraging trade and job creation.And this builds on the work that we’re doing in the United States to get rid of rules and regulations that are unjustified and that are overly burdensome.Our APEC partners are joining us in streamlining and coordinating regulations so that we’re sparking innovation and growth even as we protect public health and our environment.And finally, since many of the leaders here were also at the recent G20 summit, we continued our efforts to get the global economy to grow faster.APEC makes up more than half the global economy, and it will continue to play a key role in achieving the strong and balanced growth that we need.As I’ve said, as the world’s largest economy, the best thing that the United States can do for the global economy is to grow our own economy faster.And so I will continue to fight for the American Jobs Act so that we can put our people back to work.I was glad to see that Congress moved forward on one aspect of the jobs bill--tax credits for companies that are hiring veterans.But we’ve got to do a lot more than that.So, again, I want to thank the people of Hawaii for their extraordinary hospitality and for all that they’ve done to help make this summit such a success.I want to thank my fellow leaders for the seriousness and sense of common purpose that they brought to our work.And I believe that the progress we’ve made here will help create jobs and keep America competitive in a region that is absolutely vital not only for our economy but also for our national security.So, with that, I’m going to take a few questions.I’ll start with Ben Feller of AP.Q
Thank you very much, Mr.President.I’d like to ask you about Iran.Did you get any specific commitments from Russia or China on tightening sanctions? Did you move them at all? And do you fear the world is running out of options short of military intervention to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: One of the striking things over the last three years since I came into office is the degree of unity that we’ve been able to forge in the international community with respect to Iran.When I came into office, the world was divided and Iran was unified around its nuclear program.We now have a situation where the world is united and Iran is isolated.And because of our diplomacy and our efforts, we have, by far, the strongest sanctions on Iran that we’ve ever seen.And China and Russia were critical to making that happen.Had they not been willing to support those efforts in the United Nations, we would not be able to see the kind of progress that we’ve made.And they’re having an impact.All our intelligence indicates that Iran’s economy is suffering as a consequence of this.And we’re also seeing that Iran’s influence in the region has ebbed, in part because their approach to repression inside of Iran is contrary to the Arab Spring that has been sweeping the Middle East.So we are in a much stronger position now than we were two or three years ago with respect to Iran.Having said that, the recent IAEA report indicates what we already knew, which is, although Iran does not possess a nuclear weapon and is technically still allowing IAEA observers into their country, that they are engaging in a series of practices that are contrary to their international obligations and their IAEA obligations.And that’s what the IAEA report indicated.So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don’t trigger a nuclear arms race in the region.That’s in the interests of all of us.In terms of how we move forward, we will be consulting with them carefully over the next several weeks to look at what other options we have available to us.The sanctions have enormous bite and enormous scope, and we’re building off the platform that has already been established.The question is, are there additional measures that we can take.And we’re going to explore every avenue to see if we can solve this issue diplomatically.I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it’s my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States.But our strong preference is to have Iran meet its international obligations, negotiate diplomatically, to allow them to have peaceful use of nuclear energy in accordance with international law, but at the same time, forswear the weaponization of nuclear power.And so we’re going to keep on pushing on that.And China and Russia have the same aims, the same objectives, and I believe that we’ll continue to cooperate and collaborate closely on that issue.Dan Lothian.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.Last night at the Republican debate, some of the hopefuls--they hope to get your job--they defended the practice of waterboarding, which is a practice that you banned in 2009.Herman Cain said, “I don’t see that as torture.”
Michelle Bachmann said that it’s “very effective.”
So I’m wondering if you think that they’re uninformed, out of touch, or irresponsible?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: That’s a multiple-choice question, isn’t it?(Laughter.)Let me just say this: They’re wrong.Waterboarding is torture.It’s contrary to America’s traditions.It’s contrary to our ideals.That’s not who we are.That’s not how we operate.We don’t need it in order to prosecute the war on terrorism.And we did the right thing by ending that practice.If we want to lead around the world, part of our leadership is setting a good example.And anybody who has actually read about and understands the practice of waterboarding would say that that is torture.And that's not something we do--period.Norah O'Donnell.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.If I could continue on that, the Republicans did have a debate on CBS last night.A lot of it was about foreign policy, and they were very critical of your record--
PRESIDENT OBAMA: That's shocking.(Laughter.)
Q
So if I could get you to respond to something that Mitt Romney said.He said your biggest foreign policy failure is Iran.He said that if you are reelected Iran will have a nuclear weapon.Is Mitt Romney wrong?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: I am going to make a practice of not commenting on whatever is said in Republican debates until they've got an actual nominee.But as I indicated to Ben in the earlier question, you take a look at what we've been able to accomplish in mobilizing the world community against Iran over the last three years and it shows steady, determined, firm progress in isolating the Iranian regime, and sending a clear message that the world believes it would be dangerous for them to have a nuclear weapon.Now, is this an easy issue? No.Anybody who claims it is, is either politicking or doesn’t know what they're talking about.But I think not only the world, but the Iranian regime understands very clearly how determined we are to prevent not only a nuclear Iran but also a nuclear arms race in the region, and a violation of nonproliferation norms that would have implications around the world, including in the Asia Pacific region where we have similar problems with North Korea.David Nakamura.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.Yesterday in a speech before business leaders, you said that you want China to play by the rules.And then your staff later said that, in a bilateral meeting with President Hu, that you expressed that American business leaders are growing frustrated with the pace of change in China's economy.What rules is China not playing by? What specific steps do you need to see from China? And what punitive actions is your administration willing to take, as you said it would yesterday, if China does not play by the rules?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, first of all, I also said yesterday that we welcome the peaceful rise of China.It is in America's interests to see China succeed in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.China can be a source of stability and help to underwrite international norms and codes of conduct.And so what we've done over the last two years is to try to develop a frank, consistent, open relationship and dialogue with China, and it's yielded considerable benefits--for example, support for issues like Iran.But what I've also said to Chinese leadership since I came into office is that when it comes to their economic practices, there are a range of things that they have done that disadvantage not just the United States but a whole host of their trading partners and countries in the region.The most famous example is the issue of China's currency.Most economists estimate that the RMB is devalued by 20 to 25 percent.That means our exports to China are that much more expensive, and their imports into the United States are that much cheaper.Now, there's been slight improvement over the last year, partly because of U.S.pressure, but it hasn’t been enough.And it's time for them to go ahead and move towards a market-based system for their currency.We recognize they may not be able to do it overnight, but they can do it much more quickly than they’ve done it so far.And, by the way, that would not necessarily be a bad thing for the Chinese economy, because they’ve been so focused on export-driven growth that they’ve neglected domestic consumption, building up domestic markets.It makes them much more vulnerable to shocks in the global economy.It throws the whole world economy out of balance because they’re not buying as much as they could be from other countries.And this is not something that’s inconsistent with where Chinese leadership say they want to go.The problem is, is that you’ve got a bunch of export producers in China who like the system as it is, and making changes are difficult for them politically.I get it.But the United States and other countries, I think understandably, feel that enough is enough.That’s not the only concern we have.Intellectual property rights and protections--companies that do business in China consistently report problems in terms of intellectual property not being protected.Now, that’s particularly important for an advanced economy like ours, where that’s one of our competitive advantages, is we’ve got great engineers, great entrepreneurs, we’re designing extraordinary new products.And if they get no protection and the next thing you know China is operating as a low-cost producer and not paying any fees or revenues to folks who invented these products, that’s a problem.So those are two examples, but there are a number of others.These practices aren’t secret.I think everybody understands that they’ve been going on for quite some time.Sometimes, American companies are wary about bringing them up because they don’t want to be punished in terms of their ability to do business in China.But I don’t have that same concern, so I bring it up.And in terms of enforcement, the other thing that we’ve been doing is actually trying to enforce the trade laws that are in place.We’ve brought a number of cases--one that the U.S.press may be familiar with are the cases involving U.S.tires, where we brought very aggressive actions against China and won.And as a consequence, U.S.producers are in a better position, and that means more U.S.jobs.So I think we can benefit from trade with China.And I want certainly to continue cultivating a constructive relationship with the Chinese government, but we’re going to continue to be firm in insisting that they operate by the same rules that everybody else operates under.We don’t want them taking advantage of the United States or U.S.businesses.Jake Tapper.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.The other day you told ESPN that the scandal at Penn State--which you said was heartbreaking--should prompt some soul-searching throughout the nation.I’m wondering if you could elaborate on that, what exactly you meant and--I know you’re a big fan of college sports--if this something you think that is an indictment not just of what happened at Penn State, allegedly, but how athletics are revered in universities.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, I think that’s the kind of soul-searching that I was referring to, Jake.You’re right, I’m a big college sports fan.I think that when it’s kept in perspective, college athletics not only provides a great outlet for competition for our young people, but helps to bring a sense of community and can help to brand a university in a way that is fun and important.But what happened at Penn State indicates that at a certain point, folks start thinking about systems and institutions and don’t think about individuals.And when you think about how vulnerable kids are, for the alleged facts of that case to have taken place and for folks not to immediately say, nothing else matters except making sure those kids are protected, that’s a problem.It’s not unique to a college sports environment.I mean, we’ve seen problems in other institutions that are equally heartbreaking.Not all of them involve children, by the way.There have been problems, obviously, with respect to sexual abuse or assault directed against women, where institutions sort of closed ranks instead of getting on top of it right away.And that’s why I said I think all institutions, not just universities or sports programs, have to step back and take stock, and make sure that we’re doing everything we can to protect people who may be vulnerable in these circumstances, but also just keep in mind what’s important--making sure that our excitement about a college sports program doesn’t get in the way of our basic human response when somebody is being hurt.And it’s been said that evil can thrive in the world just by good people standing by and doing nothing.And all of us I think have occasion where we see something that’s wrong, we’ve got to make sure that we step up.That’s true in college athletics.That’s true in our government.That’s true everywhere.Julianna Goldman.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.In conversations that you’ve had over the past couple of days with Asia Pacific leaders, have any of them brought up the rhetoric that we’re seeing from Republican presidential candidates when it comes to China? And does that kind of rhetoric or posturing jeopardize the progress that your administration has made with China and the Asia Pacific region as a whole?
THE PRESIDENT: I think most leaders here understand that politics is not always measured or on the level, and so most of our discussions have to do with substance: How do we put our people back to work right now? How do we expand trade? How do we expand exports?
I’ve been very frank with Chinese leaders, though, in saying that the American people across the board--left, right and center--believe in trade, believe in competition.We think we’ve got the best workers in the world.We think we’ve got the best universities, the best entrepreneurs, the best free market.We’re ready to go out there and compete with anybody.But there is a concern across the political spectrum that the playing field is not level right now.And so, in conversations with President Hu and others, what I’ve tried to say is we have the opportunity to move in a direction in which this is a win-win: China is benefiting from trade with the United States;the United States is benefiting as well.Jobs are being created in the United States and not just in China.But right now things are out of kilter.And that is something that is shared across the board, as we saw with the recent vote on the Chinese currency issue in the Senate.And I think leaders in the region understand that as China grows, as its economic influence expands, that the expectation is, is that they will be a responsible leader in the world economy--which is what the United States has tried to do.I mean, we try to set up rules that are universal, that everybody can follow, and then we play by those rules.And then we compete fiercely.But we don’t try to game the system.That’s part of what leadership is about.China has the opportunity to be that same type of leader.And as the world’s second-largest economy, I think that’s going to be important not just for this region, but for the world.But that requires them to take responsibility, to understand that their role is different now than it might have been 20 years ago or 30 years ago, where if they were breaking some rules, it didn’t really matter, it did not have a significant impact.You weren’t seeing huge trade imbalances that had consequences for the world financial system.Now they’ve grown up, and so they’re going to have to help manage this process in a responsible way.Laura Meckler.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.Why did you get rid of the aloha shirts and the grass skirts?(Laughter.)Are you at all concerned that it not appear that you’re having a party over here while so many people are living with such a tough economy? And I’m wondering if those perceptions were at all on your mind as you were making plans for this trip, which, by necessity, takes you to some pretty exotic and fun locations.PRESIDENT OBAMA: I got rid of the Hawaiian shirts because I had looked at pictures of some of the previous APEC meetings and some of the garb that had appeared previously, and I thought this may be a tradition that we might want to break.I suggested to the leaders--we gave them a shirt, and if they wanted to wear the shirt, I promise you it would have been fine.But I didn’t hear a lot of complaints about us breaking precedent on that one.With respect to this trip, look, this is a pretty nice piece of scenery here and I take enormous pride in having been raised in the state of Hawaii, but we’re here for business.We’re here to create jobs.We’re here to promote exports.And we’ve got a set of tangible, concrete steps that have been taken that are going to make our economy stronger, and that’s part of what our leadership has been about.When I went to Europe last week, our job was to help shape a solution for the European crisis.And a lot of folks back home might have wondered, well, that’s Europe’s problem;why are we worrying about it? Well, if Europe has a major recession, and the financial system in Europe starts spinning out of control, that will have a direct impact on U.S.growth and our ability to create jobs and people raising their living standards.The same is true out here.If we’re not playing out here in the world’s largest regional economy and the world’s fastest regional economy, if we’ve abandoned the field and we’re not engaged, American businesses will lose out and those jobs won’t be in the United States of America.So part of my job is to make sure that the rules of the road are set up so that our folks can compete effectively.Part of my job is to sell America and our products and our services around the world, and I think we’ve done so very effectively.And as I said, just to take the example of exports, we’re on track to double our exports since I came into office.That was a goal I set, and we’re on track to meet it.That’s actually been one of the stronger parts of our economic growth over the last couple of years.And I want to make sure that we keep on driving that.Chuck Todd.Q
Thank you, Mr.President.The Republican co-chair of the super committee, Jeb Hensarling, went on TV today and said if the sequester happens--this idea of the automatic cuts in Medicare and defense--that there was plenty of motivation and plenty of votes to change the makeup of these automatic cuts.I know you had a conversation with him about this and said that changing it in any way was off the table, that means you’re going to veto this bill, if that’s the case, if it ends up they can’t get a deal in the next 10 days.And then, can you clarify your end of the “hot mic” conversation with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, as it involved Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Could I just say that Chuck is the only guy who asked two questions--so far.So just--when I cut off here, whoever was next in the queue--I’m messing with you, Chuck.With respect to the super committee, in August we negotiated to initiate a trillion dollars in cuts over the next 10 years--primarily out of discretionary spending--but we also said that in order for us to move towards a more stable fiscal condition that we’re going to have to get an additional $1.2 trillion--minimum.I actually argued that we needed more than that.And the whole idea of the sequester was to make sure that both sides felt obligated to move off rigid positions and do what was required to help the country.And since that time, they’ve had a lot of conversations, but it feels as if people continue to try to stick with their rigid positions rather than solve the problem.Now, I’ve put forward a very detailed approach that would achieve $3 trillion-plus in savings.And it’s the sort of balanced approach that the American people prefer.It says everything is on the table.We’ve got to have discretionary spending cuts of the sort we’ve already put in place.We’ve got to have non-defense cuts.We’ve got to have defense cuts.We’re going to have to look at entitlement programs.We’ve got to reduce our health care costs.And we’re going to need additional revenue.And when we’re talking about revenue, if we’ve got to raise money, it makes sense for us to start by asking the wealthiest among us to pay a little bit more before we start asking seniors, for example, to pay a lot more for their Medicare.Now, this is the same presentation that I made to Speaker Boehner back in August.It’s the same kind of balanced approach that every single independent committee that’s looked at this has said needs to be done.And it just feels as if people keep on wanting to jigger the math so that they get a different outcome.Well, the equation, no matter how you do it, is going to be the same.If you want a balanced approach that doesn’t gut Medicare and Medicaid, doesn’t prevent us from making investments in education and basic science and research--all the things we’ve been talking about here at APEC, that every world leader understands is the key for long-term economic success--then prudent cuts have to be matched up with revenue.My hope is that over the next several days, the congressional leadership on the super committee go ahead and bite the bullet and do what needs to be done--because the math won’t change.There’s no magic formula.There are no magic beans that you can toss on the ground and suddenly a bunch of money grows on trees.We got to just go ahead and do the responsible thing.And I’m prepared to sign legislation that is balanced, that solves this problem.One other thing that I want to say about this: When I meet with world leaders, what’s striking--whether it’s in Europe or here in Asia--the kinds of fundamental reforms and changes both on the revenue side and the public pension side that other countries are having to make are so much more significant than what we need to do in order to get our books in order.This doesn’t require radical changes to America or its way of life.It just means that we spread out the sacrifice across every sector so that it’s fair;so that people don’t feel as if once again people who are well connected, people who have lobbyists, special interests get off easy, and the burden is placed on middle-class families that are already struggling.So if other countries can do it, we can do it--and we can do it in a responsible way.I’m not going to comment on whether I’d veto a particular bill until I actually see a bill, because I still hold out the prospect that there’s going to be a light-bulb moment where everybody says “Ah-ha!Here’s what we’ve got to do.”
With respect to the “hot mic” in France, I’m not going to comment on conversations that I have with individual leaders, but what I will say is this: The primary conversation I had with President Sarkozy in that meeting revolved around my significant disappointment that France had voted in favor of the Palestinians joining UNESCO, knowing full well that under our laws, that would require the United States cutting off funding to UNESCO, and after I had consistently made the argument that the only way we’re going to solve the Middle East situation is if Palestinians and Israelis sit down at the table and negotiate;that it is not going to work to try to do an end run through the United Nations.So I had a very frank and firm conversation with President Sarkozy about that issue.And that is consistent with both private and public statements that I’ve been making to everybody over the last several months.Ed Henry.Q
Mr.President, I have three questions--(laughter)--starting with Mitt Romney.Just one question, I promise.(Laughter.)
You started with a $447-billion jobs bill.Two months later, many speeches later, you’ve got virtually nothing from that.You’ve got the veterans jobs bill--which is important, obviously--and a lot of executive orders.Are you coming to the realization that you may just get nothing here and go to the American people in 2012 without another jobs bill, 9 percent unemployment, and then wondering about your leadership, sir?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, I think--I think, first of all, the American people, at this point, are wondering about congressional leadership in failing to pass the jobs bill, the components of which the majority of Americans, including many Republicans, think are a good idea.And that's part of the reason why the American people right now aren’t feeling real good about Congress.Normally, by the way, the way politics works is if the overwhelming majority of the American people aren’t happy with what you're doing you start doing something different.So far that hasn’t happened in Congress--and the Republicans in Congress, in particular.They don't seem to have that same sense of urgency about needing to put people back to work.I'm going to keep on pushing.My expectation is, is that we will get some of it done now, and I'll keep on pushing until we get all of it done.And that may take me all the way to November to get it all done.And it may take a new Congress to get it all done.But the component parts--cutting taxes for middle-class families, cutting taxes for small businesses that are hiring our veterans and hiring the long-term unemployed, putting teachers back in the classroom--here in the state of Hawaii, you have a bunch of kids who are going to school four days a week because of budget problems.How are we going to win the competition in the 21st century with our kids going to school basically halftime? The jobs bill would help alleviate those budget pressures at the state level.Rebuilding our infrastructure.Every world leader that you talk to, they're saying to themselves, how can we make sure we've got a first-class infrastructure? And as you travel through the Asia Pacific region, you see China having better airports than us, Singapore having superior ports to ours.Well, that's going to impact our capacity to do business here, our capacity to trade, our capacity to get U.S.products made by U.S.workers into the fastest-growing market in the world.And by the way, we could put a lot of people back to work at the same time.So I'm going to keep on pushing.And my expectation is, is that we will just keep on chipping away at this.If you're asking me do I anticipate that the Republican leadership in the House or the Senate suddenly decide that I was right all along and they will adopt a hundred percent of my proposals, the answer is, no, I don't expect that.Do I anticipate that at some point they recognize that doing nothing is not an option? That's my hope.And that should be their hope, too, because if they don't, I think we'll have a different set of leaders in Congress.All right? Thank you very much, everybody.Thank you.
第四篇：奥巴马在夏威夷APEC峰会第一阶段会议的开幕词
US President Obama’s Opening Remarks at APEC Session One
J.W.Marriott Resort Hotel
Honolulu, Hawaii November 13, 2011
美国总统奥巴马在亚太经合组织峰会第一阶段会议上的开幕词
J.W.万豪酒店 夏威夷檀香山 2011年11月13日
Good morning, everybody.It is my great pleasure to welcome all of you, officially, to the APEC Leaders Meeting.This is the first time in nearly 20 years that the United States has hosted this forum, and it comes at a time when America is very focused on how we can work together in a cooperative, effective way in the Trans-Pacific region.各位早上好。我十分高兴正式欢迎各位出席亚太经合组织领导人会议。这是美国将近20年来首次主办亚太经合组织会议，此次会议的召开正值美国全力关注我们如何在跨太平洋地区以合作、有效的方式作出共同努力的时刻。
And obviously I'm particularly pleased that we’re meeting in my home state of Hawaii, which reflects the deep connections between the peoples of our region.And I hope everybody had a wonderful evening last night.I've heard that some of you wanted to join in the hula dancing--(laughter)--I'm sorry we did not give you that opportunity.毫无疑问，我为各位聚集在我的家乡夏威夷州出席这次会议感到特别高兴，这体现了我们这一地区各国人民之间的深切联系。我希望昨晚大家过得非常愉快。我听说，你们中有些人想参加呼拉舞会——（笑声）——但很抱歉，我们未能给大家这样的机会。
Now it’s time to get down to work, and we have much to do.Our 21 economies--our nearly 3 billion citizens--are looking to us to bring our economies closer, to increase exports, to expand trade and opportunity that creates jobs and economic growth.That’s why we’re here.现在该着手工作了，我们有很多事情要做。我们21个经济体——将近30亿人口——期待着我们加强各经济体之间的联系，增加出口，扩大贸易和机会以创造就业和促进经济增长。这就是我们举行这次会议的目的。
I'm confident that we can make significant progress.We’ve done it before.Since APEC started, we’ve slashed tariffs and barriers to trade and investment.Commerce in the region has soared--creating new jobs, new markets and raising living standards across the region.我相信我们能够取得重大的进展。我们过去做到了这一点。自亚太经合组织成立以来，我们削减了关税以及贸易与投资的障碍。本地区的商贸往来大增，从而创造了新的就业岗位，开辟了新的市场，提高了整个地区的生活水平。
And I want to emphasize that the Asia Pacific region is absolutely critical to America's economic growth.We consider it a top priority.And we consider it a top priority because we're not going to be able to put our folks back to work and grow our economy and expand opportunity unless the Asia Pacific region is also successful.我想强调，亚太地区对美国的经济增长绝对重要。我们将这一地区视作首要重点。我们之所以将这一地区视作首要重点是因为我们将无法使我们的人民重返工作岗位、使我们的经济获得增长、机会进一步扩大，除非亚太地区也获得成功。
This region includes many of our top trading partners.This is where we do most of our trade and where we sell most of our exports.It's also the fastest growing region in the world.And as a consequence, the Asia Pacific region is key to achieving my goal of doubling U.S.exports and creating new jobs.亚太地区包含很多我们的主要贸易伙伴。这是我们进行最多的贸易和出口最多商品的地区，也是世界上经济增长最快的地区。因此，亚太地区对实现美国出口翻倍和创造新的就业机会的目标至关重要。
Today, we've got an opportunity to make progress towards our ultimate goal, which is a seamless regional economy.We’re going to be focusing on three specific areas: increasing trade and investment, promoting green jobs, and streamlining and coordinating regulations so that we encourage trade and job creation.And more broadly, we’ll be discussing how we can work together to spur on quicker economic growth and more sturdy and sustainable economic growth.The economies of this region have a critical role to play in addressing the imbalances and making sure that growth is balanced and sustainable in the future.今天，我们得到机会为实现我们的最终目标——无缝地区经济——取得进展。我们将集中关注三个具体领域：增加贸易与投资，促进绿色就业，为鼓励贸易和创造就业机会而提高和协调规制。在更广的范围内，我们将讨论如何进行合作以促进更快速的经济增长以及更强劲和持续的经济增长。本地区各经济体应发挥关键性的作用以解决不平衡的问题，确保未来平衡、可持续的经济增长。
So I want to thank my fellow leaders for being here.I’m confident that we can continue to make significant progress during the course of this day.因此，我要感谢各位领导人前来出席会议。我相信我们在这一天的过程中能够继续取得重大的进展。
Before we begin discussing this morning's topic, I want to congratulate Japan on the superb job it did in hosting APEC in 2010.Prime Minister Noda of Japan set a high bar for us, so we are going to try to follow your footsteps.在开始讨论今天上午的议题前，我想祝贺日本十分出色地主办了2010年的亚太经合组织会议。日本首相野田为我们设定了很高的标准，我们将努力赶上。
I also want to recognize the outstanding work that's been done by our officials and ministers during the course of this year to move forward an ambitious set of initiatives.我还想对我们的官员和部长们在这一年中为推动一套宏伟的行动计划所作的出色工作表示赞赏。
The focus of our host year was to make progress towards a seamless regional economy, and we have made progress in the three themes that we set out--regional economic integration, green growth, and regulatory reform.We have agreed to address a set of next-generation trade issues, including removing frictions in the global supply chains, helping small and medium-size enterprises grow and better plug into the global trading system, and adopting smart, market-oriented innovation policies.Innovation is especially critical to all of us, and we all want to take appropriate steps to encourage it, because without it we can't grow, become more productive or create enough jobs.我们担任亚太经合组织会议主办国的这一年的重点目标是朝着无缝地区经济的方向迈进，我们在已确定的三大议题方面——地区经济一体化、绿色增长和规制改革——取得进展。我们一致同意解决一系列下一代的贸易问题，包括排除全球供应链中的摩擦、帮助中小企业发展并更加适应全球贸易体系以及采纳明智的、以市场为导向的创新政策。创新对我们大家尤其重要，我们都想采取恰当的步骤鼓励创新，因为没有创新就没有增长，无法提高生产率，无法创造足够的就业机会。
第五篇：奥巴马在夏威夷APEC峰会第一阶段会议的开幕词
奥巴马在夏威夷APEC峰会第一阶段会议的开幕词时间:2011-12-01 13:01来源:口译网 作者:口译网 点击:4945次
US President Obama’s Opening Remarks at APEC Session One J.W.Marriott Resort Hotel Honolulu, Hawaii November 13, 2011
美国总统奥巴马在亚太经合组织峰会第一阶段会议上的开幕词 J.W.万豪酒店 夏威夷檀香山 2011年11月13日
Good morning, everybody.It is my great pleasure to welcome all of you, officially, to the APEC Leaders Meeting.This is the first time in nearly 20 years that the United States has hosted this forum, and it comes at a time when America is very focused on how we can work together in a cooperative, effective way in the Trans-Pacific region.各位早上好。我十分高兴正式欢迎各位出席亚太经合组织领导人会议。这是美国将近20年来首次主办亚太经合组织会议，此次会议的召开正值美国全力关注我们如何在跨太平洋地区以合作、有效的方式作出共同努力的时刻。
And obviously I'm particularly pleased that we’re meeting in my home state of Hawaii, which reflects the deep connections between the peoples of our region.And I hope everybody had a wonderful evening last night.I've heard that some of you wanted to join in the hula dancing--(laughter)--I'm sorry we did not give you that opportunity.毫无疑问，我为各位聚集在我的家乡夏威夷州出席这次会议感到特别高兴，这体现了我们这一地区各国人民之间的深切联系。我希望昨晚大家过得非常愉快。我听说，你们中有些人想参加呼拉舞会——（笑声）——但很抱歉，我们未能给大家这样的机会。
Now it’s time to get down to work, and we have much to do.Our 21 economies--our nearly 3 billion citizens--are looking to us to bring our economies closer, to increase exports, to expand trade and opportunity that creates jobs and economic growth.That’s why we’re here.现在该着手工作了，我们有很多事情要做。我们21个经济体——将近30亿人口——期待着我们加强各经济体之间的联系，增加出口，扩大贸易和机会以创造就业和促进经济增长。这就是我们举行这次会议的目的。
I'm confident that we can make significant progress.We’ve done it before.Since APEC started, we’ve slashed tariffs and barriers to trade and investment.Commerce in the region has soared--creating new jobs, new markets and raising living standards across the region.我相信我们能够取得重大的进展。我们过去做到了这一点。自亚太经合组织成立以来，我们削减了关税以及贸易与投资的障碍。本地区的商贸往来大增，从而创造了新的就业岗位，开辟了新的市场，提高了整个地区的生活水平。
And I want to emphasize that the Asia Pacific region is absolutely critical to America's economic growth.We consider it a top priority.And we consider it a top priority because we're not going to be able to put our folks back to work and grow our economy and expand opportunity unless the Asia Pacific region is also successful.我想强调，亚太地区对美国的经济增长绝对重要。我们将这一地区视作首要重点。我们之所以将这一地区视作首要重点是因为我们将无法使我们的人民重返工作岗位、使我们的经济获得增长、机会进一步扩大，除非亚太地区也获得成功。
This region includes many of our top trading partners.This is where we do most of our trade and where we sell most of our exports.It's also the fastest growing region in the world.And as a consequence, the Asia Pacific region is key to achieving my goal of doubling U.S.exports and creating new jobs.亚太地区包含很多我们的主要贸易伙伴。这是我们进行最多的贸易和出口最多商品的地区，也是世界上经济增长最快的地区。因此，亚太地区对实现美国出口翻倍和创造新的就业机会的目标至关重要。
Today, we've got an opportunity to make progress towards our ultimate goal, which is a seamless regional economy.We’re going to be focusing on three specific areas: increasing trade and investment, promoting green jobs, and streamlining and coordinating regulations so that we encourage trade and job creation.And more broadly, we’ll be discussing how we can work together to spur on quicker economic growth and more sturdy and sustainable economic growth.The economies of this region have a critical role to play in addressing the imbalances and making sure that growth is balanced and sustainable in the future.今天，我们得到机会为实现我们的最终目标——无缝地区经济——取得进展。我们将集中关注三个具体领域：增加贸易与投资，促进绿色就业，为鼓励贸易和创造就业机会而提高和协调规制。在更广的范围内，我们将讨论如何进行合作以促进更快速的经济增长以及更强劲和持续的经济增长。本地区各经济体应发挥关键性的作用以解决不平衡的问题，确保未来平衡、可持续的经济增长。
So I want to thank my fellow leaders for being here.I’m confident that we can continue to make significant progress during the course of this day.因此，我要感谢各位领导人前来出席会议。我相信我们在这一天的过程中能够继续取得重大的进展。
Before we begin discussing this morning's topic, I want to congratulate Japan on the superb job it did in hosting APEC in 2010.Prime Minister Noda of Japan set a high bar for us, so we are going to try to follow your footsteps.在开始讨论今天上午的议题前，我想祝贺日本十分出色地主办了2010年的亚太经合组织会议。日本首相野田为我们设定了很高的标准，我们将努力赶上。
I also want to recognize the outstanding work that's been done by our officials and ministers during the course of this year to move forward an ambitious set of initiatives.我还想对我们的官员和部长们在这一年中为推动一套宏伟的行动计划所作的出色工作表示赞赏。
The focus of our host year was to make progress towards a seamless regional economy, and we have made progress in the three themes that we set out--regional economic integration, green growth, and regulatory reform.We have agreed to address a set of next-generation trade issues, including removing frictions in the global supply chains, helping small and medium-size enterprises grow and better plug into the global trading system, and adopting smart, market-oriented innovation policies.Innovation is especially critical to all of us, and we all want to take appropriate steps to encourage it, because without it we can't grow, become more productive or create enough jobs.我们担任亚太经合组织会议主办国的这一年的重点目标是朝着无缝地区经济的方向迈进，我们在已确定的三大议题方面——地区经济一体化、绿色增长和规制改革——取得进展。我们一致同意解决一系列下一代的贸易问题，包括排除全球供应链中的摩擦、帮助中小企业发展并更加适应全球贸易体系以及采纳明智的、以市场为导向的创新政策。创新对我们大家尤其重要，我们都想采取恰当的步骤鼓励创新，因为没有创新就没有增长，无法提高生产率，无法创造足够的就业机会。
原文链接：http://
点击咨询 