第一篇：一个环保者的力量
环保志愿者（一个人的力量）
一、杰桑·索南达杰原青海治多县西部工委书记以生命保护藏羚羊
二、梁从诫原全国政协常委、历史学家创办自然之友，引爆民间环保
三、廖晓义原中国社科院哲学所助理研究员从传统文化挖掘中式环保模式
四、霍岱珊原河南周口日报摄影记者多次考察淮河，成为淮河卫士
五、马军原外企员工开放污染地图，倒逼污染企业
六、梅念蜀原环境公司员工促进《昆明地下水保护条例》出台
七、程景北京百子湾小区居民检测电磁环境，破解邻居疑虑
八、韦东英浙江萧山普通农民撰写抗污日记，举报钱塘江污染
九、宋军九汉天成公司董事长在环境贫困地区发展生态产业
十、刘晓光首创集团总经理跪地一哭，引来一百位企业家参与环境保护
一个人的力量，环保志愿者的力量
渺小者，会在艰难之间，变得伟大。
当你感觉无力的时候，你已经有了力量。因为，你觉得环境与你有关。
当你想付出的时候，你已经能够超越，因为，你能做许多事。
1993年，可可西里采金和盗猎达到疯狂地步。青海治多县西部工委书记，索南达杰，有一天想，如果权力无法阻止藏羚羊被屠杀，那么即使权力挂腰全身，又有什么用处？于是，他把手中很小的权力，成了环境保护巨大的力量。
1994年1月8日，索南达杰在抓获盗猎分子的途中，为了救治受伤的盗猎分子，他被盗猎分子杀害。他的身体，在零下三十多度的气温下，永远保持着射击的姿式；他的身体，成为可可西里的环境保护神。
更多的环保志愿者跟上来了。
梁从诫，历史学家，因为不忍心看到中国环境恶化下去，1994年，他和三个朋友，一起创立了中国第一个民间环保组织“自然之友”。从此，缓慢地引爆了中国民间环保的能量。他们使用着一个共同的名字，他们叫，环保志愿者。
他们试图保护身边受伤害的每一个生灵。
（志愿者保护物种向杀戮者奋起反击的画面）
（北京山水吕植保护熊猫，奚志农保护滇金丝猴，温州绿眼睛保护青蛙等）
有一天，在中国社科院哲学所工作的廖晓义，读到一篇论文，论文说，生态文明在中国可能很难实现，生态恶化将不可阻挡。
廖晓义突然想，如果知识无法保护环境，那么知识又有什么用处？
她决心成为环保志愿者。
1996年，她创立了北京地球村环境教育中心，她想把城市所有的社区，都变成绿色社
区；她想从中国传统文化中汲取力量，阻止环境恶化。
霍岱珊，河南周口日报摄影记者，1997年，他孤身考察淮河，从此成了“淮河卫士”，把淮河饱受摧残的真相，告诉给公众。
中国最好的环保作家唐锡阳、徐刚、沈孝辉、郭耕，也是这样的，他们用尽自己的心血，去写中国冲突最剧烈的文字，让人们看到了中国生态的现实，激励人们奋起拯救身边的环境。
（四五个民间环保人士）
1998年开始，北京九汉天成公司董事长宋军，想在西北干旱地区，探索出一条生态产业化道路，他建起了月亮湖沙漠度假区。
2004年，著名房地产公司首创集团的董事长刘晓光，跪在阿拉善月亮湖边的沙地上，放声大哭。
他发现，当很多人一门心思拼命挣钱的时候，我们的环境已经恶化到了不可收拾的地步。他想，如果环境全面恶化了，水全部弄脏了，树全部砍光了，沙子盖满城市，即使人人都拥有一座金山，又有什么用处？
他从此成为环保志愿者，把积累财富所获得的力量，化为环境保护的力量。
2004年6月5日，王石、冯仑、宋军、张树新等100名中国优秀企业家，站在阿拉善月亮湖的忏悔墙边，发布了《阿拉善宣言》。
这些财富等身的人，从此都成了环保志愿者。他们创办的阿拉善SEE生态协会，成为中国环保志愿者的强大资助力量。他们所在的企业，都在成为环保型企业。
（不超过10名企业家）
在中国大地上，几乎每一个人，都具备“环保志愿者”的潜质。只要你愿意。
因为，如果环境恶化了，我们活着，又有什么意义？
因为，如果空气和水都活不下去了，我们又怎么可能活得下去？
2005年，因为创作《中国水危机》而名满天下的马军，从一家外企辞职，正式成为了环保志愿者。他带领公众环境研究中心，决心把中国的污染现状，做到一张电子地图上，让所有的人都可以见到。
2007年，梅念蜀正式从环保志愿者，成了“民间环保人士”，她带领昆明的志愿者们，对滇池周边地下水污染情况进行了调查，直接促成了《昆明地下水保护条例》的出台。
2003年底，因为无法再忍受钱塘江被一天天污染，无法忍受村里的环境日益恶化，浙江萧山的农妇韦东英，以只有小学五年级的文化，每天坚持写“抗污日记”，坚持拍摄村里的污染企业排放的污水，坚持向监管部门举报，成了钱塘江边，最受尊重的人。
2009年的正月初一，北京百子湾小区的普通居民程景，在小区BBS上贴出公告，告诉邻居们，经过他自费长达数月的检测，小区的电磁环境并不像大家担忧的那么糟糕。受他的影响，一个名叫达尔问自然求知社的环保科普组织出现了，他们的目标，就是帮助公众发现身边环境真相。
因此，你不是什么都做不了，你什么都能做。
只要你尊重环境，一切就有可能。
每一个人的力量，都可以成为环保志愿者的力量。
如果你愿意，请把你的手，放在上面。
第二篇：一个送信者
一个送信者
—《把信送给加西亚》读后感
若给你一个送信的机会，你会成功把信送给加西亚吗？你会是安德鲁·萨默斯.罗文？
《把信送给加西亚》讲述了一个简单的故事。19世纪美西战争中,美方有一封具有战略意义的书信,急需送到古巴盟军将领加西亚的手中,可是加西亚正在丛林作战,没人知道他在什么地方。安德鲁·萨默斯.罗文此接受美国总统麦金莱的命令，历尽种种磨难，把那封信交给了加西亚，为最终美国取得战争的胜利做出了巨大贡献。
故事虽然精短，却蕴含了令人深思的道理。作为送信者，罗文身上体现出的不仅仅是忠诚，勇敢，还有积极主动的执行力，这些也正是我们现在工作中所需要学习的品质。
作为世界产销书籍之一，《把信送给加西亚》的受欢迎程度可见一斑，正如一千读者就有一千个哈姆雷特一样，每个人对送信者都有自己的感悟。读过这个故事，让我对工作中的执行力有了更加深刻的反思。工作中最大的敌人就是惰性，对于领导布置的任务，拖三拉四，不去积极完成，这样对于自己打成长没有一点好处，而且也不会给同事留下好的印象。
上级布置的工作，就是一封信，你会成功送到吗？你会立即去执行吗？不会因为任务困难而推诿吗？不可否认，有时候对于比较麻烦的工作，自己面对的时候不免会抱怨，不免会推脱，结果拖到最后还是要去做，还是要去完成，而且由于前期的准备不足，最终的效果非常不好，还也会耽误一些其他事情。自己在这样的过程中得不偿失，也可以说是浪费了宝贵的时间，降级了工作效率。若是积极面对，在任务下达的时候立刻去执行，不畏艰辛，勇敢面对，尽管困难重重，但是我相信最后一定是硕果累累。千万不要推脱，不要往后推延，因为这样的你是在耽误你的青春，推脱你的生命。困难必然是有的，有困难就想办法去解决，没有趟不过的河，没有爬不过的山，不会游泳的话，不是还有船的吗？工作中有难题的话，可以请教同事，咨询权威，都可以有相对满意的结果的。怕的就是你不去做，没有在第一时间迈出你的脚步，耽误了行程。若寄予远方，就扬帆远航。不要找各种借口去推迟，因为这一刻不去做，或许就错过了绝佳的机会，或许以后就没有如此的契机了。积极面对，勇敢去做，立刻排上日程，主动去解决出现的问题，坚持到底，这样的执行力才是自己应该去学习，去领悟的。
若给我一个送信的机会，我会坚定的说：我会成功把信送到。
第三篇：内向者的力量[TED]
TED 演讲稿
Susan Cain : The Power of Introverts
When I was nine years old I went off to summer camp for the first time.And my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do.Because in my family, reading was the primary group activity.And this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social.You have the animal warmth of your family sitting right next to you, but you are also free to go roaming around the adventureland inside your own mind.And I had this idea that camp was going to be just like this, but better.(Laughter)I had a vision of 10 girls sitting in a cabin cozily reading books in their matching nightgowns.(Laughter)
Camp was more like a keg party without any alcohol.And on the very first day our counselor gathered us all together and she taught us a cheer that she said we would be doing every day for the rest of the summer to instill camp spirit.And it went like this: “R-O-W-D-I-E, that's the way we spell rowdie.Rowdie, rowdie, let's get rowdie.” Yeah.So I couldn't figure out for the life of me why we were supposed to be so rowdy, or why we had to spell this word incorrectly.(Laughter)But I recited a cheer.I recited a cheer along with everybody else.I did my best.And I just waited for the time that I could go off and read my books.But the first time that I took my book out of my suitcase, the coolest girl in the bunk came up to me and she asked me, “Why are you being so mellow?”--mellow, of course, being the exact opposite of R-O-W-D-I-E.And then the second time I tried it, the counselor came up to me with a concerned expression on her face and she repeated the point about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing.And so I put my books away, back in their suitcase, and I put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer.And I felt kind of guilty about this.I felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they were calling out to me and I was forsaking them.But I did forsake them and I didn't open that suitcase again until I was back home with my family at the end of the summer.Now, I tell you this story about summer camp.I could have told you 50 others just like it--all the times that I got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that I should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert.And I always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were.But for years I denied this intuition, and so I became a Wall Street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that I had always longed to be--partly because I needed to prove to myself that I could be bold and assertive too.And I was always going off to crowded bars when I really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends.And I made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that I wasn't even aware that I was making them.TED 演讲稿
Now this is what many introverts do, and it's our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues' loss and our communities' loss.And at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the world's loss.Because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best.A third to a half of the population are introverts--a third to a half.So that's one out of every two or three people you know.So even if you're an extrovert yourself, I'm talking about your coworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now--all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society.We all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we're doing.Now to see the bias clearly you need to understand what introversion is.It's different from being shy.Shyness is about fear of social judgment.Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation.So extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched-on and their most capable when they're in quieter, more low-key environments.Not all the time--these things aren't absolute--but a lot of the time.So the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us.But now here's where the bias comes in.Our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts and for extroverts' need for lots of stimulation.And also we have this belief system right now that I call the new groupthink, which holds that all creativity and all productivity comes from a very oddly gregarious place.So if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: When I was going to school, we sat in rows.We sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously.But nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks--four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other.And kids are working in countless group assignments.Even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think would depend on solo flights of thought;kids are now expected to act as committee members.And for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often or, worse, as problem cases.And the vast majority of teachers reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research.(Laughter)
Okay, same thing is true in our workplaces.Now, most of us work in open plan offices,without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers.And when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions,even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks--which is something we might all favor nowadays.And interesting research by Adam Grant at the Wharton School has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they're much more likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they're putting their own stamp on things, and other people's ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.TED 演讲稿
Now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts.I'll give you some examples.Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosa Parks, Gandhi--all these peopled described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy.And they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to.And this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel that these leaders were at the helm,not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at;they were there because they had no choice, because they were driven to do what they thought was right.Now I think at this point it's important for me to say that I actually love extroverts.I always like to say some of my best friends are extroverts, including my beloved husband.And we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum.Even Carl Jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there's no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert.He said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all.And some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum,and we call these people ambiverts.And I often think that they have the best of all worlds.But many of us do recognize ourselves as one type or the other.And what I'm saying is that culturally we need a much better balance.We need more of a yin and yang between these two types.This is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but who also have a serious streak of introversion in them.And this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity.So Darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner party invitations.Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr.Seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creationsin a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in La Jolla, California.And he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly Santa Claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona.Steve Wozniak invented the first Apple computer sitting alone in his cubical in Hewlett-Packard where he was working at the time.And he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up.Now of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating--and case in point, is Steve Wozniak famously coming together with Steve Jobs to start Apple Computer--but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe.And in fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude.It's only recently that we've strangely begun to forget it.If you look at most of the world's major religions, you will find seekers--Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad--seekers who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community.So no wilderness, no revelations.TED 演讲稿
This is no surprise though if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology.It turns out that we can't even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions.Even about seemingly personal and visceral things like who you're attracted to,you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that's what you're doing.And groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there's zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas--I mean zero.So...(Laughter)You might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not.And do you really want to leave it up to chance? Much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.Now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? Why are we setting up our schools this way and our workplaces? And why are we making these introverts feel so guiltyabout wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time? One answer lies deep in our cultural history.Western societies, and in particular the U.S., have always favored the man of action over the man of contemplation and “man” of contemplation.But in America's early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude.And if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like “Character, the Grandest Thing in the World.” And they featured role models like Abraham Lincoln who was praised for being modest and unassuming.Ralph Waldo Emerson called him “A man who does not offend by superiority.” But then we hit the 20th century and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality.What happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business.And so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities.And instead of working alongside people they've known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers.So, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism and charisma suddenly come to seem really important.And sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like “How to Win Friends and Influence People.” And they feature as their role models really great salesmen.So that's the world we're living in today.That's our cultural inheritance.Now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and I'm also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all.The same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust.And the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of people coming together to solve them working together.But I am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.So now I'd like to share with you what's in my suitcase today.Guess what? Books.I have a suitcase full of books.Here's Margaret Atwood, “Cat's Eye.” Here's a novel by Milan Kundera.And here's “The Guide for the Perplexed” by Maimonides.But these are not exactly
TED 演讲稿
my books.I brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather's favorite authors.My grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower who lived alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when I was growing up, partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books.I mean literally every table, every chair in this apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books.Just like the rest of my family, my grandfather's favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read.But he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gaveevery week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi.He would takes the fruits of each week's reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought.And people would come from all over to hear him speak.But here's the thing about my grandfather.Underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted--so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62 years.And even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time.But when he died at the age of 94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him.And so these days I try to learn from my grandfather's example in my own way.So I just published a book about introversion, and it took me about seven years to write.And for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because I was reading, I was writing, I was thinking, I was researching.It was my version of my grandfather's hours of the day alone in his library.But now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion.(Laughter)And that's a lot harder for me, because as honored as I am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu.So I prepared for moments like these as best I could.I spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance I could get.And I call this my “year of speaking dangerously.”(Laughter)And that actually helped a lot.But I'll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change.I mean, we are.And so I am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.Number one: Stop the madness for constant group work.Just stop it.(Laughter)Thank you.(Applause)And I want to be clear about what I'm saying, because I deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty cafe-style types of interactions--you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas.That is great.It's great for introverts and it's great for extroverts.But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work.School, same thing.We need to be
TED 演讲稿
teaching kids to work together, for sure, but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own.This is especially important for extroverted children too.They need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.Okay, number two: Go to the wilderness.Be like Buddha, have your own revelations.I'm not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but I am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.Number three: Take a good look at what's inside your own suitcase and why you put it there.So extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books.Or maybe they're full of champagne glasses or skydiving equipment.Whatever it is, I hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy.But introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what's inside your own suitcase.And that's okay.But occasionally, just occasionally, I hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and it needs the things you carry.So I wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly.Thank you very much.(Applause)Thank you.Thank you.(Applause)
第四篇：一个成功戒酒者的心声
一个成功戒酒者的心声
黄某 浙江 温州 个体户 男 28岁因经商工作压力大，长期饮酒，每天1天左右，不喝就心理烦躁，记忆力减退，反应迟钝，固大便干燥、夜出盗汗、营养差、消瘦无力、无法再搞经营。
后有妻子陪同前来我院治疗，一个疗程状况明显减轻，不想喝酒，并能控制住自己喝酒的欲望，后又巩固两个疗程，彻底戒除了酒瘾，身体状况完全康复，至此在也五复饮。
详情可以查看：http://
第五篇：一个一线施工者的感受
一个一线施工者的几点感受
2015年12月16日
我毕业后回选择到老家，至今,已在中建三局的区域分公司干了四年半的施工。接到文馨的讯息时，刚刚辗转至职业生涯的第三个项目。当时回答的斩钉截铁，内心却是诚惶诚恐。所以只能结合自己的经历来写，片面肤浅但真实。
行业整体发展态势趋缓。
2011年毕业后的第一个项目，位于这座省会城市正开疆拓土的新区。当我们项目第一台塔式起重机竖起来的时候，我们就是中心。而两年后，我站在我建的楼顶数了一下，周围立起了100多台塔式起重机。
2014年，转折突然就来了。虽然公司产值数据依旧不断攀升，但领导讲话时开始频繁提到受大环境的影响，项目上员工的流动也开始变缓。
恶意竞争引发恶性循环。
项目数量锐减，可能是真的受到大环境的影响，也可能是大环境下常态本就如此，部分业主招标条款愈加苛刻。特别是部分工程招标过程中不合理的工期压缩，资金垫付等成了中标单位恶意竞争的砝码。
以牺牲部分利益换来的中标成果，不仅给现场施工带来更大的阻力，也大大增加了中标单位的履约风险，陷入项目少还难干的怪圈。
拼命扎堆高大精尖工程。
虽有武汉绿地中心等超高层拔地而起，但被拔高的城市天际线，依旧绝大多数位于沿海城市。可这并不代表内地就没有野心，只是囿于地质环境和某个时期内资本环境的因素罢了。
如今，发展中的内陆城市也在向沿海城市靠拢：不断被刷新的地标、大体量的商业中心，尖端科技含量的办公大楼等陆续诞生。当然，这也是具有实力的企业所期盼的，毕竟来说，几乎透明的房建市场已无大利可图。
总承包管理将是大势所趋。
项目的体量和高度都在不断增加，施工工艺的复杂程度也在扶摇直上，总承包管理的口号也喊了十几年甚至更长的时间，但一直以来，从国家建设管理的相关部门、到业主单位、再到施工单位，都是喊得多干得少。
但随着竞争日益加剧，部分企业已开始踏上总承包管理的探索之路。相信在两年之后，总承包管理将会在深化设计、计划管理、科技创新、分包协调、公共资源管理、项目信息管理等方面探索出一条成功之道。
大领导讲话时说过：“我们这个行业，过去十年的常态已成往事，未来新常态到底怎样，到目前为止还很模糊”。但可以肯定的是，光是靠多接项目，人海战术的施工常态即将成为历史。唯有靠科技创新、管理创新、服务创新才能真正意义上创效，同时也带动这个行业的发展，形成新的、良性的竞争模式。
点击咨询 