第一篇:1领导威信不是从掩饰错误中而是从改正错误中提高起来的不是从自吹自擂中而是从埋头苦干中培养起来的
1领导威信不是从掩饰错误中而是从改正错误中提高起来的不是从自吹自擂中而是从埋头苦干中培养起来的。工作信心,改正错误后只会增强,不会减弱。只有那种要虚荣爱面子的人才会怕揭发错误呢!
2面向群众。不仅要教育群众,还要向群众学习。因为领导者本身知识还不完全,经验还不够,领导地位并不能使你得到知识和经验,所以面向群众,汲取群众经验,十分必要。我们要求同志们:
(1)与群众接近和联系,在某种程度上要与他们打成一片;(2)倾听群众意见;(3)向群众学习;(4)教育群众,不做群众的尾巴。
3领导群众,结交朋友。
(一)领导党的方式和领导群众的方式是不同的,领导群众的方式和态度要使他们不感觉我们是在领导。
(二)领导群众的基本方法是说服,决不是命令;只有在多数已经同意而少数尚不同意的情形下,必要时可用多数的意见强制少数执行。
(三)领导群众和结交朋友,领导者自己要起模范作用。
(四)领导者在必要时应忘记他所受的侮辱。
(五)领导者切勿轻视自己的作用和影响,要戒慎恐惧地工
作。
4列宁、斯大林论领导艺术,不可跑得太前,也不可落在运动后面,而应抓住中心一环,推向前进。
毛泽东同志论领导艺术,要照顾全局,照顾多数,以及和同盟者一道干 5发扬民主,开展批评和自我批评。
五)主要用说服的方法,不用行政的方法,只有在情况紧急时,才用命令的方式。
第二篇:TED 演讲稿 怎样从错误中学习
I have been teaching for a long time, and in doing so have acquired a body of knowledge about kids and learning that I really wish more people would understand about the potential of students.In 1931, my grandmother--bottom left for you guys over here--graduated from the eighth grade.She went to school to get the information because that's where the information lived.It was in the books;it was inside the teacher's head;and she needed to go there to get the information, because that's how you learned.Fast-forward a generation: this is the one-room schoolhouse, Oak Grove, where my father went to a one-room schoolhouse.And he again had to travel to the school to get the information from the teacher, stored it in the only portable memory he has, which is inside his own head, and take it with him, because that is how information was being transported from teacher to student and then used in the world.When I was a kid, we had a set of encyclopedias at my house.It was purchased the year I was born, and it was extraordinary, because I did not have to wait to go to the library to get to the information.The information was inside my house and it was awesome.This was differentthan either generation had experienced before, and it changed the way I interacted with information even at just a small level.But the information was closer to me.I could get access to it.In the time that passes between when I was a kid in high school and when I started teaching,we really see the advent of the Internet.Right about the time that the Internet gets going as an educational tool, I take off from Wisconsin and move to Kansas, small town Kansas, where I had an opportunity to teach in a lovely, small-town, rural Kansas school district, where I was teaching my favorite subject, American government.My first year--super gung-ho--going to teach American government, loved the political system.Kids in the 12th grade: not exactly all that enthusiastic about the American government system.Year two: learned a few things--had to change my tactic.And I put in front of them an authentic experience that allowed them to learn for themselves.I didn't tell them what to do or how to do it.I posed a problem in front of them, which was to put on an election forum for their own community.They produced fliers.They called offices.They checked schedules.They were meeting with secretaries.They produced an election forum booklet for the entire town to learn more about their candidates.They invited everyone into the school for an evening of conversation about government and politics and whether or not the streets were done well, and really had this robust experiential learning.The older teachers--more experienced--looked at me and went, “Oh, there she is.That's so cute.She's trying to get that done.”(Laughter)“She doesn't know what she's in for.” But I knew that the kids would show up, and I believed it, and I told them every week what I expected out of them.And that night, all 90 kids--dressed appropriately, doing their job, owning it.I had to just sit and watch.It was theirs.It was experiential.It was authentic.It meant something to them.And they will step up.From Kansas, I moved on to lovely Arizona, where I taught in Flagstaff for a number of years,this time with middle school students.Luckily, I didn't have to teach them American government.Could teach them the more exciting topic of geography.Again, “thrilled” to learn.But what was interesting about this position I found myself in in Arizona, was I had this reallyextraordinarily eclectic group of kids to work with in a truly public school, and we got to have these moments where we would get these opportunities.And one opportunity was we got to go and meet Paul Rusesabagina, which is the gentleman that the movie “Hotel Rwanda” is based after.And he was going to speak at the high school next door to us.We could walk there.We didn't even have to pay for the buses.There was no expense cost.Perfect field trip.The problem then becomes how do you take seventh-and eighth-graders to a talk about genocide and deal with the subject in a way that is responsible and respectful, and they know what to do with it.And so we chose to look at Paul Rusesabagina as an example of a gentleman who singularly used his life to do something positive.I then challenged the kids to identify someone in their own life, or in their own story, or in their own world, that they could identify that had done a similar thing.I asked them to produce a little movie about it.It's the first time we'd done this.Nobody really knew how to make these little movies on the computer, but they were into it.And I asked them to put their own voice over it.It was the most awesome moment of revelation that when you ask kids to use their own voice and ask them to speak for themselves, what they're willing to share.The last question of the assignment is: how do you plan to use your life to positively impact other people? The things that kids will say when you ask them and take the time to listen is extraordinary.Fast-forward to Pennsylvania, where I find myself today.I teach at the Science Leadership Academy, which is a partnership school between the Franklin Institute and the school district of Philadelphia.We are a nine through 12 public school, but we do school quite differently.I moved there primarily to be part of a learning environment that validated the way that I knew that kids learned, and that really wanted to investigate what was possible when you are willing to let go of some of the paradigms of the past, of information scarcity when my grandmother was in school and when my father was in school and even when I was in school,and to a moment when we have information surplus.So what do you do when the information is all around you? Why do you have kids come to school if they no longer have to come there to get the information? In Philadelphia we have a one-to-one laptop program, so the kids are bringing in laptops with them everyday, taking them home, getting access to information.And here's the thing that you need to get comfortable with when you've given the tool to acquire information to students, is that you have to be comfortable with this idea of allowing kids to fail as part of the learning process.We deal right now in the educational landscape with an infatuation with the culture of one right answer that can be properly bubbled on the average multiple choice test, and I am here to share with you: it is not learning.That is the absolute wrong thing to ask, to tell kids to never be wrong.To ask them to always have the right answer doesn't allow them to learn.So we did this project, and this is one of the artifacts of the project.I almost never show them off because of the issue of the idea of failure.My students produced these info-graphics as a result of a unit that we decided to do at the end of the year responding to the oil spill.I asked them to take the examples that we were seeing of the info-graphics that existed in a lot of mass media, and take a look at what were the interesting components of it, and produce one for themselves of a different man-made disaster from American history.And they had certain criteria to do it.They were a little uncomfortable with it, because we'd never done this before, and they didn't know exactly how to do it.They can talk--they're very smooth, and they can write very, very well, but asking them to communicate ideas in a different way was a little uncomfortable for them.But I gave them the room to just do the thing.Go create.Go figure it out.Let's see what we can do.And the student that persistently turns out the best visual product did not disappoint.This was done in like two or three days.And this is the work of the student that consistently did it.And when I sat the students down, I said, “Who's got the best one?” And they immediately went, “There it is.” Didn't read anything.“There it is.” And I said, “Well what makes it great?”And they're like, “Oh, the design's good, and he's using good color.And there's some...” And they went through all that we processed out loud.And I said, “Go read it.” And they're like, “Oh, that one wasn't so awesome.” And then we went to another one--it didn't have great visuals, but it had great information--and spent an hour talking about the learning process,because it wasn't about whether or not it was perfect, or whether or not it was what I could create.It asked them to create for themselves, and it allowed them to fail, process, learn from.And when we do another round of this in my class this year, they will do better this time,because learning has to include an amount of failure, because failure is instructional in the process.There are a million pictures that I could click through here, and had to choose carefully--this is one of my favorites--of students learning, of what learning can look like in a landscape where we let go of the idea that kids have to come to school to get the information, but instead, ask them what they can do with it.Ask them really interesting questions.They will not disappoint.Ask them to go to places, to see things for themselves, to actually experience the learning, to play, to inquire.This is one of my favorite photos, because this was taken on Tuesday, when I asked the students to go to the polls.This is Robbie, and this was his first day of voting, and he wanted to share that with everybody and do that.But this is learning too, because we asked them to go out into real spaces.The main point is that, if we continue to look at education as if it's about coming to school to get the information and not about experiential learning, empowering student voice and embracing failure, we're missing the mark.And everything that everybody is talking about today isn't possible if we keep having an educational system that does not value these qualities, because we won't get there with a standardized test, and we won't get there with a culture of one right answer.We know how to do this better, and it's time to do better.
第三篇:TED演讲怎样从错误中学习
TED: 怎样从错误中学习
Diana Laugenberg:How to learn? From mistakes
讲者分享了其多年从教中所认识到的一从错误中学习的观念“允许孩子失败,把失败视为学习的一部分”,以及从教育实践中学到的三件事:“1.体验学习的过程 2.倾听学生的声音 3.接纳错误的失败。” TED演讲文本:
0:15 I have been teaching for a long time, and in doing so have acquired a body of knowledge aboutkids and learning that I really wish more people would understand about the potential ofstudents.In 1931, my grandmother--bottom left for you guys over here--graduated from theeighth grade.She went to school to get the information because that's where the informationlived.It was in the books;it was inside the teacher's head;and she needed to go there to getthe information, because that's how you learned.Fast-forward a generation: this is the one-roomschoolhouse, Oak Grove, where my father went to a one-room schoolhouse.And he again hadto travel to the school to get the information from the teacher, stored it in the only portablememory he has, which is inside his own head, and take it with him, because that is howinformation was being transported from teacher to student and then used in the world.When Iwas a kid, we had a set of encyclopedias at my house.It was purchased the year I was born,and it was extraordinary, because I did not have to wait to go to the library to get to theinformation.The information was inside my house and it was awesome.This was different thaneither generation had experienced before, and it changed the way I interacted with informationeven at just a small level.But the information was closer to me.I could get access to it.1:34 In the time that passes between when I was a kid in high school and when I started teaching,we really see the advent of the Internet.Right about the time that the Internet gets going as aneducational tool, I take off from Wisconsin and move to Kansas, small town Kansas, where Ihad an opportunity to teach in a lovely, small-town, rural Kansas school district, where I wasteaching my favorite subject, American government.My first year--super gung-ho--going toteach American government, loved the political system.Kids in the 12th grade: not exactly allthat enthusiastic about the American government system.Year two: learned a few things--hadto change my tactic.And I put in front of them an authentic experience that allowed them tolearn for themselves.I didn't tell them what to do or how to do it.I posed a problem in front ofthem, which was to put on an election forum for their own community.2:27 They produced flyers.They called offices.They checked schedules.They were meeting withsecretaries.They produced an election forum booklet for the entire town to learn more abouttheir candidates.They invited everyone into the school for an evening of conversation aboutgovernment and politics and whether or not the streets were done well, and really had thisrobust experiential learning.The older teachers--more experienced--looked at me and went, “Oh, there she is.That's so cute.She's trying to get that done.”(Laughter)“She doesn't knowwhat she's in for.” But I knew that the kids would show up, and I believed it, and I told themevery week what I expected out of them.And that night, all 90 kids--dressed appropriately,doing their job, owning it.I had to just sit and watch.It was theirs.It was experiential.It wasauthentic.It meant something to them.And they will step up.3:17 From Kansas, I moved on to lovely Arizona, where I taught in Flagstaff for a number of years,this time with middle school students.Luckily, I didn't have to teach them American government.Could teach them the more exciting topic of geography.Again, “thrilled” to learn.But what wasinteresting about this position I found myself in in Arizona, was I had this really extraordinarilyeclectic group of kids to work with in a truly public school, and we got to have these momentswhere we would get these opportunities.And one opportunity was we got to go and meet PaulRusesabagina, which is the gentleman that the movie “Hotel Rwanda” is based after.And hewas going to speak at the high school next door to us.We could walk there.We didn't evenhave to pay for the buses.There was no expense cost.Perfect field trip.4:04 The problem then becomes how do you take seventh-and eighth-graders to a talk aboutgenocide and deal with the subject in a way that is responsible and respectful, and they knowwhat to do with it.And so we chose to look at Paul Rusesabagina as an example of a gentlemanwho singularly used his life to do something positive.I then challenged the kids to identifysomeone in their own life, or in their own story, or in their own world, that they could identify thathad done a similar thing.I asked them to produce a little movie about it.It's the first time we'ddone this.Nobody really knew how to make these little movies on the computer, but they wereinto it.And I asked them to put their own voice over it.It was the most awesome moment ofrevelation that when you ask kids to use their own voice and ask them to speak for themselves,what they're willing to share.The last question of the assignment is: how do you plan to useyour life to positively impact other people? The things that kids will say when you ask them andtake the time to listen is extraordinary.5:05 Fast-forward to Pennsylvania, where I find myself today.I teach at the Science LeadershipAcademy, which is a partnership school between the Franklin Institute and the school district ofPhiladelphia.We are a nine through 12 public school, but we do school quite differently.I movedthere primarily to be part of a learning environment that validated the way that I knew that kidslearned, and that really wanted to investigate what was possible when you are willing to let go ofsome of the paradigms of the past, of information scarcity when my grandmother was in schooland when my father was in school and even when I was in school, and to a moment when wehave information surplus.So what do you do when the information is all around you? Why doyou have kids come to school if they no longer have to come there to get the information? 5:51 In Philadelphia we have a one-to-one laptop program, so the kids are bringing in laptops withthem everyday, taking them home, getting access to information.And here's the thing that youneed to get comfortable with when you've given the tool to acquire information to students, isthat you have to be comfortable with this idea of allowing kids to fail as part of the learningprocess.We deal right now in the educational landscape with an infatuation with the culture ofone right answer that can be properly bubbled on the average multiple choice test, and I amhere to share with you: it is not learning.That is the absolute wrong thing to ask, to tell kids tonever be wrong.To ask them to always have the right answer doesn't allow them to learn.Sowe did this project, and this is one of the artifacts of the project.I almost never show them offbecause of the issue of the idea of failure.6:45 My students produced these info-graphics as a result of a unit that we decided to do at the endof the year responding to the oil spill.I asked them to take the examples that we were seeing ofthe info-graphics that existed in a lot of mass media, and take a look at what were theinteresting components of it, and produce one for themselves of a different man-made disasterfrom American history.And they had certain criteria to do it.They were a little uncomfortablewith it, because we'd never done this before, and they didn't know exactly how to do it.Theycan talk--they're very smooth, and they can write very, very well, but asking them tocommunicate ideas in a different way was a little uncomfortable for them.But I gave them theroom to just do the thing.Go create.Go figure it out.Let's see what we can do.And thestudent that persistently turns out the best visual product did not disappoint.This was done inlike two or three days.And this is the work of the student that consistently did it.7:39 And when I sat the students down, I said, “Who's got the best one?” And they immediatelywent, “There it is.” Didn't read anything.“There it is.” And I said, “Well what makes it great?”And they're like, “Oh, the design's good, and he's using good color.And there's some...” Andthey went through all that we processed out loud.And I said, “Go read it.” And they're like, “Oh,that one wasn't so awesome.” And then we went to another one--it didn't have great visuals,but it had great information--and spent an hour talking about the learning process, because itwasn't about whether or not it was perfect, or whether or not it was what I could create.Itasked them to create for themselves, and it allowed them to fail, process, learn from.And whenwe do another round of this in my class this year, they will do better this time, because learninghas to include an amount of failure, because failure is instructional in the process.8:29 There are a million pictures that I could click through here, and had to choose carefully--this isone of my favorites--of students learning, of what learning can look like in a landscape wherewe let go of the idea that kids have to come to school to get the information, but instead, askthem what they can do with it.Ask them really interesting questions.They will not disappoint.Ask them to go to places, to see things for themselves, to actually experience the learning, toplay, to inquire.This is one of my favorite photos, because this was taken on Tuesday, when Iasked the students to go to the polls.This is Robbie, and this was his first day of voting, and hewanted to share that with everybody and do that.But this is learning too, because we askedthem to go out into real spaces.9:20 The main point is that, if we continue to look at education as if it's about coming to school to getthe information and not about experiential learning, empowering student voice and embracingfailure, we're missing the mark.And everything that everybody is talking about today isn'tpossible if we keep having an educational system that does not value these qualities, becausewe won't get there with a standardized test, and we won't get there with a culture of one rightanswer.We know how to do this better, and it's time to do better.0:15
我从事教师工作很长一段时间了,而在我教书的过程当中 我学了很多关于孩子与学习的知识 我非常希望更多人可以了解 学生的潜能。1931年,我的祖母 从你们那边看过来左下角那位--从八年级毕业。她上学是去获取知识 因为在过去,那是知识存在的地方 知识在书本里,在老师的脑袋里,而她需要专程到学校去获得这些知识,因为那是当时学习的途径 快进过一代: 这是个只有一间教室的学校,Oak Grove,我父亲就是在这间只有一个教室的学校就读。而同样的,他不得不去上学 以从老师那儿取得知识,然后将这些知识储存在他唯一的移动内存,那就是他自己的脑袋里,然后将这些随身携带,因为这是过去知识被传递的方式 从老师传给学生,接着在世界上使用。当我还小的时候,我们家里有一套百科全书。从我一出生就买了这套书,而那是非常了不起的事情,因为我不需要等着去图书馆取得这些知识,这些信息就在我的屋子里 而那真是太棒了。这是 和过去相比,是非常不同的 这改变了我和信息互动的方式 即便改变的幅度很小。但这些知识却离我更近了。我可以随时获取它们。
1:34
在过去的这几年间 从我还在念高中 到我开始教书的时候,我们真的亲眼目睹网络的发展。就在网络开始 作为教学用的工具发展的时候,我离开威斯康辛州 搬到勘萨斯州,一个叫勘萨斯的小镇 在那里我有机会 在一个小而美丽的勘萨斯的乡村学区 教书,教我最喜欢的学科 “美国政府” 那是我教书的第一年,充满热情,准备教“美国政府” 我当时热爱教政治体系。这些十二年级的孩子 对于美国政府体系 并不完全充满热情。开始教书的第二年,我学到了一些事情,让我改变了教学方针。我提供他们一个真实体验的机会 让他们可以自主学习。我没有告诉他们得做什么,或是要怎么做。我只是在他们面前提出一个问题,要他们在自己的社区设立一个选举论坛。
2:27
他们散布传单,联络各个选举办公室,他们和秘书排定行程,他们设计了一本选举论坛手册 提供给全镇的镇民让他们更了解这些候选人。他们邀请所有的人到学校 参与晚上的座谈 谈论政府和政治 还有镇里的每条街是不是都修建完善,学生们真的得到强大的体验式学习。学校里比较资深年长的老师 看着我说 “喔,看她,多天真呀,竟想试着这么做。”(大笑)“她不知道她把自己陷入怎么样的局面” 但我知道孩子们会出席 而我真的这样相信。每个礼拜我都对他们说我是如何期待他们的表现。而那天晚上,全部九十个孩子 每个人的穿戴整齐,各司其职,完全掌握论坛 我只需要坐在一旁看着。那是属于他们的夜晚,那是经验,那是实在的经验。那对他们来说具有意义。而他们将会更加努力。
3:17
离开堪萨斯后,我搬到美丽的亚利桑纳州,我在Flagstaff小镇教了几年书,这次是教初中的学生。幸运的,我这次不用教美国政治。这次我教的是更令人兴奋的地理。再一次,非常期待的要学习。但有趣的是 我发现在这个亚历桑纳州的教职 我所面对的 是一群非常多样化的,彼此之间差异悬殊的孩子们 在一所真正的公立学校。在那里,有些时候,我们会得到了一些机会。其中一个机会是 我们得以和Paul Russabagina见面,这位先生 正是电影“卢安达饭店”根据描述的那位主人翁 他当时正要到隔壁的高中演讲 我们可以步行到那所学校,我们甚至不用坐公共汽车 完全不需要额外的支出,非常完美的校外教学
4:04
然后接着的问题是 你要怎么和七八年级的学生谈论种族屠杀 用怎么样的方式来处理这个问题 才是一种负责任和尊重的方式,让学生们知道该怎么面对这个问题。所以我们决定去观察PaulRusesabagina是怎么做的 把他当作一个例子 一个平凡人如何利用自己的生命做些积极的事情的例子。接着,我挑战这些孩子,要他们去找出 在他们的生命里,在他们自己的故事中,或是在他们自己的世界里,找出那些他们认为也做过类似事情的人。我要他们为这些人和事迹制作一部短片。这是我们第一次尝试制作短片。没有人真的知道如何利用电脑制作短片。但他们非常投入,我要他们在片子里用自己的声音。那实在是最棒的启发方式 当你要孩子们用他们自己的声音 当你要他们为自己说话,说那些他们愿意分享的故事。这项作业的最后一个问题是 你打算怎么利用你自己的生命 去正面的影响其他人 孩子们说出来的那些话 在你询问他们后并花时间倾听那些话后 是非常了不起的。
5:05
快进到宾州,我现在住的地方。我在科学领导学院教书,它是富兰克林学院 和费城学区协同的合办的。我们是一间9年级到12年级的公立高中,但我们的教学方式很不一样。我起初搬到那里 是为了亲身参与一个教学环境 一个可以证实我所理解孩子可以有效学习方式的方式,一个愿意探索 所有可能性的教学环境 当你愿意放弃 一些过去的标准模式,放弃我祖母和我父亲上学的那个年代 甚至是我自己念书的那个年代,因为信息的稀缺,到一个我们正处于信息过剩的时代。所以你该怎么处理那些环绕在四周的知识? 你为什么要孩子们来学校? 如果他们再也不需要特意到学校获得这些知识?
5:51
在宾州,我们有一个人人有笔记本的项目,所以这些孩子每天带着他们笔记本电脑,带着电脑回家,随时学习知识。有一件事你需要学着适应的是 当你给了学生工具 让他们可以自主取得知识,你得适应一个想法 那就是允许孩子失败 把失败视为学习的一部分。我们现在面对教育大环境 带着一种 迷恋单一解答的文化 一种靠选择题折优的文化,而我在这里要告诉你们,这不是学习。这绝对是个错误 去要求孩子们永远不可以犯错。要求他们永远都要有正确的解答 而不允许他们去学习。所以我们实施了这个项目,这就是这个项目中一件作品。我几乎从来没有展示过这些 因为我们对于错误与失败的观念。
6:45
我的学生们制作了这些信息图表 结果是我们决定以这个汇报作为我们学年的总结报告 内容是回应漏油事件。我要求他们拿 他们看过的资讯图表当做范例 就是在媒体里展示的那些信息图表,仔细看看那里头什么是有趣的,然后自己设计一个 以美国历史中其他的人为灾难为主题。我为这项作业设了一些其他的条件 他们觉得这个作业有些困难,因为我们从来没有出过这样的作业,而他们不完全知道要怎么进行。他们可以谈论这议题,相当顺畅,他们也能写得非常非常得好,但当被要求要用一种其他的方式来表达想法的时候 他们有点无所适从。但我给了他们空间去做这个作业。去创造,去自己发现该怎么做。让我们拭目以待我们可以完成些什么。最后那些总是 呈现最佳视觉效果作品的学生,这次也没有让人失望 这个作品大概花了两三天的时间 而这是来自一个经常很棒得完成作业的学生。
7:39
然后当我要所有学生坐下来,我问他们“谁交出了最好的作品?” 他们立刻指着这个作品回答“这件” 他们并没有细读其中的内容,就回答了“这件” 然后我说,“那么,是什么因素让这个作品这么好?” 他们回答说,“喔,设计得很好,他用了很好的颜色组合,还有一些...” 他们分别说了想法,我们一起讨论了之后 我说,“现在去读读内容” 接着他们说“喔,现在看起来好像其实没有那么好” 后来我们谈到另外一个作业--那个作品没有很好的视觉设计,但是有非常好的资讯内容--我们接着花了大概一个小时来讨论这个学习过程,因为那并不是关于哪个作品比较完美,或是我能或不能创造出这样的东西; 这作业是要他们为自己创作。这作业也让他们有失败的可能,消化思考之后,从失败中学习。今年,当我们又再一次尝试类似的作业,他们都将会比去年做的更好。因为学习必须包含一定程度的失败,因为失败具有教学意义 在学习的过程中。
8:29
我有上百万个照片 可以展示,可我得小心的选择--好,这是我最喜欢的一张--学生正在学习的照片,学习可以是什么样子 在一个我们放弃传统观念的环境中 学生非得来学校以获得知识这样的想法,取而代之,问他们,他们可以利用这些知识来做些什么? 问他们真正有趣的问题。他们不会让人失望。要求他们去不同的地方,去亲眼见识不同的事情,去真正的体验学习,去玩,去查询。这是我最喜欢的照片之一 因为这是一张星期二照的照片,当我要求学生们去投票。这是Robbie,这是他第一次投票,而他想要和大家分享这个投票的经历。但这也是学习,因为我们要他们到外头真实的世界去。
9:20
重点是 如果我们继续把教育 当作是要来学校 取得知识 而不是体验学习的过程,倾听学生的声音,接纳错误和失败,我们将会误解上学的意义。而今天每个人在谈论的每件事情 都将不可能达成,如果我们继续这样的教育系统 而不重视这些价值,因为我们是不可能依靠标准化测试,一种只有一个标准答案的文化是没有办法引领我们达到目标的。我们知道怎么样可以做得更好,而现在,需要做得更好的时刻到了。
第四篇:从“练”中培养学生的思维能力
从“练”中培养学生的思维能力
数学教学中“练”是学生熟悉运算步骤,积累运算技巧,发展思维能力的重要一环,常言说:“眼过千遍不如手过一遍”,这充分说明了“练”的重要性。通过作业练习,可以帮助学生巩固概念,发展思维,提高计算能力,进而找到正确、迅速、灵活、合理解答问题的途径。课堂教学中恰当的运用处理好“学”和“练”的关系,即提高课堂教学效果又减轻了学生的负担。
一、新课前安排“练”
数学是一门逻辑性较强的学科,知识的系统性、联系性较强,新授前安排好与新知识联系较密切的练习,为新知识打下良好的基础,起到承上启下的作用。如讲授“归一”应用题的复合应用题,我先安排了如下练习:(1)一个服装厂计划做660套衣服,已经做了5天,平均每天做75套,做了多少套?(2)服装厂计划做660套衣服,已经做了75套,还剩多少套没做?(3)服装厂计划做660套衣服,已经75套,剩下3天做完,平均每天做几套?(随时变换已知条件和问题)然后出示例题:一个服装厂计划做660套衣服,已经做了5天,平均每天做75套,剩下的3天做完,平均每天做多少套?学生一见新题就很快举手回答问题。在此基础上解答复合应用题,学生既知道复合应用题是由几个相关联系的简单应用题组成,同时又培养学生解答应用题的能力。
二、要加强知识的有机联系,处理好巩固练习。
新课授完后,抓住新知识的重点,难点和关键用时练习,不仅能加深学生对新知识的理解和掌握,还能及时发现问题,及时纠正。做到当堂情况,当堂巩固之目的。安排好巩固练习是课堂教学的重要一环,小学生模仿性强,做点模仿性练习,对于重难点要多练,但教师在授课时一定要抓住“精”点讲。以便鼓励学生从中找出解答规律,掌握概念,突破难点,发现问题及时进行针对性的纠正和练习。例如:讲组合图形,我发现学生不能识别图形,就帮助学生分割图形,掌握方法,让学生进行判断,说明理由,然后让学生自已去练,这样既提高了学生的学习兴趣,又培养了学生思维,巩固了新课所学的知识。
三、帮助学生思维练习,提高解题能力。
对于所学知识,得到巩固之后,鼓励学生在新的情况下,自己运用一般知识,有观察、分析、解答问题的能力,针对教材的实际安排一些综合性强、难度较大的练习题,以便循序渐进,使学生动脑、动口、动手。这样既提高了学生分析问题的能力,又发展开发了智力。
综合实际编题练习,如学生学会了梯形面积后,让学生独立求梯形面积的应用题,帮助学生掌握概念,同时又提高学生的学习热情,巩固了所学的知识,培养锻炼了学生的逻辑思维能力。
另外注意学生练习的时间过长易疲劳,厌学,注意力将低,效果不佳。要分散练习,加强学习进程,分散难点、重点,各个击破,然后系统地联系起来进行练习而有效。对于好、中、差学生要因材施教,因人而宜。
总的说来,课堂教学中处理好“练”的关系是教学常规的一个重要环节,是一项长期而又仔细地工作,要随着教材的实质变化而变化。
第五篇:如何从领导讲话材料中提炼智慧结晶
如何从领导讲话材料中提炼智慧结晶
一直以为,领导讲话是代表公文写作最高水平的材料。上至习近平总书记的重要讲话,下到所在处室领导的大会发言,都是领导理论和实践的智慧结晶,都是掌握公文写作要义的集大成者。因为,领导讲话里既有思想理论的高度,也有研究问题的深度,还有多种多样的鲜活情况,可以说包罗万象,是一座富矿。那么,我们怎么去看领导材料,才能充分挖掘和利用好这座富矿呢?我们感到,由浅入深应该有这么“三阶、九看”。
第一阶段
看事例。我记得自己刚开始看领导讲话时,最喜欢看的就是领导讲话中列举的各种例子。好多领导经历非常丰富,常常能举一些很鲜活、很生动、很深刻的例子,让人烙印很深。但这不是领导讲话材料的主角,甚至连配角都不算,它们只是一些配料和佐料。我们顶多把大意记下来,以后作为论据使用,或者从中能悟出些哲理,受到启迪或警醒,仅此而已。因此,现在方方面面的领导讲话很多,考虑学习效率,遇到事例一般略读,在旁边做一个标注,分门列到自己的资料库里即可。
看语言。金句名言有时比现实事例更让人眼前一亮,也更为实用。因为我们写文章一定会用到一些好的语言,这就靠平时的积累。当然,某一篇文章的语言往往是零散化的,这就要求我们在设计资料库时搞好顶层规划。比如,党的建设类,可以按照“五位一体”的结构来划分,遇到相应领域的经典语句,就摘录在相应文档里,并提炼出关键词为序,这样日积月累、积少成多,自己在起草材料的时候可以大大节省时间。
看结构。看领导讲话多起来以后,就开始慢慢关注它的结构。当然,有的处室领导也会传道授业,帮助讲解领导讲话材料怎么谋篇布局,但更多的还是靠自己去悟。有的领导讲话的结构很清楚,因为从几级提纲就可以看出来;有的领导讲话是娓娓道来,甚至比较随意,几个提纲从名字上看像是“多胞胎”。遇到这种情况,我一般是积累若干个讲同样问题的领导讲话对照着研读,从中比较不同文章是从哪些不同角度去破题的,尤其是以哪些方式去拆分观点的。这样,也方便理解那些表面上看不出行文结构和主线的文章。
第二阶段
看思路。公文的主线是工作线,所以公文的思路也是工作的思路。到了这一阶段,很多笔友们开始慢慢揣摩领导讲话中透射的工作思路,这是掌握公文门道的必经之路。无论是什么形式的讲话,其实都是讲工作,只是有的讲工作的具体内容,有的讲工作的原则方法,有的讲工作的辩证规律,有的讲工作的政治立场,这是层层递进、逐级拔高的过程。无论怎样,我们心里都应该很清楚,领导这次强调的是哪方面的工作,这些工作面临哪些形势、涉及哪些领域、区分哪些内容等等,这样在头脑中形成一个较为系统的概念,下次再遇到相应的材料,即使是工作汇报、个人述职、经验事迹等其他类型的材料,也不会跑偏离题。
看问题。问题是时代的声音。能够看到问题、提炼问题、分析问题,最体现一个人的水平。以前在科研单位工作,对这方面感触更深,因为开展重大科研的能力很大程度取决于提炼科学问题的能力。公文领域也是这样,我们看习总书记讲话,从文章的立意、到行文结构和语言、再到列举的事例等等,都是对着问题来讲。因此,我们看领导讲话,很重要的是通过学习对相关领域存在的问题做到心中有数,尤其是问题的轻重程度、产生缘由、历史因素都要很清楚,这样写什么文章都会有的放矢、精准发力。
看招法。领导讲话本身就是“桥”和“船”。一个成功的领导讲话,里面既要有思想、有情况、有问题,更要有思路、有招法、有措施。思路举措往往是对着实际、对着问题来的,所以我们在学习和梳理领导讲话中的“招法”时,要联系着问题去看。为什么这样说?因为有的时候措施反映问题,比如我们要求某个单位要有创新的魄力,折射的问题就是这个单位存在守成求稳思想;要求某个一把手要注重发挥党委委员作用,折射的问题就是民主意识不强,等等。有的时候提出问题也是措施,比如省市领导到一线基层调研,对某项工作不可能细到操作层面,这个时候往往是提出某个问题,像要处理好某方面的矛盾,具体怎么处理区县自己去考虑,但这个问题本身就是“突破口”。
第三阶段
看用意。看领导讲话到这一阶段,就开始从“术”向“道”转变了。领导讲每次话都是有意图、有想法的,这就需要我们透过文字需求去揣摩领导的本意。因为文字工作毕竟是停留在务虚层面,措施和招法再实,也得落实到行动上。我们起草材料的文字工作者,在研读领导讲话的时候,应该更多地琢磨领导为什么会讲这个主题?为什么这么讲?为什么这个时候讲?为什么对这些人讲?把这些问号拉直了,不仅仅是掌握了给领导讲话的思路和门道,同时也把握住了现实工作的方向和重点,这个时候再拿理论之矢去射实践之的,焉有不中之理?
看方法论。我们老说学习习总书记讲话,要掌握蕴含其中的世界观方法论,看似很高大上,其实很实际。就是我们看领导讲话,不仅是看他对某个问题、某项工作的看法和措施,更要看他对某类问题、某个领域的观点和方法。比如,问题导向的方法论,统筹兼顾的方法论,重点突破的方法论,标本兼治的方法论,预防在先的方法论,等等。这些都是普适性的东西,掌握好了、运用对了,就会一通百通、一灵百灵。
看风格。风格是个性的,或者说是感性的。我们经常遇到这样的情况,一个备受某位领导倚重的笔杆子,换个领导就怎么也对不上路子,问题就出在风格上。有的领导喜欢和风细雨、有的领导喜欢狂风骤雨,有的领导喜欢引经据典、有的领导喜欢“时间”“地点",这就需要我们在学习领导讲话时非常注意,只有把领导的风格揣摩透了、把握准了,才能真正把材料写到领导心坎上,让领导真正离不开你,这才是看材料的高境界。